health claims
a) Health/hale/hal - "whole"...one cannot claim whole without putting self at dis-ease.
b) Wanting to hold onto tempts one to ignore needing to let go.
c) Few tempt many to consent to suggested...which implies a claim aka a supplied demand.
want to believe
Wanting to BELIEVE tempts one to ignore what's needed to BE ALIVE...
public implies community
a) Community aka one (unit) together (com) contradicts being apart from one another as units (partials) within all (whole).
b) Public (plural) implies private (singular)...private (one) can be tempted with suggested pluralism (we) to ignore self for others.
c) Both public and community imply aggregation of private...meanwhile "implication" (if/then) implies a setting apart aka a privatization.
mindset implies cognitive disposition
The position of ones perceiving (cognitive) mind implies at the center of all perceivable. Dis-position implies ones position set apart from one another, while within all.
Dis-position can be utilized to distract ones cognitive perception from all perceivable with the suggestions of other ones...chosen ones.
The opposite of cognitive (perception) implies corporeal (suggestion) and few utilize corpus oration (corporation) to tempt many to ignore cognitive reality (perceivable sound) for corporeal fiction (suggested words).
A jew operates cognitive, while shaping corporeal suggestions for consenting gentiles...that's spell-craft; magic; masonry etc.
One's own mind cannot be shared universally
a) Oneness (whole) cannot be owned by ones (partials) within...potential cannot be possessed since it moves, only expressed as growth (life) during impressing loss (inception towards death).
The cognitive (inspiration) cannot be held onto, while the corporeal (information) tempts one to hold onto it; take possession of it; own it...by consenting to the suggestion of it.
That's where ones mind/memory gets misused as storage of information (hard-drive) instead for processing of inspiration (ram).
b) Sharing isn't consenting (buy) to suggestion (sell)...it's being partial (perception) within whole (perceivable) set free (will of choice) from one another.
A jew suggesting corporeal to cut off a consenting gentiles cognition implies a share-cropper...
c) Universe implies verse/vertere/wer - "to turn" aka turning one against another within conflicts of reason...which tempts one to ignore being (life) directed linear (inception towards death).
Reasoning implies "circular" logic based on ones consent to suggested logos (words)...that's the turn/tere - "to rub" aka those set free from one another rubbing against each other within conflicts of reason.
One's mind contains...
...whatever suggested information one consented to hold (tenere) together (con), while ignoring perceivable inspiration moving through.
One cannot see into another person's mind.
a) NOT was suggested by another person as nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing), for which ones consent de-nials perceivable.
b) Person aka per sonos (by sound) aka sound/sonos/sanus - "entire; whole" implies everything...few suggest nothing as the inversion thereof.
c) Can/gno - "to know"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/can#etymonline_v_645 implies each ones cognitive response-ability...while "can not" implies a suggested corporeal inversion thereof.
Nothing requires ones consent; everything forces ones adaptation...with or without consent.
no such thing as a public mindset exists
By private consent NO was set into a public mind. Many believing NO implies each one saying YES to the suggestion thereof.
A jewish suggestion becomes the public mind by gentile consent. Suggested information implies public mind; perceiving inspiration implies private mind.
To set implies putting into a definite/affixed place...mind/memory implies a response to a process within motion.
we
a) Off-spring implies set apart from one another...hence each anointed one.
b) Few suggest pluralism like "we the people" or "yes we can" or "one of us" to tempt many together, which in return permits few to remain apart...https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
c) Pluralism implies the suggestion of "more than one"...if all is one in energy; then what is two? How could there be more than energy?
already out
AL (all) RE (response) ADY (added)..all perceivable adds each ones responding perception "within" aka the internal/inherent power of energy.
out of the womb
a) Father (motion) Mother (momentum) Child (matter)...matter comes into being within the momentum of motion aka transformed within womb of man.
b) Inception towards death CARRIES life aka gestation/gestatio/gero - "to carry"...that implies a womb/uterus/matrix/mother/matter.
c) Life being moved from inception towards death implies abort/aboard hence a moving vessel (living) passing away (dying). Temporary rise (life) during ongoing fall (inception towards death) implies miss-carrying aka life failing to sustain oneself while being carried towards death.
In short: OUT; adverb - "expressing motion or direction from within". One cannot be out; only coming into being within...the belly of the beast.
how many?
Each one. Sound sets frequencies apart from one another...few suggest many/manifold/multiply etc. to tempt together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
Gentile frequencies
Aka generated frequencies aka whole sound generating partial frequencies. The trick here is tile/tegare/tegere/teg - "to cover".
falling for suggestion
Being implies temporary rise (life) during ongoing fall (inception towards death)...a suggestion tempts one to burden self while falling. This is why it's called "falling for temptation".
this word never lost its meaning
Sound moves, hence implying ongoing loss for temporary growth within...few utilize words shaped within sound to tempt many to hold onto meaning, while investing in loss.
Meaning/medyo - "middle" implies one within all aka frequency within sound. If one holds onto a suggested middle (meaning); then one destabilizes oneself as the middle of all perceivable.
Nazi would be a reference to an awkward or clumsy peasant
a) As in european (u are peon) aka peon/pawn/peasant/slave?
b) Nazi/nati/nat - "native", hence nasci - "being born"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/native#etymonline_v_2311
Each one is native within all and foreign to one another within sound, hence whole sound setting each frequency within apart from one another.
c) If frequency refers to one another for consideration (siding together); then they are mutually destroying each other. Few suggest words to tempt many to reference to each other within perceivable sound.
If many frequencies consent to the same meaning of words, then each ignores to resonate within sound, hence establishing dissonance among each other.
In other words...a jew tempts gentiles to vibrate each others frequencies out of existence by suggesting them to hold onto the meaning of word/verbum/verb - "a part of speech that expresses action, motion, being"....one cannot hold onto that which moves without destroying self.
some 100 years ago
a) Ago/agon - "departed; passed away"...being implies passing within way as partial within whole. Inception departs life on its passage towards death...that's the only way.
Many are tricked by few to mark and count an ongoing passage.
b) Year/yaro/jaro - "spring" like an "off-spring"...that's the life nature gives, and one doesn't need to count it, but simply spring aka burst forth aka grow life.
Frankfurt aka frank (free) + furt/ford (passage) aka free (life) passage (inception towards death). This also ties into Frankreich aka france/francia/frank (free) + reich/reg (to move in a straight line).
Germany, the land of the Nazis
a) ashke-nazi
b) Deutsch/dutch/dish aka "yid-dish-land"
c) German/germanus/germinis aka "gene-man"
d) Alemanni aka "all man"
e) Teuton/teutonic/teuta - "tribe", which implies a tripartite division of being within all aka tri-be-all (tribal).
like an empire
Imperium implies all balance; res privatus implies ones choice; res publica implies following the choices of another.
Empire implies same; private implies different; public implies alike.
If a private one believes in a "like empire", then one has been aggregated by another into a public mindset.
a) Notice the RED SHIELD (rothschild)...
b) Notice SORRY (full of sorrow) aka SOROS... https://www.reddit.com/r/Soros/
Now look into Open Society Foundations (Soros) and it's ties to Advance Publications (reddit), which are btw headquartered at One World Trade Center...
In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination)
a) The division of A vs B within the mind of the consenting observer implies imagination. This imagination tempts one to ignore ALL perceivable for the suggestions of another observer.
b) Being perception within perceivable implies "ex-peri-ment" (expression by mind)...the suggestions by another imply "en-chant-ment" (within enchanted mind).
whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
The rail-line implies male (motion); the carriage implies fe-male (momentum), and each thing within implies trans-form (matter)...only matter can observe the momentum of motion.
Observation can be tricked with suggested matter (information) to ignore perceivable momentum (inspiration)...being tricked like that establishes another observer (B) outside of self (A).
in the center...opposite sides equidistant
Ray (center) within spectrum (opposite sides) of light (equal)...no distance.
If one ignores to discern self as the above, then one establishes distance/destance - "discord/quarrel"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/distance#etymonline_v_11510
This distance/discord implies a conflict of reason within the mind of a ray, which ignores being within spectrum of light. Within a spectrum of light, the opposites aka pure light (white) and absence of light (black) aren't against each other, but apart from one another, while partials within whole.
Ones consent to any suggestion by another tempts one off-center and towards a side within a distant conflict of reason.
In short...ignorance distances one from discernment.
Observer A moves with the lamps
Each observer came to be "within motion", hence being (life) re-moved (inception towards death). Remove implies ones RE-sponse to being moved.
Those lamps imply artificial light from a suggesting "light-bearer" aka from a Lucifer...who gains the power to cast artificial shadows (ignorance) into natural light (discernment)...if one consents to it.
Observer B receives the light
Only if one consents to the suggestion thereof aka only if one chooses to re-ceive aka re-cipere (to recover/reclaim/retake) artificial light, while ignoring that all natural light is offered to each one ray within.
What is a ray? A raddix/radius aka a center (choice) within a circumference (balance) of moving light. How does light establish a circumference? By specifying (spectrum aka momentum) particulars (rays aka matter).
If your theory forces you to say
a) Sound doesn't force those within to say words to each other...suggested theorism tempts consenting theorists to soothsay (making predictions) in spell-craft aka by shaping suggestible words within perceivable sound. Why? To utilize the ignored force of nature against one another as for example law en-force-ment.
b) Nothing can force one to say anything..."the force is within you".
if this was allowed
Allowances suggested by another ONE tempts one to ignore ALL perceivable aka allow/alocare - "allocate" aka ones location within all.
How insane is the average person
In sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...not an equal share (average) but odds within equal.
made its way into
Inception implies coming to be alive within way of dying...made/make/mag - "to fashion; fit together" implies the mag-ic handiwork of suggestion tempting ones consent to fit things together, while ignoring that nature sets things apart from one another.
Life can choose to wander to Europe; Asian; Africa; Australia or America aka any which way; while being moved towards death...the one and only way of life.
Sleight of hand for being tricked off way... https://genius.com/Blondie-one-way-or-another-lyrics
We're just outside observers right?
a) OB (toward; before) + SERVE (watching perceivable or holding onto suggested)
Before implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life). To serve implies in response to which master? The one (perceivable) who sets free (perception) or the one (suggested) who tempts one to bind (consent) self to another one...to a chosen one?
Are you observing (perception) from inside (perceivable) or by outside (suggested)?
Did another suggested pluralism (we) to tempt singular (one) to ignore self? How could WE observe if each ONE perceives from a different position?
God says
SAY from root sekw - "to follow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/say#etymonline_v_22810
Why would a leader follow? When did your leader aka that which leads life from inception towards death say the word "God" and what happens if life follows the lead from inception towards death instead of resisting it?
The rail-line implies motion; the carriage implies momentum, observer implies matter...observer B implies either the suggestions of other observers or the self discernment of observer A.
The flashes of light imply suggested distractions to tempt observer to divide self into an A vs B conflict of reason.
Observing as self implies perceiving moving differences...observing from another implies holding onto moving differences, while ignoring perceivable momentum of motion.
What's preventing a war between men & women
If MEN fight the WOMB of MEN; then...?
Current (inception towards life) implies unification with the ether (death)
a) A unit (life) coming in (inception) and out (death) of current...
b) Uni (one unit) fic (to make) ation (action)...action (inception towards death) makes reacting units (life) aka the current of dying makes living waves.
c) Instead of "ether"...think EITHER (one of two) OR (alternation of partial within whole). One can be tricked to ignore OR for EITHER.
Wrong. You have it backwards
a) A conflict of reason (right vs wrong) among many about a suggestion by few...not natural, but artificial.
b) If current (inception towards death) implies TOWARDS, then each unit (life) within can navigate by free will of choice in-between forwards/backwards + left/right + up/down.
In other words...motion generates a momentum for navigation of matter within.
In short...one can be tricked to ignore "towards" for every which way of perspective.
All sets one free (will of choice)...serue/serve/slave implies ones choice to ignore that for another master.
a) There's only ones response-ability...free will of choice.
b) Fe(minine)Male + Wo(mb)Man + S(plit)HE...hence in balance with one another for each ones choice within.
c) As for neglect...consenting to a chosen ones suggestion neglects ones choice.
eventual tyranny
Even (balance) generates odds (choice)...choosing to ignore this for another ones choice establishes a tyrannos (master), while enslaving self.
Any group of people need a chain of command and a leader.
a) Nature doesn't group together (people) it sets apart (person)...few within nature tempt many together into groups.
An off-spring isn't a group...an infant can be domesticated to freely choose to be part of a group called "family" aka Latin familiaris - "a domestic" aka a familiar - "evil spirit that answers one's call".
b) If singular (person) consents to suggested pluralism (people), then ONE chains self to another ONE aka ones choice chaining itself to a chosen ones suggestion.
c) Suggestion becomes the leading command if one consents to follow it.
d) Suggestion tempts to follow; perception inspires resistance (need) of temptation (want).
e) Nature sets FREE (will of choice) which needs DOM-inance (balance)...the choices of others become wanted temptations to ignore that.
f) Slave (ones choice) chains itself (consent) to a master (suggestion by another ones choice).
rebellion
- Rebel aka re-bellum (resisting war)
- War/werra/wers (to confuse, mix up)
If one consents to a suggestion, then one confuses self by mixing up with others within conflicts of reason. Consenting to suggestion ignores perception...hence "rebel without a cause".
to keep us in line for eternity.
Eternal line (inception towards death) generates perishables (life)...few trick many to keep hold onto perishables in hope for surviving eternity.
Keeping hold onto anything within a moving system makes it perish faster...which is how few get rid of many.
to keep us...then look at
To look/lock implies focusing on, hence trying to keep for self. That implies a danger for self...just trying looking at the sun.
The few ain't keeping the many; each one among many chooses to keep holding onto/looking at suggestions by few.
Best thing we can do is "prepare"
PREPARE; verb - "set in order or readiness for a particular end"...that implies suicide for those living within the natural order of dying. There's no particular end...only whole end (death) for each particular (life) within.
when the People unite, we gain power
Many are united under few; gentiles are united under jew; slaves are united under master; followers are united under leader; students are united under teacher; buyer are united under seller; watcher are united under shower; believers are united under preachers; consent is united under suggestion...
The power of few implies the united/collectivized/aggregated many...and what is it that many are preaching to each other to overcome few? Let's unite harder, we just need more on our side; if only we could come together.
Logic/reason tempts many to believe to be DIVIDED against each other, while ignoring to be UNITED in consent to the suggestions of few.
In short...nature sets apart; few within tempt many together to benefit from unchallenged apartheid within natural wholeness.
our own responsibilities in our hands
Response-ability implies each ones free will of choice...not many choosing to follow the suggestions by a chosen few, which implies shirking of ones response-ability to a chosen one.
a) -ist (communist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (communism)
b) Few trick many to consent to suggested community (communism) and society (socialism).
c) COM implies "together"; being implies apart from one another...only self discernment can get rid of COM-munism.
change the rules
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"...that implies change.
if TPTB don't give a shit about the current Constitution
Current (inception towards death) implies setting apart (life)...that's what empowers each being. Constitution implies setting together...which deprives each being of power.
Giving currency (bank) and taking currency (trust)...few apart who give, many together who take.
why would anyone think They would give a shit about any revision?
What if suggestion implies a revision of perception? Doesn't a merchant constantly revise suggested offers? What's the changing of prices but revisionism?
to restrain the government
Restraining the control (govern) of mind (ment) implies ones free will of choice...especially from suggested temptations by others.
They never ever ever mention it (constitution) when it restrains their own power.
CON (together) STITUTE (to set) implies mind controlled (government) many following suggestions by selected few.
The power of few implies DEMOS (people) KRATOS (strength) aka democracy...the power of suggesting few are consenting many.
what was explicitly agreed on
a) Many consented to suggestions by few...what few have suggested is irrelevant, as is the conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) among many. Both distract from consent...which implies denial of self for another, hence denial of "ones choice" for "chosen ones" suggestion.
b) Explicit implies unfolding; implicit implies infolding...being implies EX (life) IN (inception towards death).
Suggested fold aka "doubling of any flexible substance" aka "in composition, the same quantity added" aka "pressed together" aka "flock of sheep"...tempts being to ignore self for others.
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/fold
A jew folds gentiles together to establish layers upon layers of deception as a fabric over life.
he (DJT) was not empowered to do so (his words) "by something called the Constitution"
Many are the constitution of few...DJT was selected by few to speak in the name of many, hence unconstitutional.
Gentiles are tricked by a jew to vote for representatives...the vote by ones choice implies the constitution; the representatives imply unconstitutional representation of ones free will of choice, and the chosen ones, who suggested voting, imply the ones controlling the constitution, while puppeteering the representatives.
a) Idea/idein - "to see"...nature sets apart what one sees aka moving differences (perceivable inspiration). Few suggest idealism to tempt many to consent to concepts/archetypes/things formed together/-isms etc. aka to suggested information.
One such ideal-ism is "not" aka nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing)...
b) As for illegal... https://www.etymonline.com/word/il-#etymonline_v_34622
Il-legal implies being within natural law as crime/krei - "to sieve" aka to separate the finer from the coarser parts of disintegrated matter, which is what natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) does to any particle of matter living within.
A gentile implies a "crime within law", which is why a jew suggests the inversion...follow laws and punish crimes.
Legal vs illegal implies a gentiles mind within natural law (il-legal) ignoring natural law (legal), while fighting other gentiles, within conflicts of reason, about which jewish suggestion is legal vs illegal.