Have you been initiated?
Inception represents the initiation of life into the process of dying aka the beginning of each beings natural rite of passage.
Joining any fraternal alliance obscures ones discernment against (contra) inception aka birth-control. This is why many so called initiations suggest a second birth; rebirth; born anew; revival; resurrection; resurgence; reincarnation; rejuvenescence; return; awakening etc.
In short...Initial aka ALL and each one IN IT.
destroying the middle class
Few suggest classism to establish class-consciousness among many, which destroys them, because the middle (life) of nature (inception towards death) has to be free from one another to build (living) during destruction (dying).
poor people
Poverty aka artificial destitution implies ones ignorance of natural prosperity. All of nature (perceivable) is offered to each native (perception)...that's prosperity. Destitution is based on ones consent to the suggestion of another aka banksters banking trust.
Are lazy people now a conspiracy?
To sustain laissez-faire capitalism at the top requires lazy debtors at the bottom, and diligent drones in the middle.
food supply
Food implies demand; hunger implies supply. Few artificially supply the demand to distract many from the natural supply demanding adaptation.
"If you're into evil, you're a friend of mine...You got me ringin' Hell's bells" ~ https://genius.com/Ac-dc-hells-bells-lyrics
Notice the video opening with saying that Jung studied various religious traditions such as "Christianity; Buddhism; Hinduism; Gnosticism"...yet deliberately leaving out the jewish influence. Later on, when circumambulation comes up, it's mentioned that the jewish rite of sacrifice is based on encircling the victim, adding Jung's quote: "There's no linear evolution; there's only circumambulation"
Now let's look at Jung's profession as analytical psychologist...PSYCHO (aka psyche; animating power) implies a linear process; which by animating establishes analysis (a setting apart). It's LOGY (aka logic; circular thinking) which represents the evolution within a linear process aka a synthesis (putting together) by circumambulation.
In short...few tempting many to ignore "psycho" for "logy" establishes the circumambulation (circular movement) within gentiles for the jewish rite of sacrifice.
Bell/bhel - "sound"...not the words articulated within natural sound by a forked tongued reptile who creeps among a lower frequency to avoid detection.
post-death revelation story
The process of dying (inception towards death) represents the revelation of living aka of the potential to grow during loss. Stories are told to burden the one storing them within memory, which makes growing harder.
The struggle to grow represents odyssey; the self inflicted burden represents the underworld.
bardos
Post as in "after" tempts one to ignore post/por - "forth" aka the process of dying putting forth each one living within, thereby implying an intermediate state of essential (life) transference (inception towards death).
standard
Few suggest stories to tempt many to store them within memory, thereby enforcing a standard aka a stationary position as the inversion of ones mobile position.
Nature moves being...beings suggest standards to one another to distract from motion.
Jung
Shabbos goy to Freud and Bleuler.
What if the clarity you were searching for is waiting on the other side of getting completely loss?
Light gives clarity by moving forwards, within which each ray comes into being. Searching forwards for clarity tempts one to ignore origin for outcome, thereby obscuring ones sight in-between competing sides.
As for completion aka com (together) plet (to fill) ion (action)...action (inception towards death) drains reaction (life) which allows growth within loss.
white race
RACE, noun (Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/race
White implies pure light; black the absence of light...being implies a ray within the visible spectrum (color) of light aka in-between white and black aka having the free will of choice to purify (discern) or contaminate (ignore) oneself.
A jew suggests race-ism to shape a consensus out of joining gentiles, which by joining contaminate purification.
A race isn't a group but each ray within the visible spectrum of light, and white and black aren't colors to identify as but the opportunity for each ray to lighten or darken self.
where were the whites in the bible?
White pages besmirched by black writing...both concealing the reader in-between covers.
Christopher Nolan's Odyssey
Odysseus's descent into the underworld aka Hades; from hadein (invisible); from weid (to see)...what is it that makes all perceivable invisible to the sight of ones perception?
Ones willing consent to the suggestion of another; especially if directed by nolan/nolle (be unwilling) while being carried (pher) across (christo).
a trans girl, two black women, an Indian guy and a Syrian jew.
These represent space/spatior (to wander) making your mind wander/wonder about the suggestions of another, while on your space-travel odyssey (discernment) to hades (perception) as Christo (across) pher (to carry) Nolan (be unwilling)...an odyssey directed by ones free will of choice through Ulysses (discernment) and his best friend Nono (ignorance).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N50XnT9206w
How does one kill the giant cyclops (all seeing eye)? Why does Tele (over a distance) machus (battle; to fight) require rescue? What does traveling among unknown stars imply? Bodies as lifeless as stone (((stein)))? The way back to earth wiped from memory?
that lasted hundreds of millions years until unknown event
As if anything lasting hundreds of millions of years could be known...
air conditioning is unnatural
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies the division of each one within all from one another...condition implies one subjecting self to another by means of stipulation (contract).
The contract for air-conditioning implies the house/haus - "hide"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/house aka hiding from natural air, while artificially mimicking it with air conditioning. The more one stays hidden; the less of natural revelation one receives.
Nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...few utilize suggestion to tempt many into hiding from revelation. Ones consent to any suggestion of another represents the stipulation (contract) establishing the condition.
Ask yourself a) What's the house of God? and b) What's the nectar of God?
- Symptom aka sym (together) ptom (to fall)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/symptom
- Disease aka dis (to divide) ease (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/disease
Nature divides each being from one another thereby putting each at ease; few tempt many together to shape symptoms for disease. Proximity shapes ease into disease.
stone
Aka Stein...specifically Silverstein.
Einstein's unified field theory
"In physics, a unified field theory is a type of field theory that allows all fundamental forces of nature, including gravity, and all elementary particles TO BE WRITTEN in terms of a single physical field."...only within a singular line of motion; can matter write any plural conception (theory).
One cannot unify an open field by enclosing it into a plural theory without binding oneself (singular) to another (plural). The written has to be shared by contract aka consent (reader) towards suggestion (writer) aka buying vs selling. That's not natural...it's a fictitious scheme.
concave. Inside the egg.
Egg implies the body (matter) formed in the females (momentum) of all animals (motion)...using the word con (together) cave (to swell) tempts one to ignore that motion sets matter apart from one another. Few tempting many together represents the con-cave deception.
As for the conflict in-between concave (incurved) vs convex (outcurved)...only within a flowing line can a curve come in (inception) and out (death) of form (life).
Freeing oneself from the deception of con (together) cave (to swell) implies "scrambling egg" aka scramble; verb - "make one's way by clambering, struggle or wriggle along," also "strive with others or jostle and grasp rudely for a share or for mastery"
Interesting then...
Interest/interresse (to make a difference) from INTER (internal; within; in the midst of) ESSE (essence; to be)...that's how God derives being aka if God; then internal essence.
God, who Creates
Create/ker - "to grow". Only the created can grow (life) within the loss (inception towards death) provided by God making a difference.
If God could grow; then that would imply into more than god, which contradicts EL > ALL. All has to divide first to allow (all low) each one within to grow. Growing also implies a secondary reaction...not a primary action.
Created the vibrations
TION (action) implies all of God...VIBRA (moving to and fro) implies each one within. Putting God outside of vibration ignores God (tion) internalizing (vibra) through vibration.
the sound the vibrations make
THE (theos; God) implies sound/sanus (whole; entire; all aka el). It's all sound acting (tion), which makes each instrument move to and fro (vibra)
the sound the vibrations make, perhaps by His Speaking
Sound > vibration > speech > noise...if you write that vibration makes sound; then you refer to acoustic/kous - "to hear" aka ones response within all sound after the division of tion into vibra.
God implies natural...speech implies articulation within natural, hence making noise within the sound of silence.
Since speech tempts one another to hold letters; words; meaning etc. together...natural vibration can be abused for artificial destruction aka rhythm like the rhymes of hip-hop by BUSTA Rhymes flipping the mode (flipmode) or the history which rhymes or the idiom "no rhyme; no reason" implying that reason equals rhythm, which is why conflicts of reason are being orchestrated into theaters of war.
Interesting...There is no in-between
The first sentence starts with essence (est) in-between (inter)...the next sentence contradicts it. Took you one sentence to shape a circle; girl...
There is no in between was and is
THERE implies a differentiation to HERE...one can only be in-between here and there.
the One outside
Only in-between IN (inception) and OUT (death) can ONE (life) choose a side.
He is always in Being
Aka all way (inception towards death) for each being (life) within. That's how he (motion) moving through she (momentum) generates off-spring (matter).
You're introducing new definitions for nearly every term
a) "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
b) The word "introduction" represents a synthesis of intro (inward) duc (to lead) tion (action) aka action leading inward into reaction. The actual process of action leading into reaction implies an analysis...not a synthesis. It's your consent to the suggested word, which inverts analysis into synthesis within your mind.
c) The word "term" implies boundary; end... https://www.etymonline.com/word/term
Few suggest terminology to confine many within the boundary of logic by choosing one side (new) over another (old). Choosing either puts both sides in conflict against each other which is called "reason".
d) A word can only be shaped within sound...holding onto a word based DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
Furthermore...DEFINI (affixed) contradicts TION (action) making the word definition a contradiction in terms.
Definitions....God, action, reaction, truth, knowledge, will, capacity, identity
a) If one defines God; action; reaction; knowledge or will; then one ignores the implied motion.
b) Truth implies holding onto something; capacity implies ones memory allowing one to hold onto something; identity implies ones ignorance of perceivable differences by mentally slapping identity (sameness) upon it.
you haven't argued why those definitions should be accepted.
An arguing mind implies a reasoning mind aka acceptance versus denial, with versus/verto - "to turn" implying an artificial circle shaped within the natural line (inception towards death) of progression.
How does one argue? By using free will of choice to choose one side over another...doing so binds ones free will of choice into a conflict.
So why would free-will-of-choice willingly bind self to a conflict in-between acceptance and denial?
Instead of accepting any synthetic definition; I use analysis to break apart de-fini-tion (division of finite within action) or ac-cept (to take) or de-nial (division of nothing)...that's how one sustains a sound mind free from synthetic definitions suggested by another.
Most of your conclusions
Few shape many into a most vs least conflict of reason by tricking them to join each other, which establishes con (together) clude (to shut)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/conclude
One shuts self when joining together with others, because proximity restricts expression.
If solution (inception towards death) generates dis-solution (life); then conclusion shapes congestion.
Could you state your argument in premise-and-conclusion form without redefining common words?
a) Argument implies a circle (versus)...that's the conclusion shutting one mentally (logic) and physically (reason) off from linear reality.
As for premise aka pre (before) mise (to send)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/premise That's God sending each being forwards....not a circular conclusion, but a linear solution.
b) Being within God implies partial within whole...few suggest words to shape a COMMON consensus among many who ignore that.
Com (together) mon (to change)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/common contradicts that change applied to togetherness sets apart.
Whatever artifice one builds together; nature sets apart. Whatever one wants to hold onto; one needs to let go of. As above (life); so below (inception towards death). Whatever goes up; has to go down and vice versa.
tl;dr: tempting many to hold onto artificial definitions, while ignoring natural motion...that's the conspiracy theory few are running. I break definitions apart to expose ignorance to motion...ignorance doesn't like change at all. Ignorance wants to hide from change.
You are equating will with desire
Equate/equal implies God...the will to desire and resisting desire implies being at odds with one another.
God supplies equal balance for each ones free will of choice struggling within the odds of desire for one another.
Desire belongs to the ego
The ego moves through each one...any belonging tempts one to ignore that for the desire to possess.
The corruption of ego from "self" into "I" is based on taking possession over oneself as "me; myself or I".
Will is the capacity to act.
a) Only God acts...anything within RE-ACTS to being enacted upon. Will aka "want" reacts to enacted "need".
b) Capacity aka "the ability to contain" implies balance enabling choice to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go of.
God implies process; being implies potential...capacity reduces potential if held onto.
If truth is known
Knowledge moves through one; truth and false represent choices held onto. Knowledge delineates; truth vs false implies circular confinement.
God implies all knowledge (perceivable) for each one (perception) within aka process dividing potential aka cause dividing effect aka need dividing want etc.
action should follow
Action generates reaction...reaction (life) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow action (inception towards death).
Few suggest leaders to tempt many to follow...doing so inverts action > reaction.
competing desires
Competing desires implies reaction vs reaction, while ignoring action. Versus/verto (to turn) implies a circle; while action implies the delineation of reaction.
Temptation is simply conflict
The ATION (action) in temptation isn't in conflict with anything, but implies God enacting reaction. TEMPT implies reaction ignoring all action for one another aka need for want.
Conflict implies friction...reaction cannot have friction with action because action (motion) divides (momentum) reaction (matter) from one another. Only reaction (matter) turning against reaction (matter) can have friction with one another.
mistaken identification
Identical implies "same"...difference (creation) cannot take sameness (creator) only mistake one another.
Few suggest Identitarianism or equality through diversity to tempt many to consent to identities...thereby ignoring to be a difference within sameness for becoming alike one another. That's a mistake.
God implies the only identity (sameness) of each being (difference). A being does not need to identify oneself to one another...it's a wanted vs not wanted desire to do so.
The first mystery of the first episode: "Shannon Davis died in a riding accident. Shannon's husband had purchased secret insurance policies totaling $330.000"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM9OlU8A1RU
a) Riding accident/accidere (to fall) implies riding (life) the fall (inception towards death) aka the process within which each rising life dies.
b) Purchase implies taking hold of that which is being set forth.
c) Insurance implies holding within that which is being set forth.
d) Policy implies the way of management by a written insurance agreement...if one consents to any suggestion of another, then ones mind agrees to permit another to manage ones mind, based on what one took hold of (purchased insurance).
e) Totaling $330.000 implies that the total is as above (3) so below (3) aka the TOT (death) of each (life) within AL (inception towards death).
he gave us a will free from his
He frees each ones will from one another. God implies need; will implies want. One needs to resist wanted temptation, while being tempted to ignore resisting.
organizing your life around conspiracy theories
Life implies the organ of delineation aka a disorganization from one another...tempting life into inertia (around) represents the conspiracy theory.
On a scale of 1-10
Scale/skel - "to cut", hence all balance (level) splitting into each choice. 1-10 implies counting aka reckoning together what was divided before.
Instead of arranging self onto levels of a scale...try discerning self as the center of scale while balancing in-between sides.
avoiding
The only void within nature represents ones ignorance of natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion) because suggestion voids perception if consented to.
stacking gold
Stacking implies the tower of babel aka whatever one stacks (as above) falls down (so below) because nature moves. Gold implies malleability aka the capability of being shaped or stretched by pressure, which implies the same value before the stacking; during the stacking and after the fall.
The issue with stacking gold...the one stacking gold isn't malleable, so the fall of the stack is going to massively devalue one, while permitting another to easily scoop up the gold.
gold; silver
Gold implies malleability; silver implies resonance...neither of which can be held onto. Mentally discerning this allows one to physically benefit from those who ignore the malleability of gold and the resonance of silver by holding onto suggested values.
stacking crypto
That implies stacking corpses within a crypt aka a mass grave...it's a trap to TETHER oneself to a BLOCK CHAIN.
spiritual warfare
Spirit implies the fare aka the passage; pass-over of each spiritually animated essence. War implies a circle shaped within the passage by essence turning against each other.
moving to a good location
Ones location implies the center of all motion...moving towards good or bad implies pivoting from center towards circumference, while turning both sides into a war against each other.
to survive
TO implies "towards" aka life being moved from inception towards death. SUR implies "beyond" aka being (life) at a distance (inception towards death). VIVE implies "to live".
Survival is based on living within everything...not outliving anything.
operator level
Operate implies "to be in effect"; level implies "balance"...a being cannot effect balance; each being represents the effect within balance aka choice.
networking
Arbeit macht frei (work will set you free)...a net confines those employed within.
putting off real life needs and wants
Putting off doesn't refer to NEED but to NOT WANT. Try putting off breathing to learn the difference.
God’s hands
God (motion) > auto (momentum) > manus (matter)...each being represents the hand (manus) of God, hence manually adapting to the auto-matic-process called God.
Furthermore...
a) God implies singularity; not plurality (hands).
b) God implies all...adding an (s) to God implies ones ignorance of all.
Correct
Doesn't holding onto correct over incorrect ignore apo (change) theos (god)?
Problem implies solution...only during a solution can each problem be thrown forwards. Nature doesn't hide anything...it dissolves (inception towards death) each problem (life).
Ones consent to suggested drug (to dry); company (to feed together) and suing (to follow) represents the artificial shell oneself builds to hide from nature.