Ok? I mean, I think you're fishing on this one. God was, is and shall be. Just because He had 72 names prior to Christ doesn't mean He has any fewer. In fact, He has one more! The Name above all other names.
And here's the thing ... that Name isn't the moniker we think of it as "Jesus" or "Christ" ... its that spiritual reverence you feel when His Name is spoken.
Yes but I believe this painting Satanic because it elevates one man up to diety status, there is only one God, I believe this painting a Jewish Synagogue of Satan creation, our founding government is not truly Christian, it is a mockery of Christianity
A name wasn't given by God but taken from one another, which keeps one below another.
Name isn't the moniker... its that spiritual reverence you feel when His Name is spoken
Speech implies the articulation of natural sound...sound doesn't have a name; it generates instruments, which wield the free will of choice to articulate speech.
The issue with any name...taking it into possession; holding it within possession; sharing it as possession, and permitting another to speak in the name of possession.
Name tempts possession of spiritual animation by sound...that's the origin of demonic possession.
God was, is and shall be
God was before anyone within shall be able to suggest to one another what God is. If God (theos) implies change (apo); then there's an ongoing change from was > be > is... notice that BE represents the center in-between WAS and IS.
Interesting then how God, who Creates, Created the vibrations and also the sound the vibrations make, perhaps by His Speaking.. There is no in between was and is for the One outside of time, He is always in Being.
Interest/interresse (to make a difference) from INTER (internal; within; in the midst of) ESSE (essence; to be)...that's how God derives being aka if God; then internal essence.
Create/ker - "to grow". Only the created can grow (life) within the loss (inception towards death) provided by God making a difference.
If God could grow; then that would imply into more than god, which contradicts EL > ALL. All has to divide first to allow (all low) each one within to grow. Growing also implies a secondary reaction...not a primary action.
Created the vibrations
TION (action) implies all of God...VIBRA (moving to and fro) implies each one within. Putting God outside of vibration ignores God (tion) internalizing (vibra) through vibration.
the sound the vibrations make
THE (theos; God) implies sound/sanus (whole; entire; all aka el). It's all sound acting (tion), which makes each instrument move to and fro (vibra)
the sound the vibrations make, perhaps by His Speaking
Sound > vibration > speech > noise...if you write that vibration makes sound; then you refer to acoustic/kous - "to hear" aka ones response within all sound after the division of tion into vibra.
God implies natural...speech implies articulation within natural, hence making noise within the sound of silence.
Since speech tempts one another to hold letters; words; meaning etc. together...natural vibration can be abused for artificial destruction aka rhythm like the rhymes of hip-hop by BUSTA Rhymes flipping the mode (flipmode) or the history which rhymes or the idiom "no rhyme; no reason" implying that reason equals rhythm, which is why conflicts of reason are being orchestrated into theaters of war.
Interesting...There is no in-between
The first sentence starts with essence (est) in-between (inter)...the next sentence contradicts it. Took you one sentence to shape a circle; girl...
There is no in between was and is
THERE implies a differentiation to HERE...one can only be in-between here and there.
the One outside
Only in-between IN (inception) and OUT (death) can ONE (life) choose a side.
He is always in Being
Aka all way (inception towards death) for each being (life) within. That's how he (motion) moving through she (momentum) generates off-spring (matter).
Correct, Washington joining 13 virgin spirits representing the 13 states is unduly Freemasonic. Some other deifications are visible, and in the larger rotunda art there's some appropriation of Native paganism too into the "American" narrative.
The church teaches theosis, not apotheosis.
The 72 names are no problem, it's that people treat them like names of powers other than God, just like they treat the names of our united states. It's not "synagogue of satan" as if that means Judaism, it's a group of "theist" Masons trying to get people away from Christianity. George probably never gave them what they wanted but he did permit himself to be diplomatic with them, and so they "repay" him by remembering him in ways he wouldn't have approved. Compare the statue of Washington as Zeus (let me know if I need to link that).
Trying to change (apo) God (theos) tempts one to ignore that God implies change.
around edge
Aka circle (around) + line (edge)...only within a line can a circle be shaped.
fresco
Holding onto fresco (fresh) makes it stale...
72
Look at the banner "E Pluribus Unum" (out of many; one)...while figuring out how to make 1 out of 72 ask yourself why the centerpiece is missing from the fresco?
Who is Gods centerpiece? What is the center of change?
Ok? I mean, I think you're fishing on this one. God was, is and shall be. Just because He had 72 names prior to Christ doesn't mean He has any fewer. In fact, He has one more! The Name above all other names.
And here's the thing ... that Name isn't the moniker we think of it as "Jesus" or "Christ" ... its that spiritual reverence you feel when His Name is spoken.
Yes but I believe this painting Satanic because it elevates one man up to diety status, there is only one God, I believe this painting a Jewish Synagogue of Satan creation, our founding government is not truly Christian, it is a mockery of Christianity
A name wasn't given by God but taken from one another, which keeps one below another.
Speech implies the articulation of natural sound...sound doesn't have a name; it generates instruments, which wield the free will of choice to articulate speech.
The issue with any name...taking it into possession; holding it within possession; sharing it as possession, and permitting another to speak in the name of possession.
Name tempts possession of spiritual animation by sound...that's the origin of demonic possession.
God was before anyone within shall be able to suggest to one another what God is. If God (theos) implies change (apo); then there's an ongoing change from was > be > is... notice that BE represents the center in-between WAS and IS.
Interesting then how God, who Creates, Created the vibrations and also the sound the vibrations make, perhaps by His Speaking.. There is no in between was and is for the One outside of time, He is always in Being.
Interest/interresse (to make a difference) from INTER (internal; within; in the midst of) ESSE (essence; to be)...that's how God derives being aka if God; then internal essence.
Create/ker - "to grow". Only the created can grow (life) within the loss (inception towards death) provided by God making a difference.
If God could grow; then that would imply into more than god, which contradicts EL > ALL. All has to divide first to allow (all low) each one within to grow. Growing also implies a secondary reaction...not a primary action.
TION (action) implies all of God...VIBRA (moving to and fro) implies each one within. Putting God outside of vibration ignores God (tion) internalizing (vibra) through vibration.
THE (theos; God) implies sound/sanus (whole; entire; all aka el). It's all sound acting (tion), which makes each instrument move to and fro (vibra)
Sound > vibration > speech > noise...if you write that vibration makes sound; then you refer to acoustic/kous - "to hear" aka ones response within all sound after the division of tion into vibra.
God implies natural...speech implies articulation within natural, hence making noise within the sound of silence.
Since speech tempts one another to hold letters; words; meaning etc. together...natural vibration can be abused for artificial destruction aka rhythm like the rhymes of hip-hop by BUSTA Rhymes flipping the mode (flipmode) or the history which rhymes or the idiom "no rhyme; no reason" implying that reason equals rhythm, which is why conflicts of reason are being orchestrated into theaters of war.
The first sentence starts with essence (est) in-between (inter)...the next sentence contradicts it. Took you one sentence to shape a circle; girl...
THERE implies a differentiation to HERE...one can only be in-between here and there.
Only in-between IN (inception) and OUT (death) can ONE (life) choose a side.
Aka all way (inception towards death) for each being (life) within. That's how he (motion) moving through she (momentum) generates off-spring (matter).
Correct, Washington joining 13 virgin spirits representing the 13 states is unduly Freemasonic. Some other deifications are visible, and in the larger rotunda art there's some appropriation of Native paganism too into the "American" narrative.
The church teaches theosis, not apotheosis.
The 72 names are no problem, it's that people treat them like names of powers other than God, just like they treat the names of our united states. It's not "synagogue of satan" as if that means Judaism, it's a group of "theist" Masons trying to get people away from Christianity. George probably never gave them what they wanted but he did permit himself to be diplomatic with them, and so they "repay" him by remembering him in ways he wouldn't have approved. Compare the statue of Washington as Zeus (let me know if I need to link that).
u/BlueDrache
Never seen that statue before, wild, very weird.
Doesn't holding onto correct over incorrect ignore apo (change) theos (god)?
Amazing White male engineering!
Trying to change (apo) God (theos) tempts one to ignore that God implies change.
Aka circle (around) + line (edge)...only within a line can a circle be shaped.
Holding onto fresco (fresh) makes it stale...
Look at the banner "E Pluribus Unum" (out of many; one)...while figuring out how to make 1 out of 72 ask yourself why the centerpiece is missing from the fresco?
Who is Gods centerpiece? What is the center of change?