Russians often didn't give a fuck to the state laws even in Stalin years. And do that all way long for millenias and successfully doing that right now.
Americans too, often don't give a fuck to the state laws (all that booze smuggle and other stuff) up to the last decades (book as a proof).
But today I don't see anything near even smugglers. All I see is "we don't like that law, we have to protest/vote/riot/sue/whatever to overturn that law", but no any voices just to ignore or circumvent that law.
Let's take moonshine. AFAIK, it is prohibited to produce moonshine in US for private person without license. Just like it was prohibited in USSR. There was a 1 year jail sentence for that here, but nobody don't give a fuck. There was no problem to find a moonshine for sale or build a cube in USSR. And it was not because of lack of vodka on the market, there was more than enough vodka in USSR up to the very end. At the same time I was hugely surprised that even alternate fuel enthusiasts in US are seriously afraid of making moonshine and don't even want to consider that fuel for their projects, even taking in mind that there exists interesting and cheap catalysts (something near ZSM-5, don't know exact western analogue) that allow to make a direct Regular (92) gas replacement from moonshine in a simple DIY catalythic converter.
Small question:
I often see some anger from americans against some government laws, orders an other shit. Also I saw a lot of proposals of diferent grades of realisticness (could I say so?) but never saw a proposals to just ignore or cheat around that laws.
Is that some local thing or I don't get something important?
Interesting, that I recently found a 1984 book "Guerilla capitalism", where idea of not giving a fuck to the government shit was presented in full.
So is that ability to not give a fuck to the government completely wiped out from American people? Or there is something else that make the way of not giving a fuck somehow inapropriate for Americans?
There's analysts that normalize for prices of currencies.
It is senseless. You could easily normalize noise signal, but it still would be senseless noise.
Until you get rid of noise (USD/EUR/RUB/whatever state currency) in economy analysis, you will not get real picture. You could only get noise, nothing more. That's the point.
Difficult to do without a currency basket approach. USD is large enough you could probably use self normalization.
IDK, but I think unless you completely get rid of fiat in your calculations, you are doomed.
As an alternative approach to find out real economy you have to replace fiat with something real and universal. For now, I suppose it could be an energy and, say, kWh as a unit of price. You could get exact prime cost of anything in kWh spent to produce it. Including employer salaries that spent on other things nominated in kWh and so on. You will get a prime costs of everything in kWh. It will be a huge system of linear equations with profits (difference between prime costs and price for end user) as unknown variables. Total sum should be 0 - you can't put kWhs to the bank or bury in the chest under old oak - all produced energy will be spent to make things (including energy spent for heating/cooling employees apartments and all that stuff). Solving that system you get full picture - all prime costs and all retail costs for all possible commodities. So you could start to find out all that supply-demand and other stuff in that info where is no any noise from fiat currency that effectively hide reality.
It is a huge thing, but I think it is perfectly possible to solve with modern computing power. I know, it is enormous job for a large group of researchers, and I don't have a clue if it is possible to organize such research by means of small anti-elite communities, but it have to be done. May be it will be done after fiat currencies crash, or under some other circumsnaces when there will be no any other way to deal with the mess elites will leave for us.
May be you would not like what you finally find out, but truth doen't have to be pleasant.
What would you consider to be a stable reference point?
I think now it is energy. Say, 1 kWh of energy could be nice reference point. Today you could easily calculate exact real prime cost of any commodity in that "energy currency" and comparing it with real market price in kWh get some real figures about state of economy around that commodity - all that supply/demand/profit/added value/whatever.
In the past it could be a bag of wheat, or something similar. Now it is definitely energy.
I would argue anything in an economy, currency or hard asset, shifts in value all the time
Of course, it is inevitable with technology development and all that stuff. It is slow but very important changes, that show the real development of economy and country, but they are completely invisible being buried under all that meaningless high-frequency and low-frequency trading shit and twerky fiat currency itself. It is like a powerful static noise in radio that makes useful signal obscure. You could endlessly tell any fortunes on that noise but you will never get a real picture.
Similar patterns with gold, oil, and now the crypto.
And that allows us to assume that it is not gold, oil and crypto really change their value. They are not connected, but have similar graphs.
If you see different unlinked variables that have similar behaviour against another one in time, that definitely mean that it is the latter really changes, not other.
Say, some country have a year demand for 1 gazillion barrels of oil. This demand could not change fast. It just can't be that this demand will change every day or even month. It could change, but slowly, year by year - more efficient transportation, better powerstations, few percent more utilisation of oil in plastic production and all that stuff. Very slow change in demand dependent on combination country development and technology advances. In a year you just can't utilize even slightly more than that 1 gazillion barrels, and you will ruin everything if there will be noticeable less than that 1 gazillion barrels.
Costs change, demand changes ...
Costs and demand of what? USD or oil? I don't see how value (usefulness) of oil could change that fast back and forth. But I perfectly understand how easy value of USD could be manipulated by those who print them.
Isn't that means that it was not a real value of oil or bitcoin changed, but only a value of backed by nothing USD? Real value (practical usefulness) of oil can't change if it is same variety. Liter of oil decade ago is same liter of oil now. Nothing changed. The energy density did not change, composition is the same, and so on. Seems that bitcoin practical usefullness was also stable as soon as it began to follow oil price chart.
What if we throw out USD as a measure of value and switch to something meaningful and really independent, say, kWh of energy instead? What charts will we get? They could be much more useful, than charts of price in some meaningless cutted paper.
Price charts of some real things in USD or any other paper could only show how value of USD was manipulated by the owners of printer, nothing more, they are useful only for those who making money out of thin air gambling on stocks or creating stupid propaganda about market. You can't use them for any scientific purpose.
Only a Jesus monarchy can over rule democracy. Are you Jesus? Is Trump Jesus to you? Is Biden Jesus to you?
I'm Russian. I don't care much about US presidents, not my concern at all.
However, in Russian Empire monarchs was imposed by patriarch of Russian Orthodox Church. Imposition itself comes from Jesus who imposed apostoles, who imposed first priests and so on. In Russian Orthodox Church you could track the imposition of any priest or monarch directly to the Jesus. So, in some meaning, there was Jesus monarchy in Russian Empire. AFAIK, Russian Orthodox Church is only church in the world where priests imposition still tracked to the Jesus. Not much and tell nothing about a imposed person, but if you care, here it is. A literal sequesnce of impositions hand by hand directly to the Jesus.
Also interesting, that Russian monarch dynasties are not some self-proclaimed persons. Russians voted for them on the special Russian democratic procedure named "Assemblies of the Land" that called on such occasions. All people participated, even serfs. Last time we do it in 1613 when previous dynasty (one with Ivan Grozny) was cut. There was 3 candidates - Russian duke Mikhail Romanov, Vladislav, son of Polish King Sigizmund III and Carl Philipp, son of Swedish king Carl IX. Russians voted for Mikhail Romanov, so he was imposed by Orthodox Church and become Russian czar from new Romanov dynasty.
So, there is how things really happened. Literally, real democracy was used to reestablish Jesus monarchy in Russian Empire.
Democracy and monarchy are not substitutes of each other and not mutually exclusive. It is just a technologies, nothing more. If you are ready to die for just technology, there is definitely something wrong with you.
No one has an automatic right to popularity (if their position is an unpopular one). Popularity amplifies your speech, and unpopularity mutes your speech. That is the rule of democracy-based speech analysis amongst the public (when it is not rigged and functions properly).
Looks like exact cite from some internal documents of current MSM. Total bullshit. Truth don't have to be popular. But there should be a guaranteed way to distribute truth to every single person, even if TPTB don't want that truth.
Free speech is democracy. You cannot have one without both.
Who told you that? Who proove that scientifically? Why do you think that say, monarchy can't have free speech? Why do you think that democracy can't censor "uncomfortable truth"?
What if in absolutely democratic society majority vote to censor something they don't like? If they can't vote for censorship, it is not democarcy but with free speech. If they can vote for censorship, than there is democracy, but no free speech.
Fuck that sociopolitical pseudosciences with pervert concepts and dogmas based on nothing. Don't fall to that shit. Don't build a cage for your thoughts with that garbage.
I live and die for FREE SPEECH as the medium, and MAJORITY RULES as the method.
Highly questionable nowdays.
What is the sense in FREE SPEECH if there is no any way it could reach the MAJORITY that should RULE?
Are you shure that it is a good idea to allow RULING of MAJORITY that jabbing itself with stupid not-a-vaxx and believe in SARS-CoV-2 and other MSM shit?
It is not enough to have only FREE SPEECH and MAJORITY RULES. They are necessary, but in no way sufficient. There should be much more to make them really work.
You need not just FREE SPEECH, but along with the unlimited access to audience, equal to what others (including elites/government/whatever) could achieve. If you have a MSM and conspiracies.win, there is no any sense to die for such "FREE SPEECH" unless MSM and conspiracies.win have equal access to all possible audience.
And you need not just MAJORITY, but absolutely educated and critically thinking MAJORITY, not a herd of sheeple with brains full of MSM propaganda. Are you really wish to die for the RULING of sheeple MAJORITY with MSM shit instead of brains?
Be careful with your wishes, they could easily make them real.
And there is no any real sense in that - in both cases sea line is an easy workaround. But in case of Baltic countries there is clear and very "obvious" way for non-military actions in return, that, suddenly, perfectly aligned with NWO "green" agenda. In case of Canada there is no such "obvious" counteractions that could be useful for NWO.
Take in mind, that this 3 Baltic states - Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia have common electric network with Russia and Belarus from the USSR times, and get most of electricity from Russia-Belarus. Lithuania once was electricity exporter, but due to "green" agenda and "deliverance from Soviet heritage" it shut down relatevly new and powerful Ingalinskaya nuclear station built by USSR and now that Baltic trinity is total electricity importer. Also, they shut down few fossil fuel power stations, again, due to "green" agenda . So, they could be literally just shut down at any moment.
Highly unlikely Putin will do it, but there is a real possibility to throw 3 EU countries to stone age without any opportunity for them to somehow restore electric power in observable future.
Looks like this is a brutal attempt to set Baltic states up to that insane Agenda 2030 "sustainable energy" narrative to check what will happen to the "civilized" country without electricity.
As for that Russian anclave, there is no problem with switching supply to sea routes from St.Petersburg, they are already working AFAIK.
Read this - https://conspiracies.win/p/11S0bnzZXc/2009-norway-spiral/ there even video of spiral forming.
Failed launch. Spiral is formed by fuel leak or engine exhaust nozzle break, that form tangential thrust, so device begin to spin drawing a spiral in top layers of atmosphere.
It's not feathers around, it's spikes of wheat.
How do y’all stay excited and up in life when everything seems stacked against you?
By trying to understand what the hell is going on and not giving a fuck to anything that "seems stacked against you". There is always multiple ways around, you just have to select the best one using knowledge you got by understanding.
Nuking Mars you will not make its atmosphere 100 times larger, which is necessary for real terraforming. They don't care about terraforming, they care only about amount of CO2 molecules around.
If my theory have any sense, and NIR is vital for them, they will get 5 times more NIR on Mars than on Earth now. On Mars insolation on the top of atmosphere is twice lower than on Earth, so it is twice less NIR falling from Sun to Mars. But 10 times less CO2 on Mars means 5 times more NIR on Mars surface than they have on Earth.
PS: Escape of elites from greening Earth to Mars is not the worst outcome of current elite-humans war.
And Mars they dream about is an ice cold desert they are desperately trying to create on Earth with their attempts to prevent Earth climate return to normal by preventing CO2 level rise to normal 1200ppm (0.12%).
Interesting, that Mars atmosphere is 95% CO2 by volume, with total mass of 2.5⋅10^16kg. Earth atmosphere now is 0.04% CO2 by volume, with total mass of 5.2⋅10^18kg. However, (after some math: CO2 is 44g/mol, Mars atmosphere 43g/mol, Earth atmosphere 29g/mol, and vol%=mol% for gases) the mass of CO2 on Mars appeared to be is 2.4⋅10^16kg, and on Earth is 3.2⋅10^17kg but should become 9.6⋅10^17kg when CO2 rise to 1200ppm. So, the amount of CO2 on Mars over your head is 10 times less as on Earth now and will be 30 times less in future.
They are afraid of certain amount of CO2 over their heads as fuck. Even consider nearly inhabitable Mars as apropriate replacement if things will go not in their favor here, and Earth become really green, from pole to pole, but with 3 times more CO2.
So who the fuck are they? Why are they afraid CO2 so much?
Had some thoughts on that, and that Mars thing perfectly fit too.
We are experiencing controlled demolition engineered and performed by grotesque incompetent performers.
Interesting. Only Jews was allowed to emigrate to USA from USSR. As for non-Jews, only some spies or high-ranked scientists, artists or athletes could do it duiring visits abroad. Ukrainian farmers definitely was not on that list.
Aslo, some Ukrainians, who well served as Germany collaborants had a chance to escape with retreating Germans during WWII. But again, barely it was Ukrainian farmers.
So, how your family left Ukraine after holodomor being farmers? Had some special paper signed by Stalin? Or just was Jews, and not farmers? Or moved out as Germany collaborants during WWII?
Something like limit number of times things could be reselled without actual processing?
Marx didn't use it himself
True. Marx & Engels use "kapitalistische produktionsform" in their writings (along with "socialistishe" and "kommunistishe produktionsform"). However, term "capitalism" was not invention of Soviet translators, that term was introduced in some Marx & Engels followers in the West around 1860s. There was no any Soviets at the time.
Sorry, but if you don't know anything about the history of socialism, you don't know where socialism has been attempted and failed.
LOL. Tell me moar! Name me one country where "common ownership of means of production" was really implemented.
Weathly people and profitable companies are NOT interested in free market capitalism.
Yes. That's what I'm telling you. That's why they are socialistic inside. That's why I'm concerned about vulnerabilities of free market capitalism that allow existence of companies that are socialistic inside. Or you are trying to tell that socialistic method of organisation of production is superior than free market capistlism one and that is why that socialist companies hijack nearly all modern free market?
So even though it may look like a corporation or government is doing something good, its likely just because you're missing something. I will always do opposite of their agenda.
Doing opposite of what enemy wants from you could be dangerous trap. That way you giving enemy way to control you, just in another way. Why not just do what you need, not giving a fuck to any corporation or government at all?
I can confirm this.
Marxism is centered on "oppression". Marxism just decalre any exploitation evil. Yes, exploitation could be evil, but that does not mean that if I hire somebody to help me in my workshop it is evil exploitation. But at the same time the exploitation of citizens by authorities is a good thing.
That marxist idea - to make "opression" from anything and blame everybody in that "crime" leaving that anything perfecly legal to use for ideological "priests" have a wide use in nearly every shit we observe now.
Thanks for your perspective.
Honestly, I think that all that stock trading stuff make more harm than good. Looks like the whole idea of share as a simple way for ordinary man to invest and potentially profit from that investment, receiving dividends from the profit of company, is completely lost and now all that continous stock trading is just a kind of gambling to make the rich richier. Ordinary man even have no right to buy shares on stock now by himself.
As for patents, I even have few, but really I don't bother to patent things I develop periodically. For the reason you mention. Even if some company will use my invention described in patent, I have no enough money and resources to effectively sue it. I think opensource idea is much better for such things. I share my invention with community and as a payment from community I receive a right to use inventions of other people for my profit.
I noticed that it is hard to remove all that black oil and grease dirt from hands and other body parts after car/truck/tractor repair without soap or some solvent. Also, a lot of rural activity could leave your hands dirty and will have to spent days using water with scrubbing to wash your hands.
What is presumable audience for your advise? People who do nothing?
Soap is easy. Take any natural oil you like and NaOH (sodium hydroxide), little chemistry (sheeple name it magic) and you have soap.
Also, it is possible to use ash as detergent, but since it is basically become alkali after combining with water, don't use it permanently, you will ruin your skin. Better use that alkali form ash to make soap from your favorite oil.