Free speech is democracy. You cannot have one without both.
Who told you that? Who proove that scientifically? Why do you think that say, monarchy can't have free speech? Why do you think that democracy can't censor "uncomfortable truth"?
What if in absolutely democratic society majority vote to censor something they don't like? If they can't vote for censorship, it is not democarcy but with free speech. If they can vote for censorship, than there is democracy, but no free speech.
Fuck that sociopolitical pseudosciences with pervert concepts and dogmas based on nothing. Don't fall to that shit. Don't build a cage for your thoughts with that garbage.
Only a Jesus monarchy can over rule democracy. Are you Jesus? Is Trump Jesus to you? Is Biden Jesus to you?
I'm Russian. I don't care much about US presidents, not my concern at all.
However, in Russian Empire monarchs was imposed by patriarch of Russian Orthodox Church. Imposition itself comes from Jesus who imposed apostoles, who imposed first priests and so on. In Russian Orthodox Church you could track the imposition of any priest or monarch directly to the Jesus. So, in some meaning, there was Jesus monarchy in Russian Empire. AFAIK, Russian Orthodox Church is only church in the world where priests imposition still tracked to the Jesus. Not much and tell nothing about a imposed person, but if you care, here it is. A literal sequesnce of impositions hand by hand directly to the Jesus.
Also interesting, that Russian monarch dynasties are not some self-proclaimed persons. Russians voted for them on the special Russian democratic procedure named "Assemblies of the Land" that called on such occasions. All people participated, even serfs. Last time we do it in 1613 when previous dynasty (one with Ivan Grozny) was cut. There was 3 candidates - Russian duke Mikhail Romanov, Vladislav, son of Polish King Sigizmund III and Carl Philipp, son of Swedish king Carl IX. Russians voted for Mikhail Romanov, so he was imposed by Orthodox Church and become Russian czar from new Romanov dynasty.
So, there is how things really happened. Literally, real democracy was used to reestablish Jesus monarchy in Russian Empire.
Democracy and monarchy are not substitutes of each other and not mutually exclusive. It is just a technologies, nothing more. If you are ready to die for just technology, there is definitely something wrong with you.
No one has an automatic right to popularity (if their position is an unpopular one). Popularity amplifies your speech, and unpopularity mutes your speech. That is the rule of democracy-based speech analysis amongst the public (when it is not rigged and functions properly).
Looks like exact cite from some internal documents of current MSM. Total bullshit. Truth don't have to be popular. But there should be a guaranteed way to distribute truth to every single person, even if TPTB don't want that truth.
Who told you that? Who proove that scientifically? Why do you think that say, monarchy can't have free speech? Why do you think that democracy can't censor "uncomfortable truth"?
What if in absolutely democratic society majority vote to censor something they don't like? If they can't vote for censorship, it is not democarcy but with free speech. If they can vote for censorship, than there is democracy, but no free speech.
Fuck that sociopolitical pseudosciences with pervert concepts and dogmas based on nothing. Don't fall to that shit. Don't build a cage for your thoughts with that garbage.
I'm Russian. I don't care much about US presidents, not my concern at all.
However, in Russian Empire monarchs was imposed by patriarch of Russian Orthodox Church. Imposition itself comes from Jesus who imposed apostoles, who imposed first priests and so on. In Russian Orthodox Church you could track the imposition of any priest or monarch directly to the Jesus. So, in some meaning, there was Jesus monarchy in Russian Empire. AFAIK, Russian Orthodox Church is only church in the world where priests imposition still tracked to the Jesus. Not much and tell nothing about a imposed person, but if you care, here it is. A literal sequesnce of impositions hand by hand directly to the Jesus.
Also interesting, that Russian monarch dynasties are not some self-proclaimed persons. Russians voted for them on the special Russian democratic procedure named "Assemblies of the Land" that called on such occasions. All people participated, even serfs. Last time we do it in 1613 when previous dynasty (one with Ivan Grozny) was cut. There was 3 candidates - Russian duke Mikhail Romanov, Vladislav, son of Polish King Sigizmund III and Carl Philipp, son of Swedish king Carl IX. Russians voted for Mikhail Romanov, so he was imposed by Orthodox Church and become Russian czar from new Romanov dynasty.
So, there is how things really happened. Literally, real democracy was used to reestablish Jesus monarchy in Russian Empire.
Democracy and monarchy are not substitutes of each other and not mutually exclusive. It is just a technologies, nothing more. If you are ready to die for just technology, there is definitely something wrong with you.
Looks like exact cite from some internal documents of current MSM. Total bullshit. Truth don't have to be popular. But there should be a guaranteed way to distribute truth to every single person, even if TPTB don't want that truth.