No. I'm a scientist. That means if you state something, you should provide a replicateable and verifiable proof of your statement, that I could check by myself, independently. That was the main idea of sharing and publishing scientific papers - to allow other scientists to verify invention or discovery. Today that papers mostly just advertising or propaganda. Read about "replication crisis". Paper without replication by others means nothing in science. You could declare anything, but without independent validation it will be just bullshit.
Because you could record and share something state or corporations could want to keep in secret. You could record conversation with some bureaucrat or corporation manager and make it public without them know about it. It is a threat for them.
Interesting that most allowed recorders beeped during record to notify another party that you are recording conversation. Apps that do that silently did not exist in application store for a long.
Same thing with "photoshoot" sound and sometimes bright red light they force when you use your smartphone as camera to shoot a photo or record a video. To prevent you from making unnoticeable shots and videos.
That bullshit have nothing to do with science.
And yes, the only thing I trust is science. That is why I don't trust MSM, BigPharma, whatever.
we need data of millions of years to work with to get on a factual level.
Check any paleontologist studies. They have tons of that data.
we can't find a planet to compare earth with
We don't need another planet to do the job.
and dont know how the climate was in the far past.
We perfectly know how the climate was in far past. Everything - temperatures, humidity, air composition, insolation, whatever you want with very good precision.
You could even just take a look at conditions you keep in your house - they are exactly the same as average conditions on most of Earth surface at the time our species was developed/created (depending on your believes) millions years ago. We keep that conditions in our homes as a genetic memory of that distant past. And even most obsessed with climatehoax globalists could not change or erase that memory, because it is in our bodies, not in our minds. Earth climate should have an average temperature of 20°C with 5-6°C gradient between winter and summer, day and night and across all latitudes from pole to pole. As it was in the past.
How can I figure out what is really going on about anything when there is an abundance of info on both "sides"?
Easily. If you can't figure is "climate change" man-made or not, dig deeper - ask yourself, does "climate change" exists at all, and if it exists, is it really as bad and awful, as both sides from your initial question try to convince you.
Hint: check "eocene climate", f.e. That climate alarmists are too dumb to get their hands on paleontology. So, paleontologists data is still untouched, and you could get some clue what real, natural Earth climate should look like. Then, think, why anybody will want our planet blocked half-dead on its way out of previous ice age, instead of becoming literally green from pole to pole.
Here is much larger game going than you could imagine.
PS: Isn't all that strange that core of idea of blocking Earth on its way out of ice age is exactly the same as core of dumbest ever idea of pushing puberty blockers on our children? Looks identical, isn't it? And pushed by exactly same persons.
I don't know better, that is why it is a conspiracy theory, not conspiracy fact. :)
Sweden was one of few countries that was able to gracefully ignore coronahoax lockdowns and mask mandates being right in the center of that crazyness. So, that wouldn't be something outstanding if Sweden again will do something out-of-narrative keeping worried face.
Of course NATO is an integral part of globalist cabal and as everything globalist is evil and satanic. But hardly that exact incident plays on NATO side. I know that satanism is self-destructive in its core, but that is too stupid even for them. It's like satanists just gather in one of their temples and instead of doing their evil things and luring more followers blow themselves with their temple to the glory of Satan. If they was so stupid, than we would have never had any problem with satanists at all, as they was a pretty self-solving problem.
There could be much simplier conspiracy about this.
Swedes are not happy to join NATO. They can't openly resist that. Joining NATO depends on muslim Turkey. So they do things that could potentially make Turkey angry and halt joining of Sweden into NATO.
I think that's just because it is mostly Christianity (or its values) is standing on the way of their agenda now. I think if f.e. Buddhism was as influental as Cristian values in countries where they have most activity, they will turn against Buddhism too in same manner.
They can't stand any alternative at all and can't allow people to have different views.
Exactly. You hardly will find some atheist who seriously trying to push his narrative among jewish or muslim religious communities, f.e. All their efforts targeted only on Christianity.
Seydozero (Spirit Lake) in Karelia, relatevily popular tourist place, there are a lot of tours from Murmansk to it, fishing, berries, mushrooms, just recreative rest and so on.
Never was there, but have a friends who like to spend vacations in North Karelia. There are really some strange things that looks like remnants of some giant ancient infrastructures.
Lake itself is surrounded by mountains, so have specific climate, different from regular North Karelia climate. Together with local legends, those strange stone things and all that stuff it is very interesting place.
As for illness - local natives use flyagaric mushrooms in shaman rithuals and as a replacement for alcohol drinks, and described "illness" looks more like description of behaviour of one who take too much flyagarics. :)
If you scratch some atheist carefully, with high probability you will find Jew or shabbes goy. Active atheists behave like LGBTXYZ+, ADL, eco or whatever activists, and with high probability they are the same persons - they see anybody who do not follow their agenda as enemy.
Spike protein is the only thing that connects all that coronahoax together. It is most changed part of barely working virus they developed, it is the only thing from virus in not-a-vaccines of all kinds, not only mRNA ones, it is what is in all that officially proposed bigpharma "covid treatments", it is what is in blood of vaccinated that could pass to other human being via blood transfusion or during pregnacy of vaccinated woman.
In addition to all that, humans develop immunity to regular coronaviruses and adenoviruses using shell or spike binding site proteine, and never use spike proteine to develop immunity.
It is more than logical to assume that delivery of spike proteine to humans was the goal of development of virus, not-a-vaccine and treatments.
Hopefully, looks like all their attempts mostly failed - virus didn't (and, really barely could, because as I mentioned, humans develop immunity to coronaviruses by shell, so most people was already immune) work as expected, vaccines was ignored by noticeable part of world population and treatments even didn't pass further than advertising. Just compare number of losses that was planned during Event 201 and what we have now. Of course they tried hard to make losses as big as possible, but, honestly, they are in no way close to what they wanted.
As far as I understand, their idea was that their spike protein meant to be developed to produce long delayed problems with blood vessels and heart, that could be then attributed to different regular causes, effectively hiding the real cause. They are trying to roll out that bullshit even now, but I think even sheeple already do not believe them.
As for "scary" - there is nothing to scare, really. Since virus doesn't work, the only way to get hurt with some probability by that spike protein is to take a jab.
The only thing that should be scared is existence of people (or not people) who have such ideas and resources for attempts to implement them. That group is real threat to humanity, not some proteins, technologies or whatever. You should avoid absolutely everything that comes from that group, from EV and "renewables" in their interpretation to health initiatives and education plans. The best way to mitigate the threat to humanity from that group is to exterminate or somehow properly detain them all by the sign of participation in that group, regardless of visible innocence.
Usually, cryptocurrency software is open-source, so you could check the code by yourself and be shure nobody could steal your money.
However, for unknown reasons, instead of using cryptocurrencies as intended, a lot of users bought into that "crypto exchange" crap, that is not needed at all. The main sign of fraud of that "crypto exchanges" was a necessity to transfer your crypto from your wallet to "your" account on that "crypto exchange" to trade coins. Of course, that in no way was "your" account and as soon as one transferred coins to that "crypto exchange" account, that poor dumbass completely loose control over his coins. From that moment coins completely change real owner to the "crytpto exchange" and "crypto exchange" owners could do absolutely anything with them. Everything depended only on honesty of "crypto exchange". Of course some was not honest and earlier or later stole customers money.
That's all. "Backdoor" is not in cryptocurrency, "Backdoor" is in brains of cryptocurrency wanna-be-users who willingly gifted their money to third-party without any real reason, still thinking they are own that money.
You don't need any third-party to use crypto.
I agree.
Really, "marxism" is just used to describe things that have nothing to do with what really Marx meant. That NWO shit globalists pushing have nothing to do with Marx, his theory, communism and all that stuff.
Really, globalists want to biuld something like controlled elitist capitalism for choosen ones with trotskism for masses. It is close to neofeodalism or advaced indirect slavery. That have nothing close to all that "public ownership of means of production", "extermination of exploiter classes", "evolution of quantity to quality", even with Marx dialectic ("new", in Marx words) materialism points and so on.
Marxism is a delusional theory of inevitable evolution of society based on assumption that society is divided by concurrent classes on the relationship to means of production and driven by basic needs, that was never proven correct, except, may be his assumptions that workforce is economically accounted by upper class as commodity and valueing of so called "free time",
Marxism today is just like other labels - racism, fascism nazism, i.e. anything some group don't like.
One could not like marxism and globalist agenda, but that does not make globalist agenda marxism.
Climate hysteria is a tip of globalists neofeodalism.
Interesting, does that thing with using "marxism" as a description of globalists agenda intentional or occasional?
At the time of last Polish-Russian war in 1792 there was no such thing as propaganda, only historic paintings and may be pamphlets.
Then, I can't remember any anti-Polish propaganda in Russian Empire, hardly it existed since Poland was part of Russian Empire at the time when such thing as propaganda had become a thing.
Russian Empire war propaganda looked like this: https://topwar.ru/uploads/posts/2010-10/1287974763_951e010810.jpg
There was only Soviet caricatures mostly anti-capitalist, not really anti-Polish. Something like this - http://redavantgarde.com/content/placard/1276/1276.jpg Factual, but poor graphically.
Then, after WWII Poland become part of Warsaw Treaty, so there again was no sense in anti-Polish propaganda.
iT wAS AlWaYs PaRt oF RuSsSia!!!
None of countries except Ukraine, Transnistria and North Kazakhstan was always part or Russia.
Belarus was part of Great Lithuania, Finland was part of Sweden and so on.
Half of that "invaded" countries exist only because of Russia's actions in the past.
Also, fun to point out, every country in the vicinity of Russia, minus Belarus, mf-in' hates the Russians to death.
Really you have to separate people from political leadership of that countries. People also divided as sheeple who blindly follow leadership and those who have their own thoughts.
Shortly, on average, countries where native population really hate Russia - Hungary and Baltic states. Interesting, that Hungary political leadership does not hate Russia even now.
Countries where population mostly neutral to Russia - Germany, Poland, Czhech Republic, Slovakia, former Yugoslavia except Serbia, Finland, Bulgaria and suddenly, Georgia.
Countries where population like Russia - Serbia (for unknown reason, really, In the past, Russian Empire liberated Serbia from Turks, but that was long ago, but Serbs still account Russia as closest friend), Moldova, Armenia, Belarus, Transnistria and Slovenia.
Slovenia, Slovakia and Serbia still have national flags made from civilian Russian Empire flag.
Transnistria that is marked on the map as "invaded", really is a political joke, consequence of mistake that Moldova government did on the top of USSR fall. When other USSR respublics declare independence by exiting USSR, Moldova denounced its joining in USSR. But, suddenly, at the moment of joining USSR, Moldova didn't include Transnistria. So, Transistria appeared to be the only part of USSR that does not leave it. Theoretically, Transnistria today could be accounted as the only existing remnant of USSR. And it's not Russia invaded Transnistria, it was Moldova, that suddenly found that they fucked themselves up with denouncing joining USSR instead of exiting, tried to invade Transnistria, but completely failed. Transnistria was always part of Russia along with Ukraine.
History of invading, liberating, acquiring and so on of that countries into Russian Empire or Soviet Union was very different. F.e. Finland was liberated from Sweden by Russian Army, and become knd of protectorate of Russian Emprie with own government and all that stuff. All that monuments to Russian Tzar Alexander they build by themselves, not by orders from metropoly. Poland... fuck, who didn't invade Poland, really? Funny that in all that cases, Poland government agressive actions was the reason for subsequent invasion.
Russia also invaaded France, Switzerland and Austria. Also, there was a story with military support of one of sides of civil war in Spain.
Unfortunately, Russia never invaded Britain. I think it is the greatest mistakes Russia did in its history.
So, you missed again with your assumption.
Just remember - everything you know about Russia, you know from its worst enemies.
I bet nanotech looks like sci-fi to you.
I just know how it works, there are no need for me to believe in it like in sci-fi as you obviously do. So, no, nanotech is not a sci-fi for me, it is more like boring and barely interesting old stuff.
Stop seeking validation for your nonsense from online users.
I'm seeking only validation of things others post here. Your posts rarely pass that validation.
Half of that shitty video is some cuts from old sci-fi. Other half of that video is micromachines activated by laser light by targeting laser beam to different photovoltaic cells on surface of micromachine.
How that is connected with 5G, graphene and vaccines?
Laser light is not 5G, need to target laser beam to specific part of micromachine to make it do something is not useable in something that is injected into human body. That micromachines was not made from graphene oxide.
Micromachines you see in that video is fully described in that paper - https://sci-hub.se/downloads/2020-08-26/f8/[email protected]?download=true
Only mention of graphene is in description of possible way of making surface electrochemical actuators -
using atomic layer deposition (ALD), cap the exposed surface with an inactive material, either graphene or sputtered titanium, and pattern them using lithography
But no graphene or graphene oxide was used.
Their manufacturing process fully described in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343901461_Fabrication_of_Electronically_integrated_mass-manufactured_microscopic_robots/fulltext/5f471000a6fdcc14c5ca4188/Fabrication-of-Electronically-integrated-mass-manufactured-microscopic-robots.pdf
They choose titanium for SEAs, not that overhyped graphene.
And they are even can't be named "nanobots" - authors describe them as "sub-hundred-micrometre walking robots".
I posted already proof of nanotech and RFID
No. You posted a paper about how some guys made centimeter antenna for a centimeter band from graphene. Centimeter sized antenna in no way could be named "nanotech". That graphene particles they use to make antenna is just a conducting material. With the same result they could make that centimeter antenna from any conductive paint or powder, f.e.
In other of your posts you insist that there is graphene oxide particles in not-a-vaccines.
But graphene and graphene oxide is different substances.
In video you posted about nanomachines clearly visible that they got power and activited by laser light directed to one or another photovoltaic cell of the nanomachine. Laser light band is no way close to 5G bands, so your video have no any connection to your topic except word "nano".
Looks like you just find similar words here and there and without any thoughts and understanding trying to create something that does not exist.
It is actually showing how little you know.
I already forgot more than you will ever know. If you can't even read and understand what is written in paper you share, there is no hope you ever be able to compete with me on knowledge.
Your opinions NEVER include any source or proof
What proof do you need to read about the size of 5G antenna in paper you cited? Or you need a proof that centimeter sized object is no way a "nanotech"?
Now find a map of Russian Empire. :) You will hate Russia even more.
You could also draw some borders of more imaginary countries inside Russia like Ukraine to make things look more suitable for your purpose.
Also interesting why Belarus and Kazakhstan parts are not painted as "invaded"? It's not fair! :)
Dates are mostly wrong, looks like one who make this meme do not know history at all. Really, those dates looks more like dates when NWO elites instigate different anti-Russian coups, moves, actions of different kind in that countries, not when Russia invaded. May be it was another meme picture where correct text "countries where West instigate something anti-Russian" was replaced with what propagandists need now without bothering to change dates?
It's a pity to see how everything that political elites touch degrades to complete shit. Even propaganda. I didn't saw any more or less quality propaganda since, IDK, mid-90s.... And it was not even political, but something about health and benefits of healthy food.
I would be glad to see any high-quality anti-Russian propaganda, if you have any, please post it here. It is very interesting phenomena, but I want to collect best of it, not some garbage made by woke dumbfucks without any enthusiasm and effort.
Sorry, you never met nanotech
I meeting with nanotech every single second, even right now typing that post. Just like most of people on the Earth. Nanotech is surrounding us for a long time, if you are not aware.
Apart from very close relations with nanotech, I have an advanced skills in electronics and all that radiowaves stuff, including microwave tech. I know how all that RF things works and how they not, instead of believing in some "nanotech magic".
I don't care if you disagree with anything I post
So what is real purpose of your posts then? If you don't need feedback, questioning and discussion on what you are posting here, then how are you differ from MSM and other propaganda?
1.) flying too low in fog, clipped building? wtf?
That top bureacrats too afraid of Russian AA strike that forced pilot to fly as low as possible.
2.) Air defense hit them and on the way down clipped the building, this seems most likely given what has been happening with all the friendly fire for the past year.
Possible too, but they was too deep in Ukrainian territory and helicopter definitely does not look like Mi-28 or Ka-52 visually or on radar. So, if it was hit by AD, with high probability it was intentional, not by mistake.
Nothing funny, really. There could be much more casualities.
There is rumors that helicopter crush was a retaliation to Internal Affairs tops for trying to interfere with Defence Ministry business of selling NATO weapons to third parties. Ministry os Internal Affairs began investigation on ways NATO weapons flee to third-party countries and suddenly collided with Ministry of Defence tops. Presumably, parties had not come to agreement on price. So, AD do the job by the order of Ministry of Defence.
Other versions:
-
That Eurocopter Pumas are not the best and most reliable helicopters and have a bad record of accidents, without proper service that bird could break by itself.
-
Trying to command pilots is not rare thing among elites. That top dumbfucks think that they know everything better and could easily force pilots do stupid things. Flying over towns at low altitude is not something pilots will do by their will. May be some could remember similar accident with Poland president Kachinsky, who ordered pilots to land in unacceptable weather conditions and crushed his plane near Smolensk. All died.
That "natural resources" question looks pretty strange. US have Canada right at the border, with amounts of resources pretty similar to Russia. But somehow there is a lack of resources for West. I'll never believe that Canada somehow resist West resources demand and don't allow research and extraction.
So, hardly it is the question of resources, really, there is something else, political, spiritual, whatever.
Science itself is about testing, checking, validation and replication to be shure you are not fooled and the thing you study is for real.
Science is not some "truth" or whatever. Science is a method of finding truth.
There absolutely can't be things like "consensus" or "settled" in science. Even small discovery could change everything that appear to be solid.