Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

19
()
posted 1 year ago by DrLeaks2 1 year ago by DrLeaks2 +22 / -3
36 comments share
36 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (36)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

We can’t explore our planet’s oceans and we can’t land on the moon but we know there’s a massive object out there “beyond Neptune”.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– freedomlogic 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

Lol. Some dude found pluto a while back because of whatever this thing is.

In early 1930, Pluto was discovered by a farm boy from Kansas with no formal training in astronomy. The announcement in March of Pluto’s discovery was a moment of excitement for both scientists and the public.

Clyde Tombaugh was born on February 4, 1906 in Illinois, and grew up on a farm in Kansas. He became interested in astronomy as a teenager after observing craters on the moon and rings around Saturn through his uncle’s three inch telescope. The family soon ordered a better telescope to encourage their son’s interests. When he was 20, Clyde Tombaugh began building his own telescopes.

By 1928 Tombaugh had built his third backyard telescope and used it to make drawings of Mars and Jupiter. He sent these to Vesto M. Slipher, the director of the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona, asking for comments. After a short correspondence, Slipher offered him a job at the observatory. His task would be to search for “Planet X.”

Planet X had been predicted by Percival Lowell. Lowell, a businessman and astronomer known for his belief that a network of canals existed on Mars and was evidence of an intelligent alien civilization, built the Lowell Observatory to prove his theory. But as it became more and more clear that there was no evidence for that theory, he began to focus on searching for a new planet. Lowell had observed some peculiarity in the orbits of Neptune and Uranus and figured there must be another planet with a mass comparable to Neptune’s orbiting the sun beyond Neptune. Lowell searched for the planet, which he called Planet X, from 1905 to his death in 1916.

Im sorry, but have you never looked through a telescope before? Have you actually looked at the math, or even attempted to do any of it yourself? If you havent, then your not getting both sides of the story.

Meh after that living planet thing, I feel like "as above, so below" is literal. Were just some speck of some gigantic being that we cant comprehend from our level.

The same way we cant comprehend that an entire another existence is there on a level to small for us to see.

I'm going with Dr. Harrington on this. Who claims that one of the missions of the voyager probes, was looking for planet X.

https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1988AJ.....96.1476H

https://www.britannica.com/video/23176/Voyager-1-planets-spacecraft-Voyagers-animation-paths-August-1989

Judging by the flight path of one of the probes that flings it up at a 60 degree angle, prolly using jupiter to do it. That looks close to the inclination of planet x supposedly...

The same weird angle that our solar system seems to be skewed at, which is one of the big questions about our little spot of real estate.

The exact same angle that Oumuamua came out of...

Same angle shown on that show https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvation_(TV_series)

Just.... coincidences, right?

And oh yeah, the french astronomer who discovered uranus, was looking for this same disturber as well.

The hunt for hidden planets in the solar system has a long history, and is not without its success stories. Based on weird perturbations of Uranus' orbit, French astronomer Urbain LeVerrier discovered Neptune in 1846, bringing the number of known planets up to eight. And when Neptune also showed irregularities in its orbit that couldn't be explained, scientists began hunting for a ninth planet.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Of course I have. None of your points prove anything about the article. The fact of the matter is that we know nothing about space.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

We can’t explore our

Suggested pluralism (we/our) and denialism (can't) contradicts ex ploro (to cry out). Consenting to a suggestion tempts one to keep the suggested within self instead of letting it out.

we know

Knowledge (all perceivable) reveals itself only to singular (ones perception)...suggested knowledge in the name of others (we) conceals ones perception if consented to.

massive object

Few suggest progressivism aka that to which the mind is directed for accomplishment or attainment; end; ultimate purpose (object) to tempt each ones consent to be aMASSed under few.

As in...order followers implies massive (followers) object (order) and it's a few suggesting those orders.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– vpnsurfer -1 points 1 year ago +1 / -2

We can’t explore our planet’s oceans and we can’t land on the moon

Of course we can. What a weird claim to make.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Prove it. Oh right, you can’t.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– vpnsurfer -1 points 1 year ago +1 / -2

https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/ocean-exploration/

Let's start with the oceans.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

National Geographic

Lol. Good one. I actually studied oceanography at university. Did you?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– vpnsurfer 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

So you explored the ocean?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

No, which is my point. Even your NG link agrees with me (but they overestimate the 5% having been explored). No one has or can with current tech, but I’m sure humans went to the moon just fine. Do you kind of see how fake your public school science is now? Astronomy is just one example.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– vpnsurfer 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Are seriously saying that it's impossible to go underwater and record data there?

That sonars and submarines don't exist?

This is fucking insane.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

of course

Aka proceeding from (life) motion forward (inception towards death)...

  • https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/of
  • https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/course

claim

What does seeking to obtain within a moving system imply? Can matter claim motion without other matter becoming a burden of debt?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Primate98 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

I think some of us already know what planet (or brown dwarf system) is out there, but from a conspiracy theoretical point of view, what's interesting is just how long "They" have been able to suppress it, even when evidence keeps bubbling up in mainstream astronomical circles.

For example, here's a mainstream news article from over 40 years ago about pretty much the same thing:

IDEAS AND TRENDS; CLUES GET WARM IN THE SEARCH FOR PLANET X (The New York Times 1/30/1983)

When "They" want to keep a lid on something--and moreover to do it in such a way that no one ever takes note of the lid--it's pretty shocking how well They can accomplish that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– freedomlogic 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Apparently canada has their own version as well, supposedly.

https://ottawarewind.com/2017/05/15/ottawas-planet-x-and-the-doomsday-prophecy/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Filo76 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

We sure it’s not just Lizzo having escaped the gravity of Earth?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SmithW1984 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Astronomy is fake and gay. What is this, normie reddit?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 0 ▼
– freedomlogic 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Well, we can see most of the other planets pretty easily...

Five planets in our solar system are easily observed without a telescope: Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. Uranus is just barely visible for those with excellent eyesight under dark-sky conditions, provided you know where to look.

They happen to be the brightest objects in the sky, next to the moon and sun of course.

The day we see planet 9 with the naked eye, itll be easy to know we are fucked.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I immediately closed that shit, I don't care what they have to say, if they are calling it Planet 9. Pluto is, and always will be, planet 9.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ReturnOfShillSlayer 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

More like planet VIII now

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Methacat 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Well, at least they didn't forget to add some stars in that picture, guessing to add some "realistic" effect this time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

...is real

Reality WAS perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it IS. Resist what others suggest is real/rael...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 0 ▼
– vpnsurfer 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

My personal pet hypothesis is that UFOs orgiinate from that planet and not from distant star systems.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy