No, which is my point. Even your NG link agrees with me (but they overestimate the 5% having been explored). No one has or can with current tech, but I’m sure humans went to the moon just fine. Do you kind of see how fake your public school science is now? Astronomy is just one example.
No, that’s not what I’m saying. The article that YOU posted says:
What drives astronomers to ask, “What’s out there?” and oceanographers, “What’s down there?” Despite covering 71% of the planet, only 5% of the ocean has been explored. Now more than ever in human history, tools and technologies are providing oceanographers and astronomers with increasing opportunities to explore the depths of the ocean and the expanse of space.
I said we can’t explore our planet’s oceans. Your article agrees with me. Do you refute that?
How much longer are you going to keep making an assclown of yourself?
I said we can’t explore our planet’s oceans. Your article agrees with me. Do you refute that?
No, the article does not agree with you.
If 5% have been explored, it means that it is possible to explore but most of it hasn't been explored yet. It doesn't say or mean that the other 95% cannot be explored.
It literally says said parts of the ocean have been explored, a thing you claim is impossible.
You seem to have problems with understanding the Englisg language. Is that it?
Just because a thing hasn't been done, does not mean it's impossible to do.
So you explored the ocean?
No, which is my point. Even your NG link agrees with me (but they overestimate the 5% having been explored). No one has or can with current tech, but I’m sure humans went to the moon just fine. Do you kind of see how fake your public school science is now? Astronomy is just one example.
Are seriously saying that it's impossible to go underwater and record data there?
That sonars and submarines don't exist?
This is fucking insane.
No, that’s not what I’m saying. The article that YOU posted says:
What drives astronomers to ask, “What’s out there?” and oceanographers, “What’s down there?” Despite covering 71% of the planet, only 5% of the ocean has been explored. Now more than ever in human history, tools and technologies are providing oceanographers and astronomers with increasing opportunities to explore the depths of the ocean and the expanse of space.
I said we can’t explore our planet’s oceans. Your article agrees with me. Do you refute that?
How much longer are you going to keep making an assclown of yourself?
No, the article does not agree with you.
If 5% have been explored, it means that it is possible to explore but most of it hasn't been explored yet. It doesn't say or mean that the other 95% cannot be explored.
It literally says said parts of the ocean have been explored, a thing you claim is impossible.
You seem to have problems with understanding the Englisg language. Is that it?
Just because a thing hasn't been done, does not mean it's impossible to do.