No, which is my point. Even your NG link agrees with me (but they overestimate the 5% having been explored). No one has or can with current tech, but I’m sure humans went to the moon just fine. Do you kind of see how fake your public school science is now? Astronomy is just one example.
No, that’s not what I’m saying. The article that YOU posted says:
What drives astronomers to ask, “What’s out there?” and oceanographers, “What’s down there?” Despite covering 71% of the planet, only 5% of the ocean has been explored. Now more than ever in human history, tools and technologies are providing oceanographers and astronomers with increasing opportunities to explore the depths of the ocean and the expanse of space.
I said we can’t explore our planet’s oceans. Your article agrees with me. Do you refute that?
How much longer are you going to keep making an assclown of yourself?
National Geographic
Lol. Good one. I actually studied oceanography at university. Did you?
So you explored the ocean?
No, which is my point. Even your NG link agrees with me (but they overestimate the 5% having been explored). No one has or can with current tech, but I’m sure humans went to the moon just fine. Do you kind of see how fake your public school science is now? Astronomy is just one example.
Are seriously saying that it's impossible to go underwater and record data there?
That sonars and submarines don't exist?
This is fucking insane.
No, that’s not what I’m saying. The article that YOU posted says:
What drives astronomers to ask, “What’s out there?” and oceanographers, “What’s down there?” Despite covering 71% of the planet, only 5% of the ocean has been explored. Now more than ever in human history, tools and technologies are providing oceanographers and astronomers with increasing opportunities to explore the depths of the ocean and the expanse of space.
I said we can’t explore our planet’s oceans. Your article agrees with me. Do you refute that?
How much longer are you going to keep making an assclown of yourself?