Lol. Some dude found pluto a while back because of whatever this thing is.
In early 1930, Pluto was discovered by a farm boy from Kansas with no formal training in astronomy. The announcement in March of Pluto’s discovery was a moment of excitement for both scientists and the public.
Clyde Tombaugh was born on February 4, 1906 in Illinois, and grew up on a farm in Kansas. He became interested in astronomy as a teenager after observing craters on the moon and rings around Saturn through his uncle’s three inch telescope. The family soon ordered a better telescope to encourage their son’s interests. When he was 20, Clyde Tombaugh began building his own telescopes.
By 1928 Tombaugh had built his third backyard telescope and used it to make drawings of Mars and Jupiter. He sent these to Vesto M. Slipher, the director of the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona, asking for comments. After a short correspondence, Slipher offered him a job at the observatory. His task would be to search for “Planet X.”
Planet X had been predicted by Percival Lowell. Lowell, a businessman and astronomer known for his belief that a network of canals existed on Mars and was evidence of an intelligent alien civilization, built the Lowell Observatory to prove his theory. But as it became more and more clear that there was no evidence for that theory, he began to focus on searching for a new planet. Lowell had observed some peculiarity in the orbits of Neptune and Uranus and figured there must be another planet with a mass comparable to Neptune’s orbiting the sun beyond Neptune. Lowell searched for the planet, which he called Planet X, from 1905 to his death in 1916.
Im sorry, but have you never looked through a telescope before? Have you actually looked at the math, or even attempted to do any of it yourself? If you havent, then your not getting both sides of the story.
Meh after that living planet thing, I feel like "as above, so below" is literal. Were just some speck of some gigantic being that we cant comprehend from our level.
The same way we cant comprehend that an entire another existence is there on a level to small for us to see.
I'm going with Dr. Harrington on this. Who claims that one of the missions of the voyager probes, was looking for planet X.
Judging by the flight path of one of the probes that flings it up at a 60 degree angle, prolly using jupiter to do it. That looks close to the inclination of planet x supposedly...
The same weird angle that our solar system seems to be skewed at, which is one of the big questions about our little spot of real estate.
And oh yeah, the french astronomer who discovered uranus, was looking for this same disturber as well.
The hunt for hidden planets in the solar system has a long history, and is not without its success stories. Based on weird perturbations of Uranus' orbit, French astronomer Urbain LeVerrier discovered Neptune in 1846, bringing the number of known planets up to eight. And when Neptune also showed irregularities in its orbit that couldn't be explained, scientists began hunting for a ninth planet.
Suggested pluralism (we/our) and denialism (can't) contradicts ex ploro (to cry out). Consenting to a suggestion tempts one to keep the suggested within self instead of letting it out.
we know
Knowledge (all perceivable) reveals itself only to singular (ones perception)...suggested knowledge in the name of others (we) conceals ones perception if consented to.
massive object
Few suggest progressivism aka that to which the mind is directed for accomplishment or attainment; end; ultimate purpose (object) to tempt each ones consent to be aMASSed under few.
As in...order followers implies massive (followers) object (order) and it's a few suggesting those orders.
We can’t explore our planet’s oceans and we can’t land on the moon but we know there’s a massive object out there “beyond Neptune”.
Lol. Some dude found pluto a while back because of whatever this thing is.
Im sorry, but have you never looked through a telescope before? Have you actually looked at the math, or even attempted to do any of it yourself? If you havent, then your not getting both sides of the story.
Meh after that living planet thing, I feel like "as above, so below" is literal. Were just some speck of some gigantic being that we cant comprehend from our level.
The same way we cant comprehend that an entire another existence is there on a level to small for us to see.
I'm going with Dr. Harrington on this. Who claims that one of the missions of the voyager probes, was looking for planet X.
https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1988AJ.....96.1476H
https://www.britannica.com/video/23176/Voyager-1-planets-spacecraft-Voyagers-animation-paths-August-1989
Judging by the flight path of one of the probes that flings it up at a 60 degree angle, prolly using jupiter to do it. That looks close to the inclination of planet x supposedly...
The same weird angle that our solar system seems to be skewed at, which is one of the big questions about our little spot of real estate.
The exact same angle that Oumuamua came out of...
Same angle shown on that show https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvation_(TV_series)
Just.... coincidences, right?
And oh yeah, the french astronomer who discovered uranus, was looking for this same disturber as well.
Of course I have. None of your points prove anything about the article. The fact of the matter is that we know nothing about space.
Suggested pluralism (we/our) and denialism (can't) contradicts ex ploro (to cry out). Consenting to a suggestion tempts one to keep the suggested within self instead of letting it out.
Knowledge (all perceivable) reveals itself only to singular (ones perception)...suggested knowledge in the name of others (we) conceals ones perception if consented to.
Few suggest progressivism aka that to which the mind is directed for accomplishment or attainment; end; ultimate purpose (object) to tempt each ones consent to be aMASSed under few.
As in...order followers implies massive (followers) object (order) and it's a few suggesting those orders.
Of course we can. What a weird claim to make.
Prove it. Oh right, you can’t.
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/ocean-exploration/
Let's start with the oceans.
National Geographic
Lol. Good one. I actually studied oceanography at university. Did you?
Aka proceeding from (life) motion forward (inception towards death)...
What does seeking to obtain within a moving system imply? Can matter claim motion without other matter becoming a burden of debt?