Flying cars become a half-century joke not because of some unsolvable technical problems, but because of decision of elites to limit people freedom as much as possible. Even small planes (which is much less useable as everyday transport) was made unaffordable to own through certification-driven spare parts and service price hike.
I agree. However, would you want an urban ghetto dweller to have a flying car? It would lead to the Red Baron of drug sellers fighting in the skies above Los Angeles. Perhaps we have been spared.
would you want an urban ghetto dweller to have a flying car?
Yes. He will quickly kill himself, and problem is solved forever. Much better than jail, police or other ways of state attempts to keep urban ghetto dwellers at level that will not lead to normal population uprise.
Fortunately, there are much more normal people on Earth than dumbfucks. And now dumbfucks exterminate normal people without losses in their rows. Nothing wiill change with flying cars, except dumbfucks began to die.
Would you like to have guns, that somehow unconditionally kill owner if owner do something really dumbfucky? Today guns don't do that. And looks like elites want to protect dumbfucks from killing by normal armed people when dumbfucks do their dumbfuckery. They issue laws, sign bans and so on, to prevent natural dumbfuck extermination. With flying cars, unlike with guns, elites will not be able to ban or outlaw gravity and kinetic energy.
If you are ready to be inder the risk of being killed by dumbfuck with gun (car, knife, chainsaw, etc.), then I see no any obstacles for you to be ready to be under the risk to be killed by dumbfuck on a flying car.
You independence is always paid up by some risk, in one way or another. Same thing here.
If you've ever lived in a large city with shitty drivers you'd know they made the right call. Most people can't even stay between two lines on the freeway without almost killing each other. I don't need them crashing through my roof because they wanted to buy one more drink at the bar instead of paying for an uber home and back to pick up their flying car. Just because we can doesn't mean we should.
Why stop there? Why not go full totalitarian if liberty is such a threat? Maybe cars should be made illegal and everyone should walk, for safety. Also let's require all walking pedestrians to wear mandatory helmets, since people are so dumb and someone might fall. If you follow your uneducated opinion to its logical conclusion, perhaps one day you will see the error in your logic. Freedom is the answer... What's the question?
Now you're talking. Remember the coof lockdown and mandatory mask and shot supporters? "If it only saves one life it's worth it". It's the same exact logic with banning private cars or other modes of transportation.
Most people can't even stay between two lines on the freeway without almost killing each other
At the beginning it will he a disaster. Yes. But it is a great cleanup of society from dumbfucks. Today, dumbfucks kill much more people just staying alive. Flying cars will guarantee dumbfucks will die quickly.
Those who are ready to exchange some freedom for safety does not deserve nor freedom nor safety.
If my roof have to suffer for extermination of dumbfuck, then, so be it.
Just because we can doesn't mean we should.
This thought somehow applied only to technologies that gives more independence to the people, but never applied to all that shit elites push.
How is that?
Why flying cars "shouldn't" but inbreed arrogant and ignorant aristocracy "should"? That aristocracy is much more harmful for humanity than flying cars. But somehow I never heard that anybody say "We can allow aristocracy to exist and rule, but shouldn't"
There are ton of things we "can", but "shouldn't". And all of them, suddenly, one way or another would have been made people more independent and humanity in general smarter and cleaner. The things we "should", again, suddenly, only benefits elites and make humanity dumber, encouraging grow of dumbfucks percentage.
Your argument is valid but you should apply it to all things, including ones that "sholdn't" but "is". Then, may be you will find out that flying cars are not in that list. Because humanity have no dumbfucks, since things that "is", that create dumbfucks become "isn't".
Your approach is like prohibiting kitchen knives, guns and chainsaws, because dumbfucks use them for doing shit. Does knives, guns and chainsaws "shouldn't"t because of dumbfucks? Obviously not. How flying cars different?
Getting rid of dumbfucks is the solution, not "shouldn't"ing of flying cars, RITEGs, well, whole science and tech branches that could rise humanity to the next level.
Do you really want tons of idiots with no training operating low cost aircraft above your house all the time?
How it is different from tons of idiots that drive pass your house all the time?
Again - flying cars will quickly end lives of that idiots. So they will not take lives anymore. Self-cleaning of society. Crucial for healthy society thing that thoroughly prevented through last half century by all that insane safety trolling, keeping idiots from their well-deserved end and all that stuff.
Of course, some equivalent of that stupid iPhone app "who throw up iPhone higher" that only idiots will use and kill only themselves will be preferrable, but unfortunately probability that such thing will be allowed is even much lower than that flying cars with their near-zero probability of allowance.
The fact that you need someone to spell out for you why aviation is fundamentally different than driving is like reddit tier stupidity.
Aviation is not any different from many other potentially risky things available to regular person. Anyone could make a bomb or set a fire without any problem. It is even much easier than buy a flying car and crash it into something. Only difference is that making a bomb or setting a fire do not provide guarantee of dumbfuck elimination. Flying cars does.
Safety trolling is one of the worst tools NWO use to make people obedient and dependent. Those who push that safety trolling are NWO shills without any exception.
Lol they had a year sub for this on amazon for super cheap so I went ahead and got it only to realize it became a woke rag. It was useful for a rolling surface but one of covers I still remember was when they demonized Telegram lol. Every month it was something the left desperately wanted to silence. It also made me laugh how even magazines suffered from shrinkflation. Those things are smaller than standard printer paper lol.
Is that the same Hiller who was making flying platforms for the Army back in the 50s? That's basically just a big quad copter, it would have had a really short range with the materials back then, but would probably work. Briefly, before crashing into a nearby building.
Supposedly they had the bell, which was not just a simple device that followed the laws of physics.
I think the timing says something, right around this time was when the creator of star trek served as a pilot in ww2, he also investigated crashes for the military about a decade later. Do you think he seen any wild stuff that just happened to make it into his book?
Things like, computers, doors that open/close on their own, etc.
I think all these scientist's seen something, and at that time they thought the technology would be used to benefit everyone, but thats not how it turned out.
I think its why these companys profiting off this technology will do anything to keep the truth from coming out.
It could also be that they feared it would never leave the military and this was their way of spreading the message to make it more public consciousness
Why are midwits continuously fooled by "Tech Porn"?
Being implies temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death)...ignoring this for suggested progressivism tempts a midwit to continuously follow artificial (tech) lust (porn).
It requires wit/wise/to know/to perceive...to realize that temporary needs to resist ongoing as to prolong continuance of being.
In short...all tech porn tempts one to ignore that which is for that which might be. Falling for this reduces the might of being.
Interesting that today "flying car" could be built by anybody with hands from the right place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNxoHqZGYa0
How it was built and tested - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBSN8afdy4g
Flying cars become a half-century joke not because of some unsolvable technical problems, but because of decision of elites to limit people freedom as much as possible. Even small planes (which is much less useable as everyday transport) was made unaffordable to own through certification-driven spare parts and service price hike.
I agree. However, would you want an urban ghetto dweller to have a flying car? It would lead to the Red Baron of drug sellers fighting in the skies above Los Angeles. Perhaps we have been spared.
Yes. He will quickly kill himself, and problem is solved forever. Much better than jail, police or other ways of state attempts to keep urban ghetto dwellers at level that will not lead to normal population uprise.
Fortunately, there are much more normal people on Earth than dumbfucks. And now dumbfucks exterminate normal people without losses in their rows. Nothing wiill change with flying cars, except dumbfucks began to die.
Would you like to have guns, that somehow unconditionally kill owner if owner do something really dumbfucky? Today guns don't do that. And looks like elites want to protect dumbfucks from killing by normal armed people when dumbfucks do their dumbfuckery. They issue laws, sign bans and so on, to prevent natural dumbfuck extermination. With flying cars, unlike with guns, elites will not be able to ban or outlaw gravity and kinetic energy.
If you are ready to be inder the risk of being killed by dumbfuck with gun (car, knife, chainsaw, etc.), then I see no any obstacles for you to be ready to be under the risk to be killed by dumbfuck on a flying car.
You independence is always paid up by some risk, in one way or another. Same thing here.
If you've ever lived in a large city with shitty drivers you'd know they made the right call. Most people can't even stay between two lines on the freeway without almost killing each other. I don't need them crashing through my roof because they wanted to buy one more drink at the bar instead of paying for an uber home and back to pick up their flying car. Just because we can doesn't mean we should.
Why stop there? Why not go full totalitarian if liberty is such a threat? Maybe cars should be made illegal and everyone should walk, for safety. Also let's require all walking pedestrians to wear mandatory helmets, since people are so dumb and someone might fall. If you follow your uneducated opinion to its logical conclusion, perhaps one day you will see the error in your logic. Freedom is the answer... What's the question?
Now you're talking. Remember the coof lockdown and mandatory mask and shot supporters? "If it only saves one life it's worth it". It's the same exact logic with banning private cars or other modes of transportation.
At the beginning it will he a disaster. Yes. But it is a great cleanup of society from dumbfucks. Today, dumbfucks kill much more people just staying alive. Flying cars will guarantee dumbfucks will die quickly.
Those who are ready to exchange some freedom for safety does not deserve nor freedom nor safety.
If my roof have to suffer for extermination of dumbfuck, then, so be it.
This thought somehow applied only to technologies that gives more independence to the people, but never applied to all that shit elites push.
How is that?
Why flying cars "shouldn't" but inbreed arrogant and ignorant aristocracy "should"? That aristocracy is much more harmful for humanity than flying cars. But somehow I never heard that anybody say "We can allow aristocracy to exist and rule, but shouldn't"
There are ton of things we "can", but "shouldn't". And all of them, suddenly, one way or another would have been made people more independent and humanity in general smarter and cleaner. The things we "should", again, suddenly, only benefits elites and make humanity dumber, encouraging grow of dumbfucks percentage.
Your argument is valid but you should apply it to all things, including ones that "sholdn't" but "is". Then, may be you will find out that flying cars are not in that list. Because humanity have no dumbfucks, since things that "is", that create dumbfucks become "isn't".
Your approach is like prohibiting kitchen knives, guns and chainsaws, because dumbfucks use them for doing shit. Does knives, guns and chainsaws "shouldn't"t because of dumbfucks? Obviously not. How flying cars different?
Getting rid of dumbfucks is the solution, not "shouldn't"ing of flying cars, RITEGs, well, whole science and tech branches that could rise humanity to the next level.
How it is different from tons of idiots that drive pass your house all the time?
Again - flying cars will quickly end lives of that idiots. So they will not take lives anymore. Self-cleaning of society. Crucial for healthy society thing that thoroughly prevented through last half century by all that insane safety trolling, keeping idiots from their well-deserved end and all that stuff.
Of course, some equivalent of that stupid iPhone app "who throw up iPhone higher" that only idiots will use and kill only themselves will be preferrable, but unfortunately probability that such thing will be allowed is even much lower than that flying cars with their near-zero probability of allowance.
Aviation is not any different from many other potentially risky things available to regular person. Anyone could make a bomb or set a fire without any problem. It is even much easier than buy a flying car and crash it into something. Only difference is that making a bomb or setting a fire do not provide guarantee of dumbfuck elimination. Flying cars does.
Safety trolling is one of the worst tools NWO use to make people obedient and dependent. Those who push that safety trolling are NWO shills without any exception.
Why do you think that living in highly populated area is a reasonable thing to do in the first place?
Lol they had a year sub for this on amazon for super cheap so I went ahead and got it only to realize it became a woke rag. It was useful for a rolling surface but one of covers I still remember was when they demonized Telegram lol. Every month it was something the left desperately wanted to silence. It also made me laugh how even magazines suffered from shrinkflation. Those things are smaller than standard printer paper lol.
His neighbor Ted is standing in his driveway with a spiffy new FIM-92 Stinger cause he's fuckin' tired of keeping up with the Joneses
Hey, in 1957...the West had a brighter, techier future. Can you blame them for some optimism, the rot hadn't begun to show.
Is that the same Hiller who was making flying platforms for the Army back in the 50s? That's basically just a big quad copter, it would have had a really short range with the materials back then, but would probably work. Briefly, before crashing into a nearby building.
This kinda brings me to a point I wanted to make.
Supposedly they had the bell, which was not just a simple device that followed the laws of physics.
I think the timing says something, right around this time was when the creator of star trek served as a pilot in ww2, he also investigated crashes for the military about a decade later. Do you think he seen any wild stuff that just happened to make it into his book?
Things like, computers, doors that open/close on their own, etc.
I think all these scientist's seen something, and at that time they thought the technology would be used to benefit everyone, but thats not how it turned out.
I think its why these companys profiting off this technology will do anything to keep the truth from coming out.
:Shrugs: who knows.
It could also be that they feared it would never leave the military and this was their way of spreading the message to make it more public consciousness
we wuz jetsons n shit
Maybe they just like it, doesn't mean they believe it.
"imagine if you will ..."
Being implies temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death)...ignoring this for suggested progressivism tempts a midwit to continuously follow artificial (tech) lust (porn).
It requires wit/wise/to know/to perceive...to realize that temporary needs to resist ongoing as to prolong continuance of being.
In short...all tech porn tempts one to ignore that which is for that which might be. Falling for this reduces the might of being.
Dude you're asking a community of dimwits what midwits think....