I would explain it as a culture which is defined by their worldview; to me the driving force behind it is best understood as a “spirit” or “collective consciousness” or perhaps “disembodied consciousness”
I am not saying the woke/ NPC people are the “spirit” etc but rather that they are like the vessels by which it images itself into the world; I’m trying to get at the root of the ideas themselves.
This explanation seems to fit most things, I think.
I feel like that understanding is also seen in this permalink here, where the “conspiracies” culture or “spirit” has expressed itself against the “Christian” culture or “Spirit”. Meaning the two worldviews expressed their ideas and the people (including me) cooperated with the ideas.
Is this appropriate post for this sub?
go along to get along; comforts and convenience over conscience; belief they can outsource their own agency to a third party authority
laziness, fear, self preservation etc.
yes, you’re correct
... tempts one to ignore resisting (inception towards death) to prolong (life).
Being implies within (life) source (inception towards death).
Being implies regent (temporary growth) within agent (ongoing loss) aka reaction (choice) within action (balance aka momentum of motion).
Others suggest "actors" under directors to tempt one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death), which when discerned would imply being reactors (growth) within generator (loss).
How to shut reactors down? By tempting them to mimic actors...
So short and so accurate.
To put a fine point on it, it's not a mindset but rather the structure of their minds.
One may liken it, at least on the surface, to color-blindness. Both conditions are not readily noticed, nor detectable through casual observation. Indeed, the color-blind themselves most often do not realize they're different from other people until their teens or early twenties. Specialized tests are required for positive identification. All this while they quite literally see the world entirely differently than everyone else around them.
The NPC state of human consciousness is virtually never studied scientifically. That indicates this is one of "Their" biggest secrets. Does everyone recall how vigorously it was denied when it first boiled over? "They" wanted to go back to the normal way of protecting the biggest secrets. It's not that it's denied and you are forbidden from discussing it, you're just never supposed to realize it exists.
Tavistock studied it long ago
the color blindness is an interesting analogy. I think it’s accurate because it doesn’t eliminate the possibility for them to learn to overcome that colorblindness (highly unlikely) or to receive some treatment or intervention which might help
they can’t do any of that if they don’t think it’s a problem to begin with, and if their faced with the reality of their situation that doesn’t mean they will always choose to address the change
EDIT: and this understanding does not give excuse for their “cutting the wrong wire”, the things they do and say are still despicable
Really good point which I had never considered! Plus finishing off with this part too
It's a really long story, but part of this differing state of consciousness--maybe the most important part--is that their moral reasoning is "inverted" from what you assume it is.
That is, in the expected mode of operation, you collect facts and reasoning, apply moral principles, then take action, hoping that you have done the morally correct thing and are thus a "good" person.
With NPCs all that is reversed. They begin with the conclusion that they are "good" people. All their actions are, of course, morally justified by definition. Moral principles, reasoning, and facts will found, interpreted, and even invented to support all this. Reality itself will give way.
This is what underlies so many confounding aspects of their behavior: total moral relativism, no fixed moral principles, inability to detect contradiction, made up "facts", hypocrisy, failure to protect even their own freedoms, etc.
This inversion leads--or perhaps defines--a complete moral certitude. Even with the religious, almost all recognize that they're liable to error and sin and will always fall short of the mark. You've got to go a long way to find a zealot that believes they are above error and sin.
Do you think that NPCs are more common in our Era? Which societies would have had the fewest?
Long story how I came to these conclusions, and as much as it may sound like outlandish fantasy there's a lot of compelling evidence to back it up.
It looks like everyone was an NPC, except for kings and chief priests, up to 600 BC. As it looks now--and I have no evidence to suspect it was otherwise at any time along the line--about 80% of the population are NPCs, 15% are "in-between", and 5% are fully conscious.
I've never come across any evidence regarding differences due to geography, culture, or environment. It also does not seem to be hereditary.
There are the slightest hints it can be affected or altered technologically. Crossing over into some informed speculation, I think everyone has the capability for full consciousness inherent genetically, but it is only activated in some people. To throw some buzzwords out, I suspect it's encoded in junk DNA and is enabled epigenetically. It also clearly seems to involve the pineal gland.
But as I mentioned, it's extremely difficult to come by information regarding all this because it's like the blind men examining an elephant. And also the Big Boss comes by to give them a beating when they get too close to the elephant.
What do you think happened around 600BC?
Interesting take. I had thought perhaps Ancient Greeks had fewer NPCs.
You are right in that odd things, morality, spirituality, consciousness don't appear to be inherited. So many dense people had amazingly bright parents. It must have been disappointing for the parents.
Yeah. From people I have spoken to and autobiographies from people like Tesla, Steiner, there seems to be a correlation with a childhood event, a spark from spirit or a strange illness/fever. Makes sense it could involve the pineal gland.
Something extremely strange, a unique event in human history, took place around 600 BC: the Axial Age.
As you read through the wiki, you'll see that they're trying very, very hard to convince you it isn't a "thing" and you should just move on. But look all the way through at the evidence they list and it's beyond stunning, moreso because it took place all over the world in places with no connection to each other.
You'd have to take my word for it temporarily, but there's much more evidence beyond what they list. Fore example, Herodotus, known as the "Father of History" was born right on the heels of this time in 484 BC. Does that even begin to make sense, that he was the first guy ever to think of writing down things that happened? But yet he was. As you're doing any research, just keep that 600 BC date in your mind and you'll start seeing more evidence yourself.
So it's like the human race "woke up", isn't it? Well, there's much more to the context but that's what happened. Everyone but a handful was an NPC before that. After, through some mechanism I don't know, a fraction of us were granted partial or full consciousness.
Before that, as I mentioned, it was only kings, chief priests, and prophets. Speaking of which, here's one of them, King Ashurbanipal II
You can find better pictures of this carving, but that's a "god" standing out of frame on the right. He's got something in his hand that looks suspiciously like a pinecone and it's pointed right at--you got it--Ashurbanipal's pineal gland. I don't believe for a second this is merely a coincidental appearance. (Also, you'll can see his other hand is holding one of those very odd "handbags of the gods".)
I hope you can see a picture building up that seems to begin pointing towards things the Elites would not want us knowing about, which is probably why you never heard this in school or on the Discovery Channel.
Right, you see this on occasion. But "science" just tends to nibble around the edges and bounce off. Part of the reason is that the results are almost always disadvantageous for the Establishment.
Like in the article you linked, I have the feeling that if the results had been reversed, we would have heard a lot about how "conservatives are filthy animals who don't even get grossed out by disgusting things". I suspect it would have become yet another article of faith for the leftists, of course leading to no further research.
As I've put it together, underlying political leanings is that NPCs adhere strongly to those they accept as "authorities", which would have largely to do with their enculturation. Thus you'll find NPCs scattered around all spectra: political, religious, etc.
Given that, you end up finding strange anomalies that no one notices because no one is looking for them. A good example would be the vaxx. Leftist NPCs are commanded to get the vaxx by their authorities and they treat it like a sacrament. We've all seen that.
On the right, contrarily, even though Trump--supposedly a right-wing dictator--said to get vaxxed, I doubt a single person did it for that reason alone, or that it even affected their sentiments on the matter. What a stark contrast, eh? I would say the subtle reason is that Trump has never presented himself as an "authority" and never been accepted as such. (The alternative is that there are no NPCs on the right, but I think we all know plenty of conservatives who have a "blind faith" in their religion.)
Well, you can see it's all a pretty tangled web, and one wonders if it will ever be unsnarled.
The vaxx uptake is definitely worthy of intense study and analysis. People from across the spectrum took it , from LSD using hippies to yuppies to conservatives.
Although, the idea of religious people as conservatives is a bit incorrect since most churches these days are very hip/liberal/progressive.
Good point
a) to build a structure implies setting building materials into place...ones consent to the suggested information by others, "sets" it into ones mind/memory; while allowing others to build suggested "structures" within ones consenting mind/memory.
b) only within deconstruction (inception towards death) can there be structure (life)...
NPCs don't have thoughts of their own, thus the meme. They don't have an internal monologue, they simply react to external stimulus without thinking.
This makes them perfect targets for Talmudvision emotional programming. It's very simple but effective.
All media pushed by the jew globalist pedos pushes the same exact messaging, the same stimulus-induced response to a topic.
You can easily see this in action with NPCs. If you utter one of the key phrases that triggers an emotional response, they will immediately become irrationally emotional about whatever you said, and respond with the programmed response.
An easy way to test this is show an NPC a video of something that their jew media owners told them is false or did not happen. They will immediately get angry at you for ruining their fragile retard world view with contradictory information.
If CNN told NPCs that breathing air was racist they'd all suffocate to death.
if someone gives their autonomy over to an ideology which is expressed in 3-word phrases and constantly updated by the social engineers and influencers, one becomes the hive-mind and loses their own autonomy. instead of independent thought, nuance, looking for oversights or bad logic, all of which are qualities which the social influencers have stated are bad, they have deferred and delegated the critical-thought process itself to the 'experts'.
My opinion, it's hypnosis via media (social media, TV, music and education). Social learning theory explains a bit of it. Every one of us "brainwashes" ourselves by virtue of what we input. Avoid depravity and seek good influence.
a) HYP (depression of spirits) NOSIS (knowledge; perceivable)...ones consent to suggested (media) tempts one to ignore perceivable; hence depressing ones expression (spirit; spiro; to breathe).
b) being implies center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable)...consenting to suggested MEDIA (Latin medius; middle) tempts one to ignore this while putting others on the center-stage.
The same way you explain the cultist. They're both brainwashed by bullshit.
The danger is propaganda and beliefs
yeah that seems similar to what I was saying
No inner voice.
a) within sound each one has a VOICE (Latin vox; voco; to drive out sound); because sound goes through everyone.
b) if nature doesn't communicate with suggested words; but as perceivable sound; then how would ones "inner voice" communicate?
c) how could other life-forms adapt to their surrounding without an inner voice aka without a mind/memory filled with suggested words to describe/define their perceivable surroundings?
This guy breaks down the normie mindset like no other, the way he sees it, it's the normie/NPC/toddler who brought about our demise and not the Joo: https://www.bitchute.com/video/vGovi3PNTCzn/
The number one characteristic of the normie is they wish to conform.
He is also selling Guitars if you are interested: https://www.youtube.com/@zacharyhandcraftedguitars9733
...tempts one to ignore need to sustain apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death). Others suggest conformism to tempt one to ignore resisting.
Tuning tension of strings implies resisting conformity to loosen up...
Look at an iq chart. The half below 100 are idiots.
School dumbed them down but lots of born retards.
intelligence =/= ethics
Rules are for stupid people
you should drive the opposite direction of traffic to prove your point
a) choosing to not play within reality (perceivable) tempts one to be played through fiction (suggested).
b) each mind/memory implies a setting within motion; hence being able to receive input...choosing to hold onto suggested input (information) tempts one to ignore letting go of perceivable input (inspiration).
The more one holds onto; the less compatible one becomes within a moving system.
c) plain (inception towards death) generates expression (life)...suggesting explanations to others tempts them to repress self under others; while ignoring to express self.
a) DEFINE, verb (Latin; to end, to limit, from finis, end.)...does that sound like a world viewed through the eyes of life?
b) adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while ignoring it for suggested definitions (words) represents DEAF PHONETICIANS.
In other words...if one consents to be limited by definitions from others; then one willingly limits ones life.
c) one views a world of perceivable sound...others slap suggested words onto it to tempt one to limit self by ignoring sound. These words/brands/labels/idols are being attached within ones mind/memory by ones consent to hold onto them...
SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies ones adaptation to being moved aka resistance (exhale) within velocity (inhale)...consenting to "stand under" (understand) the suggestions of others tempts one to ignore resisting, hence all the NPC order followers.
In short...understanding implies repression; spirit implies expression.
Vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death) implies adaptation (spirit)...motion generates living reactions; hence animating the breath of life.
Nature sets itself apart; hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving)...others suggest collectivism to tempt partials to hold onto each other (commune-ism; social-ism; global-ism; multicultural-ism etc.)
Being conscious implies ones awareness of other ones (moving differences)...this allows one to grow self discernment as partial (different) within momentum of whole (same). It's the momentum of motion which differentiates partials (temporary growth) within whole (ongoing loss).
Momentum divides center (life) from surrounding (inception towards death)...
The issue with that....idealism is being suggested by others; hence your struggle to "understand" what others are suggesting. What this behavior tempts you to ignore is being seed (perceiving) within soil (perceivable); able to grow roots of comprehension...which requires you to resist the suggestions by others.
a) consenting to suggested LOGOS (word) tempts one into LOGIC aka a conflict of reason over suggested. That represents the foundation for ones mind set "against" others.
b) perceivable communicates implication (if/then); suggested tempts one into reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; good vs evil; us vs them; coke vs pepsi etc.).