You have the useless account. You're preaching what. Nobody cares. So all you've done is troll.
Your stupid dumb as ass, bullshit, has no power. So you mouth breathe shit. You're a dumb shit speaking troll. In a topic written from an asshole. It is so stupid read it. It simply crapped all over the page.
But the best you can do is call me names. Because I don't agree with. So you stereotypically call me jew and a leftist. What does that make you. It makes you dumber than crap. Crap is necessary. You shit out your mouth. Unnecessary.
Where anybody called honesttrurh is a liar. It's completely bullshit and utterly moronic. Entry level retarded. People don't need a dumb as shit retarded username telling them you're truthful. They'll sooner understand you aren't. Because only liars suggest they're truthful. Only liars. Everybody else doesn't pretend to be truthful.
You fucking dumb shit speaking retard
You're anally retentive offering the shit speak. It makes no rational sense, and just spews bullshit. Stop decapitating your brain, give it a chance, instead of your asshole.
What didn't you understand? Everything, obviously. You've got bullshit for brains, offering the shitty conjecture. How do you get through your day. On a toilet obviously, and the only thing you decapitate is your turds.
Dumbass.
You're the leftist, you shove stuff in ass, causing shit speak.
You believe in dumb narratives used for propaganda. Lofty ideals providing you with a sense of recourse.
Nobody else cares what tune you dance too. It makes no difference.
The only difference it makes is if it affects them. Ukraine doesn't affect anybody else. They caused stupid taxes, taxes happen anyway. If there wasn't Ukraine, they'd invent somebody or something else to cause higher taxes, blaming Russia or China or the weather. It makes no difference what happens. Unless something else happens.
Yawn, I am not leftist, I am not a jew, and what I am isn't a retard. You're a dumb ass. Probably the result of being anally retentive. All that comes out of your mouth is bullshit.
There is no decapitation of Nato. For the Alliance based on military and security to break, it requires a different one. Or it to be destroyed.
It is not a civilian institution. No matter the economics there is always military. No matter the government there is always military. No member has left despite disagreements.
Get it through your dumb ass there is no decapitation of Nato. Perhaps it can be eroded politically, geographically, and economically, but that's bullshit without actual conflict. There are far too many members partnered. It could collapse and still be militarily alligned. Ideologically perhaps if another alliance offers the same protocols, or if there isn't the need for such military partnership. Yawn.
Russia aren't fighting Nato directly. Instead it's through a proxy Nato are funding. If the proxy is defeated, Russia gains some international standing. It causes the globe to use its own solutions and perhaps they break away from any agreements with Nato. But it doesn't mean Nato is decapitated. It doesn't mean much.
Trade, trades, with it comes agreements, laws, rules, requirements, investment, funding. It either trades or it doesn't. When it doesn't there is conflict and disagreement.
But there is no decapitation without actual defeat or political unrest where perhaps a country becomes ungovernable and has a coup or civil war.
No, Rome still stands. Unlike the hordes of barbarians
Decapitation means, cut off a head. What? Of all those countries? You dumbass. The Head of Nato, hahaha, doesn't mean shit. They're an administrator. A politican. It simply Hydras growing another head.
Take out America. Hahaha. One country, there's all those other Nato countries.
Look up decapitation before saying retarded things.
The concept applies to warfare if you're a Taliban. They kidnap people threatening to cut off their heads, and demand a ransom, it gets weapons they make war with.
But for the sake of understanding your retarded terminology. It is impossible to decapitate anyone who isn't fighting. You cannot cut off the heads of any countries who aren't fighting. Nato is a military/security alliance.
You haven't affected them. What like Economically. They're giving to save the Ukrainian by blowing them up, fund. It stops if you beat Ukraine. Nato will be there regardless, they aren't fighting.
Rome hasn't gone anywhere. It was never destroyed. Even if Jerusalem was. There it is today.
You're such a retard.
Cancer takes years to develop. Cancer doesn't happen overnight.
The vax hasn't been attributed to cancer. Not yet. I am sure there are claims. But it wasn't a side affect. Although a lack of immunity is potentially cancerous.
But how the fuck, because it's basic level math and figures, are you associating breast cancer affecting between 1 and 7 and 1 in 10 women as from the vax. Those figures were prior to the vax
It makes you retarded. You have zero proof of your claim. Instead you've adopted an ignorant narrative. The dumbest. As bad as the people you claim to be against adopting the vax. You're also driven by stupid narratives.
What God. You mean the cancerous one? Breast cancer isn't that fatal. It has much better treatment today if caught early. But any cancer is a horrendous experience. There is danger it returns.
As proven you're really dumb.
Constant stream of bullshit. In a topic you seek to convince everybody else about. Who actually cares, nobody expect those fighting. They expect to win something. Trade continues regardless. In a topic written by morons all eating each other's crap and agreeing. I don't. There is no decapitation. How does that word and concept actually occur. Go look at the definition. Dumbass, retard. Surely you read it somewhere and confused the terminology, because you're a retard. Where a narrative was used, so this conflict continues, or it becomes a larger war. All it's used for. It isn't peace.
But you've expected some other globe off the sacrifice and attrition. Nope. It doesn't care. It trade's how it does, and almost always has done. Veto. Patnerships. Allies. It stops trading in all out war. Nothing changes, because it doesn't agree.
You think Rome falls. Look it's still Rome. Dumbass. It falls when it's completely destroyed, and that is also utterly debatable.
I am not reading shit. I couldn't give a crap about idiots parading their fantasies. I find it absurd. A month of obnoxious fetishes harassing humanity. The highlight of civilization is not reproducing, and instead fucking itself through acts of fetishism. Ridiculous.
Your dumb joke, I simply made another. If you believe Gays are incontinent surely India has the most Gays?
No you are. You're a fucking dumb moron. Literal ignorance. Then you prove it. It's about what you want Nato to do. Factually that isn't happening. Nato aren't taking the hit. They're not fighting. Has it caused a shift in geopolitics, of course. But it makes zero difference. Trade continues until it stops. It stops with all out war. Polarised the Globe has always been. Veto. It won't change.
You expect people to believe whatever you say. I don't it's bullshit. You make a stupid little topic with decapitation. It is impossible without warfare between the two. The risk is in those fighting it. But it doesn't make that much difference. Russia has signed into law the acquisitioned territories in Ukraine. So if Putin dies, any conflict continues, it's Russian law. Zelenskyy is debatable, it could also crush morale an untimely death, but he's a puppet.
Nato however, politicians make no difference to an alliance chaired by monarchs and military, leaving it hasn't occurred. The closest was an EU alternative. Instead Nato has solidified.
Whatever bleeding hearts propaganda you dance too. Believe what you want. It's mostly inconsequential. It makes almost no difference to anybody else, outside of dumb narratives used for prolonging any warfare. Where it possibly risks inciting larger war. Then perhaps. But until then it's nothing but a dumb narrative that runs into fatigue on both sides.
You have no logic. You're worried because you're the CIA offering some other geopolitical strategy. It amounting to what if it costs more? Or were you genuinely concerned about all those taxes buying a proxy war. It constantly trading in dead Ukrainians.
In either event nothing has changed. It ultimately won't unless they fully engage.
There is no decapitation, because there's no direct warfare. Politicians come and go. It won't affect anything else. Decapitation can occur with Putin or Zelenskyy and perhaps the conflict might change strategy. But that's also problematic because Russia has adopted it into law. Ukraine are funded by Nato. Ukraine are also tyrants, there is no election, no dissent against conflict. They die because they were free and now they're told to die. It's the price of Nato.
Nato aren't going anywhere even if Ukraine doesn't ascend. The conflict is otherwise inconsequential unless it escalates, or Russia's military is defeated. Nato's isn't fighting.
Fuck off back to being a dumb stupid halfwit.
I have explained it to a retard. You believe in bullshit.
The vax hasn't caused cancer. Not yet. Definitely not breast cancer happening anyway. Check if breast cancer has increased since the vax. Nope it's the same statistic of 1 in 7 or 10 women being affected by breast cancer. Everybody knows somebody who has had it.
But there you are like a retard making up crap. Because you're a. Tell us all why you're dumb. It's genetic? Are you a bot, or an autist?
Read your name. It's definitely sprinkled with the retarded seasoning. Then when you open your mouth, look what comes out. Bullshit. Although it's the writing, comprehension, and the ability to host debate.
Categorically cancer has not been attributed with the vax because cancer takes years to develop.
If you wanted to talk conspiracy about Breast cancer, antibotics, menopause drugs, and others are attributed.
Antibotics caused a lump in my lymph node. Horrible, it was the wrong stuff, it caused a worse reaction. I'm a guy, and a big lump under my arm. It dissipated, went, I found out about lymph nodes, being problematic. It went after I stopped taking this drug prescribed, big hard lump, I was sick, because it caused all the symptoms on the warning label.
I have also had kin with breast cancer.
You're a very dumb person.
Type into Google breast cancer in women.
How did the vax cause breast cancer?
It statistically happened without the vax. You have no proof the vax caused cancer?
It hasn't been a side affect either. The side affects were myocarditis, blood clots, lack of immunity, skin allergies.
Cancer where?
I am not angry. Why would I be. It doesn't affect me. Let me know when it does?
It affects Ukraine and Russia fighting. Nato are also quite unaffected. They're cheerleaders, sponsors, and investors in this conflict. How is Russia winning or withdrawing against Ukraine effective? There's more or less trade, more or less war.
If somebody wins something else. I cannot think of what. Perhaps it might cause more. I doubt it.
You're assuming trade halts because of Ukrainians dying? Let me check. No, it doesn't. Ukranians dying increase trade, investment. Perhaps you're assuming the ability to affect or influence trade stops? Or you're assuming politicians and figureheads changing or supporting it causes trade or conflict to cease. No.
Can it cause a bigger conflict. Yes. Let me know when it does, and then we can talk about how it has affected you?
No you. There is no reality involved, unless you're fighting it. You aren't, you're boring everybody else, not bothered about it. It doesn't affect them. Apart from more taxes, causing them to be bored even more by it. Last time we all checked higher taxes happen anyway. What did you want me to say. It professes to big narratives. They amount specifically to winning something. Neither have. It continues to be boring, uneventful for everybody else on the globe.
If somebody wins something, perhaps it might affect something else. Although I actually cannot think of what. Trade continues. Ukraine aren't trading anything, except dead Ukrainians. Nato and Russia continue to trade regardless.
You're assuming a larger conflict. Some other victory. Not unless they engage outside of a dumb proxy nobody else in the World gives a shit about. It's either part of Nato or partially part of Russia. It isn't anything else.
Nato loses nothing, except the funding. Russia potentially loses some of its army fighting or withdrawing. But Ukraine only loses, all those dead.
You're talking about credibility if there is victory it supposedly causes? Who knows. Not much. There's trade or there isn't. The ability to conduct conflict hasn't changed. Like the ability to fund it. Or sanction it.
Yawn get educated, prior to the vaccine how many A-listers had it. Household names, big names.
Angelina Jolie
Kylie Minogue
Jennifer Aniston
Probably a lot more, so many more. Those 3 before any vax.
Between 1 in 7 and 10 women will contract it. Before any vax.
Using an occurrence of 1 in 7 or 10 as a vax narrative is stupid.
Mouth breathing crap at me and attacking my comment because you've assumed it wasn't a common occurrence isn't clever.
You do mind saying it, because you just said it. It makes you ignorant.
Decapitation can only occur in actual conflict.
Europe will be there all the same. Like Russia will.
In the meantime a corrupt shithole is a World narrative because it thinks to win what? Ascension. It was a free nation. Now it's in war or conflict. It has only lost. Bore somebody else with your bullshit. The rest of the World doesn't care. Any actual trade has rerouted. The same as any flight paths.
Both Russia and Nato are using it for a proxy conflict where neither will gain anything else apart from more dead Ukrainians. Seriously Russia gains more Russia it isn't Ukraine. Nato perhaps gains Ukraine, and it won't be Ukraine either.
Spurious claims of dead Russians, they signed upto this adopting it into law and battle. It makes little difference there. Unless they're significantly defeated, army destroyed. Much harder to do with a nation committed to its warfare. There is no guarantee a regime change will change its stance either.
Nato aren't committed, because they're not fighting. Simply funding. If it stops it stops. Defeating Nato. No. They're not fighting. No defeat. It will be there regardless. Regardless of dumb Ukrainian narratives assuming of some other victory. The same as Russian narratives.
Embarrassment over a loss. Loss of what. Russia can lose, by withdrawal or defeat. Nato cannot. Unless they actually fight each other.
I am sure you'll try to make another narrative about it. Join that club of bleeding hearts propaganda. How it serves some other lofty goal. Spare us.
Breast cancer is incredibly common in women today. 1 in 7 in most Western nations.
Lumps depending on where, like under your arm are very common, sweat gland lymph nodes, the body fighting infection and generally go after a week.
Not reading or watching the article. No conspiracy. You'd be surprised how many women have had the title. Prior to any vax, nonsense.
Hahahaha. No.
It would make gay people incontinent, and it also must be why they're gay. It comes from their ability to shit themselves and call it humane. India obviously has the most Gay people?
With what? Nato isn't being decapitated. Nato isn't fighting Russia. Yet?
Russia is fighting Ukraine. Whatever it is, and without funding it is nothing else.
The funding can stop. Nothing would've even happened. It is how unremarkable it is.
Any conflict is specifically about how the conflict resolves, and it has no resolution. So it's a distraction. A stage act. Doing exactly what.
Both suggest they are beating the other, but neither are actually fighting each other. If they do perhaps neither wins.
In the meantime it's a case of who gives up what first. Until then it remains a narrative. Obviously a bit more for anybody involved, they think they're winning something. Hard to say what. Any conflict cannot be resolved without those actually involved losing something.
Topics like this are absurd. You cannot decapitate anything without an actual war between the two you're suggesting. Then they'd both kill each other. Nukes. The Arctic. Instead it's a proxy called Ukraine with big ideas about its actual relevance. It remarkably means little else. Except for some other narrative of assuming something more?
Too most it's boring, go bother somebody else. You have no other consequence, geopolitically. Trade has rerouted. You're a narrative what if you could be more. The country that won something. What? You've already lost far more.
No, didn't Eve get corrupted by the serpent and became Lilith. Then Lilith's offspring were demons and vampires and werewolves.
Ishtar who Lilith is based had different forms, night, day, and the change in between, dawn/dusk where she changed and was worshipped differently at different times of day and in the lore affected by wars and rape becoming more powerful.
There are perhaps differences between Eve and Lilith, some suggest they are different. However one is the evil form the other was human.
But it's a confusing subject. Because they faster turned her into Medusa. Which in its heyday of belief upto 7AD when her worship was stopped, demonic. Lilith is massively attributed with snakes, all over her body, and fornicating with her. Lilith also stole babies in the night and was completely sexually deviant, seducing men to do evil.
Her creation like the rest of the bible came from common stories being rewritten, recreated, and retold.
In opinion she's a blimp, revisionism as worship changed from the old pantheon. It trying to establish origin as it incorporated former deities still massively worshipped and attributed as the mother of humanity. It needed to separate the two, but cause corruption.
No, that is bullshit. Completely stupid conjecture. I understand you're a dumbass. Feces look so kool.
I'm glad. Put them in a database of cattle. Gran Prix supporters are retarded cattle.
A car that doesn't drive on roads, it is exclusively driven on a purpose track, and it has no functional use.
It is such an exclusive race, it offers no variance. The same teams win it.
A boring race, driven in cars being driven nowhere else with the same team/s winning.
What are they supporting? Cuckholdery. They go to the Gran Prix because they are cucks. There is no difference to watching porn and the Gran Prix. Except porn probably gets you off. The Gran Prix gets somebody else.
Any other car race has participants. Cars driven on Roads despite their modifications, by supporting you aren't a cuckhold. Unlike the Gran Prix. It has no point. Not even worth a bet.
Hahaha. Look somebody today everybody being told and forced to drive EVs thinks the Gran Prix offers civilization anything? Seriously get rid of the cucks.
It's like witches and shaman when they read entrails, or stared at feces, and then they made a prediction based on superstition. If their guts were constipated then it was ominous. The feces had told them it was shitty.
Was there any other actual comparison?
When has Alex Jones said there are no nukes? He has talked about Nukes frequently, bases, generals, weapons.
Please link before you quote somebody else. No Alex Jones isn't a Flat Eartger either.
Link crap before you drop names.
The debate on Flat Earth didn't prove Alex Jones is a Flat Earther. Unlike yourself.
I am not angry because you shit yourself and are called a liar. Every word you say lie. Every single word you say is bullshit. You crap out of mouth.
Nobody called truth unless they lie. Why. Because everybody else everyone doesn't need to prove it. People assume they're being factual. You used a double negative. Honest. No. Liar. Truth. No. deceiver.
You might as well have just called yourself a demon. There you are wanting to decapitate stuff. Demonically. Because you're a demon who shits out of mouth, lying.