In defense of the normie I would have to say that you need 3 things to become non-normie (i.e. awake)
1-You have to have a certain type of intelligence.
IQ is correlated but it's not IQ specifically. You need to be able to think abstractly, something which very low IQ people cannot really do to a certain degree. AND you also need to have independent thoughts.
2-You need to have time.
Some people have been so crushed in life that they never get time to think things through. They have no energy to do so. Some are doing multiple jobs, loans, problems, divroce, etc.. That they do not have the luxury of free thinking. They just go with the flow until they die.
3-You need to have been shocked or hurt by the system.
Some groups of people have had it real good with them that they never have any reason to doubt the system. It rewarded them and they see themselves isolated from anyone suffering.
All that said, I think there is a difference between both groups. The difference I believe is in degree and not in kind but perhaps this could be said between us humans and animals?
This difference in degree of consciousness could mean the difference between the salve and the free man. Historically, the salve was someone who was willing to accept being a slave. Surrendering to his enemy.
A free man was someone who chose death over slavery.
What happened is that we have a world which prefers slaves over free men. This has been going for hundreds of years which means our numbers are dwindling.
They are marching humanity towards an ant-colony form of existence, will they succeed?
“Fortunately, some are born with spiritual immune systems that sooner or later give rejection to the illusory worldview grafted upon them from birth through social conditioning. They begin sensing that something is amiss, and start looking for answers. Inner knowledge and anomalous outer experiences show them a side of reality others are oblivious to, and so begins their journey of awakening. Each step of the journey is made by following the heart instead of following the crowd and by choosing knowledge over the veils of ignorance.”
-- Henri Bergson
It's why the study of basic metaphysical thinking at a young age is vital, IMO; along with a classical education with logic and reasoning. I saw a homeschool curriculum with much of this for first graders.
People have ben heavily conditioned by communist materialists and it's further put their higher faculties to sleep. The intuition needs to be exercised
Within motion, one is being pushed and pulled unless resisting. Therefore; others can follow and mislead simultaneously. Consider if it's you who is holding onto a suggested definition about what "leader" means? Leading and misleading aims different life towards the same outcome...death.
a) ones consent gives authority to others suggesting.
b) ignoring self by consenting to others tempts one to identify self (one) as group (we).
c) consent implies want to hold onto suggested (information); thinking requires adaptation to the need of letting go within perceivable (inspiration). The former is held within memory; while the later passes through it.
It's brain architecture, which is quite hereditary and partially environmental.
In computer processors it's called a bus. A bigger CPU bus means more throughput. In civil engineering they're called lanes. More lanes move more busses.
Besides the lanes, there's also the number of sidestreets. The thing that causes what happened above, where you're reminded of homonyms or make other categorical connections. Bluebird. Things that are blue (sky, poolwater, feathers, cold symbol). Things that fly (spaceships, planes, birds, drones). Things that eat worms (birds, toads, liberals, ants).
It's all about having useful physical structures in the brain. Memory, comparison... Recursion is nice but you need an escape. Memory. Recursion. Mem...
I remember back in school reading about Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Being young and ignorant, I really thought that everyone in first-world countries was at the level of Self-Actualization.
Now I know it only describes a tiny segment of the world's population.
Most people are hylics or psychics. The pneumatics (driven by spirit) are a tiny, tiny minority. The three types are clearly described in the New Testament in the Parable of the Sower:
Parable of the Sower
The hylics and the psychics provide food for the Moon. They simply feed the cosmic mechanism of planet growth and development. That's why they are necessary.
This is an interesting theory if you haven't seen it. It's only eight minutes long, but if this is true, there is no such thing as an NPC, they are all YOU (or me, or noyoushutup {wonder which water-muddier HE is these days})
Don't know if I believe this, but it's somehow comforting to me.
Level implies balance, which a) represents momentum of motion and b) implies ones choice at the center. Therefore...same balance for difference choices. The few suggest the inversion thereof, hence multiple levels/balance for the same choice (following).
Sleight of hand: games suggesting the player to reach the end of the level or to level up.
we clearly see a differentiation
Being one implies being different from every other one. One can only see (perceive) differentiation (moving differences aka perceivable inspiration)...others tempt one to ignore this for suggested sameness, hence you ignoring one (singular) for we (plural).
Gentle reminder that Europe and especially Eastern Europe differ from the US in the number of NPCs and it is surprising what a high level of awareness exists in those nations. Main reasons: education, experience based on historical memory, higher-levels of self-reliance, better community links, more travel and experiences outside one's own culture, close connections to the older generations and more. The atmosphere in Europe reminds one of the years before the fall of the Berlin wall. Most people feel the fakeness of the narratives and have their alternative version that gets closer to the truth. Censorship is also weak on the internet and people who can still think logically share those thoughts with others freely. The brainwashing is noticed mostly in the generation that has lived in the last 15 years but those will get it eventually. I can't back all this up with data, it's a feeling based on what I see and experience. I am commenting because I want you to know there are places where people are still free in their minds and that all is well. Peace and Love.
Manufactured consent. They simply do not have the knowledge or tools to comprehend. Their bodies are disabled, and kept in a permanent state of fight or flight.
This concept of hylics was about the only thing the Gnostics were correct about. It was the truth to bait the hook for the rest of their nonsense. You'll find this three-way division of levels of consciousness in other philosophies like that of the Essenes, and manifested in various ways like hypnotizability. Gathering it all together, you find about 80% are hylics, 16% psychics, and 4% pneumatics.
I cannot caution anyone enough not to take the word of the Gnostics for anything else regarding this other than the structure. Take, for example, this line from the "Hylics" wiki page:
Somatics were deemed completely bound to matter.
"Deemed" by who, the Gnostics? And who gave them fiat power in this? No answer to that because it's nonsense.
No one studies consciousness in this way because it is one of "Their" biggest secrets. Were the truth of this to be commonly understood, and commonly understood to be commonly understood, then the psychics and pneumatics would think about the world very differently and make very different decisions. That would be the absolutely final death knell of the Cabal.
Those on a quest are being send away, which diminishes their ability within the here and now.
What's the problem with them?
Suggested questions and answers tempt one to ignore being perceiving problem (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to resist being dissolved.
You tell them something then they forget it the next day.
Consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to let go of anything contradicting the suggested goals; outcomes; absolution etc. which progressivism dangles in-front of them.
Everything you may tell them is being perceived as holding them back if not outright offending their beliefs.
Can someone explain what's going on here?
The process of dying goes on; those living within either resist or go along with it. The majority willingly chooses to follow the suggested orders of the few, instead of being the resistance within the perceivable natural order.
their arguments both boil down to authority
To argument implies reasoning about suggested, which implies those suggesting it to represent the authority over those consenting. To cover the choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, those suggesting are keep adding authority figures to follow (leaders); to worship (deities); to shirk responsibility onto (law givers/rule makers) or to blame (opposite side within the conflicts of reason).
they'll never go beyond that, they can't go beyond that
Because they are willingly consenting to understand aka to stand under what others are suggesting, hence shirking their response-ability (free will of choice) onto the suggested choices of others...those of the "chosen ones".
In other words...choosing among what the choices of others are suggesting does NOT represent utilizing ones free will of choice within perceivable beyond ignorance.
Reality offers everything perceivable to each perceiving ones free will of choice, hence offering partial access to whole. The suggestions of others tempt one to ignore this for dualism aka for reasoning...want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; rich vs poor; on vs off; good vs evil etc. Whatever side on chooses represents the same choice of conflict; of reasoning against others over suggested information.
you were never a true...they're kinda right in a way
a) if reality represents change, then holding onto fictitious right or wrong aka true or false will always change. Whatever one believes to be true will be change into a false through the natural order (motion).
b) "in a way" implies being (life) within a way (inception towards death), which opens up endless more implications about ones position and response-ability (free will of choice)....unless ignored.
you always questioned your faith
Because a quest forwards contradicts the contract of faith one is holding onto. RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) tricks those who consent to TETH'ER, verb - "to confine, as a beast, with a rope or chain for feeding within certain limits".
Ones consent; ones faith (christian); ones submission (islam) binds one to the suggested dogma by others, while the consented to dogma (patri et fili e spiritu sancti) tempts one to ignore the bond with those suggesting it (e nomine).
That's why I avoid talking to religious people
Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents RELIGION (Latin religion; to bind anew)...only those who adapt as free will of choice (perceiving) to the dominance of balance (perceivable) are operating outside the religious bond, the contract law with the happy merchants of temptations.
You are being deceived to view religious people by the dogma they consented to, while ignoring the contract underneath aka the willing consent of the many to the suggestions by the few. The dogma represents the written narrative aka the worlds stage, the great lie etc.
a waste of...energy
If all represents one in energy; then it cannot be wasted, since it represents a self sustaining system. On the other hand...those within energy (internal/inherent power) perceive it as temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death), hence being tempted to view it as waste instead of opportunity.
Take a compost heap for example...waste or generator for growth? A matter of perspective, yet both simultaneously.
if the spark is in them
Being in-between ignited (inception) and extinguished (death) implies being on fire.
In defense of the normie I would have to say that you need 3 things to become non-normie (i.e. awake)
1-You have to have a certain type of intelligence. IQ is correlated but it's not IQ specifically. You need to be able to think abstractly, something which very low IQ people cannot really do to a certain degree. AND you also need to have independent thoughts.
2-You need to have time. Some people have been so crushed in life that they never get time to think things through. They have no energy to do so. Some are doing multiple jobs, loans, problems, divroce, etc.. That they do not have the luxury of free thinking. They just go with the flow until they die.
3-You need to have been shocked or hurt by the system. Some groups of people have had it real good with them that they never have any reason to doubt the system. It rewarded them and they see themselves isolated from anyone suffering.
All that said, I think there is a difference between both groups. The difference I believe is in degree and not in kind but perhaps this could be said between us humans and animals?
This difference in degree of consciousness could mean the difference between the salve and the free man. Historically, the salve was someone who was willing to accept being a slave. Surrendering to his enemy.
A free man was someone who chose death over slavery.
What happened is that we have a world which prefers slaves over free men. This has been going for hundreds of years which means our numbers are dwindling.
They are marching humanity towards an ant-colony form of existence, will they succeed?
“Fortunately, some are born with spiritual immune systems that sooner or later give rejection to the illusory worldview grafted upon them from birth through social conditioning. They begin sensing that something is amiss, and start looking for answers. Inner knowledge and anomalous outer experiences show them a side of reality others are oblivious to, and so begins their journey of awakening. Each step of the journey is made by following the heart instead of following the crowd and by choosing knowledge over the veils of ignorance.”
-- Henri Bergson
It's why the study of basic metaphysical thinking at a young age is vital, IMO; along with a classical education with logic and reasoning. I saw a homeschool curriculum with much of this for first graders.
People have ben heavily conditioned by communist materialists and it's further put their higher faculties to sleep. The intuition needs to be exercised
Alex Newman - Rescuing our children.
Slides from that talk: Dewey dumbing down and communist plan in late 1800's for gov school
That is not a henri bergson quote, that is from the intro page to Montalk.net
imho, #3 is probably the biggest driver of waking up.
...although, too much or certain kinds of #1 probably makes a person pre-disposed to #3.
Shut the fuck up shill. Why don’t you go back to randomly hate larping like a moron.
Your so fucking inconsistent in your posting style that it’s a fucking joke.
Retarded shilling. So fucking fake.
Within motion, one is being pushed and pulled unless resisting. Therefore; others can follow and mislead simultaneously. Consider if it's you who is holding onto a suggested definition about what "leader" means? Leading and misleading aims different life towards the same outcome...death.
Keep inflating that number you pull out of your ass every time lol.
a) ones consent gives authority to others suggesting.
b) ignoring self by consenting to others tempts one to identify self (one) as group (we).
c) consent implies want to hold onto suggested (information); thinking requires adaptation to the need of letting go within perceivable (inspiration). The former is held within memory; while the later passes through it.
No, every human has a soul. Not everyone is a Socrates, or a Diogenes though, and capable of lots of self reflection.
Even animals have souls, just not rational souls.
OP needs to read Plato's allegory of the cave, then come post again.
It's brain architecture, which is quite hereditary and partially environmental.
In computer processors it's called a bus. A bigger CPU bus means more throughput. In civil engineering they're called lanes. More lanes move more busses.
Besides the lanes, there's also the number of sidestreets. The thing that causes what happened above, where you're reminded of homonyms or make other categorical connections. Bluebird. Things that are blue (sky, poolwater, feathers, cold symbol). Things that fly (spaceships, planes, birds, drones). Things that eat worms (birds, toads, liberals, ants).
It's all about having useful physical structures in the brain. Memory, comparison... Recursion is nice but you need an escape. Memory. Recursion. Mem...
Yes. most people are low iq beings that are unable to think about most things. they regurgitate what they are told, and follow trends.
I remember back in school reading about Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Being young and ignorant, I really thought that everyone in first-world countries was at the level of Self-Actualization.
Now I know it only describes a tiny segment of the world's population.
Most people are hylics or psychics. The pneumatics (driven by spirit) are a tiny, tiny minority. The three types are clearly described in the New Testament in the Parable of the Sower: Parable of the Sower The hylics and the psychics provide food for the Moon. They simply feed the cosmic mechanism of planet growth and development. That's why they are necessary.
Drugs and philosophy are great awakeners
https://youtu.be/h6fcK_fRYaI
This is an interesting theory if you haven't seen it. It's only eight minutes long, but if this is true, there is no such thing as an NPC, they are all YOU (or me, or noyoushutup {wonder which water-muddier HE is these days})
Don't know if I believe this, but it's somehow comforting to me.
retards gonna re
We have that in common then.
Level implies balance, which a) represents momentum of motion and b) implies ones choice at the center. Therefore...same balance for difference choices. The few suggest the inversion thereof, hence multiple levels/balance for the same choice (following).
Sleight of hand: games suggesting the player to reach the end of the level or to level up.
Being one implies being different from every other one. One can only see (perceive) differentiation (moving differences aka perceivable inspiration)...others tempt one to ignore this for suggested sameness, hence you ignoring one (singular) for we (plural).
Gentle reminder that Europe and especially Eastern Europe differ from the US in the number of NPCs and it is surprising what a high level of awareness exists in those nations. Main reasons: education, experience based on historical memory, higher-levels of self-reliance, better community links, more travel and experiences outside one's own culture, close connections to the older generations and more. The atmosphere in Europe reminds one of the years before the fall of the Berlin wall. Most people feel the fakeness of the narratives and have their alternative version that gets closer to the truth. Censorship is also weak on the internet and people who can still think logically share those thoughts with others freely. The brainwashing is noticed mostly in the generation that has lived in the last 15 years but those will get it eventually. I can't back all this up with data, it's a feeling based on what I see and experience. I am commenting because I want you to know there are places where people are still free in their minds and that all is well. Peace and Love.
Manufactured consent. They simply do not have the knowledge or tools to comprehend. Their bodies are disabled, and kept in a permanent state of fight or flight.
This concept of hylics was about the only thing the Gnostics were correct about. It was the truth to bait the hook for the rest of their nonsense. You'll find this three-way division of levels of consciousness in other philosophies like that of the Essenes, and manifested in various ways like hypnotizability. Gathering it all together, you find about 80% are hylics, 16% psychics, and 4% pneumatics.
I cannot caution anyone enough not to take the word of the Gnostics for anything else regarding this other than the structure. Take, for example, this line from the "Hylics" wiki page:
"Deemed" by who, the Gnostics? And who gave them fiat power in this? No answer to that because it's nonsense.
No one studies consciousness in this way because it is one of "Their" biggest secrets. Were the truth of this to be commonly understood, and commonly understood to be commonly understood, then the psychics and pneumatics would think about the world very differently and make very different decisions. That would be the absolutely final death knell of the Cabal.
Tip your fedora harder.
Those on a quest are being send away, which diminishes their ability within the here and now.
Suggested questions and answers tempt one to ignore being perceiving problem (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to resist being dissolved.
Consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to let go of anything contradicting the suggested goals; outcomes; absolution etc. which progressivism dangles in-front of them.
Everything you may tell them is being perceived as holding them back if not outright offending their beliefs.
The process of dying goes on; those living within either resist or go along with it. The majority willingly chooses to follow the suggested orders of the few, instead of being the resistance within the perceivable natural order.
To argument implies reasoning about suggested, which implies those suggesting it to represent the authority over those consenting. To cover the choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, those suggesting are keep adding authority figures to follow (leaders); to worship (deities); to shirk responsibility onto (law givers/rule makers) or to blame (opposite side within the conflicts of reason).
Because they are willingly consenting to understand aka to stand under what others are suggesting, hence shirking their response-ability (free will of choice) onto the suggested choices of others...those of the "chosen ones".
In other words...choosing among what the choices of others are suggesting does NOT represent utilizing ones free will of choice within perceivable beyond ignorance.
Reality offers everything perceivable to each perceiving ones free will of choice, hence offering partial access to whole. The suggestions of others tempt one to ignore this for dualism aka for reasoning...want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; rich vs poor; on vs off; good vs evil etc. Whatever side on chooses represents the same choice of conflict; of reasoning against others over suggested information.
a) if reality represents change, then holding onto fictitious right or wrong aka true or false will always change. Whatever one believes to be true will be change into a false through the natural order (motion).
b) "in a way" implies being (life) within a way (inception towards death), which opens up endless more implications about ones position and response-ability (free will of choice)....unless ignored.
Because a quest forwards contradicts the contract of faith one is holding onto. RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) tricks those who consent to TETH'ER, verb - "to confine, as a beast, with a rope or chain for feeding within certain limits".
Ones consent; ones faith (christian); ones submission (islam) binds one to the suggested dogma by others, while the consented to dogma (patri et fili e spiritu sancti) tempts one to ignore the bond with those suggesting it (e nomine).
Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents RELIGION (Latin religion; to bind anew)...only those who adapt as free will of choice (perceiving) to the dominance of balance (perceivable) are operating outside the religious bond, the contract law with the happy merchants of temptations.
You are being deceived to view religious people by the dogma they consented to, while ignoring the contract underneath aka the willing consent of the many to the suggestions by the few. The dogma represents the written narrative aka the worlds stage, the great lie etc.
If all represents one in energy; then it cannot be wasted, since it represents a self sustaining system. On the other hand...those within energy (internal/inherent power) perceive it as temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death), hence being tempted to view it as waste instead of opportunity.
Take a compost heap for example...waste or generator for growth? A matter of perspective, yet both simultaneously.
Being in-between ignited (inception) and extinguished (death) implies being on fire.
Sleight of hand: "Deep inside...The pressure's high...Just to stay alive...Cause the heat is on"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZD8HKVKneI