Those on a quest are being send away, which diminishes their ability within the here and now.
What's the problem with them?
Suggested questions and answers tempt one to ignore being perceiving problem (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to resist being dissolved.
You tell them something then they forget it the next day.
Consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to let go of anything contradicting the suggested goals; outcomes; absolution etc. which progressivism dangles in-front of them.
Everything you may tell them is being perceived as holding them back if not outright offending their beliefs.
Can someone explain what's going on here?
The process of dying goes on; those living within either resist or go along with it. The majority willingly chooses to follow the suggested orders of the few, instead of being the resistance within the perceivable natural order.
their arguments both boil down to authority
To argument implies reasoning about suggested, which implies those suggesting it to represent the authority over those consenting. To cover the choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, those suggesting are keep adding authority figures to follow (leaders); to worship (deities); to shirk responsibility onto (law givers/rule makers) or to blame (opposite side within the conflicts of reason).
they'll never go beyond that, they can't go beyond that
Because they are willingly consenting to understand aka to stand under what others are suggesting, hence shirking their response-ability (free will of choice) onto the suggested choices of others...those of the "chosen ones".
In other words...choosing among what the choices of others are suggesting does NOT represent utilizing ones free will of choice within perceivable beyond ignorance.
Reality offers everything perceivable to each perceiving ones free will of choice, hence offering partial access to whole. The suggestions of others tempt one to ignore this for dualism aka for reasoning...want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; rich vs poor; on vs off; good vs evil etc. Whatever side on chooses represents the same choice of conflict; of reasoning against others over suggested information.
you were never a true...they're kinda right in a way
a) if reality represents change, then holding onto fictitious right or wrong aka true or false will always change. Whatever one believes to be true will be change into a false through the natural order (motion).
b) "in a way" implies being (life) within a way (inception towards death), which opens up endless more implications about ones position and response-ability (free will of choice)....unless ignored.
you always questioned your faith
Because a quest forwards contradicts the contract of faith one is holding onto. RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) tricks those who consent to TETH'ER, verb - "to confine, as a beast, with a rope or chain for feeding within certain limits".
Ones consent; ones faith (christian); ones submission (islam) binds one to the suggested dogma by others, while the consented to dogma (patri et fili e spiritu sancti) tempts one to ignore the bond with those suggesting it (e nomine).
That's why I avoid talking to religious people
Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents RELIGION (Latin religion; to bind anew)...only those who adapt as free will of choice (perceiving) to the dominance of balance (perceivable) are operating outside the religious bond, the contract law with the happy merchants of temptations.
You are being deceived to view religious people by the dogma they consented to, while ignoring the contract underneath aka the willing consent of the many to the suggestions by the few. The dogma represents the written narrative aka the worlds stage, the great lie etc.
a waste of...energy
If all represents one in energy; then it cannot be wasted, since it represents a self sustaining system. On the other hand...those within energy (internal/inherent power) perceive it as temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death), hence being tempted to view it as waste instead of opportunity.
Take a compost heap for example...waste or generator for growth? A matter of perspective, yet both simultaneously.
if the spark is in them
Being in-between ignited (inception) and extinguished (death) implies being on fire.
Those on a quest are being send away, which diminishes their ability within the here and now.
Suggested questions and answers tempt one to ignore being perceiving problem (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to resist being dissolved.
Consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to let go of anything contradicting the suggested goals; outcomes; absolution etc. which progressivism dangles in-front of them.
Everything you may tell them is being perceived as holding them back if not outright offending their beliefs.
The process of dying goes on; those living within either resist or go along with it. The majority willingly chooses to follow the suggested orders of the few, instead of being the resistance within the perceivable natural order.
To argument implies reasoning about suggested, which implies those suggesting it to represent the authority over those consenting. To cover the choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, those suggesting are keep adding authority figures to follow (leaders); to worship (deities); to shirk responsibility onto (law givers/rule makers) or to blame (opposite side within the conflicts of reason).
Because they are willingly consenting to understand aka to stand under what others are suggesting, hence shirking their response-ability (free will of choice) onto the suggested choices of others...those of the "chosen ones".
In other words...choosing among what the choices of others are suggesting does NOT represent utilizing ones free will of choice within perceivable beyond ignorance.
Reality offers everything perceivable to each perceiving ones free will of choice, hence offering partial access to whole. The suggestions of others tempt one to ignore this for dualism aka for reasoning...want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; rich vs poor; on vs off; good vs evil etc. Whatever side on chooses represents the same choice of conflict; of reasoning against others over suggested information.
a) if reality represents change, then holding onto fictitious right or wrong aka true or false will always change. Whatever one believes to be true will be change into a false through the natural order (motion).
b) "in a way" implies being (life) within a way (inception towards death), which opens up endless more implications about ones position and response-ability (free will of choice)....unless ignored.
Because a quest forwards contradicts the contract of faith one is holding onto. RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) tricks those who consent to TETH'ER, verb - "to confine, as a beast, with a rope or chain for feeding within certain limits".
Ones consent; ones faith (christian); ones submission (islam) binds one to the suggested dogma by others, while the consented to dogma (patri et fili e spiritu sancti) tempts one to ignore the bond with those suggesting it (e nomine).
Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents RELIGION (Latin religion; to bind anew)...only those who adapt as free will of choice (perceiving) to the dominance of balance (perceivable) are operating outside the religious bond, the contract law with the happy merchants of temptations.
You are being deceived to view religious people by the dogma they consented to, while ignoring the contract underneath aka the willing consent of the many to the suggestions by the few. The dogma represents the written narrative aka the worlds stage, the great lie etc.
If all represents one in energy; then it cannot be wasted, since it represents a self sustaining system. On the other hand...those within energy (internal/inherent power) perceive it as temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death), hence being tempted to view it as waste instead of opportunity.
Take a compost heap for example...waste or generator for growth? A matter of perspective, yet both simultaneously.
Being in-between ignited (inception) and extinguished (death) implies being on fire.
Sleight of hand: "Deep inside...The pressure's high...Just to stay alive...Cause the heat is on"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZD8HKVKneI