According to the math, the Holocaust was equivalent to Gettysburg happening, constantly, for 3 years.
I really don't think people can conceptualize numbers at this scale. Gettysburg didn't happen in a football field, or a few city blocks; it was literally two lines, miles long, of men killing each other with guns, cannons, bayonets, sabres and, when ammo runs out, rocks and bare hands.
Boomers never raised their kids, just sent them off to government school, which taught exactly zero useful skills.
Now the Boomers, who were actually raised by parents, are the only ones who can do anything useful. And still they refuse to train young people and insist they just keep "upgrading" their skills at schools.
This. Boomers just won't fucking die.
Hold on, I was under the impression that VAERS reports had to be validated by a doctor, which is why the sudden uptick can't realistically be attributed to false claims.
Although, even if true, it's delightfully ironic that everyone definitely died of Covid but only died with the vax.
Even psychopaths can do good.
Without psychopathy, it's impossible to plan for groups of people; there will always be decisions that help some but hurt others. If you are full of empathy, you cannot make those decisions and there can be no leadership.
The people who can't lead (even themselves) are overwhelmed with empathy; if they can't show love to the ones leading them, how could you expect anything more of the leaders who can't feel love at all?
Not going to do all of them, but as for loving your enemy: it's important to understand what love is.
Think of how you love your child. You don't just tell them that everything they do is perfect; that would be cruel. To love them properly, you encourage them when they do something right and correct or punish them when they do wrong. And all the while you make sure they know you're on their side and want them to be their best.
So take someone you hate; Hillary or Trump or whoever it is. When you love them, you are not saying you approve of what they're doing, or even that you like them. You're taking the responsibility to tell them when they're doing something wrong and correct or punish them if you can (and this can take many forms that aren't exactly intuitive). You want them to make good decisons, even if they've made many bad ones up to now. Imagine what they would be like if they weren't full of evil and hate and were actually doing good; that's who you want them to be and, if they can become that person, you find a way to forgive the bad they've done.
Love is hugely misunderstood to be nice, but it really isn't. It's hard and uncomfortable and can cause pain but the only alternative is a spiral of evil that descends to Hell.
“There are up to 23,000 Sudden Cardiac Arrests among young people aged 18 and younger in this country every year. Forty percent of them happen when kids are participating in athletics.
Would love to see the historical data on this one...
It's like they're asking for a bank run...
What's a hate group? A bunch of observant people pointing things out?
What would you expect from the type of person who expects the government to raise their kids for them?
Is that "emitted in total"? Like since the beginning of the industrial revolution? So we're not even remotely close?
Or is this study just an excuse for Bon Jovi?
Im not gonna argue or debate with ingenuine intent
Exactly, that's why I didn't even read the rest of your comment, let alone write a paper in response.
If you can't explain it, you don't understand it.
Summarize. I'm not arguing with someone else arguing on your behalf.
Oh cool, the Flat Earth crowd is finally abandoning that tack and now it's "there's no such thing as germs".
I'll reiterate, I'm fully willing to accept that germ theory isn't complete or accurate. Go ahead and provide some evidence, or a competing theory. But your "arguments" are shit.
All you've said, any of you, amounts to "anyone who believes in viruses is a shill normie loser" and "watch a bunch of youtube videos that I'm credulous enough to be fooled by". I don't doubt that you'll be spamming all sorts of sensationalist tripe on these boars over the next few weeks.
I'll consider this idea seriously when you (personally, not a link to some video) can put forward a theory of illness that explains everything that germ theory does plus everything that you claim germ theory fails to explain.
Until then, Ima assume you're just here to poison the well for good faith conspiracy theorists.
Nope, it's electron microscopy in most cases.
I mean they do colour it, so maybe it is fake?
Okay, same arguments (and attitude) as Flat Earth, gotcha.
Why would they need to prove something that everyone already believes?
It's like saying "If they actually had rockets and satelites, why wouldn't they use them to prove the Earth is a globe?" They don't need to.
I'm not saying germ theory is definitely true, just that there really isn't any doubt of it in most people's minds.
Edit: I really can't say I understand the point in denying germ theory; what difference would it make if it was completely made up?
Right now it seems to explain quite a bit via feasible mechanisms. For example, if I get a cut and it gets dirty, I get an infection. If I keep it clean, or clean it with alcohol (or any number of anti-biotic agents) to kill the supposed microbial germs, it doesn't get infected. So why is that happening, if not germs? My son got Scarlet Fever when he was younger, which was no joke, and he got better hours after being treated with anti-biotics so, again, how did that work if germs aren't real? What did they treat him with that so obviously worked?
If it is fake, so what? The claim was that the vax would stop the spread of illness, regardless of the cause, and the numbers show it doesn't. Compare this to the polio vaccine where we can easily see the different rates of polio in places that use quality shots versus those whose treatment is spotty or use the Gates killshots.
I'm no fan of the varicella shots, but it's pretty obvious that rates of chickenpox are way down today compared to when I was a kid, so clearly many of these treatments are functional.
What then, would the difference be if germ theory were a conspiracy? As opposed to the difference of the clot shot being "safe and effective" versus it being useless and killing people?
0.5 Wearing your mask while driving alone under your nose.
Good for Chad for sticking it to big oil but...remember Venezuela? Just having access to the equipment and oil does not translate to having the expertise to extract it, like Exxon does.
Hold on, Poilievre isn't PM yet, lol.
What's he going to do about the actual problem of nitrogent fertilizer regulation that will, according to farmers, result in famine? Nothing. Just going to bitch constantly against one tax, among thousands, which is going to happen anyway and, frankly, I don't really care about.
When is he going to bring up the fact that over a quarter of Canadian money on circulation today was printed during Covid, for useless vaxxes, and that's what's driving inflation?
When's he going to admit that our health systems are understaffed because 10% of nurses were fired for not getting the useless vaxxes, instead of trying to import foreigners who won't resist? (Not that it's any of his business anyway, as a Federal MP, but that doesn't stop the Liberals).
When's he going to mention the fact that our Constitution, according to our government's investigation of itself, isn't worth the paper it's printed on and can be ignored whenever lawmakers feel like it (it was signed by Trudeau's dad, btw).
Poilievre is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic and people who vote for him will get what they pay for.
Yep, and Poilievre is planning to do exactly nothing about it cause "we need nurses" (that were fired for being invaxxed).
That's a quote from the article.
Did you read between the lines?
They (the people making and pushing the shots) talk about "chasing the tail" of outbreaks all across the continent just to have them "spring up again", and needing more vaccines because low coverage is causing outbreaks. It's from the exact playbook as Covid.
And since when is polio dangerous to children? I'm not an immunologist but everything I've read abouy polio says it behaves like chicken pox and that reactions in children are rare, while adults are heavily affected by the disease. Why are kids getting sick at all?
They're assuming that none of the thousands of severe cases they're seeing have to do with their shots, because they haven't looked into it. These seven are people waking up, just like the adverse events with Covid.
They literally have "experts" saying things like "we hoped this wasn't going to happen, but knew it was possible"; so they obviously didn't do proper testing, probably because it's on impoverished African kids so who cares?
“It’s disappointing but not entirely unexpected,” says Aidan O’Leary, who heads GPEI.
"Oh well, you win some, you lose some"
"What, paralized African children?"
"Yeah"
Hate to say it, but I was wearing a mask for a while.
Back in the beginning, when governments were still saying Covid wasn't a big deal (and maybe a bit racist), the idea was that it spread through droplets. Not only did I wear a mask, I wore gloves too. It wasn't until a neighbor told me they heard that Covid was airborne that I looked into it further.
IIRC, they would make the prisoners stand in lines of a hundred and have them dig a pit beside themselves. When they were finished, they used one effective bullet to shoot the whole hundred and they would fall into the pit, which the next line would bury while digging their own pit. Then they did this 30 times a day for five years.
It may be unbelievable, but it happened!