Came to say: Heavy Plow
This basically laid the foundation for the White, high trust societies that no one else has been able to reproduce.
Alsup ruled that Anthropic's use of copyrighted books to train its AI models was "exceedingly transformative" and qualified as fair use
I'm no fan of copyright law but, if you can simply ask the AI to recite the full text of any book that was scanned, does it matter that it's transformative?
"Neo-Nazi" is a slur, are you going to censor OP?
This is exactly the problem with your rules; they always come down do what you, specifically, feel like enforcing.
What does "Boomer" even mean? Who, exactly, is or is not a Boomer? This post doesn't expose OPs date of birth so the term Boomer, in this case, obviously refers to a worldview, not an inherent characteristic.
But whatever. Not like I expect a woman to be consistant, especially in wielding power she never earned...
What if they aren't covering anything up?
What if this is a global demoralisation exercise? It's like Covid or the Panama Papers; if the elites can literally hold parties where they torture, rape, and eat children, and suffer zero consequences, what's the point of doing anything? You either stick your head in the sand or a gun in your mouth; that's the idea.
Even that isn't enough. If the people who were afflicted by these crimes don't get angry and seek justice, and die quietly instead, nothing changes.
Oh no...anyways, I have many people that are causing me to "burnout", is there a way to do all the applications in one big batch?
Since you're out of the loop, I guess you missed when we got definitive proof that it actually is all a labyrinth of dark conspiracy...
So the "Nazi" slur is allowed but "Kike" is banned?
Huh...
So you actually think that the people making these adds littered them with clues for you to find to solve their conspiracy, rather than filling them with red herrings to put you off track?
That's nice, so bones burnt to ash, in "open air pits" did they?
Or did they gather up all the bones and throw them in a crusher afterwards?
Lol
Has this small piece of the puzzle not made it clear?
They're all demons. You simply don't get to hold any position of real power without being "initiated".
These "people" know the difference between right and wrong, the difference between serving their country and lining their pockets, and chose the latter.
Do you know why Massie's words (or Trump's or Paul's) resonate with most Americans? Because the cabal knows full well what the people actually want and what is actually good for the country; they just chose to do the opposite.
Do I like what Massie is saying here? Sure. Do I think his role is to make it seem as though only some politicians are satanic child molesting cannibals? Also yes.
How goes intentionally killing the conspiracies forum to obfuscate discussion of the Epstein Files?
Something doesn't add up: why would Natalists abort babies..?
It's just another example of emotions being placed above reason. We're so spoiled by Western civilization that we sometimes forget that emotional reactance is the baseline; rationality is something our ancestors built on top of it.
"I read it in the controlled media"
Maybe. I find, though, that there's a sweet spot where the honeypots are still trying to catch flies where they'll let you say anything.
The last ten years have taught me that there is no based forum, just psyops that you can turn to your advantage for a short time, before you head off to greener pastures.
I have no doubt that, as this site shuts down, there will be plenty of new ones talking about the Epstein Files in ways that will be shut down here. (Isn't it funny how this drama is kicking off just as the biggest confirmed conspiracy, maybe ever, is being exposed?)
Community support? Are you serious? Did you not read the entire rest of this thread?
Who put you in charge, anyway?
You say, as people who didn't start this community take it over...
How about you go back to Reddit? Or just get off the internet entirely? Then the mean old government won't have any reason t come after you, lol.
So do you think we need to take down legitimate comments because of the language used? Or are we adults who can be trusted to protect ourselves?
Test case: I don't know any of you assholes; most of you are probably either bots or paid agents. Where does respect come into that?
I can respect an argument, if it makes sense, is internally consistent, and fits all available facts, regardless ofnwho makes it. If we're here to have discussions in pursuit of Truth, I'm all for it.
Your opinion/view is that by banning words that our enemies say we shouldn't say we'll, what? Attract more users? Avoid the government murdering us in our beds? Certainly not facilitate the pursuit of Truth...
I don't respect that, and some pissant rule makes zero difference to me.
So you have absolutely zero argument, which I could at least respect, you just appeal to the rule that you decide is legit.
You are pathetic: you don't even have any real power and it's already gone completely to your head. You are not a person who should have authority over anything.
Edit: Nice stealth edit, very transparent...
If we were speaking in person, I would have respect for you as a human being. I wouldn't physically attack you, deprive you of autonomy, etc.
But we aren't. I'm not engaging with you as a human being, I'm engaging with words on a screen. I don't even know that you're human. And if you are, I don't know that you aren't simply acting out a character for nefarious purposes.
I always here feminoids going on and on about respect. Well, if respect is worth anything it must be used judiciously. My respecting you means nothing if I also respect piles of pig shit. You haven't done anything to earn my respect, and your arguments haven't either. I literally cannot respect you, regardless of the rules.
What you're talking about is not respect, it's validation. You want me to treat you as though you are acting in good faith and putting forth good arguments, regardless of whether that's the case, which completely removes any incentive on you to do either.
That is a great way to obfuscate the Truth; putting up with bad actors because it would be mean to put them in their place.
You do understand that we'll just make up new slurs, right Bleeder? This does nothing other than take us on the first step of the slippery slope of arbitrary mods, who didn't even found the board, deciding what users are allowed to say.
"Hey goy, you didn't frame your post on my terms, which limit your ability to say what you need to. Why are you acting in bad faith?"
Unbeleivable.
Nope, the Heavy (8 oxen) Plow was invented right during the period you're describing; 8th to 11th century. It forced individual peasant families to band together to get enough oxen to pull it over more ground than they could all cover with single plows combined.
This led directly to peasants working in reciprocal relationships with non-blood related neighbours, undermining the clan system and creating the basis for the high-trust societies that we (and only we; not even the Romans acheived this) inherited.