2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's the right move, but "former" liberals, who migrated to the right, equate porn to free speech despite the fact that it's not speech or expression and has no correlation to free speech.

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol thanks for reminding me about the boot theory and how John McCain was secretly executed.

4
user20461 4 points ago +4 / -0

Send my condolences to your family for their burden

Blocked

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, what are you doing about these "bunch of clowns who believe clown politicians"?

What does it matter? How is it related to this thread?

I've seen you around, btw, and you're always starting problems with people. Find a hobby and thank me later.

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

We (c/Conspiracies regulars) see a bunch of clowns who believe clown politicians

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://xcancel.com/AFpost/status/1946291519994118283

Link to the document

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2025-07-18%20RJD%20Letter%20to%20FBI%20Director%20Patel%20re%20Epstein.pdf
3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1945984541266702745

Re: WSJ Letter:

It doesn't read like something Trump would write. And I also don't think he would make a drawing. Trump's best allies are the liberal media that always make up a fake claim for his supporters to rally around to defend him.


Re: Grand Jury Testimony:

No way in hell they're releasing anything of substance (or it's fake/redacted) after stonewalling the release of the Epstein files.

Here's what one guy had to say:

https://xcancel.com/AdameMedia/status/1946027104895672581

DONT BE FOOLED

This is damage control.

Grand jury transcripts are a nothingburger.

What about the videos?

Photographs?

Sworn witness interviews?

The emails? The text messages?

The hard drives?

Unseal. Every. File.

DONT STOP ATTACKING TRUMP

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

He already just said at TPUSA that Epstein was working for Israel. So this is likely out of context.

Is the thread claiming otherwise?

Does the video not include Tucker saying that Israel is implicated?

What exactly is out of context here?

It sounds like you're just repeating phrases you don't understand.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

Claim: Tucker Carlson said "I don't know if there is a client list"

Tucker Carlson: "I don't know if there is a client list"

How you think this is "out of context" is beyond me, but there's a full fucking minute of video for you to see what he said before and after that.

And here's Tucker Carlson mocking 9/11 truthers.

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16aTVFTCuH/flashback-tucker-carlson-calls-9/c

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16b5q7bF1k/always-remember-the-real-tucker-/c

He's always pretending to be on our side, but makes sure to never lead you towards the truth. And the moment public opinion sways hard to one side and he's at risk of losing credibility, he pivots and pretends like he never held an opposing view.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

Literally half the man that men used to be

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one believes he hung himself with toilet paper, that's why we're all mocking the idea.

Do you not understand the meme in the OP?

The initial report from the government was that he hung himself with toilet paper.

I hope that makes sense and you find something better to do with your life instead of being an annoying miserable fuck on the internet.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

he's a multi-billionaire in BTC.

He owns 1.096 million BTC

It's right there in the image.

How dumb is this post?

I love it when people come off as smartasses when being polite and respectful would serve them better.

Dunning-Kruger in effect

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know what else doesn't make sense?

A video not existing and then, years later, magically existing.

Same goes for a client list existing for years up until a few days ago.

Instead of pretending you're smart, try using your brain and quit wasting everyone's time. 👍

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›