2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

His argument is his behavior.

I quoted his argument and I explained it.

Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not addressing his argument.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
user20461 6 points ago +6 / -0

https://xcancel.com/WatcherGuru/status/2046080085128630435

The Wolf of Wall Street guy was arrested for doing shit like this

Today, he'd still make his money and wouldn't serve time

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems like Trump is playing the "bad guy" for the future "good guy" to look like a hero. He's just making being pro-Israhell look retarded.

c/GreatAwakening

I stand by my statement

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you

I actually agree with the part about AI scrappers (Link).

If it's true that 95% of their users don't download more than 40 images a month, it seems fair to just cap it to that and save costs.

Still looks like the site is going to shit, though, lol.

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

Would be cool if we had a link to the tweet so we can read the part that was cut off

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for sharing, it's pretty brazen of them to show off their power like this

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

And in that reply I addressed your argument after that.

If that was really your intention, you could've just responded to the main OP instead of posting in the comment thread where someone made a low effort insult, I returned it in kind, and then trying to use my low-effort insult in an attempt to debunk my main argument.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your post contains a lot of words but you didn't actually say anything.

Do you want to engage in actual debate or do you want to continue in this circular argument for your "gotcha"?

view more: Next ›