What do you mean no refunds? Those lo mein noodles were freaking disgusting!
Even I had a chance to do this and I'm a freaking nobody.
This whole thing seems fake--as if they want to scare people into not using false documentation.
His story is a sad one and he has had a very hard time of it. I don't fault him for turning to vices.
In my view, his picture collection and his habit of videotaping himself in erotic situations and uploading them aren't important. Drugs and guns aren't important.
What people need to find out are 1) in what ways have he, his father and their associates illegally undermined the United States as per financial crimes, influence peddling and national security breaches and 2) is that him leading the young Asian child with a leash in the reported child porn image, and if so, can we determine if she is still alive.
Discussion moderators are responsible for this, ideally with help from the community at large.
I'm not saying this is a perfect solution, but it's the best I can think of using the limited software tools we have at our disposal. We are under constant attack and they are winning.
Yes, everybody knows that the power to ban can be abused. I even find myself more sensitive to shill activity that is pushing a point of view contrary to mine, but that isn't the point. The idea is to make it more difficult for groups to create large numbers of accounts in an attempt to interfere with learning about topics that those people would rather we didn't.
You mean people you disagree with.
First of all, the whole "everyone you disagree with is a shill" routine was used ad nauseum just a few years ago. I now see that as an immediate red flag that an account is being operated by shills.
And it is not at all true--I agree with some of the things shills write. I disagree with people quite often who I do not suspect of being shills.
The shills I am talking about are ones whose job it is to disrupt online communities. They attain their goal by a number of methods. Anything written to that end by organizations that fall under that umbrella does not meet my definition of free speech. They are not writing to inform or directly persuade, but to thwart the communication process itself.
This is a lot of information, but not very well put together or vetted.
For one thing, there is more very important video missing. What about the alternate footage from just before Ashli Babbitt was executed? There were a lot more clips of young men changing to look like Trump supporters. Also there were lots of people up there stopping illegal activities from taking place.
There should be better organization of videos for people to learn the truth.
What's that about?
You are free to generalize, but your conclusion is wrong as a result of you doing that.
How can you even be real? In addition to legitimate bans those platforms silence legitimate speech for political reasons. I don't consider groups of shills trying to disrupt communication to be people engaging in speech.
Username checks out.
No. How colossally stupid of you to think that everybody thinks the same thing.
HOW THE GOVERNMENT LISTENS IN https://msjonesnyc.com/#/surveillance/
What is happening is that shills post stupid things to make other people believe online communities that question government policies are full of idiotic, hateful and violent people.
The purpose of your comment is to make it sound more plausible by giving colorful descriptions of those kinds of people: "boomer[s]," "retards," "the dumbest motherfuckers to ever log on to a computer," "inbred retards from Alabama," and "morons." That tactic makes your account indistinguishable from a shill account (at least by me). I think your account should be banned for that kind of attack on our community.
I need information on what criminal codes are being violated.
No way. We need to counter it.
Gotta look into this...
No, it's about a large number of serious crimes.
As to what you're referring to, some have said there is a picture of someone leading an Asian child on a dog's leash. I read that the face of the adult in the image was not shown, but the body is not distinguishable from Hunter's.
If that is true, then that poor girl has probably had her organs harvested for the privilege of being dehumanized in a way that makes it possible for her to identify such a high-profile individual.
The reason nobody can confirm any of this is because the rule of law now means that powerful people will never face justice, but anyone looking into their crimes becomes an enemy of the Deep State.
The investigation is not about illegal guns, but influence peddling and various other serious crimes against the United States.
Files can be fully recovered or partially recovered. In the case of documents especially, sometimes recovered files are previous versions in which case critical information can be uncovered.
EDIT: The files could have been deleted or modified over a long period of time. He also may have gone on a deleting binge at some point.
The smoking gun on this is that they are turning it on and off.
That's not "exhaust" from jet engines.
That's not what was going on there.
You need to reread that section of the Bible.
I thought it was at least that bad.
His mom died in a car crash when he was nearly three years old. That would have shattered me in unimaginable ways.