Every time I see this in some forum I think it's got to be Hillary's people.
Casualties of the Russo-Ukrainian War -- War in Donbas (before 2022 invasion) -- Total deaths https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War#Total_deaths
I think he would love to own Twitter. He wants lots of Starlink users, and he should be looking for ways to get them. Twitter might also possess an intellectual property or technical expertise that will help him leverage those satellites.
Don't trust Elon Musk. Try to evaluate what he does without your mind clouded by that.
That said, this post is more trash being dumped onto this forum by shills.
That political party is run by neoconservatives.
Can't upvote this twice.
Even with the U.S. Dept. of Justice involved, Tesla having regulatory issues is not the same as Elon Musk being corrupt. The timing here is suspect.
Now just outright purchasing Twitter? That's some guts...
I think my demonstration was sufficient to show that creators of faked photos might deliberately make verification difficult and how access to other photos can help in debunking them.
I've tried to address your points below, but I think they distract from the important issues. In any case, groups of people should have access to the original data from all purported leaks.
well first off all you can search to see if that image is available elsewhere
What you are looking for are photos someone has used to construct the photo in question. You also get other information (metadata), such as when the photo was taken, published, by whom and context.
someone with the right sources could take that image now and paste it into something else and just back date it and say " see , this pic is obviously fake cause its from 2012 and you would have no idea if "that evidence" was fake info or not
That is a concern. In my demonstration, one of the original photos was published by Rolling Stone and the other was from a dated Facebook post. And intelligence agency could falsify backdated social media, but backdating an article of a major publication would be harder.
Those pics you posted are obviously fake
One is fake while the other two are ostensibly legitimate photographs.
...meant to sway you in some political propaganda, you dont need to be a genius to figure that out, so you didnt solve a mystery, you just finally realized the obvious.
It fooled quite a number of people when it was distributed during the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election.
the relationship between The Bidens and Lady Gagy is already well established fact
This is altogether different from Lady Gaga doing hard drugs with Hunter Biden.
Anyone can look at my post history. I don't shill for anyone.
The police have been caught on camera committing crimes and behaving unethically. Those videos have been shared. The music is a way to prevent the sharing by having anti-piracy algorithms kick in.
Things done in the past run the gamut from planting evidence, police brutality and more.
Get this trust idea out of your mind; it is snake venom to your thought process.
Personally, I think he is connecting dots that aren't there.
But consider, do you think anyone would deliberately create a biological weapon that, when activated, causes the body to produce an autotoxin?
That's Michael Moore by the way.
It is impossible to release anonymously? What makes 9/11 any safer than other days?
You are deflecting the issue. The point is that they are deliberately making it so fewer people see their illegal behavior (unrelated to playing music).
That normalizes weird behavior for when things actually ^^do^^ go wrong. It's the whole "We don't have to show you anything. You need to trust us because we are authorities." mentality.
I looked into this once. I found no reason to think it is the actor.
It seems they want people in the dark about this.
They did this to Diana, Princess of Wales, too.
Don't care about this.
Why wait? What purpose would that serve?
Would you care to elaborate?
I think the quote in the title is misleading. I believe it begins at timestamp 13:13 (dun dun dun!), and in this context is about certain individuals who he thinks have deeply wronged him in the past.
EDIT: Also, in this context he is talking about a nuclear war initiated by Vladimir Putin.
Source:
Digital identity documents to exceed 6.5 billion users by 2026: Juniper https://www.itnews.com.au/digitalnation/news/digital-identity-documents-to-exceed-65-billion-users-by-2026-juniper-578658
False dichotomy.