Doesn't mention anything about who killed those civilians.
My guess it is the ones shelling and shooting at villages. It is reasonable to think the aggressors are responsible for the vast majority of civilian casualties, just as I think the Russians have caused the majority of civilian deaths this year.
They have issued daily updates since March 7, 2022. Search ohchr.org for: ukraine civilian casualty
That's an example of the level of detail in their reporting.
Source is the UN. Wait, now we trust them?
If you have an actual issue with their methodology or honesty, feel free to explain. I would not accept an argument that nobody is in a position to provide an honest count, so therefore any reports are vastly overstated by orders of magnitude. (As if the UN would be trying to support Donetsk and Luhansk in the first place...)
You can only speak for yourself, not others. My guess is that someone cares about my guesses.
so you trust the UN then? Yes or no?
It's not a black or white issue. That organization, being a collective of thousands of people, most certainly does not have my absolute trust. It doesn't matter the degree to which I think the things they publish are credible.
Really, why should such a thing even matter? What is your claim?
Casualties of the Russo-Ukrainian War -- War in Donbas (before 2022 invasion) -- Total deaths https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War#Total_deaths
My guess it is the ones shelling and shooting at villages. It is reasonable to think the aggressors are responsible for the vast majority of civilian casualties, just as I think the Russians have caused the majority of civilian deaths this year.
They have issued daily updates since March 7, 2022. Search ohchr.org for: ukraine civilian casualty
Ukraine: civilian casualty update 7 March 2022 https://www.ohchr.org/en/news/2022/03/ukraine-civilian-casualty-update-7-march-2022
That's an example of the level of detail in their reporting.
If you have an actual issue with their methodology or honesty, feel free to explain. I would not accept an argument that nobody is in a position to provide an honest count, so therefore any reports are vastly overstated by orders of magnitude. (As if the UN would be trying to support Donetsk and Luhansk in the first place...)
You can only speak for yourself, not others. My guess is that someone cares about my guesses.
It's not a black or white issue. That organization, being a collective of thousands of people, most certainly does not have my absolute trust. It doesn't matter the degree to which I think the things they publish are credible.
Really, why should such a thing even matter? What is your claim?