Trump turned heel and now Hunter going face? I love me some pro politics!
if that's what you call fiat money you use to buy your food and pay your taxes, then yes.
Pretty much any major central bank currency.
And we should most definitely trust Forbes on that. If they mean stablecoins, yes they may. It's not BTC though.
Idc about Fed monopoly money. BTC has gone 500-600% up since 2020.
I'd say 2.5 and 6.5 but yeah, she's probably a honeypot sex op.
I have to wonder what's your sophisticated take on the matter?
Are there still people rooting for this nwo clown?
That's a strawman. How do you think one makes it big in the ((entertainment industry)) and becomes "a star" (very Crowlian concept btw)? Yes, Sydney Sweeny is in fact a whore of modern day Babylon aka Hollywood.
Lol at the downvotes. Some people here love their coomies more than the harsh truth. Porn is ran by the jews and is designed to enslave you through your lust. It's psychological warfare. the IDF literally hijacks enemy TV stations and streams porn to demoralize them.
They get to you while you're still a child in a typical jewish fashion. Parents, protect your children from this evil. Monitor their internet use.
Of course it makes sense - it would give them autonomy and it would cut costs.
If BTC was a top down technology and a stepping stone to CBDC as some people claim they would totally use the opportunity to push it on the gamers who are tech oriented to begin with, and yet they don't? It's almost as if they don't want to replace the centralized legacy system for a decentralized one. I wonder what the conspiratard explanation is for this?
It makes sense when the ruling regime is globalist and anti-white.
Exactly, pagans aren't masons. But pretty much everyone converted eventually (except for the jews of course).
So there is no way to determine the value of anything outside of using the fiat currency issued by government? This is like saying I can't know how long is something if I don't use the government sanctioned system of measurement - do you know how retarded that is, you absolute moron?
Can you prove that's the case and tell me what prevents people from using an alternative system of valuation?
Yeah, I overgeneralized. I'm sure there are exceptions. Clarke's Childhood's end is completely demonic. Hubbard was close with Jack Parsons and they were both Thelemist. I'd guess Frank Herbert is not clean also. Asimov is 100% satanic, he even reminds me of T.H. Huxley with those sideburns.
I'd eat bats if I had to survive, but yes.
First of all, context determines the meaning of symbols. We know for certain that Jesus was not a satanist by definition. We know that Ozzy was into the occult and wrote a song about Crowley and definitely knew the depiction of Baphomet by Eliphas Levi.
Second - who depicted Jesus that way? The RC Church? As far as I'm concerned this hand gesture is not canonical in the Eastern Orthodox Church and that's all that matters to me. I mean, some crazy cult may depict Jesus in an alien ship. Why would that matter?
Turns out the argument isn't moronic - you're just a sperg who doesn't understand context.
Because the term "Christian" has been so watered down by the jews and satanists that it's not referring to anything in particular for normies. Just vague ideas about love, peace, being kind, being tolerant, etc. They think Jesus was a hippy basically.
Also many people who consider themselves Christian believe it's enough to just profess faith in Christ as God (Sola Fide) and it doesn't matter how you live. My favorite example of this is OF "Christian" 304s. Without the Holy Spirit, who guides the Church, we'd all be deluded but true Christians have the Spirit and the Spirit testifies who Christ - the Truth - is.
I think you're just splitting hairs now. There's no need to absolutise everything. I meant this more like a general direction. Like an overall guideline. We can't know anything. Who knows, maybe all this is simulated? Maybe I'm dreaming all this. Or maybe I'm just a hallucination of the God.
I'm not splitting hairs. The position that nothing can be known for sure and that everything may be simulated is self-defeating because if that were the case, your belief that everything is an illusion is also an illusion.
However, if I see that it rains outside, for all intents and purposes, I do know that it rains outside. There are various levels of truth and reality.
So you choose to trust your senses. But on what grounds? How do you determine what the levels of truth and reality are when you yourself are limited by your subjectivity, physical/temporal existence and senses?
Well, I'm not in that camp although I do live in a country where Eastern Orthodoxy has significant amount of followers. That said, even Eastern Orthodox is not quite monolithic. There are Old Believers and there are general Eastern Orthodoxy, different countries practice differently, it is influenced by politics and so on, and so on.
There is only one EO Church and different dioceses are in communion. Their differences are not theological and are covered under what is called oeconomia. A Russian Orthodox person can go to an Orthodox Church on the other side of the world in Africa and get communion there.
Old believers are considered schismatics, although they may have a point. The thing is there can't be more than one true Church.
PS: If you're curious about why the Orthodox Church is the true one, I recommend checking Jay Dyer's videos on the subject like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUvWvabTkPY
Bill Cooper was right.
Definitely. I'd add the Wizard of Oz, Alice in Wonderland, Master and Margarita, H.G Welles (who was their main propagandist), Arthur Clarke and pretty much all sci-fi. Once you see it, you see it everywhere. Same with the symbols they use.
It doesn't matter what currency is used to determine the value of the service. It could be dollar, euro, yen, gold beads or pokemon cards. Or just BTC/Satoshi. The transaction is in BTC and that's what matters.
You have no idea how money works.
Yes, I've red it as well as some other of their books. His brother Julian wrote the UNESCO manifesto and coined the term transhumanism. The Huxleys are part of the Royal Society malthusian transhumanist cabal and the Fabian globohomo socialists (Orwell was part of them too at one point), that C.S. Lewis writes about in his book.
Both him and Tolkien knew about their plan for luciferian global technocracy which inspired Mordor and Sauron. And then we have Peter Thiel's Palantir which ties in neatly with the all-seeing eye/AI theme.
If you mean the Christian God, He created everything good. Suffering entered the world as a result of the fall of man.
It doesn't make sense to believe or not to believe in Him based on how good or easy your life is. Read about Job and the Sermon at the Mount.
If He doesn't exist everything is just random cause and effect of atoms bumping into each other and all is finite and ultimately meaningless, so why even complain?
If He does exist, you can be sure there's divine providence and justice and all you have to do is follow His teachings and you will have your reward in the afterlife. This world is not where it's at and is only a stepping stone to the eternal life in Christ which starts here when you enter His Church. Be grateful for your life and what you have and know God loves you because you're His child.
You do know this term originates from 19th c. zionist propaganda, right?