Wow, you actually disproved me. You seem like a lot of fun to be around.
Or probably just a jackass, who can't take criticism and turns every argument into a battle, because his tiny, little brain can't process information that's different than his own... Surely, all people are wrong, while, oh magnificent child of light, ONLY YOU ARE CORRECT.
If you don't like someone being disrespectful, why do you immediately stoop to the same level, and even worse?
But I don't really blame you. You're just a product of the negligence of your parents. I blame them.
But you have done so much to divert the actual topic, so let me remind you:
My challenge:
Can you show the exact photo, so I can then show it to you how it's altered?
Your reply:
I don't care. I just pointed out the model didn't reply with No.
My reply to that:
What a researcher you are... Tenacious, caring, intelligent...
Or probably not.
I'm gonna go with "probably not".
Your insults:
Wow another dumbass.
I checked to see if the image was faked and yes it was. I wouldn't call that research. This doesn't mean the claim on the image is not true. Can you think bro?
So, the conclusion here is that you ignored my question with "I don't care", I called you out as a person, who doesn't care, and you went with insults, because momma's boy is very special and nobody can say he is not...
The truth is that there are brain cells, who look for a new job, right there inside your brain. They are willing to work, but the neural economy is bad and they can't find none... But you overuse your amygdala for insulting anyone online, who dares to ask a question. A neural economy driven by your moto - "I don't care"...
Is my definition of you incorrect? Am I wrong to call you a bad researcher based on evidence? Have some time to think, and you will agree with me. Or you can activate your amygdala again... How well did that work in your past?
But I have a solution.
Listen to people and respond to them. If you play this "I don't care" thing, you just show that you lack empathy, and nobody likes such a person. Notice how many words I write because I have empathy towards you. Even insulted, I am still empathising, and providing reason.
To show you how much I know on the subject of human behavior, I would show you the alternative: You write insults in anger. Anger is making you think less, but react faster, so surely you wouldn't even read my message, but just lash out with insults as soon as you read something you don't agree. You won't read the full comment, so that is also how I will use this statement to prove that you don't listen, if it comes to that. Are you willing to give me exactly what I need to crush you? Or willing to accept criticism? That's your choice.
One other thing, if you wanted your child to be a good researcher, and it responded with "I don't care", I wonder how you would react... Probably with patience, showing the alternative by ironically contrast an ignorant decision, or helpful mentoring...
Wow dude, you just run your script and don't even try to understand where people are coming from (which would be obvious if you took a step back and red my initial comment).
All I did in this thread was to prompt the AI with the same question to see what it would answer. I then pasted the answer here. I wasn't arguing for or against the veracity of the photos (the claim) but wanted to see if the AI really did answer that way. Then you and the other new age flerf guy wrongfully concluded I was somehow defending the claim made by the model and felt the need to convince me otherwise.
Because the question assumed I had a specific photo in mind and that I wasn't sure if it's altered or not.
Why ask me for an exact photo when you have all the info I have by looking at the AI reply I pasted?
How did I accuse you with a question that doesn't have anything connected to what you're saying?
Why would you reply something completely unconnected to begin with? Why not reply to the thread or make another one instead? Your comment was out of place and I viewed it in context.
That's very jewish of you. You interject with a snarky disrespectful comment and then cry about me being disrespectful?
You sound like a 10-year old girl. I don't have time for daycare.
Wow, you actually disproved me. You seem like a lot of fun to be around.
Or probably just a jackass, who can't take criticism and turns every argument into a battle, because his tiny, little brain can't process information that's different than his own... Surely, all people are wrong, while, oh magnificent child of light, ONLY YOU ARE CORRECT.
If you don't like someone being disrespectful, why do you immediately stoop to the same level, and even worse?
But I don't really blame you. You're just a product of the negligence of your parents. I blame them.
But you have done so much to divert the actual topic, so let me remind you:
So, the conclusion here is that you ignored my question with "I don't care", I called you out as a person, who doesn't care, and you went with insults, because momma's boy is very special and nobody can say he is not...
The truth is that there are brain cells, who look for a new job, right there inside your brain. They are willing to work, but the neural economy is bad and they can't find none... But you overuse your amygdala for insulting anyone online, who dares to ask a question. A neural economy driven by your moto - "I don't care"...
Is my definition of you incorrect? Am I wrong to call you a bad researcher based on evidence? Have some time to think, and you will agree with me. Or you can activate your amygdala again... How well did that work in your past?
But I have a solution.
Listen to people and respond to them. If you play this "I don't care" thing, you just show that you lack empathy, and nobody likes such a person. Notice how many words I write because I have empathy towards you. Even insulted, I am still empathising, and providing reason.
To show you how much I know on the subject of human behavior, I would show you the alternative: You write insults in anger. Anger is making you think less, but react faster, so surely you wouldn't even read my message, but just lash out with insults as soon as you read something you don't agree. You won't read the full comment, so that is also how I will use this statement to prove that you don't listen, if it comes to that. Are you willing to give me exactly what I need to crush you? Or willing to accept criticism? That's your choice.
One other thing, if you wanted your child to be a good researcher, and it responded with "I don't care", I wonder how you would react... Probably with patience, showing the alternative by ironically contrast an ignorant decision, or helpful mentoring...
I wonder...
Wow dude, you just run your script and don't even try to understand where people are coming from (which would be obvious if you took a step back and red my initial comment).
All I did in this thread was to prompt the AI with the same question to see what it would answer. I then pasted the answer here. I wasn't arguing for or against the veracity of the photos (the claim) but wanted to see if the AI really did answer that way. Then you and the other new age flerf guy wrongfully concluded I was somehow defending the claim made by the model and felt the need to convince me otherwise.
How did I concluded that "you were somehow defending the claim made by the model" with the statement:
Please, explain.
I only asked you a question. You clearly mistook it for an attack. Because that's how fragile you are in real life.
That's the truth. But if you want to stand on your faulty logic - let's hear it.
How did I accuse you with a question that doesn't have anything connected to what you're saying?
Please, explain.
Because the question assumed I had a specific photo in mind and that I wasn't sure if it's altered or not.
Why ask me for an exact photo when you have all the info I have by looking at the AI reply I pasted?
Why would you reply something completely unconnected to begin with? Why not reply to the thread or make another one instead? Your comment was out of place and I viewed it in context.