Earff
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
Wow dude, you just run your script and don't even try to understand where people are coming from (which would be obvious if you took a step back and red my initial comment).
All I did in this thread was to prompt the AI with the same question to see what it would answer. I then pasted the answer here. I wasn't arguing for or against the veracity of the photos (the claim) but wanted to see if the AI really did answer that way. Then you and the other new age flerf guy wrongfully concluded I was somehow defending the claim made by the model and felt the need to convince me otherwise.
How did I concluded that "you were somehow defending the claim made by the model" with the statement:
Please, explain.
I only asked you a question. You clearly mistook it for an attack. Because that's how fragile you are in real life.
That's the truth. But if you want to stand on your faulty logic - let's hear it.
How did I accuse you with a question that doesn't have anything connected to what you're saying?
Please, explain.
Because the question assumed I had a specific photo in mind and that I wasn't sure if it's altered or not.
Why ask me for an exact photo when you have all the info I have by looking at the AI reply I pasted?
Why would you reply something completely unconnected to begin with? Why not reply to the thread or make another one instead? Your comment was out of place and I viewed it in context.
No, it doesn't.
You assumed it. Read it again.
I challenged the photo, not you.
It's a question that assumes the photo is faked, which it turned out to be. It's a question that triggers people to understand that these photos are faked, and challenge those, who think they are not fake. And if someone argues about a photo that is not fake, I would answer the challenge.
And this argument would still be about the photo, not personal insults.
Because I don't work for you. I have my own thoughts and meaning behind my thoughts.
Congratulations on checking with AI, but that wasn't my point. Hasn't anyone conversed with you and suddenly changed the conversation to something they just thought about? If that hasn't happened to you, I can assure you, it's pretty common in conversations.
Because it's a challenge to the validity of the statement of the AI, that you provided. Again - not to you. The photo and the AI statement only.
I think you just mistook it for an insult, as I am personally challenging your comment. But I was challenging the information in your comment, and you had an AI statement there.
I think it was all just a misunderstanding. I don't judge you for that, I had many of those, and I know the shame that comes afterwards when I realized that I was in the wrong AFTER spewing so many insults towards the other person, believing that I am correct...
Once I was so ashamed that I deleted all my comments to hide how incorrect I was... Then I thought about it, and I knew it wasn't fair to insult the person, who actually just gave me the correct information... I wrote personally to this person to apologize, and to my surprise, he immediately forgave me... I was expecting insults, mockery, and all the things I was doing to him... Yet, this person understood and simply forgave me... I was even more ashamed of my actions after that, but I wanted to be like this person - generous in victory, not to shame someone in their defeat... I'd probably never forget this act of kindness. It really shocked me then, I really hope to return the favor to someone one day.
But you realize I'm not one of those people and you reply to me, not some abstract "other people", correct? So what am I to think in this case? It's reasonable to contextualize what you wrote the way I did.
It didn't help that your reply came right after the other guy saying "Omg, you're a gullible idiot" implying I agree with the AI.
Very gracious of you and nice try at gaslighting. You were the one who insulted me first though, unless you consider "I don't care" to be an insult. It seems you just had another one of those interactions you talk about, but you don't seem ashamed of it.
You had an opportunity to do so here but chose to act as if you have the moral high ground somehow. It's bizarre really.
But yes, it was a misunderstanding that didn't need to devolve into insults, I give you that. I'm sorry I stooped to your level and i apologize.