5
ryry117 5 points ago +5 / -0

International wealthy elites run the world. So technically yes, both our government and adversaries.

1
ryry117 1 point ago +2 / -1

The more likely explanation is scientists are wrong about the earth being millions of years old, so they have to act "shocked" that an axe factory was found in an area that should be from millions of years ago.

3
ryry117 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not really the case for the US. Most states are the size of other countries.

3
ryry117 3 points ago +3 / -0

They really were in no position to do so by 1850 on up. After the war of 1812 failing, that was the last concern on anyone's mind.

If they could do that, why wouldn't they have invaded DURING the civil war?

1
ryry117 1 point ago +1 / -0

People are going to rag on you for mentioning Muslims but yes, we should be allied to them. I believe it is a psyop in our ranks for people to so vehemently hate them.

Christians and Muslims are based.

1
ryry117 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is getting way ahead of things anyway. I personally believe there are enough holes in evolution that the process existing is unlikely. Not even getting into the possibility of aliens guiding our evolution yet. If that were the case though you are right, it ultimately wouldn't change anything.

0
ryry117 0 points ago +2 / -2

Until God says the aliens have souls, I can't assume they do. The Bible only says Humans.

Not that I believe we will ever meet aliens. The universe is for mankind.

2
ryry117 2 points ago +2 / -0

We Humans alone are made in God's image. Any aliens that exist would have the divine purpose of serving us, and we would have the divine purpose of protecting them.

1
ryry117 1 point ago +1 / -0

See I agree with you partly, the safe radiation levels dissipate way faster than they claim, I agree. And you're right, those places are 99% safe today. People are living in the Japanese no go zones already today.

But radiation isn't a complete lie like you said at the beginning. There's fucked up changes to the birds and bugs at Chernobyl especially.

So would it end the world and kill the earth? Doubtful. Would it be the biggest chemical disaster ever and change the world forever? Yes.

1
ryry117 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you mean by the central bank? A country's central banking institution, or the global ones? Not every country even uses the global banks.

The obvious answer is nukes.

1
ryry117 1 point ago +1 / -0

We weren't lied to there. If you think otherwise, sneak into Chernobyl or the Japan nuclear meltdown sites. People have done it, the radiation is real.

We are just getting better at controlling it, like going from cannons to rifles.

I do suspect sometimes that the idea of the ENTIRE world ending to nukes is exaggerated, but so much would be destroyed it may as well have ended, I just think nature would bounce back faster than predicted.

1
ryry117 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is dumb.

2
ryry117 2 points ago +2 / -0

This certainly is a blackpill lol. 54 years is a VERY bleak estimate that I really doubt will come true.

2
ryry117 2 points ago +2 / -0

The silence from the European countries investigating is damning. They know the US did it.

1
ryry117 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yup.

I also like how it just keeps increasing. I think recently they've increased it to billions with no new studies done to confirm it.

2
ryry117 2 points ago +2 / -0

HOLY FUCK thank you. Carbon dating is the most laughable shit ever. We completely guessed on the half life age. We have no idea if we are measuring carbon's true half life.

6
ryry117 6 points ago +9 / -3

We have no way to show that sub species are new though, which would be required for evolution. As far as we know all these species have been around at the same time.

2
ryry117 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn that is unfortunate yeah lol. Granted it's not a very well known title for him so I figured anyone using it must know

2
ryry117 2 points ago +3 / -1

How many times is this video going to get passed around because it's the only thing people who are anti-trumpers but also anti-globalists can hold onto for their world view.

Maybe just admit Trump and his allies are the real deal or they wouldn't be getting raided by the actual globalist government agents right now?

When Trump is executed live on TV, is he still a globalist? Is it still all part of their controlled opposition plan?

Absolutely retarded take.

Light Bringer was Satan's name by the way. Though you're probably a fed (or worse) and know that.

3
ryry117 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alex Jones has been right about everything he says.

2
ryry117 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well said. I know about all this from years of being on the internet and watching it change and evolve and having first hand encounters with it all.

I'm sure older people would believe this because they treat technology like it's magic, and younger people would scoff at this because they don't actually grasp how powerful technology is and what it can do, or they are naïve on what companies will do.

by pkvi
2
ryry117 2 points ago +2 / -0

I fucking love pointing this out to people especially leftists. They always stare blank faced after that. It's hilarious.

I'm shocked they teach us about yellow journalism at all in school.

1
ryry117 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's failing because the people in charge are affirmative action hires.

And also because they named it after a pagan god lol.

Remember when we named things after Catholic sources and NASA prayed to God before missions? Weird how we had success back when doing this...

view more: Next ›