No evidence of evolution.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
Fairly certain the theory requires pressure and mutation. Discounting it based on such a shitty example has no value.
Let's instead look at hummingbirds, here we see a much shorter window of time to analyze and we are rewarded with a wide variety of change within the variants produced. Bordering speciation at the very least.
We can see the reason for the change, the pressure on the being. Go learn to learn.
We have no way to show that sub species are new though, which would be required for evolution. As far as we know all these species have been around at the same time.
Well, keep digging. You are suggesting that the variance between the various ones we have discovered does not reveal an incremental change. I think the onus is on you to show that one does not exist.
We can simply look at beaks to reduce it down.