Turns out it's specifically Satan, but that's a long story.
Here's one part of the story, though, where people get thrown off the trail: Baal (or Ba'al or Bel or Beel, etc) is usually translated as "lord". It also has the connotation of ownership, so a fuller translation might be something like "lord and master".
While this is just a title or descriptor and could apply to anyone--or any deity--in all my research I've only only come across one or two instances where I thought it might not be referring to Satan. But then, I also suspect that with deeper research I would have been able to make the connection.
So a "faraway" connection would be something like "Beelzebub" is really "Baal zevuv", usually translated "Lord of the Flies". This probably should be "Lord of the Flyers", and refers to Satan being the head of a faction who possessed flying vehicles.
In burial grounds containing longheads, they are often segregated, with finer clothing and better grave goods. I have no information on how thicc they were.
Interestingly, at that time in Israel there had been no Elites at all until shortly before David. He was only the third king. The first, Saul, only became king after the Israelites insisted Yahweh appoint one.
In between the two was a mysterious character named Eshbaal (<-- whaaaat?).
Just an off-topic observation on what does and what does not get through into different people's consciousnesses.
Col. MacGregor obviously has a superior knowledge of history, particularly concerning military matters. How then is it possible that this has escaped his studies?
Up to the morning of December 7, 1941, everything that the Japanese were planning to do was known to the United States….
-- Top Secret Report of Army Pearl Harbor Board (October 20, 1944)
Of course, the Harriman anecdote I read as just another item in the overall BS narrative. And I discount that MacGregor is part of a vast disnfo Pearl Harbor coverup.
Maybe the colonel is just not paranoid enough.
Fun Bible fact: King David was a longhead. If you look at the earlier translations and the Hebrew, he was said to be the "tallest from the shoulders up". Interestingly, this locks in with a couple of other facts.
It stems from the idea that these longheads seemed to be the Elites of their time. And it's not that Elites are considered beautiful, it's that they define what comes to be considered beautiful. How many men really liked fat butts before the Kardashians came along? Anyway....
The Bible says that David was the most beautiful man in the land. Here I would contend that it was precisely because his long head resembled that Elite standard of beauty.
Also, monkey-see monkey-do, so since people want to be beautiful, they end up always trying to emulate the Elite. And that's precisely why people would dream up the extremely bizarre practices of head-binding and cradle-boarding,
I said it somewhere else on this board before, but I see this as part of a recent "Night of the Long Knives" scenario. You know, the train is now departing for the last station and they have to throw everyone off who isn't totally "on board" for the whole ride.
Everyone can make what they will of today's unexpected development:
I would like to suggest everyone with an interest take a look at the replies to this same clip posted on the Jimmy Kimmel Live Twitter.
The Establishment stranglehold is becoming an Establishment pinch. Can you imagine being on the other end trying to control minds and this is where you're at?
The frozen ruins of capital of the Atlantean Empire.
Remember when all those Elites suddenly had to, uh, see penguins in their natural habitat, and how evidently those penguins are no longer interesting? It has never left my mind that Patriarch Kirill was one of them.
I've got my eye on you, Kiro!
If there are no nukes, then what turned the WTC to dust? Judy Wood says DEWs (are these really MTG's Jew space lasers?).
But then we are confronted with the problem of producing evidence for DEWs powerful enough to turn skyscrapers into dust, aren't we? Maybe we should start with DEWs powerful enough to turn a brick into dust. If someone has evidence of a brick turning to dust from a DEW, please link us to it.
Here's a funny cohencidence:
Hollywood & Highland Center’s design is based on the Babylon set from the 1916 film ‘Intolerance’
Not that I doubt They will keep trying to escalate, but I find it a real indication that They are backed into a corner and are simply taking the only available option, no matter how pointless.
Ukraine was the largest, most combat-ready military in NATO (just not formally). They're getting down to retirees and teens, with ladies up next. The other NATO militaries are a joke. They've just been letting the US pick up the bill for decades, never worried about actually fighting.
The US would be an exception, but all the strength is outside Europe. The RF has A++ anti-ship and air defense, so it's hard to see how much of that even survives intact to the battlefield.
Escalation makes no sense. They've lost and will continue to lose. It all just keeps driving the rest of the world not already under full hegemony farther away. I suppose for Them it's like Bluto says in "Animal House": "Nothing's over until we decide it is."
Russia has been holding off and stalling for time for over two decades. And I don't blame them. Even with all the damage that's been done, it's the smart strategy.
For example. it's a long story but the Kursk was torpedoed and sunk by an American and a British sub. Putin said nothing about that, and even let 23 survivors die at the bottom of the Barents so they could never tell the tale.
Sounds heartless, but the analysis is simple: if you're going to kill the king, kill the king. Not that that's even what they wanted, but they knew the king would eventually come to kill them. They needed all the time they could get to prepare and a gutted RF was not ready in August 2000.
So the scale finally tipped a year ago, and it's never going to tip back.
Western movies have become unwatchable, but the CGI is incredible, spectacular, mind-blowing.
(((They))) have always run Hollywood, of course, but if you read through the credits nowadays, it's almost all (((them))) in all areas. Except CGI.
Cohencidence?
This "offer" reads as ludicrous to me, and not just as a normal reaction to anything coming from the Neo-imperialist Establishment. For starters, are they disconnected enough to believe that Russia considers them viable counterparties to bargain with?
Russia will never trust the West again – Kremlin (RT 6/21/2022)
And that was back in June. How much have the repeated strike on civilians using HIMARS helped? How about fresh new promises to deliver depleted uranium munitions? For Russians in their right mind, Western capitulation is the only offer worthy of consideration.
But all this is simply to pose the question: who is such talk really aimed at? Western intelligentsia? Western normies? Themselves? Or have they become so deranged that it's just the noise of failing machinery, with no message and no audience?
One always have to look for things that don't exist but should. Relative to this example, can anyone think of the last time any reporter asked a subject, "Can you please give me your definition of X?"
Haha, me neither!
I guess I would just have this to say to everyone who has felt like a sheep that has realized what was going on, jumped the fence, and ran off the farm towards the smiling face and into the waiting arms of the guy next door: that rancher may not be your friend.
Like, maybe the first rancher might have even thought of that beforehand.
Just a quick, off-topic note for those interested in how the human mind really works. This regards the phrase "cracks in the narrative".
This crack is one of many hundreds in the COVID/vaxx narrative, and one of the many thousands in the collection of other narratives that make up the wolrdview of the vast majority of the population. If such a crack is to be likened to a crack in a dam, how much water do you see flowing through it?
I see almost none. One example would be Clott Adams. He's an intelligent, worldly human being with nothing but time on his hands for research. Look at the long and torturous journey he had to go on, even after being personally affected.
That being the case, why would TPTB give out these narratives in the first place? If I was forced to give a reason, it would be that the rest of us stay under the false impression that everyone else is being convinced by them. We will believe--wrongly--that as they are exposed, other people will begin to change their conclusions about the situation. No, they were never basing their conclusions on reasoning.
Not such a quick note after all, I guess.
You hit on a question which is absolutely key to the analysis of these different people: "Why did So-and-so do such-and-such?" for any big shift in their life.
If the answer isn't obvious, then an analyst should be able to come up with something reasonable. If the subject hasn't ever stated it themselves somewhere along the line, it really starts to glow.
As a current example, Ron DeSantis dropped out right in the middle of Harvard Law School to go work with Gitmo detainees, who as clients rank right up there with pedos in radioactivity level. He's never said why he did that, to my knowledge.
Many people take everything they see at face value, and others think we live in a computer simulation. The middle ground, part authentic and part artificial, where I believe the truth is to be found, is what most people can't handle.
The DeepFake of Hamlin is flawless in isolation. But then you look again at the side-by-side and think, "Did his eyebrows just decide to have different altitudes? Are they mad at each other?"