A wrong is an action that harms another sentient being. So of course it is wrong to kill an animal. And no, we do not need to eat meat in the day of modern agriculture and food distribution. Just ask any vegan if they need meat. I'm not saying immediately switch to veganism because that will cause health issues. But you can certainly adjust to a vegetarian and ultimately vegan lifestyle over time.
The William Cooper quote is exactly the justification that the psychopaths running the show use for the harm they cause the general population. They don't see the average person as being truly conscious, so they believe there aren't any karmic repercussions for violating their rights.
This Arlen Specter guy, what a clown. Unbelievable that anyone would believe such a nonsense theory. How do these people get away with such blatant lies time and time again? All these doctors and investigators all too cowardly to speak out.
For those interested in the truth, take a look at szamboti's paper on a realistic collapse scenario refuting the le and bezant paper: https :// www (dot) metabunk (dot) org/attachments/discussion-of-le-and-bazant-2011-paper-rebuttal-to-reviewer-and-second-submission-pdf.4734/
He clearly shows they fudged their numbers to get it to fit the data (ie collapsing at 2/3 g). Guess what? The journal refused to publish his refutation because it was "out of scope". So not only is it clearly demonstrated that the towers could not have fallen at the speed they did without the structural steel being substantially compromised (ie demolished with explosives or some exotic means), but you have journals complicit with the US government in covering up this fact.
Same is QM
There is a subtle difference. In the "classical" case, if we were to somehow hypothetically know the initial conditions to enough accuracy, we could predict the result. But bell's theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem) and the experimentally observed inequalities show that there are no "local hidden variables" that one could measure to determine the exact outcome in a quantum experiment. So either we are misunderstanding the problem and interpreting the bell experiments incorrectly (which I think is a definite possibility) or quantum behavior is just intrinsically different from macroscopic behavior in that we cannot absolutely predict anything.
Then you could get into David Bohm's ideas about the implicate and explicate orders of reality, and how perhaps there are "global hidden variables" that would determine the outcome of a quantum experiment that lie within an "implicate" order that is unseen to our "explicate" order of effects from this deeper order of reality.
He never said neutrinos are being used as a weapon. He said the detectors are being used as a weapon (specifically the 5k+ digital optical modules or DOMs). I'm not saying I agree with him, just clarifying what he said. He said while working as an electrician he found anomalous power draw from the station or something like this. I do suspect there are hidden activities going on at that base but I'm not convinced that the DOMs are a directed energy weapon.
You realize it has no intelligence, right? Its just a text generator.
Also, the traveling salesman problem is just a generic way to refer to a class of problems that involve factorial scaling. Its not literally referring to traveling between physical cities lol
I don't know where these exact graphs come from but you can find very similar plots in this paper: https://www.milbank.org/quarterly/articles/the-questionable-contribution-of-medical-measures-to-the-decline-of-mortality-in-the-united-states-in-the-twentieth-century/
How would that "dismantle the deep state"? Thats what I was referring to, you can't dismantle the deep state with their own legal system. Even if you won a class action lawsuit, these people have effectively infinite money, you'd be taking money from pawns at best. Keep in mind the monetary system is also in their control as well, and its all equally as fake as their judicial system.
The only way to "dismantle the deep state" is to change the minds of the "boots on the ground" of the deep state. Ie military, police, government bureaucrats, scientists, mafia members, gang members, etc. If they all quit their jobs for honest work then the deep state collapses because none of the people pulling the strings are actually getting their hands dirty doing the work. I know that sounds impossible but it is literally the only thing short of full scale warfare, which would only temporarily disrupt the deep state and wouldn't actually solve any problems long term (and would create massive amounts of suffering for everyone).
I find it funny that the correct reply to yours is downvoted and the one making it sound impossible and overly expensive is upvoted. I guess they really dont want people using their own email server.