Sign In or Create an Account
The source is Dr. Malone.
Who are Shannon Pettypiece, Heidi Przybyla, Laura Strickler and Meg Tirrell?
Or are we pretending that NBC is 100% consistent and articles should agree with each other? If you look at the links in the article you posted, they all link to other news articles. They don't go to original information anywhere.
Did you just cite a mainstream news article? Are you 12?
Purgery? Really? Fingers crossed that it is some crazy autocorrect error.
Graphene is also a good carrier for magnetite. It is reasonable for all of this to be linked. I'm also looking for the pieces of data. Youtube is not sciencey enough for me to use as a source.
I get like a bazillion hits on this topic. Unfortunately there isn't a direct strong statement. The magnetism is often incidental. Graphene is a generally good carrier material.
Because there are plenty of articles that mention graphene as a standard, though experimental, adjuvant, and that information from the university in Spain confirms that graphene is an unlisted ingredient. That all seems to make sense and feels consistent. Since graphene can gain some magnetism in the presence of iron oxide, it makes sense.
People in general don't know how to rationalize self-assembling magnetite. There is very little believable data. Would love some sources.
Most masons have no clue about any of this. Most are just old Fudds at a social club.
Acetone fast :-*
Interesting read, but overall doesn't really have a theme or point other than sharing experiences. Maybe that lends credence? Not much concrete to take away from it.
Why would they? Any proteins your body makes itself should not be causing clotting. Clotting originally is oxygen exposure, and we should look at what might be triggering the platelets.
I don't actually have any first hand, just putting together known properties of graphene with the information we heard from the University in Spain. Lots of questions to be answered still.
So are we guessing that 10-15 GHz radio bursts get absorbed by the graphene? Does that cause the clotting or are we still ignoring why the clots form.
I certainly hope people here realize it was the loss of state rights and maybe the true death of the united states.
Prequel for a staged invasion? Still says nothing about the earth.
why not both
No, ID was not required at locations in Washington
You can find NoID required in the posts for vax sites. If you go they do ask for insurance info but you can just play ignorant
Injecting a virus into a test animal is fine. Claiming it can or cannot crossover is separate.
That isn't optical. Electron microscopes don't see the same things.
I should add that there is no test where they have "reinfected" someone or something else using tissue from someone who has tested positive. This includes animal/bat tests. If I found such a test of course the bar for believable evidence would be damn high.
You can't discover virus because you can't test for it. Viruses are too small for any optical microscopy, and there is no proven DNA evidence except in silico which is latin for "i guessed using a computer".
The mossad agent evidence is partial. I don't think anyone is saying they didn't exist, but there is no reason to believe they were the only part of the equation. They could have been separate, or complementary.
I have seen, in person, incredibly realistic projections several times in my life, as far back as the 1980s. In all cases, I could not tell what was the projector. The only explanation for that technology not being commercialized is that it is under a secrecy order. I assume that in the late 80s all commercial applications were forbidden. They want us to believe that holograms are fiction, since then we cannot disbelieve our eyes.
Watched your video. I don't fault any of the logic.
The video does appear just as it did to me two decades ago. Gives me new perspective. Thanks for sharing.
I dunno man, I researched it myself, and I can say that I find no proof viruses exist.
That no flight paths go near the south pole is concerning.
... and tell me to watch 30 hours of garbage
... and tell me to watch 30 hours of garbage
I mean, you don't have to pick a side, just admit where the evidence has a proper chain of custody. Where we can really rely on facts. Complaining that you would have to learn stuff to understand stuff doesn't really help your case.
Watching it basically live on TV that day, it struck me, in my youth, as a controlled demolition.