Could you please share the direct mp4 link to this video (ex. https://seed167.bitchute.com/MuyEGB7kVnCp/RHBUvpxPdboi.mp4)?
Unfortunately the standard bitchute link is blocked in many countries because it “incites hatred”.
It sure doesn’t help us determine what the sun is or where the power for it comes from - but i do find observations like this very interesting and compelling.
In any case, we can be certain the “giant flaming fart in the sky” theory is nothing but hot air.
From wikipedia “Konrad von Hochstaden at the tower of Cologne City Hall standing atop an autofellatio-performing grotesque.”
I didn’t do much research on it, but supposedly no one quite knows who did this or why.
Archbishop of Cologne (1238 – 1261), von Hochstaden wielded great influence in imperial affairs but was a controversial and contentious figure. Ultimately, to generate funds for continuing work on the cathedral, he initiated a tax on hops (thus raising the price of beer), a move that may have influenced the grotesque ornamentation added by stone carvers at the base of his statue.
He also was supposedly always fighting with the people of cologne and using “unscrupulous” methods. He plotted to kill the king, and sold his vote for the new king for a high price. Sounds like he did plenty to earn the privilege.
Supposedly the tower it appears on was largely destroyed by allied bombing, and rebuilt... I wonder wether this was recarved, or even present on the original? It might be interesting to research further.
Anybody advocating for a warning shot should be ignored
I wasn’t really advocating for warning shots, and i recognize their strategic issues.
It was more an expression of frustration and disbelief. There is very little “defensive” about pointing a gun at someone’s head and then putting a bullet through it when they don’t immediately comply with your demands :(. This act was offensive in every sense of the word, and i for one doubt the officer was in any sort of danger to warrant their actions.
What should happen is the officer should at least be charged with excessive force, if not murder. Though i suppose there could be extenuating circumstances that might have justified firing with intent to wound - i highly doubt there was cause to shoot with intent to kill (f*ing headshot)
They could have at least fired a warning shot...
while wasting an enormous amount of effort
Reading and writing a few sentences isn’t an “enormous amount” of effort for most of us :(
It's sad that you needed me
No one needs a troll like you. If you are a human being, i urge you to reconsider - for your own sake.
LOL Self-own of the year
Thanks for proving my point.
Note to self : bothering to respond to you at all is a “self own” :(
How do you get the seed?
Good question. You may want to ask u/SystemGay as they frequently post it (ex. https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/16ZXHSs0V0/the-future-of-car-theft/c)
Goes on to show, explain or demonstrate NONE of it
Why waste effort to throw pearls before swine, or worse - the disingenuous, disearnest, and/or unwilling? I did invite you, and anyone earnestly interested, to explore the evidence! You ignore the invitation just like you ignore the evidence :(. If you are ever actually interested in such evidence or discussions - you know where to find me and ask your questions!
and you are either part of a cult or the Federal government
I understand, better than most, why you think that. However, it is unlikely that you have met an earnest flat earth researcher like myself before. The heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop propagates (and encourages) this false view to suppress the subject. I am against cults, and against psyops. The real question you should be asking is why such an expensive psyop exists to suppress and ridicule a subject that is already ostensibly stupid by default...
So you don't have any proof of FE
What an odd statement. There is plenty of evidence (which can subjectively serve as proof, depending on beholder) for a flat world, though that doesn’t make it so. If you are interested in learning about/discussing/criticizing such evidences - please join us on flatearthresearch!
and instead just make fun of others
If merely repeating something stupid someone (elon) said is “making fun”. Didn’t you yourself remark that it made no sense? Weren’t you making fun of him as well, unknowingly?
Rumble works! Thanks!
What if I told you that you believe/push childish nonsense and have zero evidence for the shit you spew?
I’d tell you again that i have lots of evidence to support my views - however you will need to be capable of earnest discussion with me first in order to know that.
without anything to back them up besides childish insults
The childish insults are your bag :( I don’t need to resort to such petty rhetorical tricks (ad hom), because my ideas and evidences stand on their own merits. Only the intellectually weak resort to attacking the thinker because they aren’t competent/able to attack the thought.
Says you :(
Don’t be a ball/baal worshipper!
Lol. Don’t shoot the messenger!
It’s an elon quote to excuse/rationalize the outrageous fraud of phony “space footage”, like his tesla orbiting the earth.
As accountdoesntexist requested, could you please share the direct mp4 link to this video (ex. https://seed167.bitchute.com/MuyEGB7kVnCp/RHBUvpxPdboi.mp4)?
The main bitchute url you shared is blocked for many people due to supposedly containing “incitement to hatred”.
Agreed.
More than this pain in the ass (which can be circumvented by sharing the direct mp4 link instead of the bitchute url, ex. https://seed167.bitchute.com/MuyEGB7kVnCp/RHBUvpxPdboi.mp4), they silently delete videos after a certain amount of time and pretend that the video is still up/accessible. Bitshit should certainly be avoided for these reasons.
This video is also blocked for incitement to hatred :(
Please share the direct mp4 link as well/instead in the future (ex. https://seed167.bitchute.com/MuyEGB7kVnCp/RHBUvpxPdboi.mp4) as that one will not be blocked like the main bitchute url is.
It seems she was not vaxxed.
Supposedly she was a scientology nut, and made many public statements announcing that she would not be getting juiced.
Who’s a bot?
You? The OP? The youtube video author? 925thejoyisgone?
The only one i’m absolutely certain isn’t a bot is me ;P
Oh, well. Sorry, its not real
But of course it is, and has been for thousands of years. I understand what you are saying, and why you are saying it - but it is not semantically correct. You may think that it is a minor quibble, and who cares anyway - but in my view it is much more important than that.
When you claim that “gravity” isn’t real / doesn’t exist, it encourages others to misunderstand you and think you are foolish. The law of [phenomenon of] gravity is very real, and as we both know is caused by density (of the object and the surrounding media). Gravity the term and observable phenomenon (“what goes up, must come down”) has been around for millennia. There is no reason to discard it now, and scientifically it is very important that we don’t. We must have a name for phenomena that is different than the theories which describe/explain it. In the case of gravity, an attack on the foundation of science has taken place where the two have been conflated together. This is the reason for the word gravitation (the thing which doesn’t exist, in our view), which is separate and distinct from gravity - but most are not taught rigorously.
The real reason things go up and back down is because of density and boyancy
Agreed, but in science - natural laws (aka descriptions of phenomena) like gravity do not and cannot speculate on cause/reason. They are simply what is, without any why. Reason/cause/why is bore of theory which is bore of experiment. As you probably know, there are no experiments supporting the theory of gravitation and newton famously didn’t even offer a hypothesis for it {a necessary prerequisite to experiment of any kind).
What sets direction, up or down, is the electrostatic media, the Aether, which has a charge that flows to the ground.
I find this possible, but not strictly necessary to recognizing the cardinal directions.
Its not a force
Agreed. In fact, most mainstream physicists are also taught that today.
So you can easily exchange little g for 9.8 m2 acceleration in any physics formula.
You can, but that is yet another demonstration that gravitation (the little g stands for gravitational acceleration, NOT gravity) is fictional. It would violate the conservation of energy which is a cornerstone of most all science. Acceleration costs energy. To say, or mathematically describe, objects at rest accelerating perpetually is both stupid and wrong. If only it were so, we could extract limitless energy from any stationary object.
I disagree slightly with that verbiage.
In my view, gravity (the phenomenon/natural law) is very real and has been defined/known for thousands of years. In its most simple form it is the statement, “what goes up, must come down”.
It is gravitation (the theory, and hypothetical gravity wave of which it is speculatively comprised, and presumed cause of the phenomenon/law of gravity), invented a few centuries ago, which doesn’t exist (outside of equation, anyway).
Hence “Sic semper tyrannis”
Alternatively, lincoln tried to exercise congress’ right to print money and the tyrants (bankers) capped him...
This person clearly hasn’t thought it through :(
If, like that insufferable fraud hutchinson, this person is claiming that combinations of conventional radio wave frequencies are “gravity waves” then they should be able to demonstrate them. I’d quite like a gravity gun; it would bring things to me.
Speaking of which, if these radio towers were actually creating gravity waves - why wouldn’t they pull things (like clouds) towards the emitters and/or created radio wavefronts? Wouldn’t things above and below them also be attracted, like people below the wavefront suddenly losing weight and things above them suddenly gaining it?
A common speculative excuse given for why gravity waves remain undiscovered (assuming they exist at all) and unmanipulable/ungeneratable is that the power required for them is thought astronomical, and because gravity is believed to be such a weak force - the results would be less than impressive.
The nice people in their comments tried to explain it to them so they wouldn’t sound so willfully uninformed, but they were dismissed as “flat earthers”. It is a prominent view of physicists that gravity waves do not exist.
Thoughts?
In my view, and the view of our ancestors, the planets are actually planets. It is earth which isn’t.
Planets are stars which move differently than the other stars (“wandering stars”). Earth is terra firma, and not a star (aka light in the sky).
The rodenberrian “planet” is an invention of fiction majorly popularized through television.
UAP’s, which is to say - specifically - flying saucers and related flying craft are primarily clandestine surveillance vehicles. They were first mass produced around the 40’s.
They are built by the same (and only) creature that builds all the other flying craft in the sky.
Aliens are entirely fictional, modern, and modern fiction is their obvious/unambiguous origin. They have been falsely conflated with ufology systematically (what we call today a psyop) to discredit, subvert, and disable any serious research, investigation, or discussion of the subject since their first public sightings.