building one of those huge webs
Like the world wide web...and suddenly everyone's in a conspiracy?
the players weren't connected via red lines
Bloodlines...
the melting of
Nature separates being...if beings choose to come together, then the continuation of natural separation melts togetherness away.
Flow (inception towards death) melts form (life)...unless resisted.
you can draw a line to
Only within a line can one draw shapes...
where are the true conspiracy theorists?
Consenting to the synthesis of the "true conspiracy theorist" label prevents one from seeing the one who analyzes what others synthesize.
Fundamentally...nature represents the process of analysis, which allows each being within to discern self by analyzing aka taking apart. Theories and conspiracies represents artificial synthesis, designed to distract one from self discernment towards consensus with others.
consume...
...implies summoning (sum) together (con) aka sovereign (jew) summoning commonwealth (gentiles) together. Suggestion represents the summoning; consensus the coming together of individual consent.
conspiracy theory as consumable
What enables others to summon (sum) together (con) conspiracy theories? Ones free will of choice...
How jews destroy civilization
Destruction aka de (to divide) struct (structure) ion (action) implies the state of being a divided structure within enacting nature. It's civilization which secularly organizes a commonwealth (gentiles) under a divided sovereign (jew).
Destruction implies natural (analysis); civilization implies artificial (synthesis).
all reason
Reason implies one vs one, while ignoring all separating each one from one another.
the meaning of "becoming Christ" (Anointed)
Coming to be implies a process of separation...meaning implies a measurement taken into possession. Anointment prevents friction during a process, while possession destroys anointment by friction.
In my review of theology there is no...
Theo (god) implies everything...logy (logic) tempts one to contemplate everything or nothing.
evolution (i.e. change)
Change implies the linear progression of action into reaction...evolution aka ex (out) volvere (to roll) tion (action) shapes linear progression into circular regression.
From God to being...where's the circle?
various unique lives...connects lives
Connecting destroys variance and uniqueness.
we have the core absolutes agreed
a) How do agreeing minds protect various unique lives?
b) Why does agreed imply A GREED?
c) Core/cor - "heart"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/core
As one lays ones ear on ones pregnant wife's belly to discern each various unique living heart...what necessitates agreement?
clone
Natural cloning implies each different effect from the same source (a differentiation). Artificial cloning implies effect ignoring cause for affection to one another (a duplication).
Few suggesting information to shape a consensus among many...that's a clone factory.
Many under few aka students under teachers aka followers under teachers aka voters under representatives aka commonwealth under sovereign aka laymen under cleric aka slaves under master etc....those are clones.
a) Suggested crisis aka "a point at which change must come" tempts one to ignore that coming into being implies within change.
Stability (inception towards death) generates crisis (life)...
b) Actors who are directed are re-acting...not acting. Being implies reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death)...a jew suggests acting to invert gentile reaction.
c) Behind implies "hindering being"...a jew suggests an artificial narrative upfront to tempt gentiles behind it.
the problem is of course that every one above certain size is infiltrated
Solution (inception towards death) generates problem (life) through internal division. Unifying consensus; committees and correspondences together permits another to utilize natural division to enter the ever expanding rift among the conflicting opposites of any group.
Conflict aka reason establishes a versus/verto - "to turn", which nature moves straight through, hence opening up any circular conflict to the one who can think straight.
Logic establishes a circular course within the minds of those who ignore natures linear progression. The resulting conflict of reason implies a collision course.
have only 2 options
Each ones only option implies free will of choice.
They know its do or die.
The process of dying implies the foundation for the potential of living. Process does; potential responds to being done. The process of dying flowing through formed life implies knowledge.
Its not a matter of "if". It's a matter of "when".
If/then implies the moving foundation for any matter within...when implies a measurement taken by matter in ignorance of motion. The only time matter within motion can perceive implies "now".
This group has been luring jews into the dark side
Group and jews implies suggested pluralism, which tempts each singular who joins in-between sides darkening ones sight.
In-between others one can see less...look at how rubberneckers are struggling against one another for the best position to see.
mislead honest jews in the Temple
Temple/tem - "to cut" implies the division of all nature into each being. Entering a temple for the taking of auspices (omens) artificially inverts natural division.
Its pure evil.
Evil vs good imply artificial impurities turned against one another, while ignoring the natural purification process.
No more authoritarianism
Author/aug - "to increase"...decrease (inception towards death) generates increase (life); a jew suggests authoritarianism to tempt gentiles to follow along instead of resisting the decrease to increase.
Within loss; there always will be more growth.
they had us in the palm of their grip
Few offer US (unites states) freely...it's many who grip and struggle to hold it together, while ignoring that nature divides any united states within.
They + us aka pluralism only exists within each ones singular mind...if held onto.
Pride in the disguise of modesty.
expose nuclear fusion
Nature imposes; being exposes. Being implies nature's nucleus. Suggested fusion (to become liquid) inverts perceivable defusion (to become solid).
Consenting to any suggestion permits few to fuse many together into consensus, while corrupting the nucleus of each ones perception within all perceivable.
storage locker
How does one "store age"? As suggested history; locked within ones consenting mind/memory-storage...
Both names for the enemy are fine, there are different circumstances
What if en-e-my (within me) isn't circumstantial, but central?
The larp is things like "Church of..."
What if church implies the body of christ (each anointed one)? What if entering any suggested church makes one "alike" instead of "apart" from one another?
not it the surface sense
Aka not external (circumferential) but internal (central)...
we call the enemy
We implies one among many, enemy implies within one...joining the former makes it harder to disassemble the latter. Others suggest "we" to tempt one into circumference, and "enemy" to distract one from center.
the same core concept.
The core of sameness (inception towards death) implies differentiation (life), hence core/cor - "heart".
to know what I'm clicking on and why
You're clicking on a crawlers internal net to signal within a world wide web where the prey is at. Each click translates to "HEY PREDATOR...I'M OVER HERE"
People in the "conspiracy" sector tend to expose themselves
a) Sector implies a division; exposure implies a unification...that's a contradiction held within self, which permits another to exploit one.
b) The words "people"; "themselves" and "conspiracy" imply plurality aka to unite with one another artificially, while ignoring to be divided from one another naturally.
c) Few tempt many together into plurality, which when used as a sector (section of a circle) can be cut into two opposing sides. The circle within self represents logic, which turns outwards into a conflict of reason against one another.
Logic confines thinking, while reason exposes those self confined against one another.
to all sorts of theories
Theory/theos (God) implies singularity; sorts (arranging in sequence) implies plurality. Few sor-ting many implies the use of sor-cery.
All doesn't sort together...all divides each one within from one another hence setting each one free (will of choice).
the accidental (or divinely ironic) state
A state implies a potential during a process aka an internal division (divination) of ironic/eironikos (to dissemble) during accident/accidere (fall out).
Falling out (inception towards death) while being (life) dissembled from one another...
If you wish to participate...
...then you ignore wishing (summoning) contradicts participating as a particle within whole. Wishing simply implies wanting more than needed...this generates the happy merchant of temptation selling whatever one wants more of, while exploiting the ignored need.
Where is your mind at right now?
Here. At the center of motion...tempted by emotion into circumference. Right/reg - "to move in a straight line".
What do you think of the reality we are in
One ignores responding (re) to all (al) when holding onto the fictitious WE aka nosism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we
probabilistically
Another fictitious distraction from reality... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilism aka seeking approval from one another, while ignoring self discernment.
Probability implies skepticism aka denying perceivable knowledge by seeking suggested understanding.
'certainties' has been mostly surpassed
Nature moves, hence passing each being within in-between (above/below)...others tempt one to ignore that by tempting ones mind to ascertain aka to affix suggested information; beliefs; definitions; truth; names; dates; historical narratives; equations; laws etc.
if you are 'certain' sure speak your mind.
Sound moves through mind/memory before one can choose to articulate spoken words into certainties to share with one another. Doing so implies "spell-craft"...
i will start
Only in-between start (inception) and finish (death) can there be will (life)..."we didn't start the fire; it was always burning".
Keep in mind
That's the circular distortion of a mind thinking straight. Nature moves through each being...one cannot keep anything mentally or physically. One needs to let go, while resisting the wanted temptation to keep holding onto.
The more one resists, the more resistance grows, yet the more one falls for temptation, the less resistance one has to resist.
to state their own and not a comment on my own
One cannot own what all gives each one for free...any claimed ownership tempts one another to reclaim.
a nested reality
Suggested information held within ones consenting mind represents the fictitious nest keeping one from flying as response (re) within all (al).
mechanic
That's half of my learned trait (electro-mechanic) and guess what it implies...elect (choice) mecha/magh (to be able), hence free will of choice.
news-reporter
a) Few suggest N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) to draw many from center into circumference. Why? To erect self at center, while cutting others off circumference aka "circumcision".
b) RE (to respond) PORT/PER (to pass over)...a jew utilizes reporter to tempt gentiles to pass over (inception towards death) being (life) by responding to suggested information as self inflicted burden upon mind/memory.
Are these bad?
The (singular) and these (plural)...both derived from theos (God). Applying good or bad establishes the conflict in-between both.
You sure believe they are.
a) You implies versus me...an internal conflict.
b) Assurance tempts one to take a hold of suggestions from one another, hence binding ones free will of choice by consent.
Assure; verb - "to bind by a pledge"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/assure
c) Believe; verb - "be persuaded of the truth of" and "credit upon the grounds of authority or testimony without complete demonstration, accept as true"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/believe
Believing implies binding ones free will of choice to another aka given self up, while permitting another to take authority over self.
d) They once again implies the artificial plurality tempting one to ignore the natural singularity of theos. There cannot be a "they" unless one chooses to count other ones together, which then will be used by a chosen one to hold one accountable.
No it doesn't.
Aka "nothing it does nothing"...if God does everything, then what is that it which does nothing?
When and where has this (you dominate me) happened?
Me implies I AM (je suit; jesus); you implies YOU ARE (judah; jew). Where? At the foot of a cross. When? When the nail was driven into.
The nail implies DE-NIAL; a cross implies ACROSS...one denies being moved across, when asking others what happened aka what came about by chance... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/happen
it never happened
Never aka "nothing ever" implies ones denial of everything ever forwarding each temporal thing within, and it's suggested happenstance which tempts one to deny choice given by taking a chance.
Everything gives each things choice...nothing comes by chance taken. Look at the Seinfeld "nothing pitch" aka how a jew pitches nothing to tempt another to take a chance.
It only happened in your...WordGame
Again...happen implies "come by chance", hence your use of game, which implies gambling aka misusing choice given to take a chance.
stupid fantasy
Fantasy/phainein - "to bring to light" implies motion bringing matter to light by stupid/stupor/steu - "to push".
Here's a sleight of hand for pushing: https://genius.com/Paul-engemann-scarface-push-it-to-the-limit-lyrics
The only people...are brain-damaged
Only implies singular; people implies plural...it's holding onto this contradiction which damages ones brain.
outside religion...
...implies each beings IN-SIGHT.
Everyone else has religion of some kind
Kind implies alike one another...one implies apart from one another aka every (cause) differentiating each (effect).
Else/el - "God"...what else could there be?
Not in the end, no.
IN implies being within aka in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death). Not implies ones denial of the whole process for a suggested outcome by another like for example life after death.
What you ignore when seeking dominance at outcome is God aka the dominating origin of each ones free will of choice within.
piledriver
Nature drives (inception towards death) each being (life) apart from one another...a jew piles gentiles together if each gentile consents to be driven by a jew.
Where does a jew drive the piled up gentiles? Towards death with the help of nature, hence effortlessly dominating those who willingly submit to be driven like cattle by the use of god/gad - "a goad, sharp pointed stick to drive oxen"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gad
(there are no sides) ...blatantly false.
Hold your left hand out to the left and look at it while moving your body in a circle...now everything in your circumference is left without a right. Afterwards do the same measurement for the right and you'll notice that sides aren't real...only ones sight in-between.
Sides represent artificial measurements held onto, while being (life) moved within a straight line (inception towards death) by nature.
I'm hurling solid and liquid
Only within liquid can solid be hurled at one another. For example...water and stone are both solid, which is why water can be solidified, and stone liquefied...both representing the shaping of matter within motion.
Noah/noach - "rest" aka the patriarch of the flood. Patriarch implies God the father, and flood the motion thereof, hence the unmoved (rest) mover of flowing (inception towards death) form (life).
No rest for the wicked though...
You believe that is a bad thing.
You vs me + believe vs disbelieve + good vs bad...choosing either side binds ones free will of choice into a conflict; a hierarchical conflict, with ones side "standing-under" the other aka an imbalance of dominance.
That's why you (judah) dominates me (jesus); why those outside religion dominate those within, and why bad always dominates good.
Knowledge moves, which generates the balance for choice to adapt on the known ledge...there are no sides (inception/death) for one (life) to hold onto within knowledge.
Knowledge implies liquid (analysis of inspiration); understanding implies solid (synthesis of information).
borderline
Being within nature implies center (life) of bordered line (inception towards death).
Get a job
a) To be implies one piece of all work. Getting aka taking into possession contradicts being potential set free within procession.
b) What employment would you recommend for free will of choice?
until you break it down with logic
Logic synthesizes suggested information together; confines it to circular thinking inwardly, and turns into conflicts of reason outwardly against anyone else.
Breaking down implies analysis by implication (if/then)...a straight way of thinking without internal or external conflict.
How many...fake identity scams
Each. Nature differentiates each thing within from one another...others suggest identity/identical - "same" to manipulate perception. Accepting and exchanging identity implies diplomacy aka two (di) fold (plo) magic (macy).
So you ignore the deception inside the mossad title? Neither can there be an ex-mossad, nor can a being exist which isn't an institute.
He that striveth with God (yisra'el) does it while standing within (mossad)...
ex-mossad
Ex implies outwards; mossad aka institute (standing within) implies expressing outwards from within.
Death ends matter transfer. Life (being) goes on.
Being implies temporal material essence...transferred within ongoing motion. Dying implies process; living implies potential...hence the potential of length in-between beginning and end.
So free will is given by dominance over perception
You chose to view given will and perception within the confines of an over vs under conflict. Choice implies in-between balance...choosing over or under implies imbalance for ones choice.
The trick of logic (circular thinking) and reason (turning against one another) is about tempting ones choice into imbalance by choosing a side.
Only in-between sides can one wield sight...suggested sides put blinders upon ones sight, just like any book tempts ones sight in-between covers.
Free and dominant are not split.
Ongoing dominance (inception towards death) splits internally into temporal free will of choice (life).
In christian terms...the splitting represents the spiritual moving through the essential.
Patience endures this way
Way implies patience; being implies wanderer within patience; tempted by haste. The process of dying implies patience; living within implies the need to resist the wanted temptation of haste.
Few suggest progressivism to hasten many into self destruction by impatience.
nature endures
Endure implies being within/en (life) natural duress (inception towards death). What's the opposite of duress? Free-dom...
pre-Christian
Pre aka before implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life). The separation between all forwarding and each forwarded one within implies christ (to anoint), hence establishing the body of "each" christ by holy (whole) divination (division into partial).
The trick; ian/ianus/an - "pertaining to aka holding onto a possession". That's why one has to join to be a christ-IAN, which sacrifices being anointed (christ).
Each one within all implies christ...joining one another makes one a christ-ian aka anti-christ.
God was perceptible
- God (motion) > perceivable (momentum) > perception (matter)
- God (light) > perceivable (spectrum) > perception (ray)
What will be has not been made known.
Only within all known can each one come into being..."not been" implies a beings free will of choice to deny (nihilo; nothing) everything known.
Death is an end
Motion WAS, before momentum (inception towards death) generates matter (life) to suggest one another what IS. Death doesn't end motion; it ends the transfer of each particular matter.
free-will-of-choice is tempted to split free and bound
Freedom implies that one can only be free (life) within dominance (inception towards death)...bondage is based on denying dominance by binding ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion aka willing submission.
Natural dominance gives free will of choice; artificial submission is taken by free will of choice.
Perceivable dominates free perception...suggestion binds free will of choice if consented to.
Patience always wins
a) Suggested "always" implies more than one way...all perceivable moving through each ones perception implies the one and only way.
b) Wins vs loses implies an endurance conflict on an artificial timer aka patience vs haste.
Outside that circular conflict...nature implies patience (inception towards death); being (life) implies the struggle to resist the temptation of hasting. Nature endures; being succumbs.
Because you act like
Because implies each being differentiated from one another within cause aka action differentiating reaction. Few suggest actors and like-minded behavior to manipulate different reactions among many.
if people say something that something...
a) If people (plural), then summation of person (singular), hence your use of some-thing.
b) If saying, then articulation of sound, while ignoring person aka per sonos (by sound).
c) If God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all); then person implies each one by all of sound aka a singularity.
If you quit your word game
a) If implies then...an ongoing process, which one cannot quit. Others suggest that one can quit anything as to distract from quit/quietus - "free"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=quit
Only within a process (inception towards death) can potential (life) be free (choice), which also implies the sound of silence.
b) Game implies a gamble aka ones given choice taking a chance. You took a chance with the meaning of the word "quit", while gambling away your "free" will of choice in the process.
If you use reason...
...then circular reasoning (using vs not using) confines linear implication (if/then). Within nature there's no conflict in-between using vs not using; unless one ignores being (life) used (inception towards death) by nature.
magical
Aka mag (to be able) i (within) al (all)...it's all which enables each one within. You holding onto a different meaning for the word magic, like "the art or practice of using charms, spells, or rituals to attempt to produce supernatural effects or control events in nature" instead of naturally analyzing the artificial word magical...that holds you under the spell of another.
as it gets
Coming into being implies that one GOT all nature has to offer, hence the free will of choice to respond. Getting implies wanting to take into possession; got implies process freeing potential, hence the need to respond.
Bitter/bheid (to split) + rebel/rebellare (to respond to war)...before one can respond to war there has to be a split in-between the sides waging war against one another.
Compassion (passing together within action) is being suggested to tempt the natural split into an artificial conflict against one another, hence love vs hate reasoning aka a STREIT.
a) Inbreeding still counts as breeding...
b) Natalie Rheims (cousin of David De Rothschild): "Vice is nice, but incest is best".