c) Believe; verb - "be persuaded of the truth of" and "credit upon the grounds of authority or testimony without complete demonstration, accept as true"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/believe
Believing implies binding ones free will of choice to another aka given self up, while permitting another to take authority over self.
d) They once again implies the artificial plurality tempting one to ignore the natural singularity of theos. There cannot be a "they" unless one chooses to count other ones together, which then will be used by a chosen one to hold one accountable.
No it doesn't.
Aka "nothing it does nothing"...if God does everything, then what is that it which does nothing?
When and where has this (you dominate me) happened?
Me implies I AM (je suit; jesus); you implies YOU ARE (judah; jew). Where? At the foot of a cross. When? When the nail was driven into.
Never aka "nothing ever" implies ones denial of everything ever forwarding each temporal thing within, and it's suggested happenstance which tempts one to deny choice given by taking a chance.
Everything gives each things choice...nothing comes by chance taken. Look at the Seinfeld "nothing pitch" aka how a jew pitches nothing to tempt another to take a chance.
It only happened in your...WordGame
Again...happen implies "come by chance", hence your use of game, which implies gambling aka misusing choice given to take a chance.
stupid fantasy
Fantasy/phainein - "to bring to light" implies motion bringing matter to light by stupid/stupor/steu - "to push".
Only implies singular; people implies plural...it's holding onto this contradiction which damages ones brain.
outside religion...
...implies each beings IN-SIGHT.
Everyone else has religion of some kind
Kind implies alike one another...one implies apart from one another aka every (cause) differentiating each (effect).
Else/el - "God"...what else could there be?
Not in the end, no.
IN implies being within aka in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death). Not implies ones denial of the whole process for a suggested outcome by another like for example life after death.
What you ignore when seeking dominance at outcome is God aka the dominating origin of each ones free will of choice within.
piledriver
Nature drives (inception towards death) each being (life) apart from one another...a jew piles gentiles together if each gentile consents to be driven by a jew.
Where does a jew drive the piled up gentiles? Towards death with the help of nature, hence effortlessly dominating those who willingly submit to be driven like cattle by the use of god/gad - "a goad, sharp pointed stick to drive oxen"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gad
(there are no sides) ...blatantly false.
Hold your left hand out to the left and look at it while moving your body in a circle...now everything in your circumference is left without a right. Afterwards do the same measurement for the right and you'll notice that sides aren't real...only ones sight in-between.
Sides represent artificial measurements held onto, while being (life) moved within a straight line (inception towards death) by nature.
I'm hurling solid and liquid
Only within liquid can solid be hurled at one another. For example...water and stone are both solid, which is why water can be solidified, and stone liquefied...both representing the shaping of matter within motion.
The (singular) and these (plural)...both derived from theos (God). Applying good or bad establishes the conflict in-between both.
a) You implies versus me...an internal conflict.
b) Assurance tempts one to take a hold of suggestions from one another, hence binding ones free will of choice by consent.
Assure; verb - "to bind by a pledge"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/assure
c) Believe; verb - "be persuaded of the truth of" and "credit upon the grounds of authority or testimony without complete demonstration, accept as true"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/believe
Believing implies binding ones free will of choice to another aka given self up, while permitting another to take authority over self.
d) They once again implies the artificial plurality tempting one to ignore the natural singularity of theos. There cannot be a "they" unless one chooses to count other ones together, which then will be used by a chosen one to hold one accountable.
Aka "nothing it does nothing"...if God does everything, then what is that it which does nothing?
Me implies I AM (je suit; jesus); you implies YOU ARE (judah; jew). Where? At the foot of a cross. When? When the nail was driven into.
The nail implies DE-NIAL; a cross implies ACROSS...one denies being moved across, when asking others what happened aka what came about by chance... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/happen
Never aka "nothing ever" implies ones denial of everything ever forwarding each temporal thing within, and it's suggested happenstance which tempts one to deny choice given by taking a chance.
Everything gives each things choice...nothing comes by chance taken. Look at the Seinfeld "nothing pitch" aka how a jew pitches nothing to tempt another to take a chance.
Again...happen implies "come by chance", hence your use of game, which implies gambling aka misusing choice given to take a chance.
Fantasy/phainein - "to bring to light" implies motion bringing matter to light by stupid/stupor/steu - "to push".
Here's a sleight of hand for pushing: https://genius.com/Paul-engemann-scarface-push-it-to-the-limit-lyrics
Only implies singular; people implies plural...it's holding onto this contradiction which damages ones brain.
...implies each beings IN-SIGHT.
Kind implies alike one another...one implies apart from one another aka every (cause) differentiating each (effect).
Else/el - "God"...what else could there be?
IN implies being within aka in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death). Not implies ones denial of the whole process for a suggested outcome by another like for example life after death.
What you ignore when seeking dominance at outcome is God aka the dominating origin of each ones free will of choice within.
Nature drives (inception towards death) each being (life) apart from one another...a jew piles gentiles together if each gentile consents to be driven by a jew.
Where does a jew drive the piled up gentiles? Towards death with the help of nature, hence effortlessly dominating those who willingly submit to be driven like cattle by the use of god/gad - "a goad, sharp pointed stick to drive oxen"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gad
Hold your left hand out to the left and look at it while moving your body in a circle...now everything in your circumference is left without a right. Afterwards do the same measurement for the right and you'll notice that sides aren't real...only ones sight in-between.
Sides represent artificial measurements held onto, while being (life) moved within a straight line (inception towards death) by nature.
Only within liquid can solid be hurled at one another. For example...water and stone are both solid, which is why water can be solidified, and stone liquefied...both representing the shaping of matter within motion.