God destroys the intelligent and frustrates the wise
(twitter.com)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
If God destroys the intelligent, why do you always run from a challenge???? More projection from the atheist. SIN DESTROYS INTELLIGENCE, AS YOU ALWAYS PROVE.
God builds by dividing (de) structure (stroy) from one another...
Dividing what?
Dividing (inception towards death) structure (life) aka from whole into partial; from action into reaction; from cause into effect; from process into potential; from need into want; from energy into power; from motion into matter; from flow into form; from perceivable into perception; from balance into choice; from all into one etc.
Differentiation implies each thing apart from one another...bad implies turning against good aka a coming together of things within conflict.
What about the etymology of dividing (de) structure (stroy) is magical?
Because you act like if people say something that something bad will happen. If you quit your word games and use reason you think you'll die or whatever. That's as magical as it gets.
Because implies each being differentiated from one another within cause aka action differentiating reaction. Few suggest actors and like-minded behavior to manipulate different reactions among many.
a) If people (plural), then summation of person (singular), hence your use of some-thing.
b) If saying, then articulation of sound, while ignoring person aka per sonos (by sound).
c) If God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all); then person implies each one by all of sound aka a singularity.
a) If implies then...an ongoing process, which one cannot quit. Others suggest that one can quit anything as to distract from quit/quietus - "free"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=quit
Only within a process (inception towards death) can potential (life) be free (choice), which also implies the sound of silence.
b) Game implies a gamble aka ones given choice taking a chance. You took a chance with the meaning of the word "quit", while gambling away your "free" will of choice in the process.
...then circular reasoning (using vs not using) confines linear implication (if/then). Within nature there's no conflict in-between using vs not using; unless one ignores being (life) used (inception towards death) by nature.
Aka mag (to be able) i (within) al (all)...it's all which enables each one within. You holding onto a different meaning for the word magic, like "the art or practice of using charms, spells, or rituals to attempt to produce supernatural effects or control events in nature" instead of naturally analyzing the artificial word magical...that holds you under the spell of another.
Coming into being implies that one GOT all nature has to offer, hence the free will of choice to respond. Getting implies wanting to take into possession; got implies process freeing potential, hence the need to respond.