a) How could "no; not; nothing" be an answer if it's based on de-nial aka nihilo (nothing)?
b) How could artificially made choices be free? Doesn't nature set those within free to choose?
You just post in a weird format is all.
a) Flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life)... few suggest formats to gain control over shape and size of consenting many.
To format implies to arrange/arengen/hringaz/sker - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange#etymonline_v_17021 That's how few turn many against each other, while bending each ones will.
b) Weird/wierd/wyrd - "fate, chance, fortune; destiny" from root wer - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/weird#etymonline_v_4898
Nature generates choice...few within tempt many with artificial chance to ignore that, while gambling.
tl; dr...Nature differentiates, so that's what I do. Many are tricked by few to behave alike, hence taking offense by anyone behaving differently.
Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and...an open mind
a) How does seeking affirmation from another free ones mind?
b) What bot could formulate questions made by free will of choice?
Passive Christianity
a) Active (motion) Passage (momentum) Reactive (matter)...few suggest passivism to distract many from being (life) passed (inception towards death).
Passive implies "receptive", hence enacted upon...each one within nature is receptive to all of enacting nature.
b) Christian/christ/khristos/khriein "to rub; to anoint"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Christ#etymonline_v_11332
Matter (life) coming through the momentum (inception towards death) of motion implies the coming into being of EACH anointed one.
they are turned off by the passivity
Nature directs one (life) through a passage (inception towards death)...ones consent to suggested passiv-ism turns one against others within a conflict of reason (active vs passive).
it's not all to be sure
Being implies one within all....others suggest nihil-ism (not) and affirm-ism (sure) to distract one from that.
it makes my stomach turn
Reason makes your stomach turn, because reasoning implies holding onto one side, while fighting the other, which shapes indigestion within a moving nature.
Whatever one holds within self (mentally and physically) keeps tumbling over by nature forcing one to let go. Needing to let go, while wanting to hold onto implies each ones struggle with temptation aka sin.
it is in God's hands
a) God implies auto (same action)...each anointed one within implies manual (different reactions).
b) God gives...each anointed one within receives, while struggling manually to resist the temptation to hold onto it.
any serious student of the Bible knows
Student/study - "to strive toward"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/study#etymonline_v_22215
Striving towards implies falling for the temptation to ignore resisting origin. It's few (teachers) who tempt many (students) to follow suggested temptations towards DEATH, because that's what one aims at when one ignores to resist temptations.
If not FOR your own family than FOR who?
a) FORwards implies towards outcome...being implies in response (life) to origin (inception towards death).
b) If origin, then outcome...that's how implication works.
If not, then nothing...that's how reason (yes vs no) inverts implication by turning those reasoning against each other.
God implicates...if enacting cause, then reacting effects. Reason tempts effects against each other, while ignoring cause.
christian community
Christ (anointed one) implies each UNIT set apart from one another. A chosen one suggests COMMON-ism under disguise of UNITY to tempt consenting ones together.
Comm-unity contradicts Christ...if one joins others.
AI taking over
AI cannot take...each one within all nature is giving can take artifice from one another. Which costs...
AI, isn't like us
Suggested artifice tempts alike consent, while distracting each one from being differentiated from one another by nature.
doubled
a) Can energy be doubled without dividing self?
b) Can ones life be doubled without dividing self by intercourse with another into an off-spring?
c) Investment implies mind vested/clothed/cloaked within a suggested morgage aka mort gaige - "death pledge"...
d) What if consenting to a suggested investment implies "crossing" ones choice out for the chance of double the investment aka a "double cross"?
become a commodities chad
Coming (inception towards death) into being (life) implies a setting apart....suggested common-ism like commodities tempt together, hence tempting ONE to hoard ALL value, while ignoring that all value moves through each one.
The issue isn't which commodity to hold, but holding onto a current, while it moves.
own nothing an you will be happy
Happy/hap - "chance" implies ones free will of choice gambling on the chance of owning what a chosen one suggested.
Holding onto a suggestion makes one happy, hence transforming choice into chance. The issue with that....being choice within balance implies odd within even, so transforming choice into chance puts all odds against one.
exchange
a) Being implies ex (life) within change (inception towards death), hence expressing growth during loss. Exchanging any commodities implies sharing growth during loss, while ignoring to grow by resisting loss.
b) Ex implies matter; change implies motion...ex"changing" matter, while ignoring motion destroys matter mutually as traders/traitors to self.
c) Choosing to buy or sell ignores being FREE will of choice.
Sleight of hand: The Price is Right aka right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068 Only within that can one be free.
What's lacking
Nature doesn't lack anything...it's the ongoing loss for each temporary growth within.
Everyone now seems to equate it with something like
ONE implies different from one another...equating alike tempts one to ignore that.
vague notion
Holding onto an "alike equation" makes notion of motion seem vague.
the nature of the phenomenon
Noumenon (perceivable) implies nature of phenomenon (perception).
informal name for a particular state
Any suggested "informal name" tempts common consent, which contradicts particular state.
particular state of consciousness
If it's particular (apart), then why call it CON (together) SCIOUS (to perceive)?
many times by many names
Same motion for each different matter timed or named...
receive their Reality from those they have accepted as "authorities"
Reality (perceivable) moves through one, fiction (suggested) tempts one to hold onto it. Consenting to a suggestion implies accepting another as the author of the suggested.
This "Reality" is strong enough
Ones consent to hold onto suggested fiction by FREE will of choice is strong enough to distract one from perceivable reality.
If you've ever argued with them (leftists)...
Left-ist implies ones consent to suggested left-ism, which establishes a conflict of reason (left vs right) aka an argument.
figuring out
Matter (life) implies figure within motion (inception towards death).
the reason why there appears to be a "Woke Right"
Because reasoning against each other about woke right vs woke left binds both sides to the same conflict of mutual destruction.
Choosing a side (as choice within balance) tethers one to the opposition (choice vs choice imbalance).
in church, where the authority stands right up front
Authority to others is given by ones consent to suggested religion/religo - "to bind anew".
Church/circe/keue - "to swell; grow in bulk" contradicts nature, which generates growth in parts, hence each ones growth within all of nature.
Going into church implies "en-trance" aka putting self into trance - "crossing of a sea; coma; passage from life to death; fear of coming evil; a passage away or apart"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/trance#etymonline_v_16869
He mostly says batshit Leftist crap but he also says many things that make complete sense. Why?
Left VERSUS right implies a conflict at center...supplied by both sides with willing contestants entering the ring.
sometimes winning, sometimes losing
- If you like to gamble, I tell you I'm your man
- You win some, lose some, it's all the same to me
There's no winning or losing within a ring, only mutual destruction, where those who loose less are declared winner by those outside the ring.
This ring within self is called LOGIC and against others is called REASON...entrance by consent to suggested implies gambling, while sharing suggested implies LOGOS aka words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality).
only one that can save you is yourself
Save/salvus/safe/sol - "whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/save#etymonline_v_22794
Being implies partial within whole aka within (life) danger (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "Danger is my middle name" ~ Austin Powers aka austin/augur - "to increase; augment" + power/poti - "ability, being enabled", which implies one growing (life) at the center of all loss (inception towards death).
lamb of god
Aka paschal/pasah - "to pass over" + lamb aka EL AMB (around)
UFO (unidentified flying object)
a) Each ones perception within all perceivable implies a moving differentiation. Therefore...what one sees can never be identical to what another sees.
b) Object/obicere - "thrown forwards" implies flying/flowing.
In short...each one within all implies an unidentified flying object.
they always tell us
ALL implies WAY (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. Whatever tale few are telling implies the process utilized to shape and share that tale.
The trick...the tale (suggested information) distracts those who consent from the process (perceivable inspiration). Why? Because consent implies holding onto, which contradicts procession.
psychoanalysis, changed our perception
a) Psycho implies animating power, while analysis implies partial responding to whole during animation.
b) Ones perception (partial) implies being changed within all perceivable (whole)...any suggestion by another tempts one to hold onto it, while ignoring change.
c) Psychoanalyzing each other by suggesting diagnosis inverts analysis (setting apart) with synthesis (putting together).
Nature implies analysis (perceivable separating perception)...artifice implies synthesis (consent upholding suggested).
psychological techniques
Logi (circular logic + conflicts of reason) tempts one to ignore psyche (implication of being animated).
Techno/tekhnē implies artificial (suggestion), which tempts one to ignore natural (perception).
Holding onto implies artificial want, letting go implies natural need...psychological techniques are used to suggest one to want to ignore need.
Hunger implies need; appetite implies want...tempting appetite with suggested consumption of food implies a psychological technique to distract from hunger. If many ignore hunger, then few can utilize famine against many...and not just famine of food, but information; confirmation; absolution; interaction etc.
It also shifted the "center of world trade"...
what this is?
A suggested image (artificial representation) tempting each consenting ones imagination to conceal what nature reveals.
Ai generative thing?
Nature generates things...artifice tempts things to hold onto, which nature destroys.
photo shopped
a) Consenting to a suggested photo implies buying into what another sold.
b) Photo implies "light", which generates analysis by setting itself apart into a spectrum for each ray within. A suggested photo inverts this by tempting a synthesis with ones consent.
to join in the effort
Aka an effort towards outcome...tempting one to ignore being an effect of origin.
light wins
a) Win vs lose conceals...light reveals.
b) Light generates a spectrum, within which rays are set apart from one another. Win vs lose implies rays joining each other in conflict, which tempts each to ignore (dark) discernment (light).
Light is knowledge
Knowledge (perceivable) WAS before one (perception) came into being...suggesting others what IS tempts one to ignore that.
likelier that it will
Each ones free WILL of choice was set apart from one another, hence allowing each one (perception) to respond to all (perceivable)...few utilize suggestion to tempt many to consent alike.
In other words...same (all perceivable) generates differences (ones perception)...few equalize differences among many aka equality through diversity.
energy war
War/wers - "to confuse; mix up"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/war#etymonline_v_4825
a) Energy cannot mix, because all implies one in energy. With what could energy mix?
b) Energy sets itself apart internally into action (inception towards death) and reactions (life). Reactions reacting to each other (suggestion); while ignoring action (perception)...get mixed up, hence blending back into action, while loosing access to react.
still correct
Cor-rect implies being moved together within a straight line... https://www.etymonline.com/word/correct#etymonline_v_19105
Motion sets matter apart from one another, so neither could one move together, nor remain still, while being moved.
Basing ones assumption on a conflict of reason (correct vs incorrect) tempts many to respond alike to suggested conflict by few, which turns (versus/vertere/wer) many together in mutual destruction.
from around...years ago
a) How could linear time be a-ROUND?
b) Ago/agon - "departed; passed away"...how could a-ROUND circle depart or pass away?
behold...which say they are
a) A jew suggests SAYings to tempt a gentile BEing to HOLD onto it by consent...it doesn't matter what a jew says, only that gentiles behold it within self (circular logic), while fighting each other (conflicts of reason).
b) Coming (inception) into being (life) implies procession (death)...holding onto implies the temptation to ignore resisting being moved.
revelation
a) Action (inception towards death) reveals reactions (life). To be implies REVEL during ATION.
b) Reacting to each other conceals action...hence, holding onto a suggestion tempting one to ignore perception.
we are all interconnected threads woven together
a) All sets each one apart from one another.
b) Few tempt many together (tikkun olam - healing the world by bringing together) to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
a) Chasing after - Temptation - Holding onto...where's resistance?
b) Chasing after diminishes resistance.
c) Holding onto grows temptation.
possession of an evil spirit
Consenting (taking into possession) to a suggestion permits another to breathe (spiro/spirit) life into the suggested, which becomes a dead weight burden upon those consenting to carry it.
derived from the word
De (division) rivo/rivus (stream) implies the division of all perceivable sound into each ones perception within.
A jew suggests words to tempt gentiles to consent to a definition (definite; affixed), hence ignoring that which moves (inspiration) for that one takes possession of (information).
COVID is DIVOC
Invert implies "turning into opposite direction"...being implies in-between (life) opposites (inception/death) during same direction.
Origin and outcome imply same...only in-between can differences come into being.
Edit: Dybbuk aka Debug (removing faults)...
a) Notice the flag in the background... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=doublecross
b) Alien/alius - "another". To be implies one apart from one ANOTHER through alternation.
An "alien abduction" implies abduct/abducere - "to draw away" aka another one drawing one from way (inception towards death) of alternation (life).
An UFO (unidentified flying object) implies each alternating being, hence not identical, but different from one another, when flying/flowing as a formed object from inception towards death.
So inceldom?
a) IN (being within) CELIBATE (unbound aka free) DOM (dominance aka in-between boundary)...being implies free (life) withing dominance (inception towards death).
b) Suggested inceldom hides "involuntary" aka by ones own free will of choice. Why? Because ones consent to a suggestion implies shirking ones free will of choice to another, hence binding self to another.
c) To bring this back to male/female balance aka giving/taking...male needs to resist taking; female needs to resist giving. Neither can abstain the temptation of the other. Hence self sustenance implying a struggle.
A jew inverts this by suggesting males to "give it all you got" and females "you can take it...you are just as strong as them". This is how you'll get incels and sluts...the former draining themselves in isolation, and the latter getting filled up in company.
tl;dr: An ongoing division cannot be possessed by parts within, and pretending to be free from boundaries to one another (inceldom) only distracts from the original division of whole into partials...a division (inception towards death) which inspires resistance (life).
perhaps
Per (by) haps (happen; to come by chance)...by implies ones origin, while chance implies ones lack of self discernment as choice (matter) by balance (momentum) of nature (motion).
Putting together PER and HAPS implies suggested spell-craft tempting ones consent to hold it together. This is where choice gets inverted by chance, hence consenting to a suggestion implying a gamble.
universe
Aka uni (one) + verse/vers/wer - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verse#etymonline_v_4738
Nature implies oneness (motion) turning (momentum) into ones (matter), hence an internal setting apart/separation/differentiation/transformation of whole (all perceivable) into partials (ones perception).
Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many together, hence "turning" them against one another within conflicts (versus) of reason.
Therefore it's on oneself to either discern self as verse within uni or ignore it for suggested "universe", which turns one against one another.
for us
Oneness (whole) forwards ones (partials) by setting units apart from one another...few (chosen ones) tempt many together with for example suggested pluralism (us) aka United States aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
Once again it's on oneself to discern that UNIT implies apart from one another, while suggested UNITY tempts together.
Energy implies singular...not plural. All implies one in energy. Pluralism implies a fictitious suggestion to distract ones singular perception from all perceivable singularity setting itself apart internally/inherently aka energy.
to observe and name it
a) Ob (before) serve/servo (to keep)...a forwarded (inception towards death) being (life) cannot keep anything.
All perceivable moves through ones perception as "inspiration"...others suggest "information" to tempt ones mind/memory to hold onto it. Those who hold onto information are ignoring to draw from; within and in response to inspiration, while permitting others to shape information at will.
b) Motion through momentum into matter implies sound through spectrum into instrument. That's why ones structured mind within sound can specify voice.
Misusing voice to utter artificial words, which tempt others to hold onto definitions (definite; to affix), while branding the moving world around them with "meaning" establishes dissonance within sound.
Words tempt one to ignore ones response (re) to sound (sonance)...
Notice that the picture you posted doesn't show "lake washington"...but a jpg branded "lake washington" for many to share among each other, hence domesticating their memories to associate picture with label. That's idolatry.
to imply that action cannot reflect is stating the ends without recognizing the means.
a) Implic-ATION aka if/then implies origin (action) and outcome (reaction)...unless ignored by ones reacting choice for another ones chosen suggestion.
b) Cannot aka suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything acts upon one, for one to be enabled to re-act.
Choosing to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested) implies balance as origin of choice...even when ignored.
c) Responding (re) to being bend (flect) implies ones stance within the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) as a ray (matter) bend from one another.
Any suggested "state" tempts one to ignore ones position within all.
d) Mean/medius/medhyo - "middle" implies effect (matter) in the middle (momentum) of cause (motion).
Consenting to a suggested meaning permits those suggesting to "mediate" through "media" as a centralized intelligence agency what happens in-between cause and effect.
e) Suggested "without" tempts ones perception to ignore being "within" all perceivable.
implies pick of nature
To pick implies to choose from...nature (motion) sets apart (momentum) choices (matter), which only then allows picking.
Nature cannot choose (react)...nature (energy) enacts (balance) reactions (choice). Only inside of balance (inception/death) is choice (life) required for the sustenance of one self among one another.
Nature (motion) nurtures (momentum) natives (matter)...natives wield the free will of choice to ignore nurturing nature for artificial curation by one another. That's how nature allows each unit within to learn/teach self about consequences of choices aka "fuck around; find out".
moves up and down to match water levels of two given water bodies.
a) Only while being (life) moved (inception towards death) can one respond to left/right; up/down; front/back position aka balancing as choice.
b) Few suggest "mix and match" to distract from equal nature (inception towards death) differentiating each off-spring within (life) from one another.
c) Oneness (whole) gives ones (partials) temporal access to being a part...chosen ones tempt choosing many into a dual (two) conflict of reason aka a "dual duel" about access to suggested information.
Buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) tempts one (perception) to ignore all given (perceivable). Nature cannot be bought and sold...unless ignored by the majority within for a few merchants of temptation suggesting a trade towards traitors, who willingly sell themselves out.
to get high af
Aka bending out of shape, which nature orders by forcing balance upon ones choice....hence feeling down after getting high. Few suggest many to mix uppers and downers to keep the imbalance going.
bender from Futurama
Bender aka bending the rules, which shows robot/robur - "strength"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Roboration
Rama/ramate - "stands still"...https://www.etymonline.com/word/Rama#etymonline_v_3323 Those who watch a bending of rules in the future are pretending to stand still, while ignoring being (life) moved (inception towards death), which diminishes strength.
Looking implies observation without action
Choosing to look implies reacting while within enacting input towards ones senses.
I looked at the hot waitress
Looked/locked aka waitress/wait rest aka rest-aurant aka re-store...all branded to distract from being moved.
My action of looking
Looking implies re-acting to what can be seen, which nature enacts as input through each beings outputting senses.
Few suggest actors under directors to distract from action (motion) directing (momentum) reactions (matter).
My Bowels continues to move
Nature continuously moves hunger through the bowels of each temporal being tempted by appetite. Choosing to resist hunger grows strength to the temptation of appetite.
Nature implies the continuous need to let go for those within struggling with the want to hold onto...hence all the bowel re-movement issues aka indigestion.
a) JPG implies a digital compression of an image aka the further manipulation of a captured moment (picture).
Nature implies the ongoing motion generating the MOMENT-um for each temporary perspective within...few suggest many to look at (lock onto) captured moments (pictures) to distort each ones perspective within the momentum of motion.
b) If one stands at lake washington, then ones choice to look at it implies ones response (re) to being bend (flectere) by nature.
In short...nature implies action; each thing within implies reaction. Action cannot reflect...only re-action can re-flect upon action.
c) It's oneself looking/locking onto either the suggested jpg (picture) or as the perceiving sight, which mirrors/mirare - "to look at".
Nature continues to move, while those within look/lock onto things...which bends (flect) ones responses (re).
mass media lies are actually directives
Fictitious directives towards outcome tempting those who consent to ignore being (life) directed (inception towards death) within actual origin.
Truth vs lie (fictional) distracts reaction (life) from action (inception towards death).
which lies to regurgitate
Ones consent regurgitates any suggested truth or lies until withdrawn from aka letting go of, hence holding onto information establishing circular logic aka internal regurgitation of external "food for thought".
Suggested information (fictional) tempts one to ignore that perceivable inspiration (actual) cannot be held onto or regurgitated.
In my personal view
Person aka per sonos (by sound)...claiming mine distracts one from being insane aka in sanus (within sound).
Others suggest THE VIEW to distract ones sight from being within moving sound by tempting one to focus aka narrow ones sight to what another shows.
These authors view culture war not as an unavoidable result of widespread cultural differences
Taking a side within a war implies ones ignorance of being set apart from one another. TAKING truth or false from one another establishes the artificial war against each other, while ignoring that only nature is GIVING.
Nature differentiates being...few within tempt many together, which establishes a) like-minded behavior and b) conflicts of reason against each other aka war.
technique to exploit differences
Technique/tekhnē - "art, skill, craft" implies suggested artifice distracting different beings (ones perception) from same nature (all perceivable).
It's ones consent given to any suggestion by another which opens the exploit by closing ones awareness of perceivable.
Example...If I craft a house, then I can tempt those who consent to live in it to ignore the natural need to shelter for the artificial want to seek shelter from me.
Seeking becomes the very addiction one needs to shelter from... https://genius.com/The-rolling-stones-gimme-shelter-lyrics
The very main goal is controllable and obedient crowd.
What if a suggested outcome (goal) tempts those who consent to be obedient to and controllable by those who shaped the suggestion?
What if each ones perception within all perceivable implies a response to origin...not a consent to outcome?
Just look at any woke person
Does looking/locking onto a suggestion make one awake to per-sonos (by sound) aka to being (perception) by sound (perceivable)?
the way it was meant to be.
The way (perceivable) was before one came into being (perception)...others suggest meaning to distract one from that.
a) Involved aka within (in) turn (volvere; wel)...choosing to hold onto a side turns one against the other.
b) Nature reveals balance (inception towards death) for choice (life)...choosing to turn against each other implies imbalance, which occults/obcelare - "covers over" natural balance with artificial imbalance.
c) Trying to get/ghend - "to seize; take" suggested tempts one to ignore that only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) perception (life).
a) Sequence/sequi - "to follow"...why add (follow) what's already implied (follow)?
b) CON (together) SEQUENCE (to follow)...how does ones (singular) choice become consequence (plural)?