vital evidence
Evidence implies the perception of each living being...not anything suggested as evidence by another. It's the suggestion of another which incorporates vitality if one consents to it aka breathes life into it.
Incorporate (death) + vitality (life)...evidence tricks latter into former. That's what the British Broadcast CORPORATION does...
grooming gang
Groom implies "to grow"; gang implies "to go together"...the latter prevents the former.
independent inquiry...may be lost
Inquiry (to ask in) tempts one further into dependency to another...a loss for being.
about to begin
Begin implies the generation (gin) of being (be)...about (on the outside) lures the generated being from within outwards.
paperwork
Work sets free; paper compacts together which binds free will of choice, while making it impressionable.
tl;dr: Anything the BBC casts broadly upon the public tests ones free will of choice privately...unless ignored willingly.
The turning on the Harlot continues
Harlot (vagabond, man of no fixed occupation, idle rogue) contradicts turning (holding onto one side while turning against the other)...it's choosing a side to hold onto which prostitutes ones choice to a chosen ones offer.
A gentiles choice submitting to any jewish suggestion implies a harlot discovering a higher satisfaction...a satisfaction one cannot get, because one tries, and one tries, and one tries.
should you support the troops?
God frees...supporting troops (band of people) binds ones free will of choice.
should you...leaning and adhere
Leaning tempts choice off-center; adherence binds choice by adhesive.
to commit war crimes
Consenting to a side commits choice to war (both sides turning against each other), while ignoring that crime/krei implies to distinguish from one another.
Nature doesn't commit to a side...it discharges being (life) in-between sides (inception towards death).
in turn mooching
Turning implies cyclical movement; being implies delineation...it's ignoring the latter for the former which impoverishes one side in conflict with another aka rich vs poor.
A jew issues the value gentiles evaluate each other with, which leads to a circular conflict among gentiles...solely benefiting each jew.
I deserve to be shunned by all humanity?
All generates humanity (human) by animation (animal)...a jew tempts gentiles into servitude by distracting from animation with affixed values. Taking affixed values into possession shuns gentiles (potential) from animation (procession).
Free will of choice doesn't serve another aka has no duty towards anything, but represents a response-ability within everything aka in response (choice) to origin (balance)...not towards deserved vs undeserved outcome from one another.
- Inception towards life... coming in
- Life towards death... coming out
Coming in (inception) and out (death) of being (life)...one singular process for each single potential within.
perhaps
Aka per happenstance (by chance)...an inversion of being choice by balance.
is
IS implies a suggestion about what WAS before one came into being. Consenting to what is implies potential taking into possession, while ignoring procession.
the
Aka suggested theism tempting one into a conflict against others (this vs that), while permitting another to speak in the name of God (theos).
Perhaps the outcome is the becoming?
In this short sentence are four (perhaps; the; is; the) deceptions preventing you from discerning self as coming into and out of being.
God has occasionally given people the choice to return
a) God implies occasion/occidere (fall down) for each rise within.
b) Fall(cause; action; motion) towards rise (effect; reaction; matter) implies linear procession.
c) People implies ones choice to join another, while ignoring God dividing each person from one another.
d) Return implies ones response to a circle, while ignoring Gods delineation of being.
towards the faith
Towards implies procession; faith implies possession...the latter tempts one to ignore former. Procession implies linear; possession shapes circular...if held onto.
Does modern media portray it as a choice? Is it a choice?
Media/medium - "middle"...choice can only exist in the middle of balance. Few use media to tempt ones choice into circumference by taking an optional side (modern vs ancient), while ignoring primary balance.
If you wake up after dying
a) Wake/weg - "to be lively" implies the process of dying for each living being within the WEG (way).
b) Before vs after represents a circular conflict distracting from linear procession aka be (being) fore (forwarded) + aft (off, away).
Being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within a way...that isn't a conflict, but ones mind can be tricked to view it as such.
we are preparing to make the right
a) We represents a corruption of light aka an accumulation of rays casting shadows over one another.
b) Preparing implies towards outcome; being (ray) implies in response to origin (light). Preparation for outcome neglects adaptation to origin.
c) Right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies light moving each ray within a straight line...not something one makes, but everything allowing each thing to re-make self.
judgments
"Judge not lest ye be judged"...judgement implies confinement aka holding onto a verdict, while ignoring that free will of choice needs to adapt to justice by deciding...not confine self to decisions.
Balance implies just; choice implies at odds with one another.
confronting the light
Con (together) front (to project, stand out)...light projects ray by dividing each to stand out from one another. Few suggest CON to tempt many together, hence casting darkness about one another, while preventing projection with retraction.
Joining one another retracts self. Being a transference within light implies a projection of self.
ability to judge
Nature enabling being...that's justice. Beings judging one another disables many under few, hence establishing a court (enclosure) of justice. A sentence passed represents a sentience ignored. Ignorance represents mental confinement aka an enclosure.
when it happens
A happenstance implies by chance; being implies choice by balance. Taking a chance ignores choice given.
there is a choice
Only HERE (balance) can choice be used...THERE (imbalance) implies an option presented to choice by the choice of another.
IS implies optional, WAS implies primary...God was before any being within can suggest to one another what God is.
NDEs give...
a) All was given to each one within...NDEs are shared among one another to distract from all given.
b) Near (close by not distant) tempts one to ignore that DI (to divide) STANT (stance) implies ones living stance within the dividing process of dying.
There's no "near death"...only living within process of dying, hence life in-between inception and death. Near vs far represents a cyclical conflict about measurements taken, while ignoring a linear procession one cannot take into possession.
Therefore OP is about (1) trusting versus (2) distrusting
Aka a cyclical conflict of reason distracting from linear (inception towards death) procession of potential (life).
Should you go towards the light?
a) Should implies "obligation" (a binding pledge); light implies "necessity" (a setting free)...few suggest should to keep many in the dark (ignorance) about light (discernment).
b) Light > spectrum > ray...light can only move forwards. It's each ray animated to resist, which can be tempted to follow along by ignoring to resist.
Is it heaven?
Light sets each ray free from one another...resisting the temptation to come together represents heaven (heave; to rise), while coming together represents hell (kel; to cover).
A trap?
Light sets free...ignoring light by free will of choice traps ones free will of choice. Ignorance represents darkness and confinement.
Soul-recycler?
Light implies soul/sole (one and only) hence moving through each ray within. It's ignoring light which mentally (logic) and physically (reason) confines one within a cycle.
If one responses to a cycle, then one ignores being delineated within light.
A vagina?
Light > spectrum > ray aka male > female > offspring...it's the off-spring divided from one another (penis + vagina) which can have intercourse with one another for more off-spring from one another.
What the light and what should you do?
Light implies all; each ray within needs to adapt to all, while resisting the wanted temptations of one another...like suggested "should" (a binding pledge of obligation).
Death...The Living Feel It Too
Feel/fall aka the process of dying for each rising life within. The issue here...DEATH suggested as outcome instead of DYING perceived as being processed from origin towards outcome.
How To Counter...Media
A medium (life) adapts to extremes (inception towards death)...counting holds a medium accountable by another. Accountable as in counter; noun - "table where a money lender does business; table or bench of a merchant or bank".
Weaponized Social Media
Each beings weapon of choice represents a separated medium formed within flowing extremes...social aka soc (together) i (within) al (all) inverts separation.
The way they weaponized it is by filling it
Way implies fall (inception towards death) for each rising (life) weapon (choice) within...it's the minds of those ignoring to rise which others fill up with ballast (literally belly-load) aka the belly of ba'al.
first turn
- First...line (inception towards death)
- Second...delineation (life)
Only during delineation can one turn within all to shape a circle.
don't give them your fear
Fear implies holding onto a make believe dread about an outcome one hasn't reached yet. It's ones free will of choice binding itself to imagination, which others are shaping by invocation.
they will flee
Will implies form; flee implies flow...only within flow can form be shaped by separation from one another. Suggested pluralism (they) tempts singular (one) being to ignore flow, while shirking will to another.
own Life Energy
Energy sets life free...owning tempts life to bind itself while wasting energy in the process of possession.
That ain't put together (constructed) by divided from one another aka that from this; minor from major; of from on; one from all; fiction from reality.
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth" aka generation by division...not construction.
Which construct isn't man made?
You love marking...
Mark/merg - "boundary, border"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mark
Love vs hate represent the artificial borders ones free will of choice marks if choosing a side. As long as one holds onto a side...so long does one remain marked. Analyzing this shapes clarity within oneself.
Farmer (Bauer in German) aka the name used before the "Rothschild" relabeling...
even here as a supposed conspiracy forum
Any artificial place of assembly (forum) puts many at odds with one another.
the heliocentric deception
Each being represents the center (centric) of light (helio)...the more beings incline towards another; the more deceptive appearances become.
enough evidence
Evidence aka ex (outwards) videre (to see) implies ones perception within all perceivable...enough aka en (within) nough (to reach, attain) implies the suggestions of one another tempting one to reach outwards from center into circumference, hence off-center and away from ones helio-centric position.
Being implies one within all...enough represents a measurement taken by one while ignoring all given.
If hunger and thirst implies all moving through each one; then eating and drinking can never be "enough"...
to prove beyond any doubt
Holding onto proof casts doubt over ones mind/memory. Proof is in the pudding/putting aka within motion putting matter into being.
Beyond (on the other side) tempts one to ignore being (life) in-BE-tween sides (inception towards death)...looking for beyond casts doubt over ones sight.
it's highly unlikely that Mars
Is vs isn't aka high vs low aka likely vs unlikely...that's mars; the god of war aka mars/mar - "to deface, disfigure; impair in form or substance".
Facing another within any conflict of reason defaces oneself.
What evidence would you amass that is NOT circumstantial?
a) Evidence aka ex (outwards) videre (to see) implies each being at center seeing outwards circumference. The only thing not circumstantial is center.
b) Center within circumference implies fraction of whole...amassing from the circumference corrupts the fraction.
Israel has undue influence over the media
Media implies "middle" aka center of circumference. A jew mediates for gentiles to gain influence over an artificial center called consensus. Any gentile joining a consensus is stuck withing an artificial circumference, while being off-center in nature.
In other words...center (perception) within circumference (perceivable) can be tempted off-center by mediated suggestion. Consenting to any suggestion makes one owned by right of circumstance aka "due".
Furthermore...israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies center resisting the temptation of circumference.
Israel has the motive,
He that strives with God is moved by; within and in response to God. God implies the only motive force...
A jew tricks gentiles to believe that israel is a fixed place somewhere, while ignoring that it implies each beings moved position within a moving nature.
voting makes little sense. Your vote has, mathematically, about the same chance as
Voting implies ones choice taking a chance...that's what distorts sense, while permitting others to mathematically take choice out of the equation.
You can want the things that you need and deserve.
a) Only within need can a want be shaped.
b) Things (plural) implies want...need implies singularity. For example God as the singular need for any plurality of want within.
c) Deserve implies the division of all served (need) through each one within (want) , hence want being in servitude to need.
Stop being a pedant.
a) Need cannot be stopped...the cessation of motion represents a want in ignorance of needing to adapt to being (life) moved (inception towards death).
b) To learn for self implies teaching self and vice versa...with nature as the only pedagogue for each being within.
Few mislead many as students under teachers aka as slaves under masters...which represents the artifical corruption of natural pedagogy.
Peda (child) gogy (to drive, draw out or forth, move)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pedagogue That's how nature draws out each child of being.
Want your God given rights? You may be an extremist!
God given implies "need"...wanting something tempts one to the extreme aka the farthest away from need.
13
There can be only one.
bloodlines
Blood flows.
a pact
Pacts congeal form within flow.
nephelim
The fallen ones are formed within flow.
you worship Satan
How does analysis worship deception?
are insane
Aka in (within) sanus (sound) aka being of sound mind aka being a mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in)...it's synthesis which distorts this.
My respect for you is negative
Negation implies within self not upon another, hence negative/negatif - "expressing denial"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/negative
Starting a sentence with "I'm not" implies negation of self...which free-will-of-choice by sound mind analyzed.
negative, which is the proper form
Proper implies put forwards aka flow (inception towards death) putting forwards form (life)...negation implies denial of proposition.
I can not...
...again with the denial of self.
higher levels
There can only be one balance (level/libra) for each ones free will of choice within. High vs low implies imbalance of choice.
you are a deceiver
Do you think that analysis (setting apart) deceives (mislead by false appearance or statement) from synthesis (putting together)?
seeding ill will
Will (want) can only be seeded within the soil of need. Trying to plant will within another makes one ill.
subversion
SUB (under) VERS (to turn)...consenting to any suggestion turns one under (logic) and against (reason) one another.
ION (action) moves straight through reaction...subversion can only be shaped during diversion from ones path (inception towards death) of life.
understanding
Standing under implies subversion. If one stands under (sub) another, then one turned (vers) from all (ion).
Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person...
Energy aka en (within) ergy (work)...work implies ongoing solution (inception towards death) for each temporary dissolution (life) within. Dissolution implies a division aka alternation in-between.
OIL/ALL implies the dissolution of each alternating one within aka each anointed one (Christ)...the irony of which is hidden within the language itself aka the figure of speech. Why? Because speech is formed (unification) within flow (dissolution)...