What the hell is wrong with you?
a) Right implies straight; wrong/wergh/wer implies turning; bending...
b) Being implies bend (life) within straight (inception towards death)...others tempt one to turn against one another.
c) Heaven vs hell and right vs wrong and me vs you imply conflicts of reason against others aka ones mind turned away from self.
d) THE implies ones consent to suggested the-ism aka ones submission of self to authority of another.
Hell - place where evil people go when they die
a) What if living (temporary reaction) implies within process of dying (ongoing action)?
b) What if place of being cannot change, since it exists at the center (matter) of change (motion)?
c) Who suggested you moralism (good vs evil) and progressivism (heaven vs hell afterlife) and why did you consent by choosing a side within the resulting conflicts?
Wrong - something irregular, or incorrect
a) Once again...wrong/wergh/wer implies bending (all perceivable through each ones perception) or turning (suggestion vs suggestion).
b) Regular (Latin regula) - "straight"...hence being with-IN (life) REGULAR (inception towards death).
c) Suggested correct aka com (together; with) regere (to lead straight) inverts perceivable...being (life) lead straight (inception towards death) apart from one another.
Few suggest cor/com to establish correlation aka interconnection among consenting many...in other words; collectivism.
You - A person on the internet, perhaps troubled.
a) Ones free will of choice to claim self as "me; myself or I" brands everyone else into a "you". If one lets go of self; then others remain ones (partials) within oneness (whole)...for all implies one in energy.
b) Person implies per sonos (by sound) aka SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole; unbroken"...hence each one within sound (in sanus/insane) being single; partial; broken apart from one another.
c) Could few suggest ON-line and IN-ternet to distract many from discerning that ON (being in contact with surface) and IN (being within surrounding) contradict each other?
d) Solution (inception towards death) dissolves problems (life)...ignoring this establishes trouble/turbid - "confusion", hence fusing (fuse) together (con) the suggested information one willingly carries around/burdens self with as debt to others.
Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Ryan-bingham-nobody-knows-my-trouble-lyrics
- "I've been carrying my trouble...In this bag strapped to my shoulder"
- "Ever since I was a baby...I've been running from everything I know"
Trouble implies suggested information; knowledge implies perceivable inspiration, and baby implies baby-lon aka BA'BEL, noun (Hebrew) - "confusion; disorder".
Thanks for the inspiration. Great reply.
a) Nature shares everything (perceivable) with each one (perception)...anything suggested tempts one to not care about what nature shares.
b) Drug/droge - "to dry" tempts one to ignore being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). As in...waters above/waters below.
c) Rest implies cessation of motion, which temporary matter (life) within ongoing motion (inception towards death) cannot experience.
d) Knowledge implies perceivable...ones perception can only exist within all perceivable...so you do know. Others suggest IQ to tempt your consent to stand under (understand) again and again.
a) Intelligence/understanding - "to stand under" implies submission of self to another when consenting to suggested.
b) Quotient/quoties - "how often"...how often one stands under another implies ones free will of choice.
gut the establishment
Ones consent to suggested information implies the channel (guts; bowels; entrails) into ones mind (perception) within stable (perceivable inspiration).
It's about what one permits through ones gut...suggested information requires ones consent; perceivable inspiration requires one to resist suggested information...the former flows through; while the latter tempts one to hold onto.
we need to remove...
One needs to REspond as life to being MOVEd from inception towards death.
what separates from...realists.
a) Reality separates itself from whole (all perceivable) into each partial (ones perception).
b) -ist (realist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (realism) aka a binding together, not a separation from.
America First
a) Something; something...first commandment.
b) America/amerigo from emmerich aka irmin (whole) + rih (ruler; king).
What's the deal?
Ones consent buying into the suggested "return" sold by another.
return
Aka responding by turning away from being (life) directed (inception towards death).
To few it doesn't matter whose return many await; only that each one responds in turns (circular reasoning) to suggested.
I don't give two shits about the royals
a) Watching suggested implies giving consent and focus towards it.
b) Royal/regis/reg - "to move (life) in a straight line (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand...king (whole) of kings (partials).
a) AX'IS, noun - "straight line (inception towards death) passing through a body (life)".
b) Axis implies being center (ones perception) within circumference (all perceivable)...suggestions tempt one to incline towards another, hence off-center.
c) Since axis passes through each body it implies linear movement...not orbital. Meanwhile; consenting to a suggestion tempts one into a conflict of reason against others aka circular reasoning.
This consent of many to circular reasoning is labeled by few as "circle of life...wheel of fortune...leap of faith...band of hope...path unwinding" etc.
"Some of us fall by the wayside" (many)..."And some of us soar to the stars" (few)... https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics
Flat Earth
a) Flat motion (inception towards death) generates earth matter (life).
b) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatline ...a distraction from being temporal matter within ongoing motion.
c) Flat/plat - "to spread" aka towards (inception towards death) spreading (life).
to present a model
Suggesting (to present) likeness (model) tempts one to ignore being different from one another, and therefore a differentiation of matter (life) during sameness of motion (inception towards death).
a) It doesn't matter how often one (uni) is turned (vertere)...it's always one.
b) Cosmology aka cosmo (universe) logy (logic/reason) implies each different one turning within same conflict of reason.
c) Heliocentrism against geocentricism implies different ones consenting to fight each other over the same suggested -ism.
d) Center (centr) of sun (helio) and earth (geo) implies oneself...being able to stand implies balancing on earth, and ones choice can only exist at center of balance. As for sun...notice that everything within this world is called "under the sun".
e) Motion (light) generates matter (dark)...matter struggles in-between lightning (discernment) and darkness (ignorance), hence having to bear light through the valley of the shadow of death.
what else are they trying to tell us about, in, pretty much, anything they put out
Nature already put out everything (perceivable) before anything (suggested) can be shaped within...
what is this album cover insert
Album/albus - "white"...hence concealing (to cover) perceivable outside (spectrum of light) by inserting a black (ignorance) circle (circular reasoning).
Sleight of hand: "You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round...like a record, baby, right 'round, 'round, 'round" by Dead or Alive.
insert.. claiming
What if insert (ones perception) needs to extract (all perceivable), while being tempted to want to claim (suggestion by another)?
nevermind
How does "nothing everything" (never) aka a contradiction in terms, enter ones mind/memory?
Black font
a) Look at the checkerboard...is it white (discernment) on black (ignorance) or black on white?
b) FONT, noun (Latin fundo, to pour out) aka a foundation (inception towards death) pouring out (life)...
a) Enroll inverts being within (life) line (inception towards death).
b) Resolution implies "manual" response to "auto" solution.
c) Suggestion drafts resistance (ones perception) within velocity (all perceivable)...if one consents to it.
d) Military (Latin militaris; warlike) + (Sanskrit melah; assembly) implies within conflicts of reason, which tempts one to ignore implication, hence if same (inception towards death); then differentiation (life).
The opposite of war implies peace/piece aka apart from one another as different partials within same whole...not as a warlike assembly.
Fear is the greatest weapon
a) Weapon implies instrument (in-stru-ment) of offense/defense aka ones mind structuring within all by free will of choice, hence...weapon of choice.
b) Both hope (want) and fear (not want) implies ones choice of suggested outcome over perceivable origin (need).
c) Being AFRAID comes before FEAR...there's no fear outside of self.
Who's "right" here.. the instagram fact checkers or her.
If you read Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - 'The Gulag Archipelago' then you'll notice that those before the fact-CHEKA are never right or wrong, but selected to be there.
Sleight of hand: "You better check yo' self before you wreck yo' self"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrecking_(Soviet_Union)
- Upper half...same flow (inception towards death); different form (life) aka hell within heaven.
- Lower half...in the shadows (ignorance) artifice and lust falling apart, while trying to come together.
a) Notice that market place for buying and selling "love"...both buying artificial and selling natural leads to destruction.
b) Notice bell on top aka be'll (being all)...now consider this... https://genius.com/Ac-dc-hells-bells-lyrics
c) Appetite (life) for destruction (inception towards death)...ones all consuming struggle to sustain self.
start out with ok stuff, right.. but gradually turn it bad.
a) Resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) diminishes.
b) If resistance turns during gradual decline of velocity; then it tumbles like the stone of Sisyphus at peak.
Choose it yourself...
...among the variety selected by the choice of others.
Variety
VARI'ETY, noun (Latin varietas, vario) - "intermixture of different things" aka reaching equality (inception towards death) through mixing of diversity (life).
Variety pack
Packing differences together tempts one to ignore that nature (inception towards death) sets differences (life) apart from one another.
the psychology of variety
PSYCHE implies animating power differentiating internally; while LOGY (logic; reason) implies differences fighting each other within conflicts of reason about variety, while hoping that coming together will fix the issue.
Flake
Aka flake/flock (Latin floccus) - "to break or separate in layers; to peel or scale off"...few layer many together, while nature breaks/separates apart.
Sleight of hand: "The Breaks" (written by David Jolicoeur & Vincent Mason)... https://genius.com/Kurtis-blow-the-breaks-part-1-lyrics
Porque está recortado?
Judíos de la aguja
a) Is one free to perceive or are there any restrictions upon perception?
b) If one "pays" by consenting to a suggestion "sold" by another, then that implies a market...doesn't it?
c) How is consenting to another not restricting ones "free" will of choice through a "market-contract" with another?
d) Stupid/stupor/stop implies "cessation of motion"...there cannot exist a cessation of motion (inception towards death) for matter (life) within, since motion generates matter.
How is any of this obtuse (stupid in the revisionist sense)?
- NAKED, adjective - "open to view; not concealed; manifest"
All perceivable is open to view for each ones perception within...consenting to manifested suggestions tempts ones mind to conceal from it.
- DUMB, adjective - "mute; silent; not speaking; destitute of the power of speech; unable to utter articulate sounds"
a) Reality doesn't articulate sound...it is natural sound.
b) What if anyone within reality can choose to articulate sound?
- CREATE, verb - "to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist"
a) If creation implies "out of nothing", then how was motion (out of) generated?
b) What if it's "within everything" aka whole (motion) generating partials (matter) internally...while others suggest creationism to distract from that?
Universes
Plural (verses) contradicts singular (uni)...
It isn't that massive...why does one "bite a coin"? To see if it's real...
"You can tell it's real because it looks so fake" ~ Elon Musk
mining...against Central Bank Digital Currency
a) If ball/baal earth, then any mining aims towards center.
b) If mining into current, then drowning.
c) Bank curtails current...like a river-bank.
d) Digital/digit/deik - "to show"...shown by another (suggestion) contradicts ones sight (perception).
line of defense
What if line (inception towards death) implies offense (life)?
energy dominance
If EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...then what if the center thereof implies being FREE (will of choice) within DOM (-inance of balance) aka balance -in-between action (motion) and reactions (matter)?
In other words...what if consenting to suggested dominance tempts one to ignore being free?
radical communist
a) Radi/radius/ray implies outwards...com (together/with) implies inwards. What happens to radiation when matter is collectivized?
b) -ist (communist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (communism) aka ones submission of self to another...once again inwardly contradicting radiation outwards.
free market
- Free... free will of choice within perceivable
- Market... buying (consent) + selling (suggestion)
Consenting to market binds free.
there is a conspiracy
CON (together with) SPIRO (to breathe)...being implies breathing apart from one another. Few suggest conspiracy to tempt consenting many to "breathe" life into an inversion of living.
difference between wealth and wages
- Wealth... same value (all perceivable) generating difference in evaluation (ones perception)
- Wage... free will of choice
people who don't
Suggested pluralism (people) and nihilism (don't) tempting one to devalue self by consenting to another.
a) Can you show me a bot that can adapt to perceivable inspiration or any other artificial tool that doesn't require suggested information to respond to?
b) How is it that I can adapt piece by piece to what another wrote, yet most reading it can't see the "relation" of me taking apart what others put together to deceive them?
c) Please verify that you are a human...NIGGER. Congratulations; you're not a bot.