First of all, I don't give two shits about the royals. I do care when people are trying to be shady as hell though.
So does anyone here with a lukewarm IQ or higher have thoughts on Kate Middleton's recent reappearance after claiming she would be stepping away from her royal duties due to cancer? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx6AkLWerpw
- It looks like her, not a double like whoever was "out shopping" earlier this year(see link below)
- She looks fine, although a little skinnier
- All shots of her are pretty far away with no audio. They did, however, selectively release "private footage" filmed at different time or day at a time it was more sunny out.
It's just so weird to me. She's clearly alive and a functional human being, why maintain this aire of secrecy and just be normal for once?
For the record, I previously thought she was dead and royal family had been trying to cover it up. This appearance just leaves me scratching my head.
News article from earlier this year about a Princess Kate public appearance: https://www.news18.com/viral/kate-middletons-new-pic-shopping-with-prince-william-has-everyone-saying-thats-not-her-8820609.html
a) Right implies straight; wrong/wergh/wer implies turning; bending...
b) Being implies bend (life) within straight (inception towards death)...others tempt one to turn against one another.
c) Heaven vs hell and right vs wrong and me vs you imply conflicts of reason against others aka ones mind turned away from self.
d) THE implies ones consent to suggested the-ism aka ones submission of self to authority of another.
a) What if living (temporary reaction) implies within process of dying (ongoing action)?
b) What if place of being cannot change, since it exists at the center (matter) of change (motion)?
c) Who suggested you moralism (good vs evil) and progressivism (heaven vs hell afterlife) and why did you consent by choosing a side within the resulting conflicts?
a) Once again...wrong/wergh/wer implies bending (all perceivable through each ones perception) or turning (suggestion vs suggestion).
b) Regular (Latin regula) - "straight"...hence being with-IN (life) REGULAR (inception towards death).
c) Suggested correct aka com (together; with) regere (to lead straight) inverts perceivable...being (life) lead straight (inception towards death) apart from one another.
Few suggest cor/com to establish correlation aka interconnection among consenting many...in other words; collectivism.
a) Ones free will of choice to claim self as "me; myself or I" brands everyone else into a "you". If one lets go of self; then others remain ones (partials) within oneness (whole)...for all implies one in energy.
b) Person implies per sonos (by sound) aka SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole; unbroken"...hence each one within sound (in sanus/insane) being single; partial; broken apart from one another.
c) Could few suggest ON-line and IN-ternet to distract many from discerning that ON (being in contact with surface) and IN (being within surrounding) contradict each other?
d) Solution (inception towards death) dissolves problems (life)...ignoring this establishes trouble/turbid - "confusion", hence fusing (fuse) together (con) the suggested information one willingly carries around/burdens self with as debt to others.
Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Ryan-bingham-nobody-knows-my-trouble-lyrics
Trouble implies suggested information; knowledge implies perceivable inspiration, and baby implies baby-lon aka BA'BEL, noun (Hebrew) - "confusion; disorder".
Thanks for the inspiration. Great reply.