like an empire
Imperium implies all balance; res privatus implies ones choice; res publica implies following the choices of another.
Empire implies same; private implies different; public implies alike.
If a private one believes in a "like empire", then one has been aggregated by another into a public mindset.
a) Notice the RED SHIELD (rothschild)...
b) Notice SORRY (full of sorrow) aka SOROS... https://www.reddit.com/r/Soros/
Now look into Open Society Foundations (Soros) and it's ties to Advance Publications (reddit), which are btw headquartered at One World Trade Center...
In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination)
a) The division of A vs B within the mind of the consenting observer implies imagination. This imagination tempts one to ignore ALL perceivable for the suggestions of another observer.
b) Being perception within perceivable implies "ex-peri-ment" (expression by mind)...the suggestions by another imply "en-chant-ment" (within enchanted mind).
whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
The rail-line implies male (motion); the carriage implies fe-male (momentum), and each thing within implies trans-form (matter)...only matter can observe the momentum of motion.
Observation can be tricked with suggested matter (information) to ignore perceivable momentum (inspiration)...being tricked like that establishes another observer (B) outside of self (A).
in the center...opposite sides equidistant
Ray (center) within spectrum (opposite sides) of light (equal)...no distance.
If one ignores to discern self as the above, then one establishes distance/destance - "discord/quarrel"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/distance#etymonline_v_11510
This distance/discord implies a conflict of reason within the mind of a ray, which ignores being within spectrum of light. Within a spectrum of light, the opposites aka pure light (white) and absence of light (black) aren't against each other, but apart from one another, while partials within whole.
Ones consent to any suggestion by another tempts one off-center and towards a side within a distant conflict of reason.
In short...ignorance distances one from discernment.
Observer A moves with the lamps
Each observer came to be "within motion", hence being (life) re-moved (inception towards death). Remove implies ones RE-sponse to being moved.
Those lamps imply artificial light from a suggesting "light-bearer" aka from a Lucifer...who gains the power to cast artificial shadows (ignorance) into natural light (discernment)...if one consents to it.
Observer B receives the light
Only if one consents to the suggestion thereof aka only if one chooses to re-ceive aka re-cipere (to recover/reclaim/retake) artificial light, while ignoring that all natural light is offered to each one ray within.
What is a ray? A raddix/radius aka a center (choice) within a circumference (balance) of moving light. How does light establish a circumference? By specifying (spectrum aka momentum) particulars (rays aka matter).
If your theory forces you to say
a) Sound doesn't force those within to say words to each other...suggested theorism tempts consenting theorists to soothsay (making predictions) in spell-craft aka by shaping suggestible words within perceivable sound. Why? To utilize the ignored force of nature against one another as for example law en-force-ment.
b) Nothing can force one to say anything..."the force is within you".
if this was allowed
Allowances suggested by another ONE tempts one to ignore ALL perceivable aka allow/alocare - "allocate" aka ones location within all.
How insane is the average person
In sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...not an equal share (average) but odds within equal.
made its way into
Inception implies coming to be alive within way of dying...made/make/mag - "to fashion; fit together" implies the mag-ic handiwork of suggestion tempting ones consent to fit things together, while ignoring that nature sets things apart from one another.
Life can choose to wander to Europe; Asian; Africa; Australia or America aka any which way; while being moved towards death...the one and only way of life.
Sleight of hand for being tricked off way... https://genius.com/Blondie-one-way-or-another-lyrics
We're just outside observers right?
a) OB (toward; before) + SERVE (watching perceivable or holding onto suggested)
Before implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life). To serve implies in response to which master? The one (perceivable) who sets free (perception) or the one (suggested) who tempts one to bind (consent) self to another one...to a chosen one?
Are you observing (perception) from inside (perceivable) or by outside (suggested)?
Did another suggested pluralism (we) to tempt singular (one) to ignore self? How could WE observe if each ONE perceives from a different position?
God says
SAY from root sekw - "to follow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/say#etymonline_v_22810
Why would a leader follow? When did your leader aka that which leads life from inception towards death say the word "God" and what happens if life follows the lead from inception towards death instead of resisting it?
The rail-line implies motion; the carriage implies momentum, observer implies matter...observer B implies either the suggestions of other observers or the self discernment of observer A.
The flashes of light imply suggested distractions to tempt observer to divide self into an A vs B conflict of reason.
Observing as self implies perceiving moving differences...observing from another implies holding onto moving differences, while ignoring perceivable momentum of motion.
What's preventing a war between men & women
If MEN fight the WOMB of MEN; then...?
Current (inception towards life) implies unification with the ether (death)
a) A unit (life) coming in (inception) and out (death) of current...
b) Uni (one unit) fic (to make) ation (action)...action (inception towards death) makes reacting units (life) aka the current of dying makes living waves.
c) Instead of "ether"...think EITHER (one of two) OR (alternation of partial within whole). One can be tricked to ignore OR for EITHER.
Wrong. You have it backwards
a) A conflict of reason (right vs wrong) among many about a suggestion by few...not natural, but artificial.
b) If current (inception towards death) implies TOWARDS, then each unit (life) within can navigate by free will of choice in-between forwards/backwards + left/right + up/down.
In other words...motion generates a momentum for navigation of matter within.
In short...one can be tricked to ignore "towards" for every which way of perspective.
All sets one free (will of choice)...serue/serve/slave implies ones choice to ignore that for another master.
a) There's only ones response-ability...free will of choice.
b) Fe(minine)Male + Wo(mb)Man + S(plit)HE...hence in balance with one another for each ones choice within.
c) As for neglect...consenting to a chosen ones suggestion neglects ones choice.
eventual tyranny
Even (balance) generates odds (choice)...choosing to ignore this for another ones choice establishes a tyrannos (master), while enslaving self.
Any group of people need a chain of command and a leader.
a) Nature doesn't group together (people) it sets apart (person)...few within nature tempt many together into groups.
An off-spring isn't a group...an infant can be domesticated to freely choose to be part of a group called "family" aka Latin familiaris - "a domestic" aka a familiar - "evil spirit that answers one's call".
b) If singular (person) consents to suggested pluralism (people), then ONE chains self to another ONE aka ones choice chaining itself to a chosen ones suggestion.
c) Suggestion becomes the leading command if one consents to follow it.
d) Suggestion tempts to follow; perception inspires resistance (need) of temptation (want).
e) Nature sets FREE (will of choice) which needs DOM-inance (balance)...the choices of others become wanted temptations to ignore that.
f) Slave (ones choice) chains itself (consent) to a master (suggestion by another ones choice).
rebellion
- Rebel aka re-bellum (resisting war)
- War/werra/wers (to confuse, mix up)
If one consents to a suggestion, then one confuses self by mixing up with others within conflicts of reason. Consenting to suggestion ignores perception...hence "rebel without a cause".
to keep us in line for eternity.
Eternal line (inception towards death) generates perishables (life)...few trick many to keep hold onto perishables in hope for surviving eternity.
Keeping hold onto anything within a moving system makes it perish faster...which is how few get rid of many.
to keep us...then look at
To look/lock implies focusing on, hence trying to keep for self. That implies a danger for self...just trying looking at the sun.
The few ain't keeping the many; each one among many chooses to keep holding onto/looking at suggestions by few.
Best thing we can do is "prepare"
PREPARE; verb - "set in order or readiness for a particular end"...that implies suicide for those living within the natural order of dying. There's no particular end...only whole end (death) for each particular (life) within.
when the People unite, we gain power
Many are united under few; gentiles are united under jew; slaves are united under master; followers are united under leader; students are united under teacher; buyer are united under seller; watcher are united under shower; believers are united under preachers; consent is united under suggestion...
The power of few implies the united/collectivized/aggregated many...and what is it that many are preaching to each other to overcome few? Let's unite harder, we just need more on our side; if only we could come together.
Logic/reason tempts many to believe to be DIVIDED against each other, while ignoring to be UNITED in consent to the suggestions of few.
In short...nature sets apart; few within tempt many together to benefit from unchallenged apartheid within natural wholeness.
our own responsibilities in our hands
Response-ability implies each ones free will of choice...not many choosing to follow the suggestions by a chosen few, which implies shirking of ones response-ability to a chosen one.
a) -ist (communist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (communism)
b) Few trick many to consent to suggested community (communism) and society (socialism).
c) COM implies "together"; being implies apart from one another...only self discernment can get rid of COM-munism.
change the rules
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"...that implies change.
if TPTB don't give a shit about the current Constitution
Current (inception towards death) implies setting apart (life)...that's what empowers each being. Constitution implies setting together...which deprives each being of power.
Giving currency (bank) and taking currency (trust)...few apart who give, many together who take.
why would anyone think They would give a shit about any revision?
What if suggestion implies a revision of perception? Doesn't a merchant constantly revise suggested offers? What's the changing of prices but revisionism?
to restrain the government
Restraining the control (govern) of mind (ment) implies ones free will of choice...especially from suggested temptations by others.
They never ever ever mention it (constitution) when it restrains their own power.
CON (together) STITUTE (to set) implies mind controlled (government) many following suggestions by selected few.
The power of few implies DEMOS (people) KRATOS (strength) aka democracy...the power of suggesting few are consenting many.
what was explicitly agreed on
a) Many consented to suggestions by few...what few have suggested is irrelevant, as is the conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) among many. Both distract from consent...which implies denial of self for another, hence denial of "ones choice" for "chosen ones" suggestion.
b) Explicit implies unfolding; implicit implies infolding...being implies EX (life) IN (inception towards death).
Suggested fold aka "doubling of any flexible substance" aka "in composition, the same quantity added" aka "pressed together" aka "flock of sheep"...tempts being to ignore self for others.
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/fold
A jew folds gentiles together to establish layers upon layers of deception as a fabric over life.
he (DJT) was not empowered to do so (his words) "by something called the Constitution"
Many are the constitution of few...DJT was selected by few to speak in the name of many, hence unconstitutional.
Gentiles are tricked by a jew to vote for representatives...the vote by ones choice implies the constitution; the representatives imply unconstitutional representation of ones free will of choice, and the chosen ones, who suggested voting, imply the ones controlling the constitution, while puppeteering the representatives.
Isn't it time to start thinking of a new Constitution?
a) Constitute implies "setting together"...answering a question of another also implies setting together. This consent given (answer) to a suggestion (question) by another establishes a new constitution.
b) A talmudic jew protects an old constitution (mishnah) by tempting gentiles to reason (gemara) about new constitutions.
c) Underneath that deception operates nature, which "sets apart" each one within from one another...all the reasoning about setting together among gentiles permits each jew to remain apart, while setting gentiles together.
a) Both -ism (journalism) and reason (good vs bad) are artificial and in ignorance of natural.
b) Controversial/contra-versus (turned against) implies reasoning against one another over the suggested -isms by another.
c) A journal as an account of daily transactions implies ones registry of debt to another...that only happens if one burdens self with artificial, while ignoring natural.
Not even you know
a) To know implies ones perception of all perceivable..."not; nothing" implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) by another and ones consent to de-nial perceivable for it.
b) Even (all perceivable) generates odds (each ones perception) through differentiation...many consenting to suggestions by few tempts them to respond "alike"
In other words...the natural balance of even/odds can be imbalanced with likeness, hence order followers; NPCs; slaves behaving like one another.
jacobin
What can you tell me about Jacob/iacobus/ya'aqobh - "one that takes by the heel; a supplanter"? https://www.etymonline.com/word/Jacob#etymonline_v_1631
Me and beautiful woman...
...implies putting together.
Inception towards life...
...implies setting apart.
Different...not equal.
jewish occultism...
...can only work if one consents to the suggested -ism.
Black Magic
Making (magic) ignorance (black) requires ones free will of choice selecting suggested (fiction) over perceivable (reality).
the devil and the jews...
a) Consenting to suggested THE-ism gives authority over self to others.
b) Devil/diaballein - "to throw across"...hence devil (inception towards death) within details (life).
Kabbalah the jewish book
Cabbala/qabbalah/qibbel - "to receive, admit, accept"...not the suggested book, but ones consent by free will of choice to any suggested information.
the "process" by which the Mishnah was transmitted
a) Transmission (ones perception) of mishnah (all perceivable)...corrupted by gemara (reasoning about suggested).
b) Process (motion) sending (momentum) transformation (matter) aka matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
Kabbalah arose in Babylon
BA'BEL, noun (Hebrew) - "confusion; disorder"...established by ones admission/acceptance/consent (qibbel) to suggested information (gemara); while ignoring perceivable inspiration (mishnah).
influenced by...occult
Holding onto suggested (matter) conceals (occult) perceivable (motion). Influence implies being (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
Alex has a flair for the dramatic, hes a talk show host. Doesnt make him wrong however....
a) Comedy (life) can only exist during drama (inception towards death)...few utilize both to distract from one another.
b) A host with an audience on the drip for suggested information...YET...why does the audience need to consent for the host to deliver suggested information into ones mind/memory?
c) Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Talk-talk-talk-talk-lyrics + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IgjUYrDbWI
- When every choice that I make is yours
- Keep telling me what's right and what's wrong
- Don't you ever stop to think about me
- I'm not that blind to see that you've been cheating on me
- All you do to me is talk, talk
Also check out... https://genius.com/Talk-talk-its-my-life-lyrics
- If I could buy my reasoning, I'd pay to lose...one half won't do
Haym Salomon aka 'Chaim Shalom' aka L'chayim Tovim Ul'Shalom...
a) ashke-nazi
b) Deutsch/dutch/dish aka "yid-dish-land"
c) German/germanus/germinis aka "gene-man"
d) Alemanni aka "all man"
e) Teuton/teutonic/teuta - "tribe", which implies a tripartite division of being within all aka tri-be-all (tribal).