any historical event gets extra suspicious when they make a film about it. since they released the HBO series, I've been wondering what's up with Chernobyl. interesting clue, do you remember what the book title was?
sry, but all crypto is a ponzi
gender is a completely made up concept, courtesy of a degenerate who sexually abused and drove to suicide a boy and his twin brother
there was an interesting video going around regarding this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFpcvNuyfLA idk, I'm not very science minded, could be a troll for all I know
my parents took me to one of those bioenergotherapists when I was little. it worked, although I don't remember jack, so no autosuggestion here. what can I say, I just hate being lied to and these past years have been rather trying
on one hand there's lots of fuckery in history, then on the other one there's also common sense
ty for mentioning the Shakespeare authorship issue. I studied literature in uni, but of course there's no way they'd mention that even in passing. and going by the rule of thumb that the more something is publicized in media, the more likely there's loads of underlying fakery, Shakespeare has been on my mind lately
I just remembered how in the 50's in fear of the polio virus they sprayed everything with chemical DDT, which only triggered a neurological polio-like response in the population, justifying the need for a vaccine. we keep running in circles, we can't ever learn or attain actual progress, because we're being systematically lied to
all I get from this is if there will be more news like this in China, it means the society is being prepared for a conflict. it's just like the Japanese astroturfing protests against Russian invasion and marching down the streets with Ukrainian flags back in February. like, why would you even care? can you even point to where Ukraine is on a world map? can't wait in turn for the Chinese to protest against Israel occupation of Palestinian territory, what a shit show
just like they restored the skeletal structure of dinosaurs, right?
you mean that cointelpro guy who went on to impersonate Alex Jones? sorry, I had to. grilling is good though, at least can agree on that.
ikr, I can't make heads or tails out of people falling blindly for ruskie propaganda. I assume the puppets do that to get paid, but get enough of them, and you basically have a whole movement hijacked. please mind that America at least had a golden age, while Russia never did and never will. if you are here in good faith, you should work on restoring what's lost to you, rather than idolizing a foreign regime
good thing that at the end the Israeli president warned against the surge in antisemitism, I was starting to get heated
final thoughts. I read up on it during the day. it appears that people claim they see new, completely anachronistic vocabulary enter these texts. theoretically, we should be able to prove the Mandela effect on linguistic basis. if a word appears in a Bible translation from 1611, that has no business being there due to its anachronistic nature, then that proves it. however, what is or primary source of information? the Internet. it's so easy to alter information on the Internet. (I can't stop thinking about sonne as meaning son, never seen it used like this, and I read middle and early modern English texts, I think it would have jumped at me from the bookpage, it's a common word after all). regarding early modern English I remembered something that I was always taught about Shakespeare. he's known as the creator of modern English. he's said to have introduced 1700 words into English vocabulary, meaning these words have never appeared in any historical or contemporary texts before Shakespeare used them. what are the odds? was Shakespeare in the business of writing fancy poetry that is read at your leisure time, that you can reread multiple times before you finally make out the meaning of a particular word? or was he a playwright, meaning the vocabulary he used had to be clear and well understood by the common public, in order to be able to communicate the plot of the play swiftly and without any misunderstandings? so I looked up Shakespeare and Mandela and guess what, turns out Mandela was an avid reader of Shakespeare, it inspired him throughout his career, and there is even some copy of Shakespeare plays signed by Mandela lying on a shelf in some museum. all articles were about Mandela's passion for Shakespeare. that's exactly how you spoil a searchword. if anyone has the same question about Mandela effect in relation to Shakespeare, the search engines will misdirect them to the the story about Nelson Mandela's reading habits. what a coincidence.
libgen is in fact Russian, look at you, how well read you are
I don't know about tire, but they mentioned unicorn too, and unicorn means rhinoceros in this context. you can look it up in any 19th c. dictionary. real unicorn is lycorn - French still use this word. according to linguistics these are so called semantic shifts, it's when a word changes its meaning to a new one. however, I always thought it has to be a common word, and the shift would happen through slang. were unicorns and rhinos discussed so widely among the visitors of English pubs, that people got them mixed up? perhaps I don't understand the nature of semantic shifts, but this seems unlikely.
They discussed the scene in Gethsemane, so I went to look it up, in my 1611 photocopy it says:
Matthew 26:45 Then commeth he to his Disciples, and saith unto them, Sleepe on now, and take your rest, behold, the houre is at hand, and the sonne of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners.
I'm not a native speaker and also in spite of having attended a Catholic school, I don't know Bible verses well enough to know if some wording is off. I got interested in this verse, because it's more of a plot related discrepancy than a vocabulary issue. My take on it is that something seems off about this. In the current version in my language, this verse has a reproachful tone asking the apostles why did they fall asleep. Here it sounds like a reassurance, they're being asked to rest and sleep on. Plotwise it makes no sense. As a side note I wonder why is son spelled as sonne. Wiktionary says it's an obsolete form of son. I studied history of English at uni and don't remember son being spelled as German for sun (die Sonne). I know the sun symbolism has always been there among mystery cults, but I don't remember this connection being distinctly linguistic. What is going on, are we overthinking this?
Or if he shall aske an egge, will he offer him a scorpion?
I just got a 1611 KJV photocopy from libgen and it says exactly (including apparent typos):
- I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shal be taken, and the other left. 35. Two women shall bee grinding together the one shall be taken, and the other left.
call me crazy, but it's all by design and it's been long time in the making. in '69 US military invented Arpanet. apparently, CERN was involved too. they went public with it 25 years later in '94. makes you wonder what they have in store for us next.
let me guess. it wasn't a mass shooting, because they didn't stage it?
it's true though?
old news, so old actually that this is the source from which all the Russian anti-nazi narrative stems from or where any Ukrainian pro-nazi movements may originate. look him up on wikipedia, it's an important part of Ukrainian history. it's sad that we never learn and fall over and over for the same trick
info is info and that's what I'm here for. regardless of what we tag him as, the guy seems right to me. regarding the Elon situation, I don't think we'll ever have a full picture, but we can try to patch it together from bits and pieces such as this video
oh so this thread is basically why cospiracies.win claims to be fringe, and redirects to greatawakening, now I get it