▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow! Saw exactly same things in drying drop of salted water in my childhood, when I got a microscope on one of my birthdays and studied absolutely everything I could find around.

Obviously, they do that nanorouter quantum dot graphene 5G chemtrail stuff for decades already!

\s

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could do the same - generate some source code, and compile/run it from same program - even in C or whatever language you choose. But it is nearly unuseable in context of some real runtime because creation of code in this way is highly uneffective and limited. And the main thing is that this is declared "bad programming practice" and condemned. Immutability is encouraged and forced in modern programming.

As for Forth - this language, as LISP is one of rare exceptions, but it is old and abandoned now. Meanwhile in USSR Forth was default language of first mass produced and popular personal computer BK0010. It was like Sinclair ZX or Commodore 64, but had 16-bit PDP-11 architecture. And it had Forth in ROM instead of Basic. So I played with it a lot at the time and may be that's why I get a clue about alternative programming approaches unknown to nowdays mainstream.

I also ejoyed discussion a lot, thank you!

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

But under the hood so many of the frameworks do this anyways.

Not really. The whole idea of self-modifying code is changing preprogrammed algorithm to something new. The whole idea of any JIT compilation is to preserve preprogrammed algorithm intact. You don't get program you never wrote using JIT compilation based language (well, sometimes you do, but this accounted as bug, not as intended behaviour). Also you will never get a code that executes differently on subsequent calls because it was changed in between. Same piece of code will always give same result with same input data. That's not the case with self-modifying code.

To illustrate what I mean, imagine funtion, say func(a,b){return a+b;}. Self-modifying approach could make same function be func(a,b){return a+b+2;} at one monent and func(a,b){return 3*a+b;} at another moment. Add to that conditions, cycles calling other functions and all that stuff.

Apart from self-modifying code some other things is necessary for real AI - undefined behaviour, accidental "mutations", computed goto's and all that stuff.

Why all that things is importnant for AI? Because intelligence is unpredictable. You can't just calculate the outcome of intelligent entity decision. And you can't speak about intelligence when you could predict a result with 100% certainity which is a core and absolute must for modern computing paradigm. Computer science was dragged by all that "good practice"/"bad practice" narratives as far from any possible AI as possible.

Our perception of intelligence and life in whole is connected with unpredictability of both. Take a look at following analogy - you could easily found ones who account their car as alive among owners of old cars. But you will not find any among owners of new cars. The difference in unpredictability. New car works as expected, everything runs as designed and it behave same in same situations. Old car is weared, there are more randomness in its behaviour due to backlashes, working regimes shifted, something creak occasionally and so on. It could give different results in same circumstances. Of course that's all have exact reasons, sometimes very complex, but for the owner, who don't want to dig deep it's just alive. And if you fix everything, return predictability, this mistery of life in piece of metal will disappear.

Same with intelligence. We will never account something predictable as intelligent. We here make fun over sheeple, as human NPC's accounting them unintelligent. Why? because they are predictable, like some machines or preprogrammed algorithms. And so we will never accept any AI if it will be predictable. And with modern programming approaches nothing unpredictable could be created.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just block them, what's the problem?

Or may be you are suppose that somebody will create a perfect garden for you for free, to please your desire for seeking truth in perfect comfort?

No problem - you could use something like rapidshare where you completely independent from any owner or whatever and could create a perfect truth finding chatroom you totally control and do not allow any AI bots or whatever. Who knows, may be you will be able to make your place the best in the world and people will overcome their laziness and drop all that murky forums and stuff.

For me, as owners of this forum do not demand from me any info unnecessary for work of this forum and allow me to control my information flow, I'm perfectly fine with them.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, of course it wasn't. But Jews often used alcohol to put population they parasitise on into debt and vegetable existence, even if they didn't produce it. Interesting ,that Jews themselves often suffer from alcoholism with full degradation.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

A lot of languages could be used to write self-modifying code one way or another with different efficiency and haemorrhoids. Mostly it will be like brushing teeth through anus, but anyway. The problem is that it is declared "inapropriate", "bad practice", and all bad things possible. Also, self-modifying code is not in any language standard except LISP and hardly any modern programmer will even know that it is possible.

As for importance of that feature for AI, I don't think it is most important thing, but shure it is absolutely necessary for real AI.

Meanwhile about architectures. We all perfectly know about Harward and Neumann architectures, but other are pushed out, like stack machines, transport triggered, not even talking about ternary processors and other pretty interesting stuff.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your thesis doesn't discuss your question.

I show real example that there exist many useful effects of AI that make it unwanted and even dangerous for TPTB, and I suggest that this is the main reason real AI will be never allowed.

Adding more and more clockwork to the clock will not make it think.

That's excellent description of what they do with "AI" hype. Have to save it somwhere. :)

As for AI possibility, IDK if it is possible or not at all. But I know that a lot of things that could make it possible and crucial for its creation is cancelled, ostracised or abandoned in both comuter science and areas of its application. One of my thoughts on that topic - https://conspiracies.win/p/17rSnsKbhI/yet-another-thing-critical-for-c/

I believe conciousness involves the non-computable.

Shure. And other things like fortuity, undefined behaviour and a lot of other stuff that today completely cancelled from computer science. And modern development of computer science drive it exactly to the direction opposite to anything close to AI.

"highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work"

Well, I'll call bullshit, since hardly bankers or politicians or something from their kind will allow something to outperform them in their most economically valuable (especially for themselves) work. :)

Modern ANNs posed as "AI", in the best case targeted at least economically valuable work, with very questionable results that could be achieved without any ANNs. And most of that is useless work, like writing marketing articles or making mock illustrations.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

the pump "InNoVaTiOn" that is just marketing and ommissions, but under delivers on people bogus "sci-fi" fantasies.

Really, I estimate most "sci-fi" fantasies was pretty precise, just was made without taking in account evil forces that don't want technological development.

There's not really much left to advance in the physical sciences

That's what they want us to think. Really, there is whole areas of physics that are ostracised despite reproducible results of basic proof-of-concept experiments. Examples: Casimir cavity, Gunter Nimz FTL signal transmission through tunneling, energy driven space-time warping as in White-Juday experiments and so on.

Being validated, all that stuff just ignored because "there is no theoretical explanation" or "this contradicts relativity". Something like what happened with first LEDs discovered by Losev in 1920s. LEDs then was proved huge thing, but only 50 years later. Could you imagine if LEDs get proper attention 50 years earlier?

Peter Theil is a scumbag, but his conjecture that there hasn't really be anything revolutionary since the 1970's, is legit.

I agree with him. I wrote a lot about some hidden event around 1970 that stopped technological development. Also agree with him on his sentence about "we got fucking 160 chars in twitter instead of flying cars". Interesting, that flying cars are perfectly technologically possible today. It's purely TPTB artificial taboo that keep us from them. Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQK9m_OBVgY And that dudes made it just for fun, they just like to make vehicles from bathtubs. There is no any technical problems to design and do mass-produce of average driver useable flying car for decent price if any current automotive industry giant had a desire to do it.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, worst case scenario is a valid target, but to get a meaningful result you should carefully separate facts from bullshit. Only then your worst case scenario will be useful.

Overestimating enemy abilities is as dangerous as underestimating them.

I could surprise you, but quantum computing does not exist today. There is a fundamental problem appear - to do something minimally useful you need many thousands of qbits in one processor. But more qbits you have in processor, less reliable result you have. You could build large quantum processor, but the usefulness wii be at the level of flipping coin to decide result. :) And most interesting thing that, by some scientists opinion proper solution to this problem will open a pandora box of unconventional energy sources and all such stuff, since it is connected with all that negative entropy and zero point energy things.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

You pretty able to create new things without any language or external influence at all.

IDK, imagine, you need to invent something to prevent your charger cable from cracking near connectors. You could easily do that just imagining (does such word exist in English?:)) what exactly happening with cable during use that make cable break and localize problem. Then imagine different possible solutions and see in your imagination are they solve problem. Choose one that solve problem in simpliest way possible. You don't need to use any language, word or whatever to do that. Only visual images of already known things.

Phenomenon you speak about is more like intuition or flash of revelation or inspiration, when solution or idea just appear in your mind without any effort. There you have a wide range of thing to theoretize about, including your theory.

Both cases is act of creation and obviously intelligence, but one you do by yourself and other just happens.

So intelligence is definitely is a human property. And possibly, there could be influence of some external intelligence, but it is not obligatory thing.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, quick serarch in Russian language for "дореволюционные пивные этикетки" easily gives a lot of links, including f.e. https://pikabu.ru/story/pivnyie_yetiketki_dorevolyutsionnyie_birofiliya_part_2_6373397 where you could find full images of some beer labels used in OP collage. Like

https://cs10.pikabu.ru/post_img/2018/12/22/10/1545501519179068185.jpg

And even some with David star that is not in collage

https://cs7.pikabu.ru/post_img/2018/12/22/10/1545501533177840967.jpg

So, you are a liar. You didn't do any relevant search to check posted information.

Jewish participation in producing cheap alcohol in Eastern Europe is well-established fact. Nuance is in that they mostly act in Pale of settlement regions.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, the dead was more than real. There are was a lot of dead on both sides. Thing is that overhelming majority of them was not Jews.

Jews was not the main victims of that war, nor in absolute numbers (it was Russians), nor in percentage from whole etnicity (it was Belorussians).

While Stalin was alive there was no such thing as Holocaust in USSR discource. Jews losses was not accounted as something worth special attention. IDK, if Stalin just didn't want to make Russians who suffered largest losses angry or he still fight against Jews in Communist party, but nothing special about Jews and WWII existed. War was officially named Great Patriotic War, not some Jews Saving Operation. Only after Khrushev taking power, numerous propaganda about all that holohoax crap and that Jews losses was somehow special. began to pop up. That is connected with great Jewish influx into MSM. Interesting, that when Brezhnev replaced Khrushev, such preferences for Jews in culture was somewhat cut. State Central studio of documentary movies even made a long documentary "Secret and Explicit (The Aims and Acts of Zionists)" (Тайное и явное (цели и деяния сионистов)). Which is in modern Russia is in a list of extremist materials. :) You could see it here - https://archive.org/details/the-secret-and-explicit-goals-and-deeds-of-the-zionists with English subtitles. Take a look, it worth it, and you will get some clue of how USSR view Jews and why USSR was so hated on the West.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is also another thing I wrote about recently.

You buy AAA game for $50, but to play it with decent performance you have to buy new hardware for $500 or even more. Chips are dirt cheap for the manufacturer, for the fab there is no difference, what model of chip to produce if the size of crystal is the same. Just a question of what mask they will use - current one or few years old one. So, most part of this $500 profit goes to marketing. And games are part of it and I think game makers get much more from hardware manufacturers than from game sales. And I could perfectly imagine the situation, where games are completely free, since they paid by hardware manufacturer.

Also, take in account that large game makers at least have a tons of tax extempts and all that big business help from government who need people be always busy with something senseless and have no time or interest for real life, including politics.

So, game makers have at least two significant sources of money, and end user sales is just some additional, but in no way critical profit.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

If nobody will buy all that proprietary games and soft, they will give it out for free. If nobody will take it, they will begin to pay you for taking them.

They want you to play games and use bloatware. They make profits on completely different things, selling data they collect or taking money for making you burn time doing nothing from those who need that.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Since humans discovered that they could draw, carve and scratch images on different surfaces, they began to draw, carve and scratch everything they see around. Night sky is one of the most imteresting, miraclous and entertaining things that humans see pretty often. Really it's strange that ancient star maps are not as frequent as they could be. :)

I see nothing exceptional in that finding at all.

Exceptional finding would be if somebody will find ancient sky map that is not coincide with Earth skies, but with high precision coincide with sky map of some other planet in different star system. That will be very interesting.

Well, this could even be a nice research topic - find out sky maps of discovered exoplanets and search through all human imaging ancestry for them. With modern computers and image processing it should not be very hard thing to do. If I would have been an archeologist or around, I would definitely bet for grant for that research. :) Even if it will give negative result, it would be fascinating work. And if a result would be positive.... Well, I dreaming too much today. :)

▲ 7 ▼
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

Russia is a peaceful country

That's not quite right, really. You can't say Russia never started wars or whatever, it did, since times of Hermanarich. And not always it was the only option. However, it never was preferred political method of solving problems.

As for all this hype about Russian threat - that's OK. Let them do it. More they believe in their own fantasies, less they know about what's really going on, which is strategically important thing.

And it is interesting proof that modern TPTB propaganda narratives become dumber and more illogical. Yesterday they declared that Russia is on the verge of collapse, today they push fearmongering about Russian invasion into Germany and Sweden. Such high-frequency wobbling between narratives inevitably will rise questions about elite sanity even in sheeple, because even a sheeples memory of golden fish become enough to notice that, and that is a good thing.

The worse thing that could happen for TPTB is a union between Russia and Germany. They perfectly understand that, and thoroughly try to prevent this by any means for centuries.

Fun fact: Last time Russia was in war with Sweden, it liberated Finns and created state of Finland. Not even talking about Germany who had more than enough wars with Russia and always lose them. Interesting, what exact outcome they predict today.

Another interesting fact, I noticed not long ago. All US military bases in Germany are in Western part. Unbelivable, but for some reason, after 30 years since Germany reunification, US didn't build a single permanent military base in East Germany AKA ex-DDR. Why is that? Are they suspect something?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not necessary. Quotation mark separates link from parameters. If there are no parameters left, quotation mark is just senseless and could be deleted. Ampersand (&) separates parameters from each other. Often you need to delete only some of parameters, like facebook traking "fbclid", so they need to be deleted with their respective "&" separators.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

You definitely don't need thousands of satellites to create severe problems with access to social platforms and other mass internet services for sheeple who are not willing to know how their internet works.

Say, problems with root DNS servers controlled by IANA will be more than enough to declare any level of "cyber pandemic" and completely ruin "economic" infrastructure.

And all you need to do is one phone call.

Of course, internet will still be there and fully functional for anybody who have a little clue of how it works, but no sheeple will be able to use it.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think that left just can't see any logical contradictions. And I'm not shure that left make majority of those who support Palestine.

Arabs and other muslims are pretty based. F.e. AFAIK, in Canada it is muslims who strongly opposing LGBT narratives, with some Christians joined them.

What happens with left - they are conditioned to be obsessed with protests and minority rights by Jews. But since they can't think logically, when they see some muslim protests, they join them because it is non-white religious minority and so on. Just triggering of plain reflex implanted by Jews. Anbsence of logic do not allow them to get that this way they go against their masters. Being very loud they nearly completely push based muslims out of information field.

So, the average observer see left protests in support of Palestine.

Really, Jews fucked themselves up with left. Because hardly left will easily drop that beloved protests, and if Jews begin to opress or punish them, of course through controlled law enforcement and other structures, then left will immidiately turn victims, also by unconcious reflex and with more protests.

It could be fascinating to see how Jewish creatures will try to devour their creators.

Of course, top brass of left in power much better understand who their curators are, and so they totally support Israel.

From the other side, protests never acheved anything real for participants, but widely used by TPTB as excuses for tightening screws. So, even from this fuckup, Jews shurely will try to milk some benefits, like more censorship or whatever. But I think they already lost significant part of their young and most active left shabesgoys army.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, you missed biggest holidays in Russia, f.e., actually, from Dec 30 to Jan 13. There are some official working days in between, but people barely work, because New Year hangover, then Christmas is coming, then Christmas hangover, then Old New Year (don't try to understand :) ), all that stuff.

Next big Russian holidays will be May 1 - May 9, meanwhile. :)

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the same as here. Formally, you could own guns, up to civilian version of AK (Saiga), but you can't use it for self-defence practically. Intruder have to be armed with, IDK, 120mm howitzer, in order your self-defence to be accounted as "adequate". Otherwise you will be charged with "exceeding limits of necessary self-defence" with significant jail time. It's more sane to use chainsaw as a weapon against intruderm then a gun. But in any case you will be dragged through the all hell of investigation and court process. Fortunately, intrusions and assaults here is rare now, so you have to be extremely unlucky to find yourself in situation when you need a gun for self-defence.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aren't people militias already prohibited de-facto in US? I mean, I could not imagine how any large enough and uncontrolled by government formation of armed citizens will be allowed to exist in modern US.

Waco massacre already have 30-year history, and it was just tiny and powerless group of uncontrolled armed people.

Existence or absence of some shiitty paper approved by a bunch of rich bastards will change absolutely nothing practically.

In any way, mitigation or workaround that will allow creation of large and powerful formation of armed citizens uncontrolled by government will be the same, regardless of de-facto or de-jure prohibition.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's like what I suspect. Some hidden arbitrary regulations / monopolies and all that stuff that prevent any individual/small business from entering networking business.

Here, in Russia broadband internet spreaded like fire by efforts of small companies and even local non-commercial communities all over the country as soon as it become something interesting for regular person. All legislations and licensing was introduced only after the market was saturated. Of course large holdings eventually bought many small businesses, but situation is far from monopoly. Still, it is not a big problem to get a license and start provider business today if you could find a place that have no connection and want to make some money.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

many new research projects have shown how to exploit existing coax lines to transmit more than enough data

Unlike even existing coax lines fiber is dirt cheap not only on purchase, but also on ownership cost. It does not rust, it is much more rigid, it unvulrnelable to any solar flares or whatever.

In Russia, f.e. most phone cables was quickly replaced with fiber as soon, as fiber become comparable in cost with copper wires. So, that ADSL era of wired internet was just skipped and we turned from modem connectivity directly to fiber era. IDK, may be that is due to late USSR attempt to wire whole country with fiber, so we had serious fiber production and all respective things so it was easy to switch to fiber.

Ayh have a latop right now (ayh just checked :) peaking out at 850mbps wifi which is far more than enough for streaming multiple devices at 4K (especially when ratioed correctly which is where tech shd go --> router and devices that ratio time versus data and prioritize)

You could have 850mbps, but if you have no service able to stream data to you at that rate, it is senseless to have such rates, really. OK, you could utilise such bandwith copying few Tb of data from notebook to home NAS or vice versa, but it's questionable if you do it often enough to really feel need for such speeds.

As far as why they limit it based on expense --> https://detouron.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/us-eu-compare.png --> Do not forget just how fucking big we are.

Well, we are slightly bigger with noticeably lower population density. :)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›