Being kind of obsessed with all that technological progress stuff, from time to time I try to find any breakthrough or even just great inventions around. Without any success, really.
For TLDR crowd - read last paragraph.
In the mid-50s, there was created so-called "Theory of Inventive Problem Solving" (Теория Решения Изобретательских Задач - ТРИЗ/TRIZ) by Genrih Altshuller who was more widely known in USSR as an SciFi author under name of Genrih Altov. He was Jewish origin.
Interesting fact from his biography is that during his work on that theory he wrote a letter to Stalin about severe problems in inventions area and how to fix them. Not long after that he was arrested and sentenced tolong jail time for some antisoviet activity. But after few years in jail, in 1954 he was freed and completely cleared from any charges by highest USSR authorities and it was found that he was sentenced by slander by another Jewish person. In turn this person got Altshuller's sentece and disappeared in history.
Looks like Altshuller's letter finally reached Stalin, who was at the time obsessed with growing technological potential of his Soviet Empire.
In any case, it is already highly suspicious, that as soon as some interesting idea popped up, there immediately appeared somebody who tried to exterminate it at any cost.
That "Theory of Soving Invention Problems" get serious attention and was noticeably popular in engineering and science circles of USSR. However, Altshuller for some reason didn't turn to scientific approach in further development of his theory, and limit himself only to popularisation of it. There was regular seminars and classes on that theory, but it didn't have any serious development.
Shortly, theory declared that in order to make an invention, first a problem should be formulated in a way where all umimportant things are cut out. Then, you divide problem into tiniest possible parts and began to combine anything known to find solution.
It is a very simplified description, but hope you get the point. After USSR fall that theory become little known abroad, and even giants like Samsung, Ford Motors, Mitsubishi and other used it to some extent for innovations.
Those who want to dig deeper could start f.e. here - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166361517300027 with other articles by links below.
One of basic thing in TRIZ was that checking of combinations of known inventions to find a new one. Pretty logical approach, since nearly all inventions was done by combining known things. Since invention of wheel, literally, when some person combined a stick with a disk.
At the time, performance of computers do not allow store and check millions of known things in trillions combinations.
Today it is perfectly possible. And it is nearly perfect, most obvious and insanely profitable task for all that ANN based things that posed as AI today. But you will not find anything except silly toys like "Inventions generator" like https://glitch.com/~invention-idea-generator
All similar "serious" commercial "AI-driven" (they are not) tools are not any different from that toys, they just pasted all over with marketing bullshit, nothing more, completely ignoring the core of theory.
So we have more or less working theory for making inventions, we have resources to practically use that theory, we have demand for new inventions, and even few samples of real use. But this obviously highly profitable and simple approach is completely ignored by all that "AI" crowd.
And to make modern "AI" useful for such usage, tiny addition in form of rudimentary expert system is needed. But such move will open a way to real AI, that understands what it process.
I could not find anything that could be a sign of development in that directions.
I think it is a good proof that scientific and technical progress is artificially stopped by elites and corporations. And any real moves to the real AI will inevitably open that box of endless inventions. And this is unacceptable for TPTB.
That is why there could not be anything that even distantly resemble any AI, while TPTB in power. Only "AI" mockup in a form of dumb artificial neural networks (ANN) or their incarnations in one or another form that could not produce anything useful by design.
You pretty able to create new things without any language or external influence at all.
IDK, imagine, you need to invent something to prevent your charger cable from cracking near connectors. You could easily do that just imagining (does such word exist in English?:)) what exactly happening with cable during use that make cable break and localize problem. Then imagine different possible solutions and see in your imagination are they solve problem. Choose one that solve problem in simpliest way possible. You don't need to use any language, word or whatever to do that. Only visual images of already known things.
Phenomenon you speak about is more like intuition or flash of revelation or inspiration, when solution or idea just appear in your mind without any effort. There you have a wide range of thing to theoretize about, including your theory.
Both cases is act of creation and obviously intelligence, but one you do by yourself and other just happens.
So intelligence is definitely is a human property. And possibly, there could be influence of some external intelligence, but it is not obligatory thing.
Indeed. I just wonder because they don't have to do a lot of things but what they are choosing seem suspicious to me when we take into account unified language and quantum computing. Just looking at worse case scenario because that's what I do apparently. I appreciate your knowledge and perspective.
Well, worst case scenario is a valid target, but to get a meaningful result you should carefully separate facts from bullshit. Only then your worst case scenario will be useful.
Overestimating enemy abilities is as dangerous as underestimating them.
I could surprise you, but quantum computing does not exist today. There is a fundamental problem appear - to do something minimally useful you need many thousands of qbits in one processor. But more qbits you have in processor, less reliable result you have. You could build large quantum processor, but the usefulness wii be at the level of flipping coin to decide result. :) And most interesting thing that, by some scientists opinion proper solution to this problem will open a pandora box of unconventional energy sources and all such stuff, since it is connected with all that negative entropy and zero point energy things.
This is true about estimations and I should probably recalibrate on the whole thing so as not to completely go mad ahahaha. I just know they're trying real hard on quantum stuff and yeah, I don't think people 'in charge' fully understand the implications or if they do they don't care and are willing to risk it.
Unified language and quantum computing were suggested by few aka the ACCOUNT (a registry of a debt or credit) holders of all those who gave creed/belief/faith/consent aka those who pay into the account of others.
a) Can you show me anything "created new" without being shaped within; out of, and in response to perceivable reality?
b) Consider being (perception) enabled (perception) before being able to shape suggestions towards others.
I think language is more like 'idea' at the root of reality....not just sound and 'vocalizations'