by -pkvi-
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

We defeated whole soviet propaganda machine by not giving a fuck to it. That works. Tested. But we made another mistake - looking for source of information we fall into Western propaganda machine trap with all that "freedom of speech" and other bullshit. So we had to run another round.

You have much better situation - you could learn on our victories and mistakes. All you need to do is to began openly don't give a fuck to Western propaganda machine. And don't fall into any other centralized propaganda and controlled media.

And you don't need to convince whole population. More or less noticeable amount of people who don't give a fuck to any MSM, regardless of its partisanship if enough to destroy them.

Really, Western MSM did the most part of work, already. They heavily discredited itself multiple times, so even some sheeple tired of their crap. But they are separated and have no idea that some other people don't give a fuck to MSM too. If they will see others also don't give a fuck, and it is perfectly normal, then bridge will burn.

This "fuck you" toward media should become loud, and that's all.

It's like tirning off TV. "Did you see latest NNN show?" - "What NNN? Who the fuck is this? Do you think I'm so dumb to watch such shit?". Or "CNN told..." - "Who told? ZNN? What is this? Some web-page in internet?"

Also there could be other approaches. Do you know how once popular fashion styles die? It's not only marketing of new style. It is also a very noticeable push from very small group of "fashionable" people who began to mock and humiliate those who still wear old style clothes/hair/shoes. So you need to become that "fashionable" man who mock and humiliate those who still stick to MSM. "Nobody need all that MSM anymore, with their over makeuped plastic dolls and stupid experts".

I agree that there is too much information noise around, but it is better when sheeple consume noise instead of MSM propaganda. At least they have a chance to get something real in that noise. So, for now, noise is much better than MSM.

by -pkvi-
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Using Aesop language is not a solution at all. It doesn't work against propaganda. And it doesn't make enemy job harder.

In information war, probably the best solution is don't give any fuck about enemy and its attempts to to its job.

Enemy goal in information war is to bend you under its rules. As soon as you bent - you lost the battle.

I think most decent way to deal with enemy is to clearly state that we don't give any fuck about how they call us or what they think about us. If they don't like that - they could go fuck themselves. Clear and open declaration that they are absolutely nobody for us is what they really afraid of. They have to be somebody, have some influence on everybody, that is their goal and that is their Achilles' heel. Total influence, regardless of its sign is what they want. Why give them that? Why not hit them hard in their most wulnerable spot?

Whatever, "ADL? Who the fuck is that? Some kike nobodies? GTFO". That works. That not only kick them out of their comfort zone, but also show others that they could be ignored.

It was your slogan - "burn the bridge". Bridge want to be listened in the first place. It exist only because everybody listen. And not giving a fuck is the best and most effective way to burn it, isn't it?

Mocking them, laughing on them, accounting as empty place - that is what firing their asses the most. And that fire inevitably will burn that bridge.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's nothing new, From early days of internet. (((|))) is menorah smile. I mean old-time hardcore smiles, made from ASCII characters by real men, not that modern hipster woke Unicode emoji idiocy.

PS: I don't recall that anybody used menorah smile to mark jews. People just wrote "jew" or "kike" in plain text in the past, if necessary. Both, "jew" or "kike" just shorter than six brackets. Menorah smile used mostly in Jews' signatures or among Jews to congratulate each other with Jewish holidays.

by -pkvi-
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the point? For kikes, any participant of such forum is antisemite by default, excluding their shills, of course. Regardless of brackets usage or whatever.

I'm more concerned about brackets on another reason. People are so afraid, that unable to name things by their names. What's the problem to write "jew" or "kike" instead of that silly brackets? Some implanted taboo or what? Poor dudes.

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

JFYI - bearable pain level is different for different races and etnicities. Shortly, colder the climate where etnicity lives - higher the pain threshold.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If some obviously Jewish person says something should be stopped "for safety", then I'm sure it is not about safety, it is about control.

As for technology - every possible technology should be absolutely open and accessible for anybody. It's not that inbreed arrogant and ignorant elites technologies created for. Elites have no any rights on any technology, nether they have any right to supress and prohibit them. Technologies belong to whole humanity, not to elites.

Access to technologies is like an ultimate gun that equalize people. But elites are afraid of that. They, being completely insane, psychotic and ignorant want to be the only one who can use and control all modern technologies, while telling others fairy tales about "what if some insne neighbour create Godzilla". Elites are most insane and human hating beings here, not people. It is not for elites to talk anything about "safety" or "what is some crazy..." at all. Elites are the only ones who really should be deprived of any technology to ensure people safety.

And that startup, hardly would have been able to do anything more than glowing plant, really, if succeed at all. The danger for elites was promise of that startup about public access to technology currently available only to elites and their BigPharma/BigAgriculture pocket monsters. They could not allow that. So killed the dude.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you're anonymous they have no reason not to kill you as a punishment and a warning to future whistleblowers (same as mafia rules).

If you are anonymous, how they would know that it was you? Also, they will have much more important task of damage control, when punishment of somebody will be only a proof and additional attention to the information.

Mafia killed snitches, who informed police or agreed to testify in court, not made some information public. Here you have same situation, really. BigBusiness, just like mafia, account such wistleblower hiding data from public as a snitch, who is ready to witness to police or testify in court or something like.

There is difference between "People should know that it is Big Boss who racketing our town, here is proofs" and "I will give police/judge proofs about who is racketeering our town". Especially in the case of corrupt law system, when there is zero probablility that BigBoss/BigBusiness will be really punished. In the best case BigBoss/BigBusiness will be fined, nothing more, but people around will not be warned about source of danger, because "private person protection" and all that stuff.

It's always a David against Goliath scenario and I applaud their bravery and self-sacrifice

I will applaud their bravery only if that bravery have real results, specifically in releasing meaningful information about participants. With exact names, locations, documents, bank accounts, sums and all that stuff. Released to public without any redactions, not to some fucking court or lawyers who will sweep this stuff under the carpet and that's all.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember they most likely signed non-disclosure contracts.

Nobody force you to share your critical and important information under your real name.

Or there is something about acquiring some piece of fame and glory for themselves? Then, we are doomed in the long run.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Again and again I observe exactly same stupidity of wistleblowers.

"Soon, I'll reveal information very harmful for NNN" - something happens - "They killed wistleblower!!!!1111"

It is unbeliveable insanity.

Today, there is no any problem to instantly share important information you have with whole world.

I could not imagine any real reason for wistleblower to keep information from release except may be some desire to get some ransom from corporation or whatever.

Wistleblower is a target only if he withhold some information. If information is already published, there is no any sense anymore to kill a wistleblower, his death will be only additional proof that information he released is truthful.

So if a wistleblower doesn't publish full information he have, without any omission, regardless of all that crap about "protecting persons from whatever", with exact names, facts, locations, dates, unredacted documents and so on, then there is something else , filthy and disguisting.

Same applicable to all that "great inventors of great inventions" and other similar persons.

When you suspend or withhold some information you know, this information is a mortal danger for you.

PS: When Twitter Files was published with redacted email From/To fields without IP addresses from mail path, it became absolutely clear that Musk is nowere near about getting rid of government and elites control over Twitter. Following events show that absolutely clear. But the first proof of that was withholding information about malicious actors participated in Twitter censorship.

As positive example of correct wistleblowing I could point to Hunter Biden e-mails dump where nothing is redacted and all email information is published including mail headers. But still there should be doubts about fullness of that dump. May be some emails was deleted before publishing f.e.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Continious laser weapons look pretty cool, but they have no future in the battle with real enemy, since they are fundamentally self-laser-tagged targets.

Pulsed chemical laser weapons, where laser medium pumped with powerful chemical reaction (basically blast) could have some use, but still, they are also easily targeted.

Any part of laser beam spotted from two different points instantly reveal precise target position. Very simple math and very precise coordinates for instant strike with least possible effort.

So, it is unuseable on the battlefield. Probably, could be used for defence from some low-tech enemy with few drones without any serious strike capability.

Continous laser need some significant time to heat the target to destruction temperature. System should track target all way during "shot". While doing that, other targets could do the job. Either you need multiple laser systems, either system should be able to fire multiple beams with independent target tracking.

Also, laser is easy to deflect. White, mirror or light-return paint will significantly increase already significant time needed for beam to heat target surface to destruction temperatures. And even could damage laser weapon targeting/observation optics/cameras.

From the "sci-fi weaponry", railgun f.e. looks much better. No need to track target with beam for some significant time. Shoot and forget, switch to next target. And even railgun lose to regular missile based AD, that could fire missiles simultaneously to all detected targets and missiles able to track targets by themselves.

As for defence in general - some force shields would be real breakthrough. Meanwhile, Alcubierre drive warp bubble should have that feature, regardless of if it stationary or moving with any speed including FTL. Warp bubble surface is space-time distortion with high curvature that will completely destroy any possible matter trying to cross it. And it will destroy matter on atomic level, so no material will sustain that. Only possible workaround is a projectile with its own warp-drive. Possibly, if metric inside target and aroung projectile are equal, projectile will be able to soak inside target warp bubble. But that's just an assumption, not even mathematically checked AFAIK.

▲ 7 ▼
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

Interesting, when all that social platforms lovers finally get a very simple fact - there are can't be any "safe" platform if it is centralized and ask personal data that in no way needed for the platform functioning?

IDK, how any sane human being could step on rake again and again and don't even think that he is doing something idiotic.

If any social platform asks for your email, phone, birthdate, credit card or anything except login and password on registration or during use - it is not the platform you should use for anything.

There can't be any technical reason for any social platfom to ask you anything except login and password. If they do - they inherently want to use you as a commodity. There can't be any other options at all.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shrimps main allergen is tropomyosin. Of course shrimps have chitin too, but usually humans don't eat shrimps chitin shell. :)

You are right that chitin do not allow fats to be absorbed in stomach, but obesity is rarely connected with fat consumption. Obesity fats created by body, speaking oversimplified from glucose that was not used for providing energy to the brain and other body parts.

So, chitin could lower risk of different liver issues connected with fat consumption, but hardly could do anything about obesity.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

basic differential equations describing our world could give nearly infinite number of soulutions in form of formulas. They all correct mathematically, if you put formula in that basic differential equation it will be true, but that does not mean that they correctly describe our world. Soulutions could include new particles, all that dark matter/enercgy, strings, strapels, whatever shit you want. The only way to check solution is practical experiment (observation for astrophysics).

Math is not a science, it is a language to describe our universe. And as with any other language, you could easily make grammatically correct sentence that will have no any sense.

What astro/partical physics theorists do - is constructing that grammatically correct sentences and then throwing them to practics to find any sense in them. While practics check that "phrase", possibly in very hard, expensive and long way, theorists create 10 more such grammatically correct phrases.

It is practics who have to find that values for formulas you are talking about. And it is much harder in all senses than to pop yet another "sentence".

▲ 15 ▼
CrazyRussian 15 points ago +15 / -0

FE crowd is not about explaining anything. It is a 130-year old (Zetetic society and all that stuff in late 1800s) British elites operation to litter with grabage any uncensored platform where people dare to question official narratives.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Strictly speaking astrophysics/cosmology, just like particle physics divided into two separate things - theorists and practics. And problem is that theorists produce too many theories, mathematically correct, but unfounded in reality. Practics do a great job disproving all that stuff (showing that 10^120 errors), but they can't handle all that constant flow of garbage from theorists.

It is like overloading experimenters wtih random theories. Theorists today does not need their theories being proven practically to get grant money, so they just publish mathematically correct garbage and switch to creating new theory to get new grant. Something tells me that this done intentionally, to disrupt science process in very important areas of science that could produce brearthrough discoveries and inventions.

Ideally, theorist should not get grant money in full until his current theory checked in practice. And only when his theory proven or disproven by experiment(observation of things predicted by theory in case of astrophysics), he should be able to apply for the new grant and switch to another problem.

Today, theorist just publish his article, and that accounted like his job is done. This ruins scientific method. Divide and conquer principle applied to science by elites.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you live so far away from other people, you should be able to fly your bushcraft around anywhere you please without anyone noticing, right?

In most countries anything flying lower that 30-300 meters (this ceiling depends on the country) anywhere except from areas around airports and other strict air control zones are not accounted as aircraft at all. No licensing or registration needed. It is accounted right thing to do to notify nearby ATC about your flight, but it is not mandatory. So, I could fly here on anything I want perfectly legally. Just do it lower than ceiling.

There is small amateur airport nearby (relatively), they fly on everything from hot air balloons to autogyres over my house for more than 20 years. I fled too on their devices, just for fun (autogyre is the best, really. Amasing flying machine).

Funny, right now moroized deltaplan fled over. :)

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cities become overpopulated during inductrial revolution to keep cheap and poor workforce closer to factories. Today it have no sense at all. Factories moved out of cities, need much less workforce and workforce become wealthy enough to have their own means of transportation.

There is jus no any sense in overpopulated cities anymore.

About "Chineese piece of shit". Chineese long ago learned how to make high quality things. We have large influx of Chineese cars here. And suddenly, people find out that they are not any worse than South Korean and modern European/Japaneese cars. Chineese could make anything, and will never deny making shit if customer will ask for cheapest possible price. So, you have to deal with "Chineese piece of shit" only because importers from your country, or you yourself want cheapest possible price. Pay decent money to Chineese, and you will get decent Chineese product instead of "Chineese piece of shit". Simple as that.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why do you think that living in highly populated area is a reasonable thing to do in the first place?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fact that you need someone to spell out for you why aviation is fundamentally different than driving is like reddit tier stupidity.

Aviation is not any different from many other potentially risky things available to regular person. Anyone could make a bomb or set a fire without any problem. It is even much easier than buy a flying car and crash it into something. Only difference is that making a bomb or setting a fire do not provide guarantee of dumbfuck elimination. Flying cars does.

Safety trolling is one of the worst tools NWO use to make people obedient and dependent. Those who push that safety trolling are NWO shills without any exception.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

At some point there will be more humans than there is food, that is a problem sadly.

It is too far perspective that there is no need to think about it. Earth could sustain hundreds of billions people without any problems. If climate will return to normal Earth climate, like in eocene, when Earth had ~1200ppm CO2 and was green from pole to pole, then, I think this number would rise to trillions of people.

So there is no any problems with number of humans at all.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you really want tons of idiots with no training operating low cost aircraft above your house all the time?

How it is different from tons of idiots that drive pass your house all the time?

Again - flying cars will quickly end lives of that idiots. So they will not take lives anymore. Self-cleaning of society. Crucial for healthy society thing that thoroughly prevented through last half century by all that insane safety trolling, keeping idiots from their well-deserved end and all that stuff.

Of course, some equivalent of that stupid iPhone app "who throw up iPhone higher" that only idiots will use and kill only themselves will be preferrable, but unfortunately probability that such thing will be allowed is even much lower than that flying cars with their near-zero probability of allowance.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know they forbidden to eat squids (like pork), but shrimps are OK for them. IDK, in Russia muslims eat shrimps without any doubts.

Meanwhile, Turks, being muslim, have dishes with shrimps in their cuisine.

Really that things with shrimps is interesting.

Jews, due to genetics are very suspectable to the allergen in shrimps. Up to anafilactic shock and all that stuff. Arabs, being genetically close to Jews could have same prohibition about shrimps (do they?). In Russia muslims are not of arab origin, so shrimps pose no danger for them.

Also, shrimps allergen activate same immunoglobulins that was used to detect "COVID-19 immunity". So, if you had need "not-a-vaccine proof" for, f.e. for travelling abroad, you could eat a lot of shrimps (with beer f.e.) and make that test within a day or two. Test will show that you "vaccinated"/"had covid". :)

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Again, people will find out what to eat and what not by themselves, without any NWO marketing or any "experts" and "interpreters" of any kind.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shrimps are kind of bugs too. Only Jews have abomination about shrimps. It is wrong to put Jews in one row with Muslims and Christians on that topic.

Problem with eating bugs is not in bugs themselves. Problem with eating bugs is with elites that push eating bugs unsuitable for eating that demand heavy factory processing before consumption.

People will find out what to eat and what not by themselves, without any NWO marketing or any "experts" and "interpreters" of any kind.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

would you want an urban ghetto dweller to have a flying car?

Yes. He will quickly kill himself, and problem is solved forever. Much better than jail, police or other ways of state attempts to keep urban ghetto dwellers at level that will not lead to normal population uprise.

Fortunately, there are much more normal people on Earth than dumbfucks. And now dumbfucks exterminate normal people without losses in their rows. Nothing wiill change with flying cars, except dumbfucks began to die.

Would you like to have guns, that somehow unconditionally kill owner if owner do something really dumbfucky? Today guns don't do that. And looks like elites want to protect dumbfucks from killing by normal armed people when dumbfucks do their dumbfuckery. They issue laws, sign bans and so on, to prevent natural dumbfuck extermination. With flying cars, unlike with guns, elites will not be able to ban or outlaw gravity and kinetic energy.

If you are ready to be inder the risk of being killed by dumbfuck with gun (car, knife, chainsaw, etc.), then I see no any obstacles for you to be ready to be under the risk to be killed by dumbfuck on a flying car.

You independence is always paid up by some risk, in one way or another. Same thing here.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›