Staying unvaxed and overcoming enormous social push rised your self-esteem and self-appraisal. You are winner. Humans and animals feel that. That simple, without any misteries.

If it was real, then why you use "much worse"? It is oblviously "much better" should be used.

Since I don't observe much whinning and screaming in MSM about CISA hack, it could be some real fuckup.

Forum do not allow so long conversations :), so I'm answering to this your comment - https://conspiracies.win/p/17si9zxCg1/x/c/4ZA12CwpGA1 here

Depends on how strong the government is and how people feel about the government. I agree we did ignore many covid rules here in the east because people didn't trust them but also because the government couldn't enforce them.

It is interesting phenomena, really. How it appeared that Eastern Europeans that was under stricter government control in the past preserved more critical thinking and ability to resist authorities than Western Europeans. Either that "Eastern totaliarism" and "Western democracy" was not what they say, either people just need some push or opression to keep their brains work. :)

People are conditioned to have faith in the system. Societal values are not constant and they can be influenced through media, education, culture and religion.

So the people's faith in the system allows manipulation of basic societal values.

Therefore, distrust, or at least some level of suspicion toward system is the key thing to keep society healthy.

Karl Marx believed it's all power dynamics and reality is a social construct which is one of the greatest psy ops ever.

That exactly what all that WEF stooges push today as their strategy - "reality creation" through propaganda. But too much propaganda eventually morth into total and obvious bullshit that become clear even for target audience.

Really I don't see propaganda as something inherently bad. It is just a tool that could be useful or harmful depending on who and with what purpose use it. What could be bad in propaganda of family values, knowledge or healthy way of life, for example?

They are not the same as moral laws although that's what they're supposedly based on.

Validity of state laws depends on their distance from moral laws. Further state laws from moral laws, less they would be respected. To implement those insane laws globalists want, they have to change moral laws in the first place. And according to all above they need faith in system to change moral laws. And again, faith in system is a key thing in all that psyop.

Paradoxically, those who have less "democracy and freedom" in Western terms have much better chances for survival as conscious beings.

there was loss of trust but people forget and they will fall for it again the next cooked crisis

That's one of misteries I can't resolve, really. Why and how people forget recent events so fast. Yes, that narrative of living in current day and all that stuff is powerful, but shock from previous manipulation should be strong enough to be significant to remember.

Just one example - when my classmate living in GB make constant visits to Russia (through Turkey) in the times of coronahoax to take a rest from all that GB coronahoax insanity and freely spent time with friends, she told about ways Brits use to circumvent coronahoax restriction, like putting tables and chairs outside house window for the guests to celebrate something together when it was not allowed to visit each other in GB. And was glad she had an opportunity to come back to Motherland and spent time like normal human being hanging with friends. This definitely should be significant thing to remember. But today she suddenly assume that all that GB crap was right thing and helped to "stop covid". And went mad when we remind her about her visits and happiness here. Suddenly, our authorities was reckless and didn't care about us enough. And nothing, including lower losses and absence of all that miocardites and blood clots could convince her. We are still oppressed here, and she lives in free country. :)

That paradoxes show that all that modern alt-anti-globalist-movement miss something important and focuses on wrong things in their activity. Well, they do a good job of speading some info, but somehow don't try to dig deeper. And even if they do, it results in some "saturn worshipping" crap and other weird things that looks more like distraction or well poisoning than attempt to find out something practically useful.

"Khazars" is not etnicity.

Fuck, again that slops of whitewashing kikes.

Khasarian kaganate was multiethnic state where power was in hands of Jews, and other etnicities was servs or slaves. It is clear that Judaism was state religion, but it is unknown if the lower castes of Kaganate was allowed to practicise it. Taking in account that Talmud do not allow Jews to share their religions with goyim, and that there are no any non-Jew etnicities in the area where Kaganate was that practicise Judaism, most probably only Jewish authorities of kaganate practicise Jewdaism.

There are two branches of Jews - sefards and ashkenazi. They both Jews genetically, the difference is that after destruction of ancient Israel one part of Jews moved to the north-west, to the Spain and around (sefards) and other part moved to the north-east (ashkenazi). Khazarian Kaganate was under the foot of ashkenazi Jews.

It is just stupid to push all that bullshit about "it's not Jews doing shit, it is Khazarians", because "khazarians" is not an etnicity at all, it was "citizenship" where non-Jewish "citizens" was slaves or servs of the Jews, but also because non of those shabbesgoys who produce that "Khazarians are not Jews" bullshit never even was somewhere near Russian city of Astrakhan where center of Kaganate was so never did any archeological research of Khasarian Kaganate, so can't have any clue what it really was.

"Khazarian" distraction is an operation of some Hasbara or whatever Jewish gang to distract attention from kikes. It is just yet another chutzpa to somehow whitewash fucking Jews, their Satan worshipping cult and their crimes against humanity well-known since Old Testament times, including creation of Khazarian Kaganate terrorist state.

Those who spread that Jewish chutzpa are no better than those who produce that vomit and Jews who is behind it.

I'm not westerner myself - I'm a balkan guy.

So you have to know that laws is not enough to make things real. In the best case laws just mirror reality of society values. If they are not, then people will ignore them.

Laws are an expression of power.

Kind of. But issuing a law that 2+2=3 does not really make 2+2=3. It's a manifestation of power that they could force something, but if it does not agree with reality, then such law is just void.

As for coronahoax, you could find a lot of fuckups despite the laws and enforcement. It was not grounded in reality, so it was not sustainable. And technocracy even make things easier. Recall that QR-codes counterfeiting, I personally make several QR-codes, perfectly valid for all that computerised shit, never needed, but checked few times just out of curiosity.

And as first decent reason appeared in media space in form of Ukraine war, all that coronahoax shit was quickly curtailed, because they perfectly understand that coronahoax could not last long, regardless of their laws and enforcement. They had to curtail it, because if they don't all that shit eventually would have inevitably fall apart, showing their weakness and impotence. They couldn't allow any doubts in their power, so just switched attention to another shit and stop coronahoax by themselves.

Total control is not an easy thing to implement. And technocracy gives much more ways to mitigate any insanity than raw enforcement by army or whatever.

FEMA camps and that Australian madness was more for fearmongering than as some real approach, because you can't build camps for all population, only for small part of it.

Nice butthurt. :)

There are tons of different Princesses, Dukes, Kings and so on around the world. This does not make them important at all.

So what exactly make this Kate the Princess of Wales important? She revealed that Windsors are half-reptilians or that the royal family of that small European island make child sacrifices or that we all live in Matrix or that head of Britain is zombified by City of London jews, so her life is now under severe threat?

Who the fuck is that Kate, and why anybody could be concerned about this?

Is she kind of new Erin Valenti or Tiffany Dover or what?

This article full or some stupid "royal family" mumbling nobody cares about does not provide any clue of Kate importance.

A more reasonable prediction is having smart-grid credit score megacities inhabited by the NPCs, while people who opt out could be sent to live off grid in sort of rural reservations. Either this or labor camps.

This could sound easy on paper, but couldn't be really done properly. Take all that elites controlled social media for example. Even on that simple level, elites are far from total control and reservations. Real life implementation will be even more pathetic.

Well, what else can it be? All land and property ownership is just papers. Their papers are backed by the law and the threat of force against anyone who crosses it.

How it is different from fiat? Fiat is also "backed by law and force". That does not make fiat something real. Moreover, necessity of laws and force is a proof that fiat (and papers) are sham.

There can't be any real ownership even of land, without personal participation of owner in developing and using it. Some paper in safe does not mean ownership of some land where "owner" never even been.

May be it's kind of cultural difference between us, it always wonder me why western people account laws as something significant. Laws is just some rules created by your enemy to control you. Why account them as something worthwhile?

Ownership without personal active use and participation in object of ownership is utter nonsence. Having paper of ownership of something you don't have any clue about is no different from having paper about ownership of few acres somewhere on Venus, Moon or Mars. It is fake and virtual. If you lose that paper (records in some database) you have no any proof that it is your property. You never put your hand or foot on it and nobody will be able to witeness that you ever owned it.

If you live and develop your land, or participate in life of your enterprise, then you are owner. If you have only paper about ownership, you own only that paper.

It's some core question of ownership, really. Is it ownership when owner have nothing to do in reality with owned object? How that ownership reveal in reality? In some piece of paper? I doubt it.

Let's say my boss knows nothing about the work I do for him and yet he owns the business and I'm his wagecuck.

It's a bad boss. But at least he participate in his enterprise directing it.

Will you tell the same if it will be just some paper in the safe of unknown person? Will you account him as your boss?

I don't think all so called elites are the real deal.

So to get a real picture we have to clearly separate those who are real deal from those who are not. This will make picture simplier and cleaner.

Good material.

Having high IQ does not mean being clever. IQ is necessary, but not enough. IQ is just a gauge of pattern recognition ability. Useful thing, but only with connection with curiosity, creativity (I mean ability to create something useful, not that modern meaning), ethics and many other things.

Encouraging curiosity is really important thing. Lack of curiosity is shine even here, when people share some "hidden truth" without any questions and attempts to find out is it really truth and how things really work.

At least I imagine that's how it's sold to them.

That's a good point.

They won't have profit per se but they will own everything either way so profit becomes useless.

Then half of elite brains will explode. :)

In your picture is assumed that people should be made NPCs dumbed down by entertainment or technical means. But that not much different from current situation when people dumbed down by endless race for earnings, when they have to spent all their time in making money.

There is one more question I have no answer in that picture. Great Reset narrative about owning nothing and being happy is suspicious for me. People who own nothing have nothing to lose. And people that have nothing to lose are most dangerous for elites. Making people happy to avoid that danger is a tricky task. In the best case you could make only ~80% of people happy, regardless of means to make them happy, from chemicals to indoctrination. Other 20% will be a direct threat to elites.

Now, this threat is mitigated by the fear of losing what people earned by years and decades of labour along with other means like entertainment and expropriation of people's free time.

Then what's the point of forcing "own nothing" for NWO? It will make things worse for them.

The crux of the matter is the financial elites believe they will still be at the top even when the NWO government emerges because they not only have money but control of the land, resources and infrastructure.

I will question that. Their "control" over land, resources and infrastructure in reality is just some papers, nothing more. Just like fiat or paper gold or oil, this papers backed with nothing. Having some paper is obviously not enough to be an owner.

And there is one interesting thing coming to mind - all that stuff with BlackRock, Vanguard and so on. "They own everything" is a plain bullshit. Huge distraction. They have shares of everything, yes, but this shares are small, largest share that shady organizations have is 15% in Apple. Combined. It is not enough even to have noticeable influence on company's roadmap. In other compaines their shares are lower. And that BlackRoks and Vanguards know nothing about things they "own".

Also, owning a paper without any clue about manufacturing process, knowledge of how things really work and how enterprise make money is kind of senseless. And financial elites have no any clue about that matters at all. Middle-age feoudals at least knew how to ride the horse and how food grows on their land. New "owners" know absolutely nothing about their assets.

Adding that to the "owning nothing" perspective for people we come to the situation where nobody really owns anything.

Too bad for them because they will be dealt with eventually if they're causing any trouble (here's looking at you John McAfee).

McAfee knew his business in depth. You see - those who know things they own and so real owners are exterminated.

"You will own nothing" is not only about regular people. It is about everyone, including elites.

Then who will become real owner?

Nothing unexpected here for those who are trying to make a business from speaking the truth.

When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless.

Interesting. Then the usefullness of all financial institutes and so financial elites will end. And all that ex-financail figures will become useless for the player and will be removed from the game. So it is not in interests of financial circles to rush for the goal of total control.

Also, most profits made by financial elite through parasitizing on different criminal activities. If there will be total control, then criminal activity, including financial aspect will be seriously lowered. So financial circles will lose larger part of their profits. And, this means that financial circles, if they are some independent player, should be against total control over the people.

It's not the models eventually suddenly output that numbers. This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.

All the negatives will be covered by the proles

Even if you will expropriate all the wealth created by 10M slaves leaving absolutely nothing to them, it still be less profit than expropriating only 20% from 100M.

Either game is not about profits at all, so financial elites is irrelevant and could not play significant roles in game, either there is something else.

I think finances really just a tool of manipulation for elites, not the goal. So financial elite (basically just manufacturers of hammers or screwdrivers for higher level process) should have low significance for the figures.

Really, term limits is a distraction.

The problem is not in that somebody hold some electoral position for a long time. The problem is that he could not be revoked, bear no responsibility for fulfilling his promises and incompetence.

You could not resolve that problems with term limits. It could even make thing worse.

There is no any point to replace working part with new one. Moreover, new one could be of lower quality and have internal defects.

To resolve the problem with corrupted representatives other means necessary:

1. Responsibility. At the end of term any unfulfilled promise for voters should be accounted like pure fraud with criminal charge, jail time and private assets seizure.
2. Recall. Voters should be able to recall their representative at any time without any exceptions or obstacles. Nobody except voters could fire of impeach representative.
3. Competence. All that mandatory IQ tests and mental health checks. May be some exams to enshure at least minimum competence of candidate.

And sane and good working representative could have his job as long as he able to fulfill the will of voters.

Term limits, especially without aforementioned conditions will attract only candidates with the goal of self-enrichment. They will know that it is a temporary job without any consequences and with nearly unlimited access to power. Guess what kind of people such job will attract.

Moreover, the problem with all that elections stuff is much deeper, really. Freedom of choice is not a freedom at all when it is not you who select availabe options to choose. In ideal world, voters should form their list of candidates, not candidates wannabes themselves or some political parties or whatever. May be even without consent of potential candidates themselves. Say, people of some county know a highly competent man who will be perfect representative for them in power. But he is lazy or just don't want participate in elections or not interested in being representative. There should be some way to convince or even force him to represent his people at least for one term. Something like calling a juror or like. This could be kind of not very fair toward this man, but the benefits for all people of county including himself could hugely overweight any doubts. Politics should be duty for competent and best people, not some stairs for slimy bastards greedy for power and money.

The specific markers are mostly bs pseudoscience made up by the technocratic class. It's like the 6 feet distance covid rule which they officially admitted to have made up on the spot

Pseudoscience usually unstable, since it does not have any ground, so its deductions constantly changes. Your 6 feet example is a good example. 6 feet was chosen for US/UK who use imperial units. In other countries it was 2 meters, 1.5 meters, 2.5 meters. You still could find it in google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2+meter+distance

https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+1.5+meter+distance

https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2.5+meter+distance

:)

Unlike that social distancing bullshit, climate bullshit is stuck with some fixed values - keep no more than 400ppm with "optimal" target of 350ppm CO2, do not allow more than 1.5°C temperature rise - it is too specific things, appeared from nowhere, and unlike pseudoscience random are not changing. There is no any ground for them in anything, but they are fixed for a long time. For me it is a clear sign that it was some authority above any bureaucrat and pseudoscientist that issued that demand.

Depopulation agenda also contradicts with at least corporation and finance figures desires. Lower the population - lower the profits and wealth to be extracted from people. And also lowering population will devalue assets elites own - lower the population - higher the amount of assets/money/whatever per person - lower the value of that assets/money/whatever. It is equivalent of creating money from thin air, just in that case not amount of money grow, but population declines.

And so on.

Remember that no one knows who actually owns the Fed.

So it is a good task to find that out, isn't it?

Sometimes leaders get exterminated when they step over their line or go off script. That's what happened to JFK, Khadafi and Saddam.

They are figures who broke the rules of game, not that they was exterminated as a move of another player. They like a figures that stop to obey any of the players and tried to play on their own rules. And I'm not shure Saddam have place in that list. He was pawn of other pawn in the best case, not that he did something against players or rules, unlike JFK and Gaddafi.

Financial elites are figures too. Important ones, but they are not real players.

There is some markers in game that is too specific and too unattached to any figure. F.e. that exact 400ppm CO2 in Earth atmosphere threshold. In no way financial elites could set such marker - it just absolutely does not fit in their (or any other figure) role. So, they are not players and it's not them who set the rules.

Also, one of the rule that everybody obey, including financial elites - one figure is not allowed to just exterminate another figure. There is no any problem today to kill figure - Rotshild, Windsor, Putin, Biden, whatever. But figures never do that. So there is some strict rule, external for the figures and set by somebody out there.

I think there is several different NWO approaches:

1. Kissinger-like - link all countries with trade relations so all countries become mutually dependent, so NWO will appear naturally.
2. Soros-like - force everybody to globalist jail under the control of single non-electable entity through all that green agenda, forced tolerance, global surveillance and so on.
3. Corporation-state-like - establish NWO through technology
4. may be China-like - create something like hive from humanity. I'm not shure about that, really, historically China do not need any expansion and is fine with their own hive-like life in their borders, if nobody disturb them, so China more likely is at 1 approach.

and so on. All that approaches have something common in goals and at the same time different enough to be incompatible.

What we see now is a fight between different NWO "parties" for the leadership in future NWO. West play for Soros, corporations play for their own approach, Putin play for Kissinger, together with "Global South", and so on.

May be on higher level it is a game between different entities/kinds/races of "reptiloids" operating their Earth puppets. Winner get control over planet or who knows what.

Only way to stop that insane game is to find real masters of all that public puppets. There probably could be other ways too, but its hard to imagine some independent force (or idea, or some trick) powerful enough to severely disrupt the game.

Putin's Russia was balls deep in the plandemic hoax.

Yes, but there are nuances.

First, due to Russian specific, many don't give a fuck to coronahoax. All that lockdowns and mask mandates was not strict or heavily forced. Those who didn't want to obey, could do that without serious problems. Putin didn't sign any order or law on it, throwed all that shit to local authorities.

Second, western vaccines was not approved in Russia, but was not banned - you could buy them and get a jab, but that was on your own, and so we have no such devastating side-effect from domestic one. So only some of those who for whatever reason took western vaccines get serious injuries with all that miocarditis, blood clots and so on. Probably, Pfizer shot he got in Germany hospital was real cause of Navalny death from blood clot f.e. Domestic vaccine side effect was mostly kind of arthritis in joints. I have two examples from around hundred of people who took vaccine around me. And I never heard about anything more serious.

Interesting that western backed "opposition" at the time insisted on much stricter lockdowns and later on vaccine mandates and approvement of western vaccines. It was up to insane rallies with demands to immidiately ban any gatherings. "Oppositon" blamed evil Putin for negligence before the face of "deadly virus" and so on. Navalny & Co even contrived to lost significant part of their supporters when harshly condemned Canadian truckers as right-wing extremists and all that stuff. Their already not very large audience immidiately declined in ten times or even more.

Also, take in account that Belarus completely ignored coronahoax on all levels and even denied IMF bribe for introducing lockdowns and mask mandates, did literally nothing in accordance with globalist's coronahox guidelines - I'd visited Belarus multiple times during coronahoax and could confirm that there was no any sign of coronahoax at all in Belarus. People talk about it, but that's all. And Belarus is closest Russia ally, so if Putin really want to push coronahoax he would had been ask Lukashenko and Lukashenko would had been aligned with Putin on coronahoax (in the same relaxed manner, but anyway). But that didn't happen, and Belarus stayed coronahoax free all way long.

IDK, what was that thing with coronahoax with kind of implementation in Russia and full ignorance in Bealrus, was it kind of some game with his NWO rivals, or kind of control group or whatever, or some signal to somebody, or whatever.

In any case, course and outcome of coronahoax in Russia was noticeably different from the West. Only more or less common thing was that criminal WHO insanity with ventilators and treatment of anything that look like severe covid (mostly regular pneumonia) in the beginning.

Putin is in no way antiNWO, really. He for a long time sided with Kissinger way to NWO through making all states highly dependent on each other, so NWO will eventually appear like something natural. Putin know Klaus Schwab since early 1990 when they organized so called "Food in Exchange for Oil" machination. Of course, Russia sent a lot of oil to the Schwab connected businesses, and never got any food in exchange. All money settled on shady western accounts. Later, when Putin gain some political weight, he was noticed by Kissinger. F.e. Kissinger was the first who immidiately rushed to Putin after accindent with Kursk submarine, which, with high probability collided with US submarine (or was accidentally hit by it), to convince Putin not to reveal whole story for public.

But on the other side he have to obey some Russian specific and could not cross some lines like LGBTXYZ crap normalisation, all that DEI and ESG and so on.

So he is a representative of Kissinger type of NWO who walk on the rasor's edge between his masters and Russia as civilizational entity.

This is what convinced me Putin can't truly be in opposition to the international jewish cabal.

Putin is hardcore, USSR communist party internationalist, so he can't be in oppositon to any etnicity. This create a lot of problems, really, but that's what we have.

However, walking on his rasor's edge Putin have to do some antiglobalist and anticabal things from time to time. He had to ban many cabal NGOs, now there is a process of closing Jewish Sokhnut organization in courts, f.e. and so on. He do that things unintentionally, as side effect of more important things he do to keep walking on razor's edge. May be Russian thing will eventually outweight his Kissinger NWO adherence and internationalism, may be not, IDK.

Putin is in no way a saviour or great leader or supersmart or whatever. He just in situation where he have to do some reasonable things and slowly develop Russia. As I said earlier, it is not leaders changing Russia, it is Russia inevitably changing its leaders.

Something like that.

Wouldn't you consider the barbaric killing of the royal family and the subsequent installation of a jewish ran (85% of the party) degenerate atheistic state by Lenin a fall of the monarchy?

It was end of monarchy, but not the end of Russia. Eventually, Stalin, being Georgian, exterminated all that insane jewish trotskist in power, and began to build his own Empire (that is why he is so hated on the West, and have some respect in Russia). And he succeded, despite WWII that was unleashed as soon as most of trotskist jews in Russia was exterminated around 1938 and Western elites found out that their attempt to hijack Russia failed again.

The USSR was financed by western jewish bankers and exploited for its resources and for geopolitical reasons (muh Cold War fearmongering).

USSR creation eventually turned out as western nightmare, when Russia not only defeated West (again), but ressurected from devastaing war much faster than any Western country. Russian Empire under the guise of USSR was back.

Next attempt to subvert Russia was attempted in 60s with Khruschev and subsequent so called Cold War, when the West convinced USSR leadership to start oil trade with the west and accept dollar as payment. Along with many other shit like curtailing Russian computer tech on behalf of IBM, DEC and other Western corporations, switching to some sources of crucial components to the West instead of creating own and so on. But that was eventually to some extent mitigated by Brezhnev with a wave of anti-colonial uprising in Africa and Latin/South America that undermined those external, colonial sources of wealth and power of the West.

Then Brezhnev died, and next round was with traitor Gorbachev, who organized all that mess and deficit to reason USSR destruction. Then West installed their puppets in all ex-USSR republics, but again that failed, and only by the West fault, really. Instead of accepting new ex-USSR elite as equal to Western aristocracy, which could have guarantee slow but unhindered sucking all juice from Russia, West suddenly clearly showed that it will never account any Russians as equal. And that simple and very easy to do thing ruined all West plans on Russia again. West begun to use Jewish oligarchs (Khodorkovsky, Berezovsky, and many others, less known) to destroy Russia further.

Final West fuckup happened in two stages - at 2014 sanctions, and finally with coronahoax. That was combined point of noreturn for the Western influence in Russia. If before that population have in mind that there exists oppotrunity to "make some money" and move to the "blessed, elven, free and democratic West" to live wealthy life, then after that events, last foothold of the Western elites vanished completely. No any desire for "Western life" left, an that illusory image of the "blessed West" disappeared completely. Today, there is absolutely nothing left in the West that could attract any noticeable amount of Russian citizens to the side of the West.

Today, again, Western elites have absolutely nothing to offer for Russians and Russia. Russians (as citizens) view Western elites as perverted clowns who fucked themselves up, and those who praised the West earlier do not need anything from the West anymore and turned to developing Russia as only reasonable option. And will do it at any cost, not giving any fuck to all that Western sanctions and laws. That does not mean that Russians began hate regular Western people, or deny Western commodities that are still worth something. They will get all they want from the West regardless of West desire. West become nothing and nobody.

Putin, supposedly, still have some intentions to somehow communicate with West and to adhere to some proprieties regarding the West, but internal opposition to such policies grow in the country, so he will have to correct his behaviour with time. For now, Putin is the best person Western elites could dream about. They should pray for Putin health and wellbeing to have a chance for anything regarding Russia. Population is already completely lost for the West.

Something like that, speaking as simple as possible.

Ekatherine westernized Russia.

As Peter I. But eventually it turned in completely different way.

She had revolutionary enlightenment ideology influenced by the Illuminati and the French Revolution degenerates.

At the same time it was Ekaterine II who eventually prohibit Jews from settling in core Russia and created strict Pale of Settlement around 1790 IIRC, after 30 years being Empress.

Even only this single act of Ekaterine fully covered all shit she brought from the West. Also you could be aware about establishing Novorossia/Crimea and dividing Poland (again).

It was such western-oriented monarchs

She was German by etnicity. And still eventually made Russian Empire stronger. It took time, of course, but eventually Russia changed her and she began to work in Russian interests.

that led to the downfall of the Russian Empire.

Russian Empire never felt. You just pay to much attention to the naming. It have an ability to ressurect even after severe fuckups, unlike Western empires. While now dead Western empires always had external source of wealth and power, Russia always had internal one.

There is interesting question about USA on that matter. USA, among very few countries in the world could have internal source of wealth and power too, just like Russia, it is objective fact. But for some insane reason, USA leadership through the last century did everything to set USA wealth and power based on external sources. May be USA Founding Fathers should have took an example from Ekaterine II about Pale of Settlement for Jews? Especially taking in account that it was Ekaterine who noticeably supported young US independent state with intense Russian-American trade and diplomacy, despite officially declared neutrality.

Why on Earth would I need an argument?

Just because only arguments is the basis of any sane conversation. :)

It's well known that any serious opposition to Putin gets murdered or imprisoned.

Do you understand that most serious opposition to Putin is not some West paid liberals, but Communist Party of Russian Federation (conservative-right) and Liberal-Democratic Party of Russia (far-right)? With real support among population, not some Western MSM fairy tales. That is serious Russian opposition, not some Western elites dick suckers.

The question is rather why you go to so much lengths pretending that this election wasn't rigged from the start.

This time there was no any need to rig elections at all. As I already said it was protest voting - people willingly voted for the dude most hated on the West.

You have to be fucking retarded to assume that average Russian sheeple will beg for installing some Western shill because West denied to sell him Mercedes. It is exactly opposite. "We will not sell you Mercedes, orc, until you will bent before us!" - Russian sheeple answer will be - "So fuck you, fuck all your relatives and ass partners, fuck your inbreed pedo elites and fuck all your wishes". And he will willingly and consciously vote for Putin if he will see that this inbreed Western dumbfucks hate him. Along with ordering Mercedes through Kazakhstan or Georgia, not giving a single fuck to some stupid Western dreams about "isolation". It will become his point of honour - to do what Western elites didn't want him to do - vote for Putin and fuck Western "laws" and bans.

You do not understand anything about Russia at all.

Meanwhile, you told me nothing about King Charles f.e. Who voted for this Britain ruler in your "freedom and democracy" world? Where is his opponents in the fight for taking King position in Britain?

Somehow it is OK for "free and democratic West" to have rulers who wasn't elected at all and rule till death unquestionaby, but for some unimaginable reason for the same time you are very worried about elections in Russia.

Well, I could tell you only one thing about that all - elections in Russia is not your fucking business. Go fuck youself, or cry in a corner about some western dicksucker fate in Russia, or try to elect another King of Britain, whatever. Nobody cares.

hilarious to see the resident Russkie shills immediately explain why this is the real outcome of the election and how it's the fault of The West.

:)

Do you have a single argument why it can't be a real outcome and why it is not purely fault of the West?

PS: Especially funny to listen opinion about outcome of Russian elections from a person who lives in Western "democracy" with different Bidens, Macrons, Sholtzes and especially King Charles nobody ever voted for.. :)

Putin is western-oriented liberal, internationalist and hardcore bureaucrat, paper worm with little imagination. He obviously don't care about those who do not directly want to destroy his kingdom, so he does not care about those who didn't vote at all or voted for, say, "non-destructive" opposition.

Putin is dangerous only for open traitors who used to suck western dick and for hardcore Russian nationalists. If you are not one or another, there is nothing to fear.

As for all that idiocy about "freedom of speech" or "democracy", we don't have tradition to acount freedom of shouting "Putin is motherfucker" in public places as freedom of anything at all. We account it as mental illness. It is alien concept for us, so only paid shills will do that, so this way they reveal themselves.

Western audience is absolutely unaware about Russian political opposition for one simple reason - they are all much more "right" than Putin. It is Communist Party (conservative-right, don't even ask :) ), Liberal-Democratic Party (far-right slightly nationalistic, don't ask too :) ) and Fair Russia (antiglobalist-right). This is real Putin and United Russia ruling party opposition with noticeable support, presence in Parliament and local authorities and so on. This parties more or less natural, i.e. there exist real people who share their ideology and programs and have socially useful jobs in business and state. Everything more left and/or liberar than Putin and United Russia is unnatural, artificial constructs, existing mostly on western support without any noticeable support in public.

What you see in Western media as "Russian" "opposition" have nothing to do with Russian politic life at all. They are purely western shills without any chance for anything in Russia. Western media is frightened to death to talk about real Russian opposition, so they push stupid narrative about "all opposition is supressed". No, it is not. Just this real Russian opposition is much worse for the Western elites than Putin. And they are not supressed here.

IDK, try to imagine that Trump is the most liberal and left candidate in US elections, all other candidates are much worse for US elite/MSM then Trump. They insist on instant cut of Israel support, prohibition of LGBTXYZ+ propaganda, expelling not only illegal immigrants, but also heavy checking of IQ and education level of any new legal immigrants who get US citizenship, dismantling CIA, MIC audit, laws prohibiting dual citizens from getting any state position or job, and so on.

In such situation, there will be no other option for MSM except completely ignore any Trump opposition existence, because they will have to at least disclose something from their programs which is unacceptable and think out some artificail candidates that was supressed by evil Trump.

Something like that.

Are you concerned that not voting might put you on an FSB list?

No, I'm not. Why should I?

Russians love their "Strongmen"

Putin is accounted as liberal here, if you are not aware. And I think he is too old to have a chance to become a "strongman". Hardly in his next 6 years he will suddenly drop his liberalism and give orders to began operation on extermination of globalist elite all over the world f.e.

They don't even get the really important thing - that the voting turnover significantly rised from around 60% to 75%. That means that even politically neutral people decided to participate in elections and vote for Putin, making his victory undeniable, since more than 50% of all voters voted for him for the first time ever.

And it is purely achievement of Western elites and their MSM including that Politico with idiots writing nothing except pure bullshit. :)

It was protest voting really, not for Putin, but against Western liberal insanity and Western inbreed elites - to elect guy they hate most.

PS: No, I didn't vote at all, I do not account elections as something scientific and sensible. This shit with permanent elections doesn't fit Russia as civilization phenomenon at all. It is not politicians who change Russia, it is Russia who change politicians. If you take a look at Russian history, Russia always developed under long-term ruler, and had serious problems each time when ruler was short-term. And every time long-term ruler was eventually changed by Russia to her benefits. Took anyone - Ivan Grozny, Peter I, Ekaterine II, Alexander II, even Stalin or Brezhnev. All of them was eventually changed by Russia to her benefits. Even German Ekaterine or Georgian Stalin. Elections in Russia could be necessary only when ruler dies or dynasty cut in case of monarchy.