12%of Russians Experience Panic Attack
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
It's not the models eventually suddenly output that numbers. This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.
Even if you will expropriate all the wealth created by 10M slaves leaving absolutely nothing to them, it still be less profit than expropriating only 20% from 100M.
Either game is not about profits at all, so financial elites is irrelevant and could not play significant roles in game, either there is something else.
I think finances really just a tool of manipulation for elites, not the goal. So financial elite (basically just manufacturers of hammers or screwdrivers for higher level process) should have low significance for the figures.
Agreed, but what's in question is whether the specific number is of any importance at all or if it's just a random number that sounds convincing (like the 2m rule) and fulfills its function (in the distancing case: atomizing and isolating people; creating constant paranoia about the invisible enemy; everyone is a potential vector of disease/enemy agent; an exercise of restructuring society and everyday life because the experts told us so). Note that none of those model-generated figures are falsifiable.
Wealth is relative. Money translates ultimately to power, energy and control. They don't view money as an end in itself but as means to an end (same as what you said) - namely, means to establish better control and steer humanity as they see fit (or as they are ordered by entities we can speculate about). When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless. That's why the NWO elite is perfectly happy with collapsing the current system and erecting a zero growth centrally planned one (using advanced technology like AI models - basically Skynet).
Interesting. Then the usefullness of all financial institutes and so financial elites will end. And all that ex-financail figures will become useless for the player and will be removed from the game. So it is not in interests of financial circles to rush for the goal of total control.
Also, most profits made by financial elite through parasitizing on different criminal activities. If there will be total control, then criminal activity, including financial aspect will be seriously lowered. So financial circles will lose larger part of their profits. And, this means that financial circles, if they are some independent player, should be against total control over the people.
I'd say the financial elites won't loose their position because their money will translate to control - they will be the technocratic elite who runs the one world government. At least I imagine that's how it's sold to them. Maybe they will be get rid off eventually, who knows. Money will cease to be perceived as it is today. They won't have profit per se but they will own everything either way so profit becomes useless. People will be allotted digital tokens and wouldn't be allowed to own anything of value like real estate or business everything will be rented and concessional. Public and private ownership will collapse into one category since the government will be in effect a corporation and the citizens will have contractual obligations to it. State ran contraband and drug dealing may be allowed to serve as escapism mechanisms and vents in such a sterile and highly controlled society (as they are today). That's pretty much THX-1138 and Brave New World scenario.
The crux of the matter is the financial elites believe they will still be at the top even when the NWO government emerges because they not only have money but control of the land, resources and infrastructure. We see an analogical situation with the oil giants pushing for transitioning to green energy which wouldn't make sense at first, but makes sense when you keep in mind they can extend their influence and gradually transition to the green energy market themselves - they are not entirely dependent on the current system. They are in the business of controlling energy regardless of its source, not oil and coal in particular.
But yeah, independent players may not be stoked about that future. Too bad for them because they will be dealt with eventually if they're causing any trouble (here's looking at you John McAfee).
That's a good point.
Then half of elite brains will explode. :)
In your picture is assumed that people should be made NPCs dumbed down by entertainment or technical means. But that not much different from current situation when people dumbed down by endless race for earnings, when they have to spent all their time in making money.
There is one more question I have no answer in that picture. Great Reset narrative about owning nothing and being happy is suspicious for me. People who own nothing have nothing to lose. And people that have nothing to lose are most dangerous for elites. Making people happy to avoid that danger is a tricky task. In the best case you could make only ~80% of people happy, regardless of means to make them happy, from chemicals to indoctrination. Other 20% will be a direct threat to elites.
Now, this threat is mitigated by the fear of losing what people earned by years and decades of labour along with other means like entertainment and expropriation of people's free time.
Then what's the point of forcing "own nothing" for NWO? It will make things worse for them.
I will question that. Their "control" over land, resources and infrastructure in reality is just some papers, nothing more. Just like fiat or paper gold or oil, this papers backed with nothing. Having some paper is obviously not enough to be an owner.
And there is one interesting thing coming to mind - all that stuff with BlackRock, Vanguard and so on. "They own everything" is a plain bullshit. Huge distraction. They have shares of everything, yes, but this shares are small, largest share that shady organizations have is 15% in Apple. Combined. It is not enough even to have noticeable influence on company's roadmap. In other compaines their shares are lower. And that BlackRoks and Vanguards know nothing about things they "own".
Also, owning a paper without any clue about manufacturing process, knowledge of how things really work and how enterprise make money is kind of senseless. And financial elites have no any clue about that matters at all. Middle-age feoudals at least knew how to ride the horse and how food grows on their land. New "owners" know absolutely nothing about their assets.
Adding that to the "owning nothing" perspective for people we come to the situation where nobody really owns anything.
McAfee knew his business in depth. You see - those who know things they own and so real owners are exterminated.
"You will own nothing" is not only about regular people. It is about everyone, including elites.
Then who will become real owner?