12%of Russians Experience Panic Attack
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
Financial elites are figures too. Important ones, but they are not real players.
There is some markers in game that is too specific and too unattached to any figure. F.e. that exact 400ppm CO2 in Earth atmosphere threshold. In no way financial elites could set such marker - it just absolutely does not fit in their (or any other figure) role. So, they are not players and it's not them who set the rules.
Also, one of the rule that everybody obey, including financial elites - one figure is not allowed to just exterminate another figure. There is no any problem today to kill figure - Rotshild, Windsor, Putin, Biden, whatever. But figures never do that. So there is some strict rule, external for the figures and set by somebody out there.
The specific markers are mostly bs pseudoscience made up by the technocratic class. It's like the 6 feet distance covid rule which they officially admitted to have made up on the spot. That's how the Rockefeller ran scientific research grift goes - you have a policy you want to enact but you need some scientific papers to back it and you get exactly that - bad methodology, cooked data, stupid models. Any scientifically literate person would detect the paper is full of shit but they gaslight people that the dissenters are a bunch of kooks and quaks who spread dangerous misinformation and are grifting for fame and money. The masses have been primed for such propaganda and they eat it up no questions asked.
We don't know all of the figures in the financial business. Remember that no one knows who actually owns the Fed. Sometimes leaders get exterminated when they step over their line or go off script. That's what happened to JFK, Khadafi and Saddam. But most of the times that's too much on the nose and they manage to depose them through other methods.
Pseudoscience usually unstable, since it does not have any ground, so its deductions constantly changes. Your 6 feet example is a good example. 6 feet was chosen for US/UK who use imperial units. In other countries it was 2 meters, 1.5 meters, 2.5 meters. You still could find it in google:
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2+meter+distance
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+1.5+meter+distance
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2.5+meter+distance
:)
Unlike that social distancing bullshit, climate bullshit is stuck with some fixed values - keep no more than 400ppm with "optimal" target of 350ppm CO2, do not allow more than 1.5°C temperature rise - it is too specific things, appeared from nowhere, and unlike pseudoscience random are not changing. There is no any ground for them in anything, but they are fixed for a long time. For me it is a clear sign that it was some authority above any bureaucrat and pseudoscientist that issued that demand.
Depopulation agenda also contradicts with at least corporation and finance figures desires. Lower the population - lower the profits and wealth to be extracted from people. And also lowering population will devalue assets elites own - lower the population - higher the amount of assets/money/whatever per person - lower the value of that assets/money/whatever. It is equivalent of creating money from thin air, just in that case not amount of money grow, but population declines.
And so on.
So it is a good task to find that out, isn't it?
They are figures who broke the rules of game, not that they was exterminated as a move of another player. They like a figures that stop to obey any of the players and tried to play on their own rules. And I'm not shure Saddam have place in that list. He was pawn of other pawn in the best case, not that he did something against players or rules, unlike JFK and Gaddafi.
It seems to me the 400ppm is based on some idiotic mathematical model they propagate in their studies. It just has stuck and there's no need to modify it for now since it does the work of justifying policy.
They come up with random figures out of thin air. The Royal Society class has been doing this schtick since the 19c at least when Thomas Malthus declared the world cannot sustain more than a billion people because he observed flies in a jar and extrapolated that to a model. The problem with those models is they are not based on the real concrete system of variables, but on an abstract synthetic one which is always incomplete. There is also confirmation bias due to scientists setting up experiments so that their hypotheses would be confirmed.
Depop and zero growth won't have a negative effect on the financial elite. All the negatives will be covered by the proles (the middle class will cease to exist). Besides, technology makes it possible to manufacture goods, govern and support infrastructure with limited human input. Supporting a large population of "useless eaters" using up finite resources is not justified in any way in their worldview. People can't grasp that because they're used to viewing the world through the lens of free market capitalism where the purpose of a society is creating larger markets to promote economic growth and prosperity for everyone. This system is gone, we're in the process of transitioning away from it and the WEF as the mouthpiece of the NWO affirms that every chance they get (marketing it as the Great Reset where "you'll own nothing and you'll be happy").
It's not the models eventually suddenly output that numbers. This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.
Even if you will expropriate all the wealth created by 10M slaves leaving absolutely nothing to them, it still be less profit than expropriating only 20% from 100M.
Either game is not about profits at all, so financial elites is irrelevant and could not play significant roles in game, either there is something else.
I think finances really just a tool of manipulation for elites, not the goal. So financial elite (basically just manufacturers of hammers or screwdrivers for higher level process) should have low significance for the figures.