12%of Russians Experience Panic Attack
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
Pseudoscience usually unstable, since it does not have any ground, so its deductions constantly changes. Your 6 feet example is a good example. 6 feet was chosen for US/UK who use imperial units. In other countries it was 2 meters, 1.5 meters, 2.5 meters. You still could find it in google:
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2+meter+distance
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+1.5+meter+distance
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2.5+meter+distance
:)
Unlike that social distancing bullshit, climate bullshit is stuck with some fixed values - keep no more than 400ppm with "optimal" target of 350ppm CO2, do not allow more than 1.5°C temperature rise - it is too specific things, appeared from nowhere, and unlike pseudoscience random are not changing. There is no any ground for them in anything, but they are fixed for a long time. For me it is a clear sign that it was some authority above any bureaucrat and pseudoscientist that issued that demand.
Depopulation agenda also contradicts with at least corporation and finance figures desires. Lower the population - lower the profits and wealth to be extracted from people. And also lowering population will devalue assets elites own - lower the population - higher the amount of assets/money/whatever per person - lower the value of that assets/money/whatever. It is equivalent of creating money from thin air, just in that case not amount of money grow, but population declines.
And so on.
So it is a good task to find that out, isn't it?
They are figures who broke the rules of game, not that they was exterminated as a move of another player. They like a figures that stop to obey any of the players and tried to play on their own rules. And I'm not shure Saddam have place in that list. He was pawn of other pawn in the best case, not that he did something against players or rules, unlike JFK and Gaddafi.
It seems to me the 400ppm is based on some idiotic mathematical model they propagate in their studies. It just has stuck and there's no need to modify it for now since it does the work of justifying policy.
They come up with random figures out of thin air. The Royal Society class has been doing this schtick since the 19c at least when Thomas Malthus declared the world cannot sustain more than a billion people because he observed flies in a jar and extrapolated that to a model. The problem with those models is they are not based on the real concrete system of variables, but on an abstract synthetic one which is always incomplete. There is also confirmation bias due to scientists setting up experiments so that their hypotheses would be confirmed.
Depop and zero growth won't have a negative effect on the financial elite. All the negatives will be covered by the proles (the middle class will cease to exist). Besides, technology makes it possible to manufacture goods, govern and support infrastructure with limited human input. Supporting a large population of "useless eaters" using up finite resources is not justified in any way in their worldview. People can't grasp that because they're used to viewing the world through the lens of free market capitalism where the purpose of a society is creating larger markets to promote economic growth and prosperity for everyone. This system is gone, we're in the process of transitioning away from it and the WEF as the mouthpiece of the NWO affirms that every chance they get (marketing it as the Great Reset where "you'll own nothing and you'll be happy").
It's not the models eventually suddenly output that numbers. This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.
Even if you will expropriate all the wealth created by 10M slaves leaving absolutely nothing to them, it still be less profit than expropriating only 20% from 100M.
Either game is not about profits at all, so financial elites is irrelevant and could not play significant roles in game, either there is something else.
I think finances really just a tool of manipulation for elites, not the goal. So financial elite (basically just manufacturers of hammers or screwdrivers for higher level process) should have low significance for the figures.
Agreed, but what's in question is whether the specific number is of any importance at all or if it's just a random number that sounds convincing (like the 2m rule) and fulfills its function (in the distancing case: atomizing and isolating people; creating constant paranoia about the invisible enemy; everyone is a potential vector of disease/enemy agent; an exercise of restructuring society and everyday life because the experts told us so). Note that none of those model-generated figures are falsifiable.
Wealth is relative. Money translates ultimately to power, energy and control. They don't view money as an end in itself but as means to an end (same as what you said) - namely, means to establish better control and steer humanity as they see fit (or as they are ordered by entities we can speculate about). When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless. That's why the NWO elite is perfectly happy with collapsing the current system and erecting a zero growth centrally planned one (using advanced technology like AI models - basically Skynet).
Interesting. Then the usefullness of all financial institutes and so financial elites will end. And all that ex-financail figures will become useless for the player and will be removed from the game. So it is not in interests of financial circles to rush for the goal of total control.
Also, most profits made by financial elite through parasitizing on different criminal activities. If there will be total control, then criminal activity, including financial aspect will be seriously lowered. So financial circles will lose larger part of their profits. And, this means that financial circles, if they are some independent player, should be against total control over the people.