12%of Russians Experience Panic Attack
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
I think there is several different NWO approaches:
and so on. All that approaches have something common in goals and at the same time different enough to be incompatible.
What we see now is a fight between different NWO "parties" for the leadership in future NWO. West play for Soros, corporations play for their own approach, Putin play for Kissinger, together with "Global South", and so on.
May be on higher level it is a game between different entities/kinds/races of "reptiloids" operating their Earth puppets. Winner get control over planet or who knows what.
Only way to stop that insane game is to find real masters of all that public puppets. There probably could be other ways too, but its hard to imagine some independent force (or idea, or some trick) powerful enough to severely disrupt the game.
Yes, that seems fair but I think it's a multipronged approach that employs ideas from multiple angles. For example Kissinger was head of CFR, which is a Rockefeller institution. He was big on depop and worked along the CIA to interfere with foreign countries' governments - things we would attribute to the Soros approach. There are many intersections between those systems and they will use whatever means are most practical in a given situation to achieve their long term goals. That's the grand chessboard (inevitable masonic symbolism) Machiavellian approach to geopolitics Brzezinski and Kissinger popularized that all globalists love.
It's safe to say who their masters are, at least as far as we are allowed to see. Those would be the financial elite who prints and regulates the money - the big banking houses.
Financial elites are figures too. Important ones, but they are not real players.
There is some markers in game that is too specific and too unattached to any figure. F.e. that exact 400ppm CO2 in Earth atmosphere threshold. In no way financial elites could set such marker - it just absolutely does not fit in their (or any other figure) role. So, they are not players and it's not them who set the rules.
Also, one of the rule that everybody obey, including financial elites - one figure is not allowed to just exterminate another figure. There is no any problem today to kill figure - Rotshild, Windsor, Putin, Biden, whatever. But figures never do that. So there is some strict rule, external for the figures and set by somebody out there.
The specific markers are mostly bs pseudoscience made up by the technocratic class. It's like the 6 feet distance covid rule which they officially admitted to have made up on the spot. That's how the Rockefeller ran scientific research grift goes - you have a policy you want to enact but you need some scientific papers to back it and you get exactly that - bad methodology, cooked data, stupid models. Any scientifically literate person would detect the paper is full of shit but they gaslight people that the dissenters are a bunch of kooks and quaks who spread dangerous misinformation and are grifting for fame and money. The masses have been primed for such propaganda and they eat it up no questions asked.
We don't know all of the figures in the financial business. Remember that no one knows who actually owns the Fed. Sometimes leaders get exterminated when they step over their line or go off script. That's what happened to JFK, Khadafi and Saddam. But most of the times that's too much on the nose and they manage to depose them through other methods.
Pseudoscience usually unstable, since it does not have any ground, so its deductions constantly changes. Your 6 feet example is a good example. 6 feet was chosen for US/UK who use imperial units. In other countries it was 2 meters, 1.5 meters, 2.5 meters. You still could find it in google:
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2+meter+distance
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+1.5+meter+distance
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2.5+meter+distance
:)
Unlike that social distancing bullshit, climate bullshit is stuck with some fixed values - keep no more than 400ppm with "optimal" target of 350ppm CO2, do not allow more than 1.5°C temperature rise - it is too specific things, appeared from nowhere, and unlike pseudoscience random are not changing. There is no any ground for them in anything, but they are fixed for a long time. For me it is a clear sign that it was some authority above any bureaucrat and pseudoscientist that issued that demand.
Depopulation agenda also contradicts with at least corporation and finance figures desires. Lower the population - lower the profits and wealth to be extracted from people. And also lowering population will devalue assets elites own - lower the population - higher the amount of assets/money/whatever per person - lower the value of that assets/money/whatever. It is equivalent of creating money from thin air, just in that case not amount of money grow, but population declines.
And so on.
So it is a good task to find that out, isn't it?
They are figures who broke the rules of game, not that they was exterminated as a move of another player. They like a figures that stop to obey any of the players and tried to play on their own rules. And I'm not shure Saddam have place in that list. He was pawn of other pawn in the best case, not that he did something against players or rules, unlike JFK and Gaddafi.