You somehow still miss the point.
Technology could not be good or evil. Those who use it for good or evil are good or evil.
Blockchain is just a technology. It allows to create a list of verifiable records. The question is who is allowed to add records to that list. If it is everybody, like with BTC, then it allows to get rid of some third-party parasites like banks, lawyers, state, whatever. If only licensed entities allowed to add records to that list, then it is CBDC or whatever nigtmare is hyped around today. Same with license plates. If everybody could add records to that list, then people could sell and buy cars without state agencies intervetion so blockchain become an instrument of independence. If only state could add records to the list, then it is an instrument of control.
It is exactly like internet. Difference is only in who is allowed to rise a site. If it is everybody, then I can't see everything inherently bad in that. If it is only state or corporations, then it is not any different from TV or other MSM.
Blockchain is nothing more than a tech. You are free to use it for whatever thing you want. And it is only one who use it responsible for goodness or evilness of result.
That Jewish shit have nothing to do with feminism. Feminism means equal rights and obligations for men and women.
What kikes mean under "feminism" have nothing to do with equal rights at all. It is all about oppressing and subduing men, making total parasites from women and destroying family.
USSR had full-scale feminism, much earlier than any other country, and it does not cause any problems. Russia is more feministic than any other country, with total equality and deserved respect to a women role in society from huge state family payments for bringing child to at least half-year postnatal paid leave for women. Nothing of that damaged family and men/women social roles.
Jews are fucking perverts. They pervert everything they could get their hands on, every sane thing they could find, every wise idea.
Exactly. That "DS" thing have exact names, surnames, addresses, property and assets. But somehow 99% of those who talk about "DS" never name names. There is no any problem to name, say AIPAC tops WEF officers or MIC oligarchs. But here comes crickets.
It is very simple way to release the steam. When it become impossible to deny bullshit happening in the world, just blame "Deep State", "Blackrock", "Bilderberg" whatever. Everybody hate that virtual things and threats and anger effectively directed out from those bastards who doing all that shit.
It just can't be any problem, to say that it is Zukerberg, Brin, Musk and Cook who directly do all that obvious censorship everybody hate, not some faceless "Censorship Industrial Complex". But no, somehow that bastards with names, surnames, addresses, properties and assets are unnameable and unmentionable. "Censorship Industrial Complex" financed by "Blackrock" execute orders of "Deep State" on behalf of "Globalists". See, how they say a lot without really saying anything? And everybody like "Cool! Dude is based! He talk about Deep State!"
"Freedom of choice" have absolutely nothing to do with freedom if options to choose from selected by somebody else.
Pathetic.
Yes. Masons are pathetic faggots. Those who try to make them look omnipresent and omnipowerful with high probability works for them. Don't understand that. It's absolutely disguisting to take money from freaks who wear stupid mantles and fuck eachother in the ass in their lodges.
You could easily do more harm than all mason obsessed fearmongers making memes just ordering (or printing at home on sticker paper) labels with most sacred masonic symbolic and placing them on garbage bins and public toilets in your county. Sewage disposal trucks are fine too.
Stensil and spray paint will work too.
For a few bucks you could destroy that dumb outdated sect.
You know, that compass and square will forever be associated with garbage and shit among people around you.
But you don't want that, right? You don't want to humiliate masons and destroy their symbolic. Why?
Imagine you make a show nobody could remember anything about, but everybody have a feeling it was very cool. Perfect business. :)
May be that's why modern Hollywood production become so forgettable that you can't tell what it was about right after watching, and so will never be able to tell did you watch it already or not. :)
So, you admit you couldn't learn anything. :) Interesting.
How do you think, what happened with LGBTXYZ+ evolution garbage in Russia? And how initial flow of it in 1990s was eventually stopped? How many mason lodges do you know in Russia? Jesuits? Jehovah witenesses? Scientologists? Rotary clubs?
They all come and go. Did you ever thought that may be it is a wise thing to listen the one who is part of the nation who get rid of all that crap?
If you can't laugh on the mason, you already lost. If you cant imagine that you are smarter than Jew, you lost. If you are unable to ignore stupid laws, you lost.
Haitian dude with mason ring. How do you know, may be it is a ring of a mason he eat recently? :)
So, destroying enemy communications somehow is not acceptable for you? Why?
And if that masonic shit have no any sense, then why pay attention at all?
Either their symbolism is very important for them, either not. If it is important, then it should be destroyed. Devaluation of symbols works great. When people in USSR began to laugh and make jokes about hammer and sickle, days of communist party was numbered. When people in Russian Empire began to laugh and mock freemasons (obscene "farmazons") they almost vanished here. It become a shame to be a "farmazon". Why the fuck not do that with fucking masons? Make their ribbons, rings and mantles stupid toys. Mock their rithuals, make memes showing masons as dumb idiots wearing stupid uniforms.
You post a picture of Haitian Barbeque dude pointing to his masonic ring. There are two ways - you want those who see wour post be afraid of fucking masons? "Wow, how great they are, they are everywhere" and all that stuff.
I'll prefer to see a clown wearing stupid ring. If somebody is a mason, he is a clown. Should be treated as clown and deserve same respect as clown.
Fuck masons. They are just clowns. Mock them, humiliate them in public. Guess, will they find followers, if being mason will be something like being a clown?
There are a lot of dudes who obsessed with masons and their shit. They produce tons of meme pictures to scare people. Why? With that enthusiasm they could destroy masons in no time. But they prefer to be fearmongers.
Interesting, what if somebody will began to devalue all their stupid symbols and ruin all that stupid public signalling?
Took their symbols and began to put them here and there without any reason. Order a batch of masonic rings, shirts with signs, car stickers with masonic grades, whatever stuff with all that marks and symbols in China, sell them out everywhere and so on.
If this masonic shit is really something meaningful and important, then such devaluation should hit them hard.
Those who truly believe in masonic signalling should definitely do that. Ruin enemy signalling system along with making some profit selling things - you can't think out anything better.
Just take a look at source code of your miner and you wiil find all answers you need,
Some pools were caught on spreading source code that include some fee for pool. You sould account it as fair share for organising pool or theft, It is up to you, to accept that or deny.
If you get source code for your pool miner from third party, then you could fing that it do some work for third party.. That's also up to you to believe in some "better performance" of third party miner or check it by yourself and find out what is the real price.
If you use some binary you downloaded from some source and you didn;t check and compile source code by yourself, then it is you the worst enemy of yourself.
That's it. either you question everything, either you are fucked up. Simple as that.
I know you, you are smart enough to qestion everything. So just do it.
:(
No any footage of man in color changing suit. I was so hopeful.... :)
Unlike SETI@Home with crypto you work on known unencrypted data block with recent transactions inside. Everybody at network work on the same piece of data. You just need to add some random bytes to that block so that hash of that block along with your bytes as an integer number will be less than current limit. If you are the first to find solution, you get reward in form of transactions fees in block plus system award. Same with pools, just reward divided among participants. All pools I know use only opensource miners (pretty simple ones, easy to look into and check what they really do), and pool server just can't do anything except tell you what ranges of additional bytes already in work by other participants.
In SETI@Home you get some unknown data from server and try to find regularities or whatever. You can't look into data and see what's inside. Everybody receive different chunks of data, and you have no way to determine if it is a radio noise from radiotelescope or some encrypted data provided by three-letter agency to crack (finding regularities in encrypted data is one of the steps of cracking encryption).
Cryptopools and SETI@Home or other similar networks are completely different things. The only similarity is they are both distributed computing. In former you have to create some data to get necessary result, so data flows from you to network, in latter somebody else give you data to crack, so data flows from somebody to you. Direction of dataflow is opposite crypto and SETI@Home.
However, you could run your own SETI@Home with your friends getting data from your own radiotelescope, not some shit from unknown source. It is not difficult to build a radiotelescope today. And it's size and sensitivity, I think, does not matter really. If somebody out there will have to say something to us, he will do it loud enough for even simple garage built radiotelescope.
There is no such thing as "Khazarian mafia". It is just the Jews no less, no more.
It is very stupid and unproductive to use all that "Khazarian mafia", "Zionists" and other examples of Aesopos language to name a Jew.
Stop that shit already. Name things as they are, not as somebody want you to name them.
... grey suit man ...
Ron Johnson says this man went dark after reaching out to talk.
Do you mean he had a color-changing suit? Wow. This would be much more important than all that "Trump assasination attempt" stuff together.
:)
Really it is not that hard to use even worst Holliwood production to educate kids about narratives, malicious intents of movies creators and all that crap. :) Kids imagination is powerful enough to imagine that Hollywood hero could be really anti-hero and they really like that approach and questioning protagonist actions. You could easily show them how Hollywood protagonists betray their own, don't care about regular people, how egoistic they are, how arrogant and ignorant, how they do shit left and right and there are tons of such examples in modern Hollywood movies.
Just don't leave kids alone with Hollywood. :) And it is really fun for youself to watch child movies from that angle together with kids.
The holy trinity is a Catholic belief.
It is a fact known centuries before Catholics separated from Christianity mainline.
I see you just not able to understand even basic concepts of Christianity.
What religipn are you? I'm not very interested in multiple heresies, so can't directly point to exact heresy, but at least I see you definitely don't account Christ as a your God. You believe in existence of Christ, but many other religions believe in it too, like muslims and jews, with different attitude. Jews see Christ as enemy, Muslims as a prophet, but both believe He was real but not a God, exactly like you. Then what is the difference between you and those non-Christians? You are all not Christians. I'm perfectly fine with that, but I'll never listen anything you could say on the matter of Christianity.
So, don't spend your time trying to argue something about Christianity. It is completely useless, as you are not a Christian.
Didn't know that. Very interesting, thanks.
Interesting, will there be a moment when that dumb idiots finally realise that crypto is not an asset, never was and never will be an asset?
That mindset of a hammer when everything around is a nail is fascinating. And then they are trying to convince us that economists and financists are intelligent beings. :)
Yep. Photographer is significantly lower than Trump's head. Bottom edges of rostrum gives a clue.
More interesting is why honesty of journalist who shared that frame is not under the question. :) He could easily photoshop bullet to become celebrity. You know, that journalists from that NYT... Since when they are honest people?
Or image was just photoshopped by photographer to receive some fame and hype.
As for calculations, they are OK, but I'm in doubt that shutter speed is real time of CMOS sensor exposure. This exposure values are legacy standard from film cameras. Exposure setting was estimated from illumination brightness along with film sensitivity value for best results. CMOS sensors have different properties, including sensitivity and working principle.
Exposure settings (along with "film sensitivity" (ISO) setting) in digital cameras made to be compatible with photo tradition. In CMOS sensor, exposure is really integration time, and ISO is amplifier gain, and they are completely different from exposure and ISO for film camera. So it is very possible that 1/8000 setting on camera have nothing to do with real CMOS sensor exposition (integration time) and it is inapropriate to calculate bullet speed from that virtual "shutter speed" that provided just for compatibility with film cameras setting.
AFAIK in Sony Alpha digital cameras, CMOS sensor integration time is less than shutter time, to cut off opening and closing times. CMOS sensor get image only when shutter is fully open with some delay after shutter fully open, unlike film in film camera that is exposed already at the beginning of shutter opening, and continue being axposed during closing, just with less light. At high shutter speeds like 1/8000 CMOS sensor "exposure" could be more than 2 times less than this film camera value.
Wow. Ever heard about Holy Trinity and what it is all about? :) You can't be a Christian if you don't understand that Father, Son and Holy Spirit are the one and undivisible. If you don't think that Jesus Christ is God, and God is Jesus, if you separate Jesus from God, you just can't name yourself a Christian. Holy Trinity is a fundamental concept of Christianity.
Is Jesus Christ your God?
As for the Bible, this clearly stated in John 1
- In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
- And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us,...
Jesus is God. Literally.
You could write tons of heresy about Jesus, but that makes you just a heretic, not a Christian.
IDK, it is just my speculation to make OP theory more valid. I'm not US citizen and do not live in US, so I don't know enough local details to fine tune this theory.
BLM was not employed as soldiers, just turned loose and even without much arms they did a lot of chaos. So you probably right.
It means state does not make difference between men and women. Women can do anything men can do in relation to the state. That is feminism of the healthy human.
That absolutely doesn't mean that women could be dumb, fat and ugly and demand same attention and attitude from men as pretty, smart and svelte ones. And vice versa. This also does not mean social roles equality. Men can't be pregnant.
Jewish "feminism" began here, when state began to force "equality" into relations between individuals. When individuals are forced to treat equally dumb and smart, ugly and beautiful, soulless and hearty and so on.
That "rights" thing exist only in relation between individual and state. Not between individuals.
Many states in the past treated men and women equally long before France.
Fake Jewish "feminism" started, when they hijack that feminism thing in attempt to manipulate society.
I see absolutely nothing bad in men and women having equal rights in relation to the state. And more than century practice show that equal rights of men and women does not destroy family, social relations, religion or whatever other thing. Really it eliminates possibility of missing good opportunities when some individual could not do something useful for society just because state do not allow that based on individual sex.