But you could turn all that Firefox shit off, with some efforts and thinking. It's not that easy and require some knowledge, but it is still possible. You can't do that with any Chrome-based browser, including crap like Brave adwertised as "protected".
Infortunately, for now you have to choose between two kind of shit when you want more or less useable browser.
Work in progress on at least two completely independent browser engines (ladybird and netsurf) and so browsers, so it is possible there will appear some decent alternative eventually. They already works, but not every HTML/CSS/JS feature implemented, so some web2.0 sites with tons of bells and wistles doesn't work yet.
For now I prefer Firefox with all shit turned off. Go about:config, type "url" in search, delete every single URL you find except addons one, then turn off all modern shit like DNS over HTTP, HTTP3, Websockets, Webrtc, webasm, serviceworkers and many other. Equip with adblocking and antifingerprinting addons, check with sniffer if you are really clean and didn't forget about some piece of crap, and you will be more or less safe.
Played volleyball, soccer and other games with girls since kindergarden. There is nothing wrong in boys playing volleyball game with girls. Of course there was rare occasional minor injuries on both sides, but everybody always had in mind that it is just a fucking game with a goal of mutual entertainment and pleasure.
Here is completely different problem. Here we have mentally sick person who have intention to win by any means including harming adversary to kick him out in a fucking GAME.
It is absolutely sick by all accounts when playing ball game turn to the battle to death. And "professional sports" is all that. Die or win in fucking GAME. People are ready to work-out to irreversable damage for their bodies, ready to eat, drink, inject themselves with shit of all kinds just to have a tiny advantage over the adversary. Ready to loose health, ability to have children and grow ignorant idiots. And so on. "Professional sport" It is not a sport for a long time. It is bloody barbaric entertainment for the sake of big money and pleasure of fat and lazy idiots who are for some reason prefer to watch how others play games instead of playing games themselves.
"Professional sports" should be declared a criminal activity with punishment similar to human trafficking and child mutilation. And "professional sports" is nor really far from both.
Even at 7 kids are smart enough to not participate in "eat the shit" game.
If 17 year old decide to play "eat the shit" with mentally ill man, then it is very dumb 17 year old.
Funny, at 18 girls in US allowed to vote. At 16 allowed to drive a car. But at the same time dumb enough to not send GTFOs to all bastards who try to convince them that mentally ill man is a girl just like them.
Kids play volleyball together everywhere, without any problems, why anybody will strive to play volleyball "professionally" on some championships with evolution garbage?
"Wanted to play volleyball". If she really do, she would never agreed to participate in fucking sports show with freaks. She would have played volleyball with friends without exhausting work-outs, championships and all that "sports" shit. And she would have played her beloved volleyball now too. For her plasure and health. But she consciosly choose a carrier of "sports clown".
There is another interesting question - why didn't that girls refuse to participate in clown show with a mentally ill man?
Participation in fucking "sport" show is much more important than life and pride?
What's the problem? See a mentally ill dude in a team - just quit "sports". Fuck that olympics and championshps. You could continue to play your beloved volleyball with friends on the backyard without any problems and with the same pleasure.
Or it is not really about game, but about fame, glory, attentionwhoring, money, ability to graduate without knowing anything and all that stuff?
Then fuck all that sportswomen, who are ready to swallow any shit for the moment of fame. They choose that fate willingly.
You fall to the Jewish cheating with words.
Term "communism" just by its name means "system of relations in community". Regardless of what anybody want it to mean.
Relations in community are what kikes want to destroy. This relations have no space for usury, exploitation, extraction of wealth and so on.
How do you extrapolate that relationships within that unit to broader society?
With extrapolation all the shit begins. You can't just stretch something on the things that have nothing to do with original one.
Funny that you think it is valid to apply "extrapolation" to the phenomena of relations in community (family in this case), but I'm certain you never even thought about "extrapolation" of say, marriage thing or other things you find here.
That doesn't work like that. And will never work. You can't "extrapolate" communism even to relations with arbitrary neighbour, because it is other way round. If your neghbour family become very close with yours, then communism will appear by itself, as most effective way of relations inside community. Not vice versa. You can't force your neighbour to become your family. If you do, all kind of shit start to happen. Only when you develop total trust and some level spiritual unity with neighbour family, communisim become possible.
Capitalism works exactly same way - it is a solution that appear when relations in most effective way resolved through trade. You can't force capitalism on the community (family). When you do it, all kind of shit start to happen.
It is a devil thing - to divide and conquer. Sow tensions and discord, then rob weakened people in all senses, from material to spiritual. Perverting all that natural relations methods, making capitalism, communism, whatever some political thing and forcing you to ultimately deny or support it, is straightforward division and destruction of natural, God given solutions.
Would you become close with neighbour if you practicise capitalism in all relations with his family? When you charge him for using your lawnmover and he charge you for whater when your water well pump failed? Never.
Would you become close with arbitrary individual if you forced to give him everything he demand, or when you, under the propaganda decide that you can take anything you want from him? Never.
That's the point. We have God given, natural ways to establish relations with other people depending on situation. That natural ways exaggregated, perverted, and declared ultimate and only possible solutions by sons of Satan. And you drop those of them that are declared "bad" depending on your "political" views. And it is a win for satanists - you deny something God given.
There is absolutely nothing in communism that demand getting rid of God, collapsing hierarhies or whatever. It is kikes who attached that shit to this natural thing. There is nothing satanic in capitalism too. It is kikes who perverted it to the level when only individuals with complete absense of anything holy in them could really prosper.
But why would I use their term "communism" to describe what a Christian family should be when I have a worldview that supplies all the terms and meanings I need? This is like using "cisgender" to describe a healthy sexual proclivity.
Look how is that done. :) I think you already get that, when you wrote it, but still I will clarify:
"Communism" is directly from word "community" which is exatl term for union of people with common goals, spirit and blood and all that stuff. It is a natural word. There is no any other word to name relations in a community. There is no word "familyism", word "tribalism" already have another meaning and so on. There was no need to create such word earlier, because nobody tried to study, analyse or describe the natural order of relations in family, tribe or other community as it was something so obvious that nobody think about studying it.
"Cisgender" word is completely artificial from the beginning to the end and created with the only purpose to replace words "normal", "healthy", "natural" with obvious single goal of presenting sick perversions as something like equal to normal, natural way.
It is normal to create new words when you began to study something, and it is completely unnatural to create replacements for existing well-established terms and definitions.
So why should the state treat men and women the same in they are different in reality? Shouldn't the state be based on reality?
States have their own reality. For the sate human being is source of tax money and potential threat.
The funny thing is both sides believe Russia is the same as the USSR and they either love them or hate them for that.
They are kind of right. :) Modern Russia keep a lot of USSR legacy.
women in the workforce too and not at home caring for children
Kindergardens are not just temporary storages for children. It is a place where children socialize and learn how to live together.
From the state point of view - yes, women added to workforce.
But that's not mandatory. Some choose to be housewives, but even they cooperate and organise their own kindergardens to get free time and make children play together. That's millenia long tradition, really.
You have to teach children be self-dependent and socialized. Those kids who are overcared by moms often become sociopaths.
I already wrote men and women's roles and duties should be informed by the same principles given to us by the Lord.
If you are not force abstract "equality", then things self-organises exactly in that way. In Russia women had a right to work, since ancient times. That never messed up with traditional structure of family.
Jews invented communism,
No. They stole very old idea and perverted it.
You have pure communism in your family. You don't trade duties in family, you do not charge your kids for food and do not pay your wife for washing dishes and you will feed every family member regardless of the size of their contribution to family wealth. This way things was long before any Jews appeared on the face of the Earth. Literally "From each according to ability, to each according to needs".
Jews don't care if you will love or hate communism. In either case you will be harmed. Blindly denying communism you destroy family, Blindly accepting it (especially in jewish interpretation) you destroy society.
Communism is just one of many ways to build relations between individuals. Just like with "equality" it shouldn't be stretched for everything. It shouldn't be some abstract standalone "communism". It have it's own purpose and use. For example, inside family (or tribe, in ancient times) it works. But for now it just can't be scaled to the whole society for multiple reasons.
Communism become a disaster when you try to apply it where and when it could not be applied. But it works perfectly inside family right here, right now.
Jews always exaggerate things they want to use for their own goals. But you don't have to accept their exaggregation. You could easily love communism inside your family and hate it for the whole country. But Jews want you either hate it or love it unconditionally.
That's one of their deadliest weapon. And it's a pity that most people fall to it. And there are tons of things that is under that attack.
You could take nearly anything you consider always good or always bad, and separate pure technology or method from whatever construct created around that thing. And just take an unbiased look - is it really always good or always bad? You will easily find that very few things inherently bad or inherently good. Satanism is bad. mercy is good. and few other things. All other things just sorted into whatever bin forcefully and with clear intention either to not allow technology that could be useful for you, or force you to use unsuitable technology.
This assumes men and women aren't different though.
For the state - yes.
The gender roles shift was a result of women getting into government and workforce which happened because of the feminism you think is good.
No. Again, men and women have equal rights in Russia for more than a century. I do not observe any noticeable gender role shift. Being able to realise some right does not mean you have to. So men and women do their choices, what rights they want to realise, and what they don't want. Men can work as nurse, but only few do that. Women can serve in military, but only few do that. When conscious of people is not poisoned by all that jewish perversions (career, selfishness, ultimate competition with everybody including your own family, anti-merit crap, praising degeneracy and so on,), equal rights for men and women could not do any harm.
Because that's exactly what happened.
In the West - may be. Here - not at all. May be it is just because Stalin quickly eliminated all that trotskist kikes who tried to push their perverted dreams from liquidation of family to forcing single sexless type of clothes (forced as unisex today)?
Equality is another poisonous jewish communist idea brought to fruition by the French revolution
You follow their narrative exactly like they want. Equality is a tool. It is useful in one situation and harmful in another. It should be used with wisdom and thought, and can't be something universal.
Imagine you have son and daughter. If you love them equally, does that mean you obliged to dress them in same clothes and buy them same toys? Is equal love to both of your children somehow bad?
Jews do simple thing. They replace meaning and usage of "equality" with their insane meaning and usage. In Russian we have two different words - "равенство" and "уравниловка". First means "equality" like in mathematical sense, and second means "make everything the same, regardless of any circumstances". Kikes replaced first, initial meaning of "equality" with second one. And you bought it.
There can't be "equality" standalone. There always should be objects that are equal. Numbers, rights, height, wage and so on. When you read or hear "equality" without specifiying equality of what exactly meant here, then you are manipulated.
Simple as that. Just ask a question - "Equality of what exactly they are talking about?"
Same thing they did with many other concepts too. "Freedom", "Democracy", "Profit", "Diversity", "Tyranny" and so on.
Freedom from/of what they are talking about? Democracy of whom? Profit of what kind and for whom? Diversity where? Tyranny of what? Easy-peasy. Just ask questions.
And that "communism" thing. Communism is inevitable. Not in jewish, marxist sense, but more like in Star Trek. If humans will survive that clown world and defeat those bastards, sooner or later that replicators will be created. When human being will have everything he need to live, there will be no any sense in money and all that capitalism stuff. Values will shift to usefulness for others, knowledge, goodness, skills and so on. You know, that's how Johannes' Revelation ends. I hope you don't think that there will be capitalism with all that stocks, profits and money making under the ruling of Jesus and Saints :) Mindblowing, isn't it?
Just by it existing it poisons the minds of those who "use" it.
If a tool could poison someone's mind, then such mind deserves everything happens with it.
mathematics can be spun to suit any variable of definitions -- but every thing in the material world only fits in to a set boundary.
Math is just a language for describing reality. No less, no more. It's not material world sets boundaries, it is mathematicians just "spoke" things wrong.
It is really a huge problem in modern science, when math excersises was set higher than real experimentation and studies. (happened around 1970, when the stream of amasing inventions and discoveries suddenly completely dried out) This is completely wrong and evil approach, and it is strange for me that you projecting the same thing in your statement.
Technology makes weak men.
Men makes technology. Not vice versa.
What does "equal rights" even mean?
It means state does not make difference between men and women. Women can do anything men can do in relation to the state. That is feminism of the healthy human.
That absolutely doesn't mean that women could be dumb, fat and ugly and demand same attention and attitude from men as pretty, smart and svelte ones. And vice versa. This also does not mean social roles equality. Men can't be pregnant.
Jewish "feminism" began here, when state began to force "equality" into relations between individuals. When individuals are forced to treat equally dumb and smart, ugly and beautiful, soulless and hearty and so on.
That "rights" thing exist only in relation between individual and state. Not between individuals.
The French revolution was the first major feminist revolution
Many states in the past treated men and women equally long before France.
Fake Jewish "feminism" started, when they hijack that feminism thing in attempt to manipulate society.
I see absolutely nothing bad in men and women having equal rights in relation to the state. And more than century practice show that equal rights of men and women does not destroy family, social relations, religion or whatever other thing. Really it eliminates possibility of missing good opportunities when some individual could not do something useful for society just because state do not allow that based on individual sex.
You somehow still miss the point.
Technology could not be good or evil. Those who use it for good or evil are good or evil.
Blockchain is just a technology. It allows to create a list of verifiable records. The question is who is allowed to add records to that list. If it is everybody, like with BTC, then it allows to get rid of some third-party parasites like banks, lawyers, state, whatever. If only licensed entities allowed to add records to that list, then it is CBDC or whatever nigtmare is hyped around today. Same with license plates. If everybody could add records to that list, then people could sell and buy cars without state agencies intervetion so blockchain become an instrument of independence. If only state could add records to the list, then it is an instrument of control.
It is exactly like internet. Difference is only in who is allowed to rise a site. If it is everybody, then I can't see everything inherently bad in that. If it is only state or corporations, then it is not any different from TV or other MSM.
Blockchain is nothing more than a tech. You are free to use it for whatever thing you want. And it is only one who use it responsible for goodness or evilness of result.
That Jewish shit have nothing to do with feminism. Feminism means equal rights and obligations for men and women.
What kikes mean under "feminism" have nothing to do with equal rights at all. It is all about oppressing and subduing men, making total parasites from women and destroying family.
USSR had full-scale feminism, much earlier than any other country, and it does not cause any problems. Russia is more feministic than any other country, with total equality and deserved respect to a women role in society from huge state family payments for bringing child to at least half-year postnatal paid leave for women. Nothing of that damaged family and men/women social roles.
Jews are fucking perverts. They pervert everything they could get their hands on, every sane thing they could find, every wise idea.
Exactly. That "DS" thing have exact names, surnames, addresses, property and assets. But somehow 99% of those who talk about "DS" never name names. There is no any problem to name, say AIPAC tops WEF officers or MIC oligarchs. But here comes crickets.
It is very simple way to release the steam. When it become impossible to deny bullshit happening in the world, just blame "Deep State", "Blackrock", "Bilderberg" whatever. Everybody hate that virtual things and threats and anger effectively directed out from those bastards who doing all that shit.
It just can't be any problem, to say that it is Zukerberg, Brin, Musk and Cook who directly do all that obvious censorship everybody hate, not some faceless "Censorship Industrial Complex". But no, somehow that bastards with names, surnames, addresses, properties and assets are unnameable and unmentionable. "Censorship Industrial Complex" financed by "Blackrock" execute orders of "Deep State" on behalf of "Globalists". See, how they say a lot without really saying anything? And everybody like "Cool! Dude is based! He talk about Deep State!"
"Freedom of choice" have absolutely nothing to do with freedom if options to choose from selected by somebody else.
Pathetic.
Yes. Masons are pathetic faggots. Those who try to make them look omnipresent and omnipowerful with high probability works for them. Don't understand that. It's absolutely disguisting to take money from freaks who wear stupid mantles and fuck eachother in the ass in their lodges.
You could easily do more harm than all mason obsessed fearmongers making memes just ordering (or printing at home on sticker paper) labels with most sacred masonic symbolic and placing them on garbage bins and public toilets in your county. Sewage disposal trucks are fine too.
Stensil and spray paint will work too.
For a few bucks you could destroy that dumb outdated sect.
You know, that compass and square will forever be associated with garbage and shit among people around you.
But you don't want that, right? You don't want to humiliate masons and destroy their symbolic. Why?
Imagine you make a show nobody could remember anything about, but everybody have a feeling it was very cool. Perfect business. :)
May be that's why modern Hollywood production become so forgettable that you can't tell what it was about right after watching, and so will never be able to tell did you watch it already or not. :)
So, you admit you couldn't learn anything. :) Interesting.
How do you think, what happened with LGBTXYZ+ evolution garbage in Russia? And how initial flow of it in 1990s was eventually stopped? How many mason lodges do you know in Russia? Jesuits? Jehovah witenesses? Scientologists? Rotary clubs?
They all come and go. Did you ever thought that may be it is a wise thing to listen the one who is part of the nation who get rid of all that crap?
If you can't laugh on the mason, you already lost. If you cant imagine that you are smarter than Jew, you lost. If you are unable to ignore stupid laws, you lost.
Haitian dude with mason ring. How do you know, may be it is a ring of a mason he eat recently? :)
So, destroying enemy communications somehow is not acceptable for you? Why?
And if that masonic shit have no any sense, then why pay attention at all?
Either their symbolism is very important for them, either not. If it is important, then it should be destroyed. Devaluation of symbols works great. When people in USSR began to laugh and make jokes about hammer and sickle, days of communist party was numbered. When people in Russian Empire began to laugh and mock freemasons (obscene "farmazons") they almost vanished here. It become a shame to be a "farmazon". Why the fuck not do that with fucking masons? Make their ribbons, rings and mantles stupid toys. Mock their rithuals, make memes showing masons as dumb idiots wearing stupid uniforms.
You post a picture of Haitian Barbeque dude pointing to his masonic ring. There are two ways - you want those who see wour post be afraid of fucking masons? "Wow, how great they are, they are everywhere" and all that stuff.
I'll prefer to see a clown wearing stupid ring. If somebody is a mason, he is a clown. Should be treated as clown and deserve same respect as clown.
Fuck masons. They are just clowns. Mock them, humiliate them in public. Guess, will they find followers, if being mason will be something like being a clown?
There are a lot of dudes who obsessed with masons and their shit. They produce tons of meme pictures to scare people. Why? With that enthusiasm they could destroy masons in no time. But they prefer to be fearmongers.
Interesting, what if somebody will began to devalue all their stupid symbols and ruin all that stupid public signalling?
Took their symbols and began to put them here and there without any reason. Order a batch of masonic rings, shirts with signs, car stickers with masonic grades, whatever stuff with all that marks and symbols in China, sell them out everywhere and so on.
If this masonic shit is really something meaningful and important, then such devaluation should hit them hard.
Those who truly believe in masonic signalling should definitely do that. Ruin enemy signalling system along with making some profit selling things - you can't think out anything better.
Just take a look at source code of your miner and you wiil find all answers you need,
Some pools were caught on spreading source code that include some fee for pool. You sould account it as fair share for organising pool or theft, It is up to you, to accept that or deny.
If you get source code for your pool miner from third party, then you could fing that it do some work for third party.. That's also up to you to believe in some "better performance" of third party miner or check it by yourself and find out what is the real price.
If you use some binary you downloaded from some source and you didn;t check and compile source code by yourself, then it is you the worst enemy of yourself.
That's it. either you question everything, either you are fucked up. Simple as that.
I know you, you are smart enough to qestion everything. So just do it.
:(
No any footage of man in color changing suit. I was so hopeful.... :)
Unlike SETI@Home with crypto you work on known unencrypted data block with recent transactions inside. Everybody at network work on the same piece of data. You just need to add some random bytes to that block so that hash of that block along with your bytes as an integer number will be less than current limit. If you are the first to find solution, you get reward in form of transactions fees in block plus system award. Same with pools, just reward divided among participants. All pools I know use only opensource miners (pretty simple ones, easy to look into and check what they really do), and pool server just can't do anything except tell you what ranges of additional bytes already in work by other participants.
In SETI@Home you get some unknown data from server and try to find regularities or whatever. You can't look into data and see what's inside. Everybody receive different chunks of data, and you have no way to determine if it is a radio noise from radiotelescope or some encrypted data provided by three-letter agency to crack (finding regularities in encrypted data is one of the steps of cracking encryption).
Cryptopools and SETI@Home or other similar networks are completely different things. The only similarity is they are both distributed computing. In former you have to create some data to get necessary result, so data flows from you to network, in latter somebody else give you data to crack, so data flows from somebody to you. Direction of dataflow is opposite crypto and SETI@Home.
However, you could run your own SETI@Home with your friends getting data from your own radiotelescope, not some shit from unknown source. It is not difficult to build a radiotelescope today. And it's size and sensitivity, I think, does not matter really. If somebody out there will have to say something to us, he will do it loud enough for even simple garage built radiotelescope.
There is no such thing as "Khazarian mafia". It is just the Jews no less, no more.
It is very stupid and unproductive to use all that "Khazarian mafia", "Zionists" and other examples of Aesopos language to name a Jew.
Stop that shit already. Name things as they are, not as somebody want you to name them.
May be she just played one role in that show and suddenly one of actors leave the show and producer chamge her role to fill the gap and gave her another script?
It is not unusual thing for actors. F.e. in "Orphan black" series one actress played 13 completely different roles and do that very convincing.